Title: Are There Any Posters Besides Eunechs and Dykes at the Nest? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 30, 2012 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2012-06-30 01:53:38 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:36522 Comments:61
Are their any posters other then Eunechs and dykes at the nest. There is no masculinity allowed there. You must be a male hating dyke or check your balls at the door. Dykes and girly men all of them. With the exception of one exceptional poster named chan.
He started a thread that turning some AQ asshole into a greasespot was unconstitutional. I told him that AUMF authorized strikes against any member of AQ, linked to the AUMF. He had also mentioned that the CIA was not allowed to launch missiles. I told him that he had no proof that the missile was launched by a CIA agent rather than a member of the USAF and linked to an article that detailed one such strike which specifically stated that even though the strikes are done out of CIA, the drones are operated by a member of USAF.
He deleted that post.
I asked Robin if she deleted it. Got no answer.
Chan then responded and said that he had and that I wasn't going to get away with trolling at TPF as I did here at LF.
I pinged Robin and told her to delete my account...that if I was going to be censored it was going to be at a site with more traffic.
He started a thread that turning some AQ asshole into a greasespot was unconstitutional. I told him that AUMF authorized strikes against any member of AQ, linked to the AUMF. He had also mentioned that the CIA was not allowed to launch missiles. I told him that he had no proof that the missile was launched by a CIA agent rather than a member of the USAF and linked to an article that detailed one such strike which specifically stated that even though the strikes are done out of CIA, the drones are operated by a member of USAF.
He deleted that post.
I asked Robin if she deleted it. Got no answer.
Chan then responded and said that he had and that I wasn't going to get away with trolling at TPF as I did here at LF.
I pinged Robin and told her to delete my account...that if I was going to be censored it was going to be at a site with more traffic.
She granted my request.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
war posted on 2012-06-30 13:34:52 ET
[war & imaginary friends] "He started a thread...."
[Reality] Robin started the thread. The thread is still there for anyone to look at.
[war & imaginary friends] "that turning some AQ asshole into a greasespot was unconstitutional."
[Reality] The Jack Cafferty article asked, "Here's my question to you: How can the Obama administration justify killing U.S. citizens overseas without due process?"
I opined at TPF #1 that, "Citation of the 2001 AUMF does not extend authority to the CIA (non-military) to do anything." The CIA is not a military force.
Also, at TPF #1
The Constitution presents an insurmountable problem regarding U.S. citizens. If the AUMF is to be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with any provision of the Constitution, then it fails as a congressional act repugnant to the Constitution. "No person shall be … deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."
The AUMF of 2001 pertains to military force only, not the CIA.
The AUMF states, "Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution." As it is declared consistent with the War Powers Resolution of 1973, it cannot be interpreted in any manner which is inconsistent with any of the requirements of that resolution.
The AUMF of 2001 provides, "the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons."
This provision presents insurmountable problems.
A conflict presents three possibilities under international law.
1. An armed conflict of an international character. (Specifically defined in international law.)
2. An armed conflict not of an international character. (This negative statement includes all armed conflicts not included in 1 above.)
3. Something not rising to the level of an armed conflict.
Choice 1 requires a literal interpretation of international. It required recognition of al Qaeda as a national entity, among other inconveniences, and has been dropped.
Choice 2 offers a different set of problems.
Choice 3 holds it to be a domestic affair.
- - - - -
#4. To: war (#3)
Cite your authority for this statement.
Thanks.
And while you are at it, cite your authority that the POTUS, as CIC, may not order an attack against any member of Al Qaeda operating outside of the US.
Don't bother to attempt to waste my time here with your spam. To date, you have failed to cite any authority for your spam.
nolu chan posted on 2011-10-28 23:36:14 ET
- - - - -
#5. To: nolu chan (#4)
[Deleted] nc
war posted on 2011-10-29 9:10:04 ET
- - - - -
#6. To: war (#5)
As I know you are not actually stupid, your acting out is taken to be your deliberate attempt the be a pain in the butt and has been dealth with accordingly.
If you choose to review your nonsense attack on LF, you may do so on the threads linked below. A similar nonsense attack will not be entertained here.
The little douchenozzle made believe that he did not know who edited #5. He must have thought Robin put that "nc" there. Before I got to see war's #8, Robin had retired war's account. I deleted war's #5 and #8, and marked each "[deleted] nc". Actually I edited the text of the two posts so I could make it show who did it. I made sure he did not have to guess, no matter how dumb he wanted to act.
Contrary to the comment of war that he pinged Robin to delete his account and she granted his request, the below shows the now deleted post #8 in which he pinged ME to delete his account. Robin saw it before I did.
More importantly...has Stone denied trying to blow himself yet?
war posted on 2011-10-21 10:16:14 ET
- - -
There is nothing special about the above examples except that Robin missed them so they still there. Most were deleted. TPF does not want to be used for that purpose. And it does not want to be used just so war can play at being a dickhead.
TPF did not want war or his infantile bullshit and sent him packing, along with his imaginary friends.
You're a pussy chan. You didn't even have the balls to sign your name to what you did but had to hide not only behind Robin's skirt but behind *initials*.
Go bend that needledick of yours and fuck your big vagina, you hermaphrodite douchebag.
