Title: Rowdee You Are Confirmed So are you Anonymous something, sorry for the delay Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 22, 2012 Author:The Big Stone Post Date:2012-06-22 21:11:46 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:63966 Comments:109
Rowdee loves us, Fred. I am praying she scolds you. You need her advise. Gambling on horse racing and TLBSHOW. She is going to charge into your fantasies of wealth.
Here is where TV changed and helped turn many Americans into degenerates. This show said Divorce is ok to our detriment. It brainwashed many. Some think this is a good values show. It isn't.
Mike Brady (Robert Reed), widowed architect with sons Greg (Barry Williams), Peter (Christopher Knight) and Bobby (Mike Lookinland), marries Carol Ann Martin (née Tyler) (Florence Henderson), whose daughters are Marcia (Maureen McCormick), Jan (Eve Plumb) and Cindy (Susan Olsen).
The wife and daughters take the Brady surname. Producer Schwartz wanted Carol to have been a divorcée but the network objected to this.
A compromise was reached whereby no mention was made of the circumstances in which Carol's first marriage ended.
Maybe you could try doing some actual research before getting on your high-horse and pontificating to the rest of us.
Plot summary
Mike Brady (Robert Reed), widowed architect with sons Greg (Barry Williams), Peter (Christopher Knight) and Bobby (Mike Lookinland), marries Carol Ann Martin (née Tyler) (Florence Henderson), whose daughters are Marcia (Maureen McCormick), Jan (Eve Plumb) and Cindy (Susan Olsen).
The wife and daughters take the Brady surname. Producer Schwartz wanted Carol to have been a divorcée but the network objected to this.
A compromise was reached whereby no mention was made of the circumstances in which Carol's first marriage ended.
Sorry, I didn't mean to be so blunt about it, but there are plenty of shows that have contributed to the downfall of American society that are more subversive than Brady Bunch.
All in The Family, Family Guy, Married With Children, Roseanne are some of the worst of the lot.
(All in The Family, Family Guy, Married With Children)
All three were GREAT shows.
'All in the Family' wuz great - until it began getting too PC...Just like MASH.
IMO the Family Guy is too vulgar and subversive. That's just me.
Married with Children had its funny/sarcastic moments...but again, I think overall it's glorification of classlessness, irreverence for shock-value sake, and vulgarity attributed to the devolution and acceptance of disrespect for young AND old people alike - and our culture in general.
'Roseanne' may have been one of THE worst shows ever. It represented the promotion and agenda of the WORST possible traits of our culture - it was vulgar, low-rent, white-trash, perverted and irreverent of virtue.
IMO, there were several things which contributed to the current downward spiral we're facing.
First and foremost was when the S/C (government) said it was OK for the nurturers of society to kill their young. That put -0- value on life. Period.
Second was LBJs "Great Society"...the one that really put blacks on the plantation and pulled in a great number of whites, too. They encouraged women with the idea they didn't need a husband, that children didn't need fathers. That goverment would provide housing, food, medical, and other necessary things.
This extended to young girls in high school--the massive outbreak of out of wedlock births can be attributed here, I believe, when you consider the girls always had the 'government will take care of me' option if the guy they gave into didn't really 'love' them. They could play the role of head of house/home maker...be their own boss.
That, and them not getting the love and attention at home--which brings up @3.
Third was all levels of governement needing more and more $$$ to feed their bigtime programs, which meant that mommies had to go to work to help make ends meet--especially when taxation was competing with the family's deisre to own more and more goodies, to keep up with the Jones, so to speak.
#2 and #3 brought about the idea of 'entitlement'
Fourth, and on down the line would come the performing arts, fine arts, and other entertainment. All wanting to be on the cutting edge were actually trying to be a bit more outrageous/anything goes than the next movie, program, literary work, or 'work' of art.
All of these play to the baser nature of mankind. And it has been quite effective in reducing the morals and values of this once great nation to what we see today....whether it is in your face homosexuals, or teenagers on a school bus, or wall street crooks, the Kevorkians, the Susan Smiths, the Jerry Sanduskys, child murderers--what else can you expect from a society who diesn't have a problem killing the most innocent beings?
First and foremost was when the S/C (government) said it was OK for the nurturers of society to kill their young. That put -0- value on life. Period.
Second was LBJs "Great Society"...the one that really put blacks on the plantation and pulled in a great number of whites, too. They encouraged women with the idea they didn't need a husband, that children didn't need fathers. That goverment would provide housing, food, medical, and other necessary things.
Just reiterating just two MAJOR cases from whence we lost our way as a nation. And they just happen to be MORAL issues that walk hand-in-hand:
1) Making acceptable (and lawful) Accepting the MURDER of PRE-BORNS as "birth control".
2) Foisting LBJ's Great Sugar Daddy Society upon American Culture, of which de-stabilized and ripped off the working class as a whole and relieved parasites and deadbeats of any financial responsibility of raising a family (that would now be Big Goob-Daddy's Job).
3) AWOL daddies and whores would then be de-stigmatized while helping UTTERLY DESTROY the Black Family to the tune of a 75% father-less family rate.
Is it any wonder many young Black Americans act as raging lunatics? This is the direct backlash of a society (including their own "leadership)) who sabotaged THEM.
Is it any wonder many young Black Americans act as raging lunatics? This is the direct backlash of a society (including their own "leadership)) who sabotaged THEM.
Their leaders for the most part, are pathetic. And I don't hold their parent (s) in much higher regard, either.
I come from a very poor backgruond. But let me tell you, had my brothers or I done the stuff many of these kids do, either of my parents would have torn us a new one. Cops or no cops!
If they had my Mom, they'd have had their asses switched good with a willow branch, backs of their legs, too......ears pulled off and mouth washed with the worst soap she could find.
Had we ever acted the way those kids did on that school bus, we'd still be standing up sleeping!!
Did we do stuff wrong? You bet we did.....but nothing on the magnitude of what is done today. And we knew we were wrong and elected to do the wrong knowing we'd get our asses whupped. I much preferred doing good in school and sleeping flat in my bed at night.
When my kid brother was involved with a theft, he was punished...and my parents paid restitution. He then worked it off for them.
Their [black] leaders for the most part, are pathetic. And I don't hold their parent (s) in much higher regard, either.
I come from a very poor backgruond. But let me tell you, had my brothers or I done the stuff many of these kids do, either of my parents would have torn us a new one. Cops or no cops!
If they had my Mom, they'd have had their asses switched good with a willow branch, backs of their legs, too......ears pulled off and mouth washed with the worst soap she could find.
Had we ever acted the way those kids did on that school bus, we'd still be standing up sleeping!!
Hear ya.
MY behavior (of lack thereof) was taken as a personal affront by my parents....and embarrassment.
Lack of economic status STILL didn't justify the lack of discipline within a family, school, society, OR culture.
During the Great Depression (especially in the cities), crime was TOTALLY under control.
Did we do stuff wrong? You bet we did.....but nothing on the magnitude of what is done today. And we knew we were wrong and elected to do the wrong knowing we'd get our asses whupped. I much preferred doing good in school and sleeping flat in my bed at night...When my kid brother was involved with a theft, he was punished...and my parents paid restitution. He then worked it off for them.
Therein lies THE difference between today and yesterday; Theft = Entitlement. And the socialists, politicians, psychiatrists, and media toons ALL agree the have-nots are "entitled" to their share of a pie THAT IS NOT THEIRS TO SHARE.
In the 1930's there were two factors that made crime widespread:
One was the Great Depression, which made some people desperate for money and willing to do anything.
The second was Prohibition, this allowed organized crime to expand their operations to illegal bootlegging, a very bloody crime.
Crime was NOT "widespread," nor were anywhere the number of violent crimes committed during the depression or else there would have been Martial Law - DESPITE the desperation of the poor and hungry.
Prohibition was a victimless crime - except when it became a mob op and the payola made police/goob corruption rife. It was the precursor to the fake "war on drugs" that's made it so profitable...for corrupt alphabet agencies and again, mobs.
Btw:
a) Petty crimes don't count.
b) Talk to older people who lived during the time. There was NO wilding nor flash-mobs in the Big Cities, OR blatant merchandise theft by the general populace.
c) Though people were poor and STILL by and large didn't perform wholesale heists.
Wrong question, I want to add: it is not all your fault either as YOU examine life, life and the pursuit of happiness for yourself and family and business and country.
I AM VOTING FOR THE one MAN OF PRINCIPLE IN ALL OF THE USA FOR President.
ron paul
You can vote for Mitt, 0bama and other political muther-fuckers all you want but YOU OR ANYONE WON'T SEE CHANGE CORRECTED TOWARDS THE IDEAS YOU HAVE WITHIN YOUR OWN SPHERE OF BEING. YOU SHALL NEVER SEE PRINCIPLES AGAIN, as you punch a chad for the two dominating choices that have nothing to do with the US Constitution or the laws of the land.
Punch your chad ALL you want, you won't get anything out of the archaic and unstructured voting system of communists that gets a "nod" from the two political parties, much less your personal dignity.
You could improve your odds of choices by punching a voodoo doll with a pin to develop America in a way that you have vision about. (hint, hint and enjoy a whiskey)
I want breathing room and a chance to win battles...and down the line the war. Romney provides IT.
We (you) are winning JACKSQUAT with 0buma setting fire to EVERY SINGLE corner of this nation. Hey - but at least your conscience will be clear, eh Buck?
