Title: Rowdee You Are Confirmed So are you Anonymous something, sorry for the delay Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 22, 2012 Author:The Big Stone Post Date:2012-06-22 21:11:46 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:64034 Comments:109
Rowdee loves us, Fred. I am praying she scolds you. You need her advise. Gambling on horse racing and TLBSHOW. She is going to charge into your fantasies of wealth.
Here is where TV changed and helped turn many Americans into degenerates. This show said Divorce is ok to our detriment. It brainwashed many. Some think this is a good values show. It isn't.
Mike Brady (Robert Reed), widowed architect with sons Greg (Barry Williams), Peter (Christopher Knight) and Bobby (Mike Lookinland), marries Carol Ann Martin (née Tyler) (Florence Henderson), whose daughters are Marcia (Maureen McCormick), Jan (Eve Plumb) and Cindy (Susan Olsen).
The wife and daughters take the Brady surname. Producer Schwartz wanted Carol to have been a divorcée but the network objected to this.
A compromise was reached whereby no mention was made of the circumstances in which Carol's first marriage ended.
Maybe you could try doing some actual research before getting on your high-horse and pontificating to the rest of us.
Plot summary
Mike Brady (Robert Reed), widowed architect with sons Greg (Barry Williams), Peter (Christopher Knight) and Bobby (Mike Lookinland), marries Carol Ann Martin (née Tyler) (Florence Henderson), whose daughters are Marcia (Maureen McCormick), Jan (Eve Plumb) and Cindy (Susan Olsen).
The wife and daughters take the Brady surname. Producer Schwartz wanted Carol to have been a divorcée but the network objected to this.
A compromise was reached whereby no mention was made of the circumstances in which Carol's first marriage ended.
Sorry, I didn't mean to be so blunt about it, but there are plenty of shows that have contributed to the downfall of American society that are more subversive than Brady Bunch.
All in The Family, Family Guy, Married With Children, Roseanne are some of the worst of the lot.
(All in The Family, Family Guy, Married With Children)
All three were GREAT shows.
'All in the Family' wuz great - until it began getting too PC...Just like MASH.
IMO the Family Guy is too vulgar and subversive. That's just me.
Married with Children had its funny/sarcastic moments...but again, I think overall it's glorification of classlessness, irreverence for shock-value sake, and vulgarity attributed to the devolution and acceptance of disrespect for young AND old people alike - and our culture in general.
'Roseanne' may have been one of THE worst shows ever. It represented the promotion and agenda of the WORST possible traits of our culture - it was vulgar, low-rent, white-trash, perverted and irreverent of virtue.
IMO, there were several things which contributed to the current downward spiral we're facing.
First and foremost was when the S/C (government) said it was OK for the nurturers of society to kill their young. That put -0- value on life. Period.
Second was LBJs "Great Society"...the one that really put blacks on the plantation and pulled in a great number of whites, too. They encouraged women with the idea they didn't need a husband, that children didn't need fathers. That goverment would provide housing, food, medical, and other necessary things.
This extended to young girls in high school--the massive outbreak of out of wedlock births can be attributed here, I believe, when you consider the girls always had the 'government will take care of me' option if the guy they gave into didn't really 'love' them. They could play the role of head of house/home maker...be their own boss.
That, and them not getting the love and attention at home--which brings up @3.
Third was all levels of governement needing more and more $$$ to feed their bigtime programs, which meant that mommies had to go to work to help make ends meet--especially when taxation was competing with the family's deisre to own more and more goodies, to keep up with the Jones, so to speak.
#2 and #3 brought about the idea of 'entitlement'
Fourth, and on down the line would come the performing arts, fine arts, and other entertainment. All wanting to be on the cutting edge were actually trying to be a bit more outrageous/anything goes than the next movie, program, literary work, or 'work' of art.
All of these play to the baser nature of mankind. And it has been quite effective in reducing the morals and values of this once great nation to what we see today....whether it is in your face homosexuals, or teenagers on a school bus, or wall street crooks, the Kevorkians, the Susan Smiths, the Jerry Sanduskys, child murderers--what else can you expect from a society who diesn't have a problem killing the most innocent beings?
his extended to young girls in high school--the massive outbreak of out of wedlock births can be attributed here
I would attribute more to the decay of the inner city=ies due to the flight of jobs and opportunities. This hurt men the most and their ability to support the mother.
The mobility of society certainly has played a major part in the breaking up of the family, and hence society. I failed to note anything about it.
I've been doing genealogy for many years now and came to the conclusion a long while back that mobility while industrializing the nation took a toll on the families.
My father left his parents and headed to Califronia as a young person looking for a better life--more jobs, more money. He returned to visit them, but never returned to live.
On the other hand, some of his brothers and sisters moved to California, only to return back to their roots.' ' But to return to the comments.....the Great Society said for a woman to get benefits there couldn't be a man in the house.
