[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Santorum Sticks By Criticism Of Romney, Says He Wouldn't Serve In His Administration
Source: Associated Press
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201 ... t-serve-in-his-administration/
Published: Jun 17, 2012
Author: Associated Press
Post Date: 2012-06-17 13:44:58 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 17734
Comments: 47

Rick Santorum is sticking by earlier questions he posed about former rival Mitt Romney's authenticity, saying the points he made during the primary campaign were legitimate.

Santorum said Sunday "I don't back away from any of those things."

Santorum had also argued in March that Republicans should give President Obama a second term because Romney wasn't conservative enough. The former Pennsylvania senator now says "clearly, the difference between President Obama and Mitt Romney is a chasm."

Should Romney win in November, Santorum says he would advise Romney if asked but not serve in his administration. He said:

"It's pretty much a flat no."

Santorum tells CNN'S "State of the Union" that he wouldn't consider working for a Romney administration because his priority lies with his family. Subscribe to *Elections 2012*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 42.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

One bum attacking another. Who CARES?

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-06-17   19:08:43 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#1)

Well, to tell you the truth I can't remember Santorum's history, but I do know he is Christian. I know many people on the right are going to be pissed off when they discover that there are Christians who simply won't vote for a leader of a cult that is so opposed to what Christianity is and that masquerades as "somewhat" Christian. LDS IS ABSURD and it is a huge LIE.

SJN  posted on  2012-06-17   19:19:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#2)

I'll go out on a limb here as well to say I could see the LDS as being the group that is associated with one of the largest if not THE 'ANTI-Christ' (there have been many smaller anti-Christs as we've seen through out history), but there is a real possibility that this CIA, LDS, Presidental contender is that very thing.

I don't care what people say, I'm not voting for him.

SJN  posted on  2012-06-17   19:23:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: SJN (#3)

I don't care what people say, I'm not voting for him.

You are not alone, SJN. I am voting for Ron Paul 2012!

buckeroo  posted on  2012-06-17   21:33:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: buckeroo (#13)

You are not alone, SJN. I am voting for Ron Paul 2012!

What a waste of a vote Buck. In my opinion (I know you don't give a shit about my opinion but I'm giving it anyway :)) if your not going to vote against Romney you should at least vote for someone on the ballot. Ron Paul votes wont be counted my friend.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-17   21:35:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: A K A Stone (#16)

Vote for Romney all you want. You shall have nothing but more deterioration about American quality of life.

Some of you silly people need to wake up. It is YOUR stinkin' chad punching for one of the two major political party that has DESTROYED America.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-06-17   21:42:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: buckeroo (#17)

Some of you silly people need to wake up. It is YOUR stinkin' chad punching for one of the two major political party that has DESTROYED America.

I try to convince people to vote in the primaries for people such as Ron Paul. Ron Paul didn't win unfortunately. So I am planning on voting for a piece of shit. I know he sucks. But it is him or Obama. Again unfortunately. I wish it wasn't true but you must admit it is.

Buck I would rather vote for you for Presidnet then Romney.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-17   21:47:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: A K A Stone (#18)

Ron Paul didn't win unfortunately.

Don't compromise your values. Vote your convictions. Throw the chad-puncher away and send a clear signal to EVERYONE ---

Write Ron Paul in as your Presidential choice 2012!

buckeroo  posted on  2012-06-17   21:54:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: buckeroo (#19)

Don't compromise your values. Vote your convictions. Throw the chad-puncher away and send a clear signal to EVERYONE ---

Write Ron Paul in as your Presidential choice 2012!

What you propose requires an unshakeable moral core, which cannot be bought at *any* price. Ron Paul is such a man, and he tends to attract other well- educated, honorable men. Thus, your support of him tells me volumes about your character.

Here at LF, we have plenty of fair-weather friends who were quite happy to jump on the band-wagon when Paul had a chance (however meager) of winning. It's *easy* to be a revolutionary after the war has begun. Followers that they are, they'll stand by the moral man only so long as they think they're on the "winning" team. When hardships or challenges arise, they'll steal away, like a thief in the night. What have such thieves stolen? Trust and hope, from those whom they stood with. This forum- a microcosm of society- is an indication of how far society has fallen. The forum members, who encourage dancing with the devil, show how utterly weak and feckless most American (so- called) "Patriots" truly are.

Those of REAL courage and convictions stand by their values regardless of the price, and despite the risks. But you'll not receive any support here. The mindlessness of the herd is too strong to break through the normalcy biases that drive them.

Truly, they would rather *die than think.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-06-17   22:37:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Capitalist Eric (#22)

Here at LF, we have plenty of fair-weather friends who were quite happy to jump on the band-wagon when Paul had a chance (however meager) of winning. It's *easy* to be a revolutionary after the war has begun. Followers that they are, they'll stand by the moral man only so long as they think they're on the "winning" team. When hardships or challenges arise, they'll steal away, like a thief in the night. What have such thieves stolen? Trust and hope, from those whom they stood with. This forum- a microcosm of society- is an indication of how far society has fallen. The forum members, who encourage dancing with the devil, show how utterly weak and feckless most American (so- called) "Patriots" truly are.

So when the Miami dolphins or whoever are eliminated from the playoffs. Do you still instist they should win the super bowl?

In the Olympics when a boxer is eliminated by losing the bout. Do you still insist the judges should give him a gold medal?

Why not just vote for Ronald Reagan?

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-18   9:13:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: A K A Stone (#29)

Capitalist Eric: Here at LF, we have plenty of fair-weather friends who were quite happy to jump on the band-wagon when Paul had a chance (however meager) of winning. It's *easy* to be a revolutionary after the war has begun. Followers that they are, they'll stand by the moral man only so long as they think they're on the "winning" team. When hardships or challenges arise, they'll steal away, like a thief in the night. What have such thieves stolen? Trust and hope, from those whom they stood with. This forum- a microcosm of society- is an indication of how far society has fallen. The forum members, who encourage dancing with the devil, show how utterly weak and feckless most American (so- called) "Patriots" truly are.

YOU: So when the Miami dolphins or whoever are eliminated from the playoffs. Do you still instist they should win the super bowl? In the Olympics when a boxer is eliminated by losing the bout. Do you still insist the judges should give him a gold medal?

LOL. Once again you resort to the same high-school tactics, to push a losing position. THIS time it's the logical fallacy of a question-begging false analogy. X is similar to y (where the similarity depends for its strength upon some assumption which begs the question). x is P. Therefore, y is P.

Really, aren't these childish attempts of yours starting to embarrass you yet???

The comparison in invalid- a bread-and-circuses game with many choices and many teams, without a single purpose beyond boredom-killing, does not correlate to whether someone has a moral core.

Getting past your latest silliness, the elitists offer two poisons, one fast- acting, the other more slow and agonizing. You prefer to the take the slow and miserable path.

I recognize that both are poison, and refuse both.

I refuse to acquiesce to false choices. Allowing yourself to become trapped in a false dichotomy allows others to control you.

With regard to the election, it's clear that my vote doesn't have any real meaning, thus whether I vote for Ron Paul carries no weight, with regard to who will occupy the White House. That's the reality, much as I dislike it.

On the other hand, I imagine there will be millions who make the same choice as I.

WHY?

Because the refusal to participate in a patently rigged game robs the elitists of the legitimacy they require to push their agenda. I- and others- will rob them of what they want most... acceptance.

Your conscious choice to take one of the poisons, is a fault in your moral character; simply put, you lack the courage to stand by your convictions, and foolishly think you can happily toss your conscious (and morals) out the window, when it is no longer convenient, or when you think nobody's watching...

How comforting it must be for you, to simply walk away from your beliefs. How EASY it must be, to willingly sacrifice what matters, because it's easier to fall for a lie, than to stand for the truth...

Given your constant threads about religion- the bible, different verses, arguing with other posters- it is clear that you consider yourself a religious man… And you’ll notice I never get into those discussions, because damn-near anything in the bible can be twisted and used to suit a particular viewpoint… But you know what REALLY keeps me away from them??? It’s the fact that such people who are the first to shout at the top of their lungs about some minor point on religion are usually the FIRST to walk away from their stated beliefs, when it really matters…

I’ve not stated this before because while I find such hypocrisy detestable, the calling-out of such hypocrisy is almost equally distasteful, and as such, I prefer to stay quiet about such things…

Morals and integrity are easy, when things are going well… The TRUE test is when things are NOT going well; does a man remain true to his values, or does he sacrifice his soul, when it is easier than standing for the right thing?

You constantly push the religious angles, so you should be familiar with the story of Job… I’ll let it go at that.

The truth is that you throw away what you claim to stand for, when such beliefs become a burden. Instead, you revert to "situational ethics," a practice where rationalization of anything can be done, no matter how repugnant, no matter how immoral.

Contrary to your apparent self-image as a religious, righteous man… You’re neither.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-06-18   17:13:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 42.

        There are no replies to Comment # 42.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 42.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com