United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: 4um Dummies Read this for a clue. You're welcome
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 9, 2012
Author: Chris Cillizza
Post Date: 2012-06-09 00:50:13 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 2310
Comments: 7
Yes, Romney formally secured the Republican nod late last month. And, yes, as a Republican it’s assumed that Paul was with Romney as opposed to President Obama or even Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson. But, remember that this is Rand Paul, the scion to the political legacy of his father, Texas Rep. Ron Paul. The Pauls have built a political base entirely independent of the Republican party and that’s why Rand’s endorsement is intriguing — for two reasons. Before we get to that, let’s look at what Rand Paul said on Thursday night on Sean Hannity’s show: “My first choice had always been my father. I campaigned for him when I was 11-years-old. He’s still my first pick, but now that the nominating process is over, tonight I’m happy to announce that I’m going to be supporting Gov. Mitt Romney.” It might not be exactly the endorsement Romney might have wanted — two thirds of it was spent pumping up Ron Paul with the Romney endorsement as an afterthought — but it is genuinely important to have Rand Paul on the record in support of Romney. As we have seen over the last few months, the Paul forces have the very real ability to not only disrupt the choosing of delegates to the Republican National Convention but also influence (and change) the leadership at various state parties around the country. Does Rand Paul endorsing Romney mean that the Paul acolytes will immediately cease and desist in their efforts to have their views heard? No. But more so than most people who support a politician, the Paul folks listen to Ron/Rand and follow their wishes. Rand’s endorsement then — when coupled with Ron’s email to supporters earlier this week urging politeness at the national convention — are a net win for Romney because they virtually ensure that there won’t be a genuine insurrection led by supporters of Paul at the convention. (Expect Romney to give Rand/Ron speaking slots at the convention too in hopes of throwing a sop to the Paul acolytes and push the theme of inclusion and big-tented-ness.) The second way Rand Paul’s endorsement matters is as it relates to the Kentucky Senator’s own future national prospects. It’s an open secret in Washington that Rand Paul wants to — and will — run for president either in 2016 or 2020. In the spring of 2011, in fact, Rand Paul speculated that he might run in 2012 if his father decided against a bid. To do that and have a genuine chance at winning, Rand Paul can’t have the Republican establishment in open revolt against him. He knows that. His dad knows that. (It’s why we still believe Ron Paul won’t pursue a third party bid this fall.) In making clear that he is publicly behind Romney, Rand Paul is sending a very clear signal: I’m a good soldier for the GOP. Make no mistake: The Republican party establishment will never embrace Rand Paul as one of their own — nor would he want them to. But, it is possible that Paul playing the role of loyal Republican in the 2012 election could well neutralize some of the fears the party regulars have about the prospects of him carrying their standard at some point down the line. The lesson? Sometimes — actually almost always — in politics there’s more than meets the eye.
Poster Comment: Here is the clue dummies. You're little tiny .02 percent I hate the Jews faction will never ever amount to anything. NOT EVER! To do that and have a genuine chance at winning, Rand Paul can’t have the Republican establishment in open revolt against him. He knows that. His dad knows that.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
If Romney loses the election, you'll be the first to blame that tiny little .02 percent for his defeat. As will yukon.
Well it's not like the Republican "establishment" haven't been in open revolt of them anyway.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
I agree with the analysis and outside the nasty rhetoric of a campaign Rand Paul is certainly qualified. And, it is good for the Republican Party to embrace the younger generation with demands for a real change in the way government operates. The Republican establishment used to appeal to me for its strong defense orientation and good management. The fuddy duddys in the Senate and the House need a wake up call...to wake up, pack their bags and stop sucking off the teat. If the Republicans can manage to morph more gently into a real opposition then they can have power for years. Unlike the Democrats who need a total reset. As a Democrat, we must absolutely stop pandering to the 'needy' and the 'minorities'. Each of us is a minority. I don't need Chuck Schumer and his wife on the public dole telling me he needs more. But having tried to rid the party of the Clinton/Reid kind of Democrat (Obama doesn't count...but his advisors do...get them out) we have to wait for an honestly courageous leader in the Democrat Party to push the button. The Republicans are lucky to have the new invigorated youth. People may dislike Scott Walker for a number of reasons, but he did what he said he was going to do (and contrary to Democrat statements...never lied about it...they just didn't believe him...because no one in politics had ever done what they said they were going to do). The go along to get along crowd is hopefully on its way out and that includes Paul Ryan in spite of his notoriety as a 'comer'. His 'plan' will go nowhere. Just my opinion.
I don't think so. There are more factions then the factrions like forum whose only screed and only purpose is to hate the Jews.
That is an honest assessment.
Not all jews. Just the evil ones.
#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#3. To: A K A Stone, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#0)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#4. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#5. To: Logsplitter (#1)
If Romney loses the election, you'll be the first to blame that tiny little .02 percent for his defeat. As will yukon.
#6. To: harrowup (#4)
#7. To: A K A Stone (#5)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]