Title: Romney names Scott Walker his VP in my imagination Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 6, 2012 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2012-06-06 07:01:19 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:6551 Comments:36
The liberal scum of our society wet their diapers last night. With Walkers landslide win over his statist opponent it sends a clear message. Romney should be bold and choose Scott Walker as his VP. The liberals would shit themselves again.
A historic day in Wisconsin ended with even more history made Tuesday as Republican Gov. Scott Walker is now the only governor in the United States to win re-election after facing a recall.
Garnering
*****53 percent of the vote over Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett's 46 percent,******
Walker will continue in office as the state's governor.
The union inspired a heavy turnout of voters, against them. Greedy public sector union eliteists out to feather their own nest at the expense of everyone else, just doesn't sit well with the taxpayers.
Industrial unions are OK, but public sector ones are a rip off scam because they're trying to soak the taxpayer TWICE. Their phony class warfare rhetoric put them over the top, for the loss.
The union inspired a heavy turnout of voters, against them.
You're guessing of course.
And wasn't it you or someone close like Harrow up or CZ
saying the unions were spending $80 million?
LMFAO.....8D
"Media pundits and political scientists never question the standard practice of forcing the exit polls to match the recorded vote. It is unscientific and faith-based. Besides, the adjustments are are mathematically impossible.
It wasn't me but when you're selling shit sandwiches, a huge advertising budget isn't all that helpful
Uh Huh. Which is why the Wisconsin Election Spending was equal to the Presidential Election....;}
And Citizen's United was anointed by the SCOTUS....'
cause Money just doesn't work in politics....;}
The coming deluge of political advertising in Wisconsin - m.JSOnline ... m.jsonline.com/topstories/134967738.htmCached
Dec 3, 2011 – Wisconsin is about to witness the biggest eruption of political advertising ... total of $48 million in broadcast spending) with the 2008 presidential campaign ... When both sides are spending equally and the information flow isn't ...
RECORDED votes have deviated sharply from UNADJUSTED exit polls (and the TRUE VOTE) in EVERY election since 1968. The UNADJUSTED exit polls have ALWAYS been accurate. The polls matched independent True Vote Models in presidential elections from 1988 to 2008. The reason why FINAL state and national exit poll exactly matched the RECORDED vote is because they have been forced to. It is standard policy. But the recorded vote has NEVER reflected true voter intent due to documented uncounted and stuffed ballots and maliciously programmed electronic voting machines.
And 1968.....I rememver 1968....a Couple of very popular people got gunned down....Hell....what's a POTUS selection.
And 1968.....I rememver 1968....a Couple of very popular people got gunned down....Hell
Yeah, I remember 1963 when JFK was taken out too.
I respect your first amendment right to give however much you want to Obama's campaign, couple of billion or so?
IMO it's not really large contributions that are the problem so much, as the corrupt media and election process. We need the New Black Panthers, Hutaree Militia, the KKK, the Occupy black blocs, and a few thousand more groups watching the voting process. The crazier the better!
t's not really large contributions that are the problem so much, as the corrupt media and election process.
Who do you thin k is giving those large contributions?
And why do you think they're mutually exclusive from those 'corrupt media and election 'process'....;}
"Of the 148 exit polls that exceeded the MoE, 138 shifted to the Republican. The probability that this was a random occurrence is ZERO. The movement from the exit polls to the vote has been in ONE direction. It is proof of systemic vote miscounts beyond any doubt
The 148 exit poll discrepancies were distributed as follows: 1988:14, 1992:30, 1996:21, 2000:21, 2004:25, 2008:37
