[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Climate Change Skeptics Score High Marks in Scientific Literacy Test
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.newsmax.com/SciTech/clim ... s-science/2012/05/29/id/440513
Published: May 20, 2012
Author: Newsmax Wires
Post Date: 2012-05-30 15:38:09 by Mad Dog
Keywords: arrogant man made climate chan, slack jawed droids, BUSTED again
Views: 1603
Comments: 3

.

Climate-change skeptics, derided by many members of the scientific community, outperformed climate-change believers in a recent test of scientific literacy published in the journal Nature Climate Change, reports Fox News.

The test, which measured general scientific knowledge, not climatological awareness, asked respondents for answers to questions such as “Electrons are smaller than atoms — true or false?” and “How long does it take the Earth to go around the Sun? One day, one month, or one year?”

Those respondents who identified as skeptics answered an average of 57 percent of questions correctly, barely outpacing the score of climate-change believers, who averaged 56 percent, according to Fox.

Some researchers were more intrigued by another result of the study, which found that individuals’ cultural and social predisposition — either individualist or cooperative — exerted a greater impact on their climate-change beliefs than did their actual level of scientific knowledge. Respondents with a more individualist ethos reported far greater levels of skepticism than their more cooperation-oriented counterparts.

Aaron Huertas, a spokesman for the Union of Concerned Scientists, explained the results as a natural byproduct of the political furor that accompanies any debate over energy or climate policy: “Over the last few years, the policy issues surrounding climate change have become increasingly politicized, and that’s bleeding over into people’s perceptions of climate science.”

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

www. nature.com/nclimate/j...nt/full/nclimate1547.html

Seeming public apathy over climate change is often attributed to a deficit in comprehension. The public knows too little science, it is claimed, to understand the evidence or avoid being misled

1. Widespread limits on technical reasoning aggravate the problem by forcing citizens to use unreliable cognitive heuristics to assess risk

We conducted a study to test this account and found no support for it.

Members of the public with the highest degrees of science literacy and technical reasoning capacity were not the most concerned about climate change.

Rather, they were the ones among whom cultural polarization was greatest.

This result suggests that public divisions over climate change stem not from the public’s incomprehension of science but from a distinctive conflict of interest: between the personal interest individuals have in forming beliefs in line with those held by others with whom they share close ties and the collective one they all share in making use of the best available science to promote common welfare.

Contrary to SCT predictions, higher degrees of science literacy and numeracy are associated with a small decrease in the perceived seriousness of climate change risks. Derived from Supplementary Table S4, Model 1. Low and high reflect values set at −1 s.d. and +1 s.d. on the composite Science literacy/numeracy scale (see Supplementary Information). Responses on the 0–10 risk scale (M=5.7, s.d.=3.4) were converted to z-scores to promote ease of interpretation. Confidence intervals reflect the 0.95 level of confidence.

Contrary to SCT’s predictions, highly science-literate and numerate hierarchical individualists are more sceptical, not less, of climate change risks.

Estimated risk-perception scores derived from Supplementary Table S4, Model 3. Hierarchical individualist and egalitarian communitarian reflect values set, respectively, at +1 s.d. and −1 s.d. on both the Hierarchy and Individualism cultural-world-view scale predictors. Low and high reflect values set at −1 and +1 s.d. on the Science literacy/numeracy scale. Responses on the 0–10 risk scale (M=5.7, s.d.=3.4) were converted to z-scores to promote ease of interpretation. Confidence intervals reflect the 0.95 level of confidence.

The study collected data on the climate-change risk perceptions of a large representative sample of US adults (N=1,540).

Measures were selected to permit assessment of two competing accounts of public opinion on climate change. One, already adverted to, can be called the science comprehension thesis (SCT). As members of the public do not know what scientists know, or think the way scientists think, they predictably fail to take climate change as seriously as scientists believe they should.

The alternative explanation can be referred to as the cultural cognition thesis (CCT).

CCT posits that individuals, as a result of a complex of psychological mechanisms, tend to form perceptions of societal risks that cohere with values characteristic of groups with which they identify4, 5. Whereas SCT emphasizes a conflict between scientists and the public, CCT stresses one between different segments of the public, whose members are motivated to fit their interpretations of scientific evidence to their competing cultural philosophies6.

Explanations for the public’s perceptions of climate change risk can be tested by observational study insofar as such hypotheses imply correlations between concern over climate change and specified individual characteristics7. We instructed subjects to rate the seriousness of climate change risk on a scale of 0 (no risk) to 10 (extreme risk), a general risk-concern measure that furnishes a parsimonious focus for such testing8, 9.

SCT asserts, first, that ordinary members of the public underestimate the seriousness of climate change because of the difficulty of the scientific evidence3. If this is correct, concern over climate change should be positively correlated with science literacy—that is, concern should increase as people become more science literate.

Second, and even more important, SCT attributes low concern with climate change to limits on the ability of ordinary members of the public to engage in technical reasoning. Recent research in psychology posits two discrete forms of information processing: system 1, which involves rapid visceral judgments that manifest themselves in various decision-making heuristics; and system 2, which requires conscious reflection and calculation10. Most members of the public, according to this research, typically employ system 1 reasoning without resorting to more effortful system 2 processing. Although system 1 works well for most daily contingencies, ordinary citizens’ predominant reliance on heuristic rather than analytic modes of reasoning is viewed as leading them to underestimate climate change risks, which are remote and abstract compared with a host of more emotionally charged risks (for example, terrorism) that the public is thought to overestimate2, 3.

If this position is correct, one would also expect concern with climate change to be positively correlated with numeracy. Numeracy refers to the capacity of individuals to comprehend and make use of quantitative information11. More numerate people are more disposed to use accuracy-enhancing system 2 forms of reasoning and are less vulnerable to system 1 cognitive errors11, 12. Hence, they should, on this view, form perceptions of climate-change risk less biased towards underestimation.

These predictions were unsupported (Fig. 1). As respondents’ science-literacy scores increased, concern with climate change decreased (r=−0.05, P=0.05). There was also a negative correlation between numeracy and climate change risk (r=−0.09, P<0.01). The differences were small, but nevertheless inconsistent with SCT, which predicts effects with the opposite signs.

MORE at link if you need it. This is NOT a anti-glow bull warming site/outfit that did this study. They are actually SURPRISED!

These idiots believe their own BULLSHIT.

www. nature.com/nclimate/j...nt/full/nclimate1547.html

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2012-05-30   16:04:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Mad Dog (#0)

Some researchers were more intrigued by another result of the study, which found that individuals’ cultural and social predisposition — either individualist or cooperative — exerted a greater impact on their climate-change beliefs than did their actual level of scientific knowledge. Respondents with a more individualist ethos reported far greater levels of skepticism than their more cooperation-oriented counterparts.

Of course. The glow-bull warming scam was *designed* to entice the sheeple in, so they could be fleeced. And God knows, they *were.*

The thinking crowd- antiSheeple, basically- knew it a scam from the git-go.

Their conclusions are perfectly logical.

LoonyMing: I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires.
Translation: IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

'It's now very common to hear people say, "I'm rather offended by that", as if that gives them certain rights. It's no more than a whine. It has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. "I'm offended by that." Well, so fucking what?' —Stephen Fry

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-05-30   16:41:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Capitalist Eric (#2)

Some researchers were more intrigued by another result of the study, which found that individuals’ cultural and social predisposition — either individualist or cooperative — exerted a greater impact on their climate-change beliefs than did their actual level of scientific knowledge. Respondents with a more individualist ethos reported far greater levels of skepticism than their more cooperation-oriented counterparts. Of course. The glow-bull warming scam was *designed* to entice the sheeple in, so they could be fleeced. And God knows, they *were.*

The thinking crowd- antiSheeple, basically- knew it a scam from the git-go.

Their conclusions are perfectly logical.

Their conclusions about who won't buy their man made glow bull warming FRAUD certainly are correct.

What I mean about them believing their own bullshit is the FRAUD itself.

It has been my lifelong experience that the numbers guys always believe their numbers and usually screw up applying their thesis to the real world. Unfortunately no man made model is 100% accurate for anything.

But really this is about HOW to propagandize those of us who won't buy their bullshit.

I note with interest that the arrogant libTURD posuers who love the meme of the "ignorant deniers" have just had their legs cut out from under them.

I bet you that they will still TRY to take that absurd position because these people are F'ing NUTS!

I note the silence of the usual promoters of the scam in response to this study.

They have NOTHING that they can say and be consistent. Which will not end up being a problem to them since "facts" are only used as decorations by these fools.

Sort of like it turned into man made climate change from man made glow bull warming.

These fools play all of their games with "living" rules that are designed to help support their positions, no matter what the actual facts are.

"libTURDISM is a terminal mental DISEASE."

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2012-05-31   12:02:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com