LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: DOJ pressures university to allow 38-year old man access to women’s restrooms
Source:
TDC.com
URL Source: http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/23/d ... an-access-to-womens-restrooms/
Published: May 25, 2012
Author: Caroline May
Post Date: 2012-05-25 16:11:27 by CZ82
Keywords: None
Views: 23219
Comments: 72
DOJ pressures university to allow 38-year old man access to women’s restrooms Published: 11:03 PM 05/23/2012, By Caroline May Watch out, you ladies at the University of Arkansas at Fort Smith: Those feet under the stall next to you might just belong to a 38-year-old man. Despite opposition from female students, UAFS has decided on “advice of counsel” to allow a 38-year-old anatomically-male, transgendered student access to the women’s bathrooms on campus. According to a report from the conservative Campus Reform, the university decided to reverse its transgender policy after receiving a letter from the Department of Justice. The school’s initial solution was to allow the man to use gender-neutral bathrooms instead of the women’s restrooms, and to offer to convert more bathrooms into gender-neutral areas. “Because of the stance we took, the individual filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights in the Department of Justice,” Mark Horn, vice president of university relations, told Campus Reform. Jennifer Braly, the 38-year-old male student who was not satisfied with the university’s policy, filed a complaint with the Justice Department and sued. “I am frustrated and highly depressed about all of these unfair restrictions,” Braly explained in an online appeal for sex-change surgery donations. “I live as a woman full time and have been for a year and a half now. I have natural breast development bigger than some normal girls from the hormone treatment. The only thing restricting me is what’s between my legs. Everyone is so concerned with what’s between my legs. I am just as much woman as anyone else.” According to Campus Reform’s interview with Horn, it was a letter from the Department of Justice that led to the bathroom policy change that allows Braly to use women’s restrooms. “[T]he office of civil rights basically made its expectations through the attorney and the decision was made to respond to that direction,” Horn said. “[T]he DOJ complaint caused revisiting of our thinking. … In the eyes of the law, this individual [Braly] is entitled to use the bathroom that she identifies with.” Neither DOJ nor UAFS have released the letter in question. DOJ explained to Campus Reform that the records “pertain to a currently active Civil Rights Division enforcement and access to the records should therefore be denied pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A) since disclosure thereof could reasonably be expected to interfere with Civil Rights Division enforcement proceedings.”
Poster Comment: The school’s initial solution was to allow the man to use gender-neutral bathrooms instead of the women’s restrooms, and to offer to convert more bathrooms into gender-neutral areas.---- What they should do is refuse to do anything at all and let the "IT" find it's own place to go to the bathroom.... Preferably at home where "IT" belongs....
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
#2. To: CZ82 (#0)
She should be allowed to use the woman's rest room because that is exactly what she is. Women like her have no interest in being predatory when they prefer the opposite sex as partners. And anyone taking say Premarin estrogens conjugated and an androgen blocker like say spironolactone can't preform sexually like a man anyway. It is unavoidable to have people do a period before surgical correction is done, as it is crucial to be very sure they are indeed transgender, as once someone's genitalia have been reshaped, breast implants given and a bilateral orchiectomy is preformed, there is no going back.
So I'm curious as to how the other people that use those restrooms feel about having "IT" using it when they are in there????? (but let me guess you're going to speak for them even though you don't know them)... But that doesn't matter does it, it's all about the feelings of those "Speeeeeeecial" people isn't it????? Everybody has the right to do something really stupid and "IT" did it.... But they also have the "obligation" to pay the price for their stupidity... Making others pay the price for "IT'S" stupidity is not how it's done, but then again we're dealing with Leftards here so nothing amazes me..... Truthfully this is more appropriate............
You are against surgery and hormone treatments to correct this problem, but what about hermaphrodites? Often in the past surgery was done that is still done in many cases even now to remove one of the two physical aspects of gender while the person is extremely young. If you expand your misplaced sense of how others should be forced to live to them, then you would support them being preserved as they were born and then do your little games of harassment, intolerance and hatred should they determine they prefer a sole gender role and treatment that includes surgery to help them achieve this. And should you do that and also pass laws that a person with a vagina can't use the room set up to accomidate people with penises and someone with a penis can't use the room with only toilets and feminine product disposal boxes, where do you propose they urinate and have bowel mnvements? The bushes around back?
So you think I'm wanting to force these people to live a certain way???? LOL.... They can have all of the useless surgeries they want to have, it's their screwed up life not mine.... But that doesn't mean I have to be "NOT DISGUSTED" over them and what they are doing.... And that also doesn't mean I can't "suggest" they try something that may be more effective than body mutilation!!! (That is one of my "Rights" the last time I checked).... But you and the GLBT community "DON'T" seem to be too bothered by "Forcing" non- GLBT people to have to deal with GLBT peoples problems and to be receptive of them!!! (isn't that against the non-GLBT peoples rights)?? But that's the GLBT agenda isn't it, to make everybody be tolerant of them and their problems, when they themselves aren't tolerant of others!!!! (there's that idiotic "tolerance" word again, or is it "intolerance", oh well no matter).... So don't accuse me of "Forcing" someone to live a certain way when you and the GLBT crowd are more guilty of it than I am.... (I also think the "hypocrisy" word fits in here somewhere too, doesn't it)!!! So has anybody asked the straight people if they feel alright sharing their bathrooms with the tranny crowd??? (I seriously doubt it, that's not the way GLBT (or you) work, right)!! You know what, if they just went ahead and got their own bathrooms I'd bet everybody that is non-GLBT wouldn't have a problem with it, (I wouldn't) now would they..... ($5 says that GLBT would be pissed off though, because they think the country should revolve around the 3%)!!! That's what the article is about, "suggesting" they "do the right thing", but they (and you) just don't want to???
There are no replies to Comment # 12. End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Ferret Mike (#2)
#10. To: CZ82 (#3)
#12. To: Ferret Mike (#10)
If you expand your misplaced sense of how others should be forced to live to them, then you would support them being preserved as they were born and then do your little games of harassment, intolerance and hatred should they determine they prefer a sole gender role and treatment that includes surgery to help them achieve this.
Replies to Comment # 12.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]