Don't worry lefty, you'll get your police state, your perpetual war, and your big government to take care of you. Both Romney and Obama will see to it. It's a win-win for you.
Don't worry lefty, you'll get your police state, your perpetual war, and your big government to take care of you. Both Romney and Obama will see to it. It's a win-win for you.
I'm not worried at all. The Ron Paul 'revolution' has fizzled out and all you have to show for it is some hyper technical yammering about "rules".
No, what's pathetic is leftist scum like you taking over the Republican party and turning it into the Democrat-Lite party. What's pathetic is because of liberals like yourself, a baby-murdering politician who has spent his entire political career governing like a Democrat is going to be the Republican nominee.
No, what's pathetic is leftist scum like you taking over the Republican party and turning it into the Democrat-Lite party. What's pathetic is because of liberals like yourself, a baby-murdering politician who has spent his entire political career governing like a Democrat is going to be the Republican nominee.
Try taking a closer look around at the next Ron Paul rally at all the college students supporting that old man. Hint: They're NOT social conservatives.
The way I see it.. it's foolish Ron Paul supporters like yourself who are the ones 'leaning forward' while the Obama left takes 'liberty' with your hind quarters.
Hey..it was Fiber Dog who brought up 'baby-murdering politicians' in reference to Romney and Obama. Go back and read the quote I responded to.
Ron Paul's anti-abortion is rock solid. When the faux anti-abortion Republican party had complete control of the federal government, Paul was the ONLY PERSON to propose anti-abortion legislation.
Therefore, if pro-abortionists are voting for Ron Paul they are doing so knowing his stance on the issue. That being the case, your comment is moot.
Ron Paul's anti-abortion is rock solid. When the faux anti-abortion Republican party had complete control of the federal government, Paul was the ONLY PERSON to propose anti-abortion legislation.
Hello Dog. I voted for Ron Paul in the primaries.
I don't think Ron Paul is strong enough against abortion. If abortion is murder and that is my position. Why isn't he in favor (like Rand Paul is) of a constitutional amendment banning abortion?
I understand his state rights argument. But when you amend the constitution states rights doesn't come into play for you are changing the constitution. To change the constitution to outlaw murder seems like a no brainer to me. Why doesn't Ron Paul support a constitutional amendment to ban murder and Rand does? That is why Rand Paul is more appealing then Ron Paul. On many issues.
I don't think Ron Paul is strong enough against abortion. If abortion is murder and that is my position. Why isn't he in favor (like Rand Paul is) of a constitutional amendment banning abortion?
I understand his state rights argument. But when you amend the constitution states rights doesn't come into play for you are changing the constitution. To change the constitution to outlaw murder seems like a no brainer to me. Why doesn't Ron Paul support a constitutional amendment to ban murder and Rand does? That is why Rand Paul is more appealing then Ron Paul. On many issues.
Dr. Paul has stated that he believes that regulation of medical decisions about maternal or fetal health is "best handled at the state level".
However, with the Sanctity of Life Act that he and other real pro-life politicians (as opposed to those who don't give a damn about the issue and use it to manipulate the gullible) you do not need a constitutional amendment to outlaw the murder of an unborn child. To do that all that Congress has to do is "define human life and legal personhood (specifically, natural personhood) as beginning at conception "without regard to race, sex, age, health, defect, or condition of dependency."
That quote comes directly from the Sanctity of Life legislation that real pro-life politicians have been trying to get passed since before Ron Paul was in office. Once an unborn child is given the same status as you or I then they are protected by the same laws as you or I. No constitutional amendment needed. But that would also take away an us vs them issue which draws a lot of people to the Republican Party.
In addition, the Sanctity of Life bill would have "recognized that each state has authority to protect the lives of unborn children residing in the jurisdiction of that state." In other words, the states would be able to handle the issue just like they do any other murder case if they so choose.
Also, "The Act would have amended the federal judicial code to remove Supreme Court and district court jurisdiction to review cases arising out of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or practice, or any act interpreting such a measure, on the grounds that such measure: (1) protects the rights of human persons between conception and birth; or (2) prohibits, limits, or regulates the performance of abortions or the provision of public funds, facilities, personnel, or other assistance for abortions"
Had the Republican Party voted on and passed this legislation when they had 100% control of the federal government rather than sitting on it and not allowing it to even be voted on in committee, there would be no abortions in this country today.
Your party has done zero, nada, zilth about abortion and yet Ron Paul is weak on the issue? LOL! They had complete control of the federal government. Where was their proposal to amend the constitution to prohibit abortion?
Your party has done zero, nada, zilth about abortion and yet Ron Paul is weak on the issue? LOL! They had complete control of the federal government. Where was their proposal to amend the constitution to prohibit abortion?
Because Ron Paul is weak on the issue. Doesn't mean the Republicans are strong the issue. What makes you think that?
