Title: Fidogate: Listen To Obama Brag About Eating Dog Source:
Breitbart TV URL Source:http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart- ... 09200A5F9231}&title=Fidogate-L Published:Apr 19, 2012 Author:Bill Ayers Post Date:2012-04-19 22:09:20 by Hondo68 Keywords:Roasted Grasshopper, dog meat, Bill Ayers dreams, beaten with bamboo switches Views:34246 Comments:78
From chapter 18 of the audio book "Dreams Of My Father" as recited by the author, President Barack Obama.
Poster Comment:
Muslims don't eat dog, Bill Ayers and Obama are lying again.
Baking and eating dog here has fallen out of fashion in North America, but it is a meat that is fair game elsewhere. So President Obama ate dog as an indigenous dish in an Asian country.
This is no big deal. To say the least. I would never give anyone shit about that. Unless it involved eating people or sme incredibly intelligent creature, which a dog is not.
I'll always give you fairly intelligent, but not extremely. I've always been interested in this question of intelligence and animals like the human and other great apes, or dolphins and whales.
I like dogs, and had several while growing up. They were all smart as dogs go, and I was never tempted to eat any that passed away. ;-)
"The diff comes when a child figures out that you're pointing at an object."
Dogs actually are so in sync with humans they recognize the finger pointing and will look when larger brained primates not so acclimated to us will miss that meaning.
Dogs have been joined at the hip with humanity so long, what a pointed finger means has become almost intellectually known to them. I found that interesting when scientist figured that one out.
A common test of frontal lobe development is often the test of awareness that a reflection is of the observer. A dolphin one puts a paint spot on will go to a mirror nearby and look at what you did to that particular body part one painted.
Also other tests dolphins actually outdo humans in, such as the number of meaningless sounds they can repeat back in tests scoping out that capacity.
No. Actually they did a fascinating study that showed the used to human culture over thousands of years dogs got it with no training in the vast majority of cases, while the larger brained, but not so used to humans species of other large apes did not get the clue what it meant.
Humans are indeed a species i the animal kingdom of animals, and our species is one of the species of great apes in terms of where it fits in the sceme of life. Although you would deny our own niche in the taxonomic nomenclature of living things.
So, humans having sexual intercourse with humans is exactly that; apes having sex with apes.
And nobody here but you is talking about interspecies sex.
Which no doubt comes from you in many ways living in your own little world arrogantly ignoring everything else around you.
Order - Primates [arboreal prehensile locomotion; terrestrial bipedal leaping in some cases; Strepsirrhini, Prosimians, also included, oldest living primates, common ancestor with them]
Suborder - Haplorrhini [anthropoidea; like Tarsiiformes, also included, oldest living haplorrhini, common ancestor with them]
Infraorder - Simiiformes [earliest documented tool ethology; like Platyrrhini, American Monkeys, also included, oldest living simiiformes; monkeys and apes included here]
Parvorder - Catarrhini [land extended locomotion; like Cercopithecoidea, Old World Monkeys, also included, oldest living ones]
Superfamily - Hominoidea [tail loss, arboreal locomotion reduced to forelimbs (Brachiation); apes, lesser apes, hominoids; like Hylobatidae, Gibbons, also included, oldest living ones]
Species - Proconsul africanus
Family - Hominidae [great apes, hominids; fist-walking; family with Ponginae, Orangutans, also included, oldest living ones, common ancestor with them]
Subfamily - Homininae [or hominines; knuckle-walking; includes gorillas but not orangutans]
Species - Pierolapithecus catalaunicus
Tribe - Hominini [or hominins; includes chimpanzees but not gorillas]
Species - Sahelanthropus tchadensis, possible common ancestor with chimpanzees[citation needed]
Species - Orrorin tugenensis, may be an early species after split with chimpanzees[citation needed]
Subtribe - Hominina [or hominans; orthograde (upright) bipedalism; humans are the only surviving species]
Genus - Ardipithecus [Human lineage] Genus - Kenyanthropus Genus - Australopithecus [Human lineage; made tools found]
Genus - Homo [or humans; specific and specialized development of memory/learning/teaching/learning application (learning driven ethology)]
Species - Homo habilis [refined stone technology; earliest fire control] Species - Homo ergaster [extensive language, complex articulate language] Species - Homo erectus [fire control, cooking; aesthetic/artistic refinement of tools] Species - Homo heidelbergensis [possible earliest sanitary burial of deads, accompanied with symbolic/formal supplement]
Species - Homo sapiens [further development and specialization of learning application; active environment transformation, acclimatization and control; infrastructures and advanced technology]
As you see from the human taxonomy quoted from the point where it classifies what order our species is categorized under, we are primates. That is just a fact, just like any other in any system which categorizes and classifies in the study of biology.
All great apes evolved from a common ancestor. Nobody contends our ancestors bred with modern offshoots of a common ancestor. To do that, one group or the other wold have to travel through time.
In any case, modern humans are primates. And this is an undeniable fact, whether you chose to believe in evolution or not.
