[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Science-Technology Title: 50 Top Astronauts, Scientists Sign Letter Slamming NASA For Promoting Man-Made Climate Change Dogma Update: Now at Fox News! Eventually the sham is going to give, and the latest letter signed by 50 NASA experts, with more than 1000 years of combined professional experience, is a sure sign the gigs about over.
..unproven remarks
..not substantiated
..hundreds of well-known climate scientists
..tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief
..science is NOT settled
..unbecoming of NASAs history
..advocacy of an extreme position
..damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA
..even the reputation of science itself
Letters to the top dont get any more blunt than that. And how many tens of billions have these crackpots at GISS cost the taxpayers? Heres the letter: March 28, 2012 We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled. The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASAs history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements. As former NASA employees, we feel that NASAs advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASAs current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself. For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, (Attached signatures) CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science Ref: Letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, dated 3-26-12, regarding a request for NASA to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that human produced CO2 is having a catastrophic impact on climate change. 1. /s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years Poster Comment: The enviro-kooks say that global warming skeptics are mentally ill, and need "treatment".
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
Man-made global Warming is the ultimate socialist wet dream. It's complete and utter nonsense.
And the perfect example/reason for why NASA no longer exists except as a shell of it's former self....;} "A stammered truth is more resonate to the heart than a well-told lie. Unfortunately, a habitually dissembling mindset will view the situation in reverse. All too often, internalized systems of viewing an unfolding event will determine an individuals take on a given situation. If the institutions (e.g., familial, religious, governmental, mass media) that have influenced ones method of perception are themselves compromised by internalized, self-resonating biases, then a type of carnival funhouse mirror effect comes into play (both on an individual and culture-wide basis) whereby distortions reflect distortions that, in turn, reflect those distortions
ad infinitum. Reality is made grotesque, and gross distortions are perceived as reality." Always wondered about that mission to 'explore for life' in outer space when every rocket launch was/is destructive to life on this planet...;} Heart of the Rose April 11, 2012 at 8:51 am Log in to Reply They are both (3 and 4 SPF) structurally destroyed
. full of debris and have been burning from the beginning.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|