[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Health/Medical
See other Health/Medical Articles

Title: Individual Mandate: Republicans Were for It Before They Were Against It. In Fact, It Was Their Idea
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wende ... -mandate-republ_b_1022079.html
Published: Oct 20, 2011
Author: Wendell Potter
Post Date: 2012-03-29 11:05:08 by mininggold
Keywords: None
Views: 2132
Comments: 5

Individual Mandate: Republicans Were for It Before They Were Against It. In Fact, It Was Their Idea

In the Republican presidential debate Tuesday night, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich acknowledged, apparently in an unguarded moment, that a core element of "ObamaCare," the requirement that all Americans be enrolled in either a private or public health insurance plan, was a proposal originated by the Heritage Foundation, a powerful conservative think tank.

Gingrich made the admission as he was denying former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney's accusation that the former Republican leader was once a supporter of the mandate.

I'm sure the other presidential hopefuls on the stage in Las Vegas were holding their breath, praying they would not be asked why they all are now so staunchly opposed to the very notion of such a mandate, which several GOP attorneys general are even alleging in various lawsuits violates the U.S. Constitution. As a result of those lawsuits, the Supreme Court is likely to rule next year on the constitutionality of the mandate and the entire reform law.

The candidates' prayers were answered. Not one of them was asked why an idea conceived more than two decades ago by several conservative economists and favored by Republican lawmakers is a horrible idea now.

Snip


Poster Comment:

LOL Short, selective memories must be the number one hallmark of being a conservative.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: mininggold (#0)

This was Heritage's less odious alternative to HillaryCare (which is what this thing called ObamaCare really is). Obama never campaigned for this but Hillary's clique in the Senate rammed this through, much as the Dims in 1993 rammed through stuff until it cost them control of the House.

Once the GOP was in power, no elected Republicans made a serious effort to institute it.

It's pure bunk to pretend this is a Republican program. Obama's minions are now claiming that, because Heritage once proposed it as an alternative to HillaryCare, that means that ObamaCare really is a bipartisan bill despite the fact it never got a single vote from a Republican in either house of Congress (umm...maybe they got Cao's vote on the first round in the House which wouldn't count for much since the election of Scott Walker meant that the Dems had to pass the Senate's version unaltered).

Tooconservative  posted on  2012-03-29   11:58:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: TooConservative (#1)

Once the GOP was in power, no elected Republicans made a serious effort to institute it.

It's pure bunk to pretend this is a Republican program. Obama's minions are now claiming that, because Heritage once proposed it as an alternative to HillaryCare, that means that ObamaCare really is a bipartisan bill despite the fact it never got a single vote from a Republican in either house of Congress (umm...maybe they got Cao's vote on the first round in the House which wouldn't count for much since the election of Scott Walker meant that the Dems had to pass the Senate's version unaltered).

More of your (plural) expertise (ie spin), I see. Bring it up with Newt. He made the statement.

Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET

mininggold  posted on  2012-03-29   12:03:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: mininggold (#2)

Bring it up with Newt. He made the statement.

I don't need to.

When he was Speaker, the GOP had the votes but made no such move. Nor have they at various times in since when they controlled either or both houses of Congress.

What some thinktankers say or some Speaker out of office means nothing. Only when they cast official votes in Congress can it possibly mean anything.

Years back, for instance, in the Eighties, Barry Goldwater favored gay rights. Does that somehow mean that every Republican from that point in time is required to believe in it and vote for it? No. Yet that is about how "bipartisan" ObamaCare was.

Your first clue should have been when Reid and a handful of Dem senators met in a locked room and posted guards to keep the Republicans out.

Bipartisan, my white shiny ass.

Tooconservative  posted on  2012-03-29   12:41:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: TooConservative (#3)

I don't need to.

When he was Speaker, the GOP had the votes but made no such move. Nor have they at various times in since when they controlled either or both houses of Congress.

What some thinktankers say or some Speaker out of office means nothing. Only when they cast official votes in Congress can it possibly mean anything.

Years back, for instance, in the Eighties, Barry Goldwater favored gay rights. Does that somehow mean that every Republican from that point in time is required to believe in it and vote for it? No. Yet that is about how "bipartisan" ObamaCare was.

Your first clue should have been when Reid and a handful of Dem senators met in a locked room and posted guards to keep the Republicans out.

Bipartisan, my white shiny ass.

Are you saying Newt would choose to lie since he's now out of office? While actually handing the ammo to Obama?

"You guys" need to purge his lack of ideological purity from your ranks.

Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET

mininggold  posted on  2012-03-29   12:46:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: mininggold (#4)

Are you saying Newt would choose to lie since he's now out of office? While actually handing the ammo to Obama?

You mean like he did while rolling around on the couch with Pelosi?

She did everything but use a strap-on on him.

He's a cheap whore. Now he's selling photos of himself with supporters for $50.

Tooconservative  posted on  2012-03-29   13:27:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com