Title: Your Liberal Outrage Boycott Target of the Day: Randi Rhodes Source:
HE.com URL Source:http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=50059 Published:Mar 8, 2012 Author:John Hayward Post Date:2012-03-08 17:11:56 by CZ82 Keywords:None Views:197
Your Liberal Outrage Boycott Target of the Day: Randi Rhodes
Countless ovaries are at stake.
by John Hayward
Hi there, liberals! I know you’re not a bunch of phony, hypocritical, lying, hate-mongering, totalitarian jackasses, so you’re working really hard on getting Mike Malloy off the air for his disgusting comments earlier this week, and boycotting the Washington Post’s advertisers until they censure columnist Richard Cohen for saying all conservatives have problems with sex.
I’ve got something else to throw on your plate. You should be able to make short work of this one, because the deeply offensive host in question doesn’t have much of an audience. Her advertisers shouldn’t be difficult to knock off, since they wont’ really be losing much exposure by pulling out of her show.
The host in question is Randi Rhodes, who used to be on something called “Air America” that nobody listened to. She’s still out there, and as The Blaze reports, she was far more offensive than Rush Limbaugh has ever been:
After playing audio of Fox commentator Monica Crowley criticizing Sandra Fluke and the idea that women need $3,000 a year for birth control, Rhodes lost it on Wednesday, saying that conservative women don’t deserve to have ovaries.
“You know, these women, somebody really needs to go repossess their ovaries. Really, truly, they have no right to them. They are fabulous, little organs and they have absolutely no right to be estrogen-bearing beings. Okay? Just cut ‘em off, let ‘em go through the hot flashes, let ‘em just sit there and complain about hormone therapy, okay? Just take the ovaries and get it over with. Because they don’t deserve to have estrogen. They really don’t. It’s a privilege.”
The infantile Left has always tried to silence dissent by rescinding the racial or sexual identity of people who don’t march in lockstep with prevailing liberal orthodoxy – Clarence Thomas isn’t really “black,” Sarah Palin isn’t really a “woman,” etc. Rhodes is taking it a step further by suggesting this nonsense should be enforced through involuntary surgery.
Was this meant as some kind of satire? It sure doesn’t sound like it:
But even if we assume we’re listening to some kind of meta-satire of liberal hatred, it wouldn’t matter, because Rush Limbaugh was being satirical as well, and it didn’t help him one little bit.
Get busy, Liberal Outrage Brigadiers! Intellectual consistency absolutely demands that you spare no effort in getting Randi Rhodes off the air. Countless ovaries are at stake. Good hunting!
