Leak a document
See other Leak a document Articles
Title: Lucysmom and mininggold are the same poster beware
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 7, 2012
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2012-03-07 15:19:16 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 145617
Comments: 188
They are the same poster. Proof here on ths thread libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=21416&Disp=63#C63 You see minningold posted this #63. To: Wood_Chopper (#62) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 12:41:38 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit You see the only problem is that it was a post from Lucysmom. Here is her post #62. To: lucysmom (#53) Imagine how they would scream if government schools decided not to have children begin their day by pledging allegiance to the government You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. Wood_Chopper posted on 2011-06-21 12:38:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit #63. To: Wood_Chopper (#62) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 12:41:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit Replies to Comment # 63. #65. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#63) (Edited) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. Hey yukon, you're answering a post I made to lucysmom and claiming it as yours. Too many windows open??? Are you and lucysmom one and the same? Wood_Chopper posted on 2011-06-21 12:56:52 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit In case someone thinks I edited it like the liberal trash here is trying to say. That isn't the case or someone would have noticed it at the time. Also anyone is free to contact pinguinite to have him confirm that nothing has been edited. So what we have here is a liberal who needs 2 screen names to back themselves up. That poster is such a lightweight that they try to make up for it by having 2 screen names. That is against the rules. The poster in question could never "man" up and answer the question. So a warning to all forums these people are one in the same.
[Thread Locked] Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-40) not displayed.
.
.
.
#41. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, Wood_Chopper (#28)
"So you didn't read the thread (where the proof is conclusive) you just don't want to believe it." There was no mistake made by 'mininggold', she (mininggold) answered a post 'Wood_Chopper' had made to 'lucysmom', claiming 'lucysmom's quote as hers (mininggold).
("Every fetus that DOESN'T go on welfare in 18 years because he/she was aborted yesterday... brings a smile to my face today" ~ GrandIsland - LibertyPost)
That was the way I read the exchange but then bucky got into yelling at W_C and I pretty much gave up. I was only reading it to see how many more threats bucky is laying out in all of his guises. The 'high dudgeon' exhibited by mininggold suggests the last act of a dying breeder or was it Henry the 5th...to paraphrase Blazing Saddles.
The post/quote in question was made by 'lucysmom' at #53 of the thread. That was the post 'Wood_Chopper' responed to in post #62. Then 'mininggold' responded in post #63, forgetting for the moment they were 'mininggold', and responded to 'lucysmoms' orginal post, as her own.
("Every fetus that DOESN'T go on welfare in 18 years because he/she was aborted yesterday... brings a smile to my face today" ~ GrandIsland - LibertyPost)
Fixed for accuracy. Before or AFTER the dingbat LM/ming accused Stone of changing her post? Hell, he didn't even know lucy and ming were one person, until I posted the proof, with a link back to the original post. Yep. Indeed. It might have gone down that way, but it didn't. There was never an explanation forthcoming by either of "them." I don't understand, honestly, why someone feels the urge to have multiple screen-names. Either a person is able to reasonably articulate and support their position, or they can't. How much of a loser leftist do you have to be, to use multiple IDs to keep from drowning in a sea of facts? It's pathetic, really.
To: mcToejam, rat-boy, drippy, Alzheimer Fred, whitesands, t-bird, Uh... YEAH. Give him credit, though, in that he's consistent in his ignorance. I think his Alzheimers' meds needs to be upped.
To: mcToejam, rat-boy, drippy, Alzheimer Fred, whitesands, t-bird, That was the post 'Wood_Chopper' responed to in post #62. Then 'mininggold' responded in post #63, forgetting for the moment they were 'mininggold', and responded to 'lucysmoms' orginal post, as her own. All your investigative skills, evidence gathering, and rationalization don't amount to a hill of beans. You are wrong, plain an simple. So keep it up. It is amusing to watch youse guys drink Capitalist Eric's Kool-Aid, and assert with confidence, his lies. He must be powerfully amused too.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
People who post with numerous names, or who get together with other posters- to form online gangs- could very well suffer from Identity disorders. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/dissociative- disorders/DS00574/DSECTION=symptoms Disociative disorder, in the extremism can result in multiple personalities. Anyone who has multiple personalities- has been through huge amounts of trauma, so it really is not comical- but deeply painful. No doubt that among the online community there are people with severe personality disorders. I am not saying that the poster/posters lucymoms is suffering from that- just making the point that people who do post with numerous names could be very ill. I, personally, do not think they are the same people. I think they post in a tag team and make it appear they are the same.
Ridiculous. Even a casual read through of their posts shows this not to be the case.
. Yeah, blame somebody else, anybody else... Right? Now THAT'S amusing! You know WHY that approach doesn't work? Because I posted the evidence, with links. The words posted were yours, not mine. The "lies" that have been posted, therefore, are also yours. It's one thing to dispute something that can't be easily demonstrated, but this isn't one of those times. Your responses have been to avoid the question (of whether you're one or two people, based on the linked evidence), attack anyone who asks you a valid question, and finally accuse Stone of altering your statements. This last point is what sealed the deal for Stone. Everything you've done since then, has merely strengthened the conclusion that ming and loonymom are in fact one person. It's why you're attempting to limit the damage, so that you can continue with your games... The problem with this approach, is that when everyone knows what your game is, they tend to not want to participate. You're a little too stubborn, a little too stupid, to accept the fact that your game is over, and that you might as well pack up and move on. You won't, of course... Not voluntarily. So as far as "Kool-Aid" and who's telling "lies," you need only look in the mirror. Now, since Stone had said ming was toast, and you're back, my response is "buh- BYE, bozo." LOL. Oh, and one more thing: CHECK-mate.
To: mcToejam, rat-boy, drippy, Alzheimer Fred, whitesands, t-bird, Just wait until the Sybil sisters start blaming each other. That would really be amusing.
I didn't notice CE was involved in the discussion under review and since he claims to have me on bozo I don't read him anyway. That said, instead of getting all bitchy about it, if there is a simple explanation why don't you calm down and just explain why mininggold answered a post directed to you? You said the pledge was to the government. W_C repeated that claim and justifiably condmemed your silly charge. Then the charge that A K A Stone changed the quote was thrown into the mess which made absolutely no sense at all. Do I believe you and mininggold are the same? On this record it would appear so. However, my observation of your posting styles to me demonstrates that mininggold has a sense of humor and you do not. And, anyway, it doesn't matter other than I get very tired of forum members on every forum I've ever been associated with claiming the forum host is either a slime eating fraud or a wife beating child molester. Sometimes, the forum host is just as human as his members claim they are.
Perhaps. I'm not going down that path, because I'm simply not qualified to. Generally, I have a positivist mindset, though post-positivism allows more leeway in dealing with "what is truth?" type of questions. I can't say with 100% certainty, and it's just not worth my time to know... I go by her/their behavior, responses to this whole question, and the words that I'd linked to. And this puts me at... say, 95% confidence. I can't prove that last 5% even if I wanted to, so I'm not going to worry about it. Yes, I think they're one and the same person, which is why I posted the links and quotes. The only editing I did, was reorder the complete quotes in such a way that it becomes very apparent why I believe as I do. At that point, others will judge whether my view may be valid, or not. It would seem that most posters believe my point is indeed valid- to say, the 95% confidence interval. Of course, had she strenuously denied the point, I believe the responses would have been far different to her position; after all, she can't prove a negative. But she's just a bit too arrogant, and a bit too stupid to understand that every attack, every snide remark made buries her just a little more, like a dinosaur in a tar-pit. Either way, it's not my problem; Stone had suspicions, I offered up what I had, and the rest is history. But honestly, given the concentration of leftist losers on this forum, I'm starting to get the feeling that it's time for me to move on. As my mother has told me, I've "no tolerance of fools," which is a requirement to be a leftist.
To: mcToejam, rat-boy, drippy, Alzheimer Fred, whitesands, t-bird, LMAO!!! Now THAT was funny!!!
To: mcToejam, rat-boy, drippy, Alzheimer Fred, whitesands, t-bird, :) good points. So move on? I like these old school message boards myself. Where would you go? Just curious. :)
Don't know. Honestly, I stay with one board at a time, and don't wander around too much. If you've got suggestions, send me a private reply...
To: mcToejam, rat-boy, drippy, Alzheimer Fred, whitesands, t-bird, :) I actually don't wander around too much either. Perhaps someone will send each of us a note. :)
You would need to ask mininggold about that.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
I go by her/their behavior, responses to this whole question, and the words that I'd linked to. And this puts me at... say, 95% confidence. I can't prove that last 5% even if I wanted to, so I'm not going to worry about it. Yes, I think they're one and the same person, which is why I posted the links and quotes. The only editing I did, was reorder the complete quotes in such a way that it becomes very apparent why I believe as I do. At that point, others will judge whether my view may be valid, or not. It would seem that most posters believe my point is indeed valid- to say, the 95% confidence interval. Of course, had she strenuously denied the point, I believe the responses would have been far different to her position; after all, she can't prove a negative. But she's just a bit too arrogant, and a bit too stupid to understand that every attack, every snide remark made buries her just a little more, like a dinosaur in a tar-pit. Either way, it's not my problem; Stone had suspicions, I offered up what I had, and the rest is history. But honestly, given the concentration of leftist losers on this forum, I'm starting to get the feeling that it's time for me to move on. As my mother has told me, I've "no tolerance of fools," which is a requirement to be a leftist. That's all very interesting, and you are still 100% wrong.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
This thread is hilarious. All the Sherlock Holmes wannabes - aren't. LOL
Are they still going at it? If they want my answer then they need to ask ME the question, but then they need to blame Stone and my 7 posts per day limit for any untimely reply. But not a one has the balls to do so. Personally I'm not wasting my time on it anymore, because this bunch sure can't shoot straight and I have nothing further to offer that hasn't already been said.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
Well, why did you answer a post directed to lucysmom with such drama and then claim Stone changed the text? You've been copied on every one of my posts.
What's hilarious is the tag team avoidance. I have quoted comments directed to someone else and stated a position but I've never claimed the quoted reference was mine. That issue is what is so puzzling.
The least talented have the biggest egos.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
They are completely invested in the rightness of their theory and will not be dissuaded - true believers in a false reality.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Your time to address the question is running out. You know the question. Tick tock tick tock
"Personally I'm not wasting my time on it anymore, because this bunch sure can't shoot straight and I have nothing further to offer that hasn't already been said." They are completely invested in the rightness of their theory and will not be dissuaded - true believers in a false reality. And of course the problem is that nothing has been said, (by mininggold or lucysmom)that answered the question. If anyone has a simple explanation then let's hear it and stop the juvenile resort to kicking the sand out of the box. The 'false reality' is of your own devise, lucy.
Read my post on this thread. I know for a fact that they are two different people. FACT. It's impossible to be in two places at the same time or for one person to be in one place as two people. IMPOSSIBLE. You folks are fucking loons. And the fact that you would pick on two very sweet and likeable ladies, well, you should be ashamed of yourselves as "men".
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
War anyone can get on the internet and make the statement you made. It may be proved to you. That could be true. But that isn't proof for us. I don't mean to start an inquisition. But it isn't fair when someone uses two screen names to back themselves up. mininggold clearly talked about her post being changed. That is an indisputable fact. Another fact is that Lucysmom made that post. Another fact. Those have never been addressed. Just dodged. To tell you the truth I wish I knew they were different people. Then I wouldn't have to go asking these questions of people here.
I did read it and was curious why April 2011 was the time you chose as the epiphany. I don't recall either of them engaging with me during that month of horrors but do note that they both were interested in goats in June and you were not. Outside of this conundrum I've seen no similarity in their style in that mininggold sometimes has a sense of humor and lucy never. The conclusion drawn from that could go either way. Hence my dilemma.
Good Grief, i can't believe you folks have kept this silliness going for days. Who really gives a RAT'S ASS.
http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19500&Disp=9
Those of us who find false charges odious.
You started the thread, Stone. You look like a loon now that you're suddenly denying what your intent was. I know for a fact that they are two different people. Period. End. Finis. TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE. You've put them both in a position where the only "proof" is for them to reveal themselves to eveyone here which neither of them SHOULD be forced to do. Repeat this until it sinks in: I know for a fact that they are two different people. I know for a fact that they are two different people. I know for a fact... You used to have a political website. I told you the moment that you allowed Boofer on here that it would die. He posted here and then went and shit on you everywhere else - as he always did and does. I told you that if you did not control Padlock/no gnu and his *nigger* compulsion, you'd never attract any significant posters. So what did you do? You joined in. Look at this place, Stone. So much potential that ran at its best when you were nowhere to be found.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Sorry but your word isn't good enough.
I don't give a shit whether you *think* it's good enough or not. You're hardly a man of honor.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
And I know for a fact that you repeatedly lied to me in pm's so where does that leave the question of your credibility?
Sometimes it's helpful to go back to original material - look what I found: #67. To: Wood_Chopper (#65) (Edited) Hey yukon, you're answering a post I made to lucysmom and claiming it as yours. Too many windows open??? Are you and lucysmom one and the same? Sorry, I forgot someone as perfect as yourself never makes mistakes. I see you put a call in to your mommy to help you out. mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 13:01:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Why wasn't mininggold's explanation been included in Stone's "proof"? Do you reject mininggold's explanation? BTW, Wood_Chopper is on my bozo list and has been for a long time - does it make sense to you that I would bozo someone as lucysmom, and not as mininggold? You fearless investigators could check out your theory by reviewing both mininggold's and my posting history over - say - the past year.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Do you think it's fair to ban someone or limit their posts as you've done with mininggold because some nut with an ax to grind makes a false accusation?
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Someone I trust thinks I'm wrong. I still think I'm right but will probably let it pass. I hope you would at least admit the comment is suspicious? Can you admit that much? I've already bumped mings posting limit up. Maybe I will remove it entirely. Let me think on it. I would also hope you agree that it is fair for me to want people to only have one screen name. I will also admit that if someone slips by and has 2 names it is not the end of the world. Buck does it all the time. I zap them as I find them. His are easier as he has the same ip numbers. This wasn't because of your politics which are different then mine. If you remember I took the thread down a while back because I was going to let it pass until I received the message containing the comment in question. Then I opened it back up because my interest stirred. Sincerely A K A Stone
and CE's word is good enough for you to start these threads and ban mininggold?
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Comments (81 - 188) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest"I read that mininggold admitted to making a mistake. That was good enough evidence for me to see and make appropriate judgment."
#42. To: Murron, Fred Mertz, A K A Stone, mininggold, Wood_Chopper (#41)
There was no mistake made by 'mininggold', she (mininggold) answered a post 'Wood_Chopper' had made to 'lucysmom', claiming 'lucysmom's quote as hers (mininggold).
#43. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, mininggold aka lucysmom (#39)
"It was possible the 'quote' to which mininggold replied was not the complete text but if that was the case mininggold could have said so and stopped accusing everyone of bad faith."
#44. To: harrowup, Fred Mertz, mininggold, A K A Stone (#39)
So you think
mininggold and lucysmom are the same poster? I don't. As for 'the mistake' - that was implied or at least that was how I read it.
There was ample time for an explanation which was not given anywhere; just a lot of yelling.
It was possible the 'quote' to which mininggold replied was not the complete text but if that was the case mininggold could have said so and stopped accusing everyone of bad faith.
loonymom, ming, e-type jackoff, goober56, wreck, cal-CON, rabid dog, dummy DwarF, biff, harrowup the communist, and meguro. You're on the "a waste of human flesh" list. Brian S[ocialist], you're a propagandist moron. ALL of you can piss off.
#45. To: A K A Stone (#40)
Fred is a lightweight. He doesn't read articles but just spurts out opinions based on nothing.
loonymom, ming, e-type jackoff, goober56, wreck, cal-CON, rabid dog, dummy DwarF, biff, harrowup the communist, and meguro. You're on the "a waste of human flesh" list. Brian S[ocialist], you're a propagandist moron. ALL of you can piss off.
#46. To: Murron, harrowup, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, mininggold (#43)
The post/quote in question was made by 'lucysmom' at #53 of the thread.
#47. To: Capitalist Eric (#44)
#48. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Say hello to your grandma for me.
#49. To: lucysmom, Murron, harrowup, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, mininggold (#46)
It is amusing to watch youse guys drink Capitalist Eric's Kool-Aid, and assert with confidence, his lies.
loonymom, ming, e-type jackoff, goober56, wreck, cal-CON, rabid dog, dummy DwarF, biff, harrowup the communist, and meguro. You're on the "a waste of human flesh" list. Brian S[ocialist], you're a propagandist moron. ALL of you can piss off.
#50. To: Capitalist Eric (#49)
(Edited)
Yeah, blame somebody else, anybody else... Right? Now THAT'S amusing!
Iran’s main drive for acquiring atomic weapons is not for use against Israel but as a deterrent against U.S. intervention -- Major General Zeevi Farkash, head of the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate
#51. To: lucysmom, Murron, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, mininggold, (#46)
It is amusing to watch youse guys drink Capitalist Eric's Kool-Aid,
#52. To: diva betsy ross (#47)
People who post with numerous names, or who get together with other posters- to form online gangs- could very well suffer from Identity disorders.
I, personally, do not think they are the same people.
loonymom, ming, e-type jackoff, goober56, wreck, cal-CON, rabid dog, dummy DwarF, biff, harrowup the communist, and meguro. You're on the "a waste of human flesh" list. Brian S[ocialist], you're a propagandist moron. ALL of you can piss off.
#53. To: jwpegler (#50)
loonymom, ming, e-type jackoff, goober56, wreck, cal-CON, rabid dog, dummy DwarF, biff, harrowup the communist, and meguro. You're on the "a waste of human flesh" list. Brian S[ocialist], you're a propagandist moron. ALL of you can piss off.
#54. To: Capitalist Eric (#52)
#55. To: diva betsy ross (#54)
loonymom, ming, e-type jackoff, goober56, wreck, cal-CON, rabid dog, dummy DwarF, biff, harrowup the communist, and meguro. You're on the "a waste of human flesh" list. Brian S[ocialist], you're a propagandist moron. ALL of you can piss off.
#56. To: Capitalist Eric (#55)
#57. To: harrowup (#51)
if there is a simple explanation why don't you calm down and just explain why mininggold answered a post directed to you?
#58. To: Capitalist Eric (#52)
Generally, I have a positivist mindset, though post-positivism allows more leeway in dealing with "what is truth?" type of questions. I can't say with 100% certainty, and it's just not worth my time to know...
#59. To: lucysmom, mininggold (#58)
That's all very interesting, and you are still 100% wrong.
#60. To: lucysmom (#58)
(Edited)
That's all very interesting, and you are still 100% wrong.
#61. To: mininggold, lucysmom, A K A Stone (#60)
If they want my answer then they need to ask ME the question, but then they need to blame Stone and my 7 posts per day limit for any untimely reply. But not a one has the balls to do so.
#62. To: Fred Mertz, mininggold, A K A Stone, lucysmom (#59)
This thread is hilarious. All the Sherlock Holmes wannabes - aren't. LOL
#63. To: Fred Mertz (#59)
All the Sherlock Holmes wannabes - aren't. LOL
#64. To: mininggold (#60)
Personally I'm not wasting my time on it anymore, because this bunch sure can't shoot straight and I have nothing further to offer that hasn't already been said.
#65. To: mininggold (#60)
#66. To: lucysmom, Murron, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, mininggold, (#64)
#67. To: harrowup (#66)
#68. To: war (#67)
#69. To: war, mininggold, lucysmom (#67)
Read my post on this thread.
#70. To: ALL (#0)
#71. To: war (#67)
#72. To: calcon (#70)
Who really gives a RAT'S ASS.
#73. To: A K A Stone (#68)
(Edited)
I don't mean to start an inquisition.
#74. To: war (#73)
#75. To: A K A Stone (#74)
#76. To: war, A K A Stone (#73)
I know for a fact that they are two different people. I know for a fact that they are two different people. I know for a fact...
#77. To: harrowup, A K A Stone (#66)
If anyone has a simple explanation then let's hear it and stop the juvenile resort to kicking the sand out of the box.
#78. To: A K A Stone (#68)
I don't mean to start an inquisition. But it isn't fair when someone uses two screen names to back themselves up.
#79. To: lucysmom (#77)
#80. To: A K A Stone (#74)
Sorry but your word isn't good enough.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]