[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse" "Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD" "Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy" Woodworking and Construction Hacks "CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination" "NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law" "Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing" Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn. After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending. Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar” "Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny" "Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is" Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner. Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally "It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive' (Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl "Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race" He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom! "Kamala’s Inane Talking Points" "The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics" Easy Drywall Patch Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind" Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’ Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer? hurricanes and heat waves are Worse 'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA. Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence. Status: Not Logged In; Sign In Leak a document See other Leak a document Articles Title: Lucysmom and mininggold are the same poster beware Source: [None] URL Source: [None] Published: Mar 7, 2012 Author: A K A Stone Post Date: 2012-03-07 15:19:16 by A K A Stone Keywords: None Views: 152956 Comments: 188 They are the same poster. Proof here on ths thread libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=21416&Disp=63#C63 You see minningold posted this #63. To: Wood_Chopper (#62) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 12:41:38 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit You see the only problem is that it was a post from Lucysmom. Here is her post #62. To: lucysmom (#53) Imagine how they would scream if government schools decided not to have children begin their day by pledging allegiance to the government You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. Wood_Chopper posted on 2011-06-21 12:38:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit #63. To: Wood_Chopper (#62) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 12:41:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit Replies to Comment # 63. #65. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#63) (Edited) You little sweetheart you, re-writing the pledge are you? So now its worded, "I pledge allegiance to the government" according to you. I see you've even resorted to changing my posts in order to try to make YOUR point. But I see you can't refute anything...... again. Hey yukon, you're answering a post I made to lucysmom and claiming it as yours. Too many windows open??? Are you and lucysmom one and the same? Wood_Chopper posted on 2011-06-21 12:56:52 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Edit In case someone thinks I edited it like the liberal trash here is trying to say. That isn't the case or someone would have noticed it at the time. Also anyone is free to contact pinguinite to have him confirm that nothing has been edited. So what we have here is a liberal who needs 2 screen names to back themselves up. That poster is such a lightweight that they try to make up for it by having 2 screen names. That is against the rules. The poster in question could never "man" up and answer the question. So a warning to all forums these people are one in the same. [Thread Locked]   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 88. #8. To: A K A Stone (#0) I have no interest of wading into the spastic monkey cage that Stone has turned this place into but I have to step in here to defend both LM and MG. You've totally lost it, Stone. LM and MG are two completely different people which is a fact that I can verify as of April of 2011. ON the other hand, you, AKA Stone, are one and the snme with MD, misogynistic douchebag. Nice site you have here, douchebag - as I predicted, btw. /dolt war  posted on  2012-03-08   8:34:19 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #9. To: war (#8) You can't confirm anything. Lucysmom/mininggold is a coward who can't debate without having two screen names. Even if you met one of them doesn't mean you met the other. You libtards can't handle the truth. Regardless nice to see you and hope all is ok with you. Take care. A K A Stone  posted on  2012-03-08   8:38:40 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #14. To: A K A Stone (#9) LM and MG are two completely different people which is a fact that I can verify as of April of 2011. Read it until you figure out what it means. If not, have a 5 year old explain what "two completely different people" means. Plain English is obviously well over your head. What's happened to you? I know that any intellectual sense of proportion waved "bye bye" to you a long time ago but you've since lost any sense of decency that you may have once possessed. That fact is reflected here in almost every post and thread. Your *site* has turned in to a Men's Room wall. war  posted on  2012-03-08   10:21:20 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #16. To: war (#14) Read it until you figure out what it means. If not, have a 5 year old explain what "two completely different people" means. Plain English is obviously well over your head. This thread is just too funny. Can you imagine these imbeciles with lots of guns and ammo. mininggold  posted on  2012-03-08   10:51:57 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #18. To: mininggold (#16) Can you imagine these imbeciles with lots of guns and ammo. Perish the thought! And pity on their toes. Fred Mertz  posted on  2012-03-08   11:32:46 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #19. To: Fred Mertz (#18) Perish the thought! And pity on their toes. All I know is it's too bad Don Knotts is dead, as he would be perfect for Stone's part. mininggold  posted on  2012-03-08   11:46:15 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #23. To: mininggold, war, Fred Mertz (#19) It is also a big coincidence that your two screen names don't post for yesterday. Then today show up One minute 23 seconds apart. You're not fooling anyone except those who want to be fooled. A K A Stone  posted on  2012-03-08   12:18:20 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #24. To: A K A Stone (#23) It is also a big coincidence that your two screen names don't post for yesterday. Yesterday lucysmom said she wouldn't post here until mininggold was reinstated, dim one. You could join us at The Peoples Forum, but you've already been banned there. You ran off Ferret Mike and buckeroo too. Way to go dim one! Fred Mertz  posted on  2012-03-08   12:23:40 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #26. To: Fred Mertz (#24) The coincidence part is they post 1:23 apart after not being here. Ming still never answered about the "changed post" that she claimed as hers but was her other screen name lucysmom. Are you really that stupid Fred? Did you actually go and read the comments? I didn't think so. A K A Stone  posted on  2012-03-08   12:29:38 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #27. To: A K A Stone (#26) I read that mininggold admitted to making a mistake. That was good enough evidence for me to see and make appropriate judgment. You, on the other hand, think it's a vast left wing conspiracy! LOLOL Fred Mertz  posted on  2012-03-08   12:32:25 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #36. To: Fred Mertz, mininggold, A K A Stone (#27) I read that mininggold admitted to making a mistake. Where did you read that, Fred? harrowup  posted on  2012-03-08   13:47:40 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #38. To: harrowup (#36) So you think mininggold and lucysmom are the same poster? I don't. As for 'the mistake' - that was implied or at least that was how I read it. Fred Mertz  posted on  2012-03-08   13:58:31 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #39. To: Fred Mertz, mininggold, A K A Stone (#38) So you think mininggold and lucysmom are the same poster? I don't. It appears that way on the record. As for 'the mistake' - that was implied or at least that was how I read it. There was ample time for an explanation which was not given anywhere; just a lot of yelling. It was possible the 'quote' to which mininggold replied was not the complete text but if that was the case mininggold could have said so and stopped accusing everyone of bad faith. harrowup  posted on  2012-03-08   14:12:27 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #44. To: harrowup, Fred Mertz, mininggold, A K A Stone (#39) So you think mininggold and lucysmom are the same poster? I don't. Fixed for accuracy. As for 'the mistake' - that was implied or at least that was how I read it. Before or AFTER the dingbat LM/ming accused Stone of changing her post? Hell, he didn't even know lucy and ming were one person, until I posted the proof, with a link back to the original post. There was ample time for an explanation which was not given anywhere; just a lot of yelling. Yep. It was possible the 'quote' to which mininggold replied was not the complete text but if that was the case mininggold could have said so and stopped accusing everyone of bad faith. Indeed. It might have gone down that way, but it didn't. There was never an explanation forthcoming by either of "them." I don't understand, honestly, why someone feels the urge to have multiple screen-names. Either a person is able to reasonably articulate and support their position, or they can't. How much of a loser leftist do you have to be, to use multiple IDs to keep from drowning in a sea of facts? It's pathetic, really. Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-03-08   14:44:12 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #47. To: Capitalist Eric (#44) People who post with numerous names, or who get together with other posters- to form online gangs- could very well suffer from Identity disorders. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/dissociative- disorders/DS00574/DSECTION=symptoms Disociative disorder, in the extremism can result in multiple personalities. Anyone who has multiple personalities- has been through huge amounts of trauma, so it really is not comical- but deeply painful. No doubt that among the online community there are people with severe personality disorders. I am not saying that the poster/posters lucymoms is suffering from that- just making the point that people who do post with numerous names could be very ill. I, personally, do not think they are the same people. I think they post in a tag team and make it appear they are the same. diva betsy ross  posted on  2012-03-08   16:25:02 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #52. To: diva betsy ross (#47) People who post with numerous names, or who get together with other posters- to form online gangs- could very well suffer from Identity disorders. Perhaps. I'm not going down that path, because I'm simply not qualified to. I, personally, do not think they are the same people. Generally, I have a positivist mindset, though post-positivism allows more leeway in dealing with "what is truth?" type of questions. I can't say with 100% certainty, and it's just not worth my time to know... I go by her/their behavior, responses to this whole question, and the words that I'd linked to. And this puts me at... say, 95% confidence. I can't prove that last 5% even if I wanted to, so I'm not going to worry about it. Yes, I think they're one and the same person, which is why I posted the links and quotes. The only editing I did, was reorder the complete quotes in such a way that it becomes very apparent why I believe as I do. At that point, others will judge whether my view may be valid, or not. It would seem that most posters believe my point is indeed valid- to say, the 95% confidence interval. Of course, had she strenuously denied the point, I believe the responses would have been far different to her position; after all, she can't prove a negative. But she's just a bit too arrogant, and a bit too stupid to understand that every attack, every snide remark made buries her just a little more, like a dinosaur in a tar-pit. Either way, it's not my problem; Stone had suspicions, I offered up what I had, and the rest is history. But honestly, given the concentration of leftist losers on this forum, I'm starting to get the feeling that it's time for me to move on. As my mother has told me, I've "no tolerance of fools," which is a requirement to be a leftist. Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-03-08   17:36:05 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #58. To: Capitalist Eric (#52) Generally, I have a positivist mindset, though post-positivism allows more leeway in dealing with "what is truth?" type of questions. I can't say with 100% certainty, and it's just not worth my time to know... I go by her/their behavior, responses to this whole question, and the words that I'd linked to. And this puts me at... say, 95% confidence. I can't prove that last 5% even if I wanted to, so I'm not going to worry about it. Yes, I think they're one and the same person, which is why I posted the links and quotes. The only editing I did, was reorder the complete quotes in such a way that it becomes very apparent why I believe as I do. At that point, others will judge whether my view may be valid, or not. It would seem that most posters believe my point is indeed valid- to say, the 95% confidence interval. Of course, had she strenuously denied the point, I believe the responses would have been far different to her position; after all, she can't prove a negative. But she's just a bit too arrogant, and a bit too stupid to understand that every attack, every snide remark made buries her just a little more, like a dinosaur in a tar-pit. Either way, it's not my problem; Stone had suspicions, I offered up what I had, and the rest is history. But honestly, given the concentration of leftist losers on this forum, I'm starting to get the feeling that it's time for me to move on. As my mother has told me, I've "no tolerance of fools," which is a requirement to be a leftist. That's all very interesting, and you are still 100% wrong. lucysmom  posted on  2012-03-08   22:44:33 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #60. To: lucysmom (#58) (Edited) That's all very interesting, and you are still 100% wrong. Are they still going at it? If they want my answer then they need to ask ME the question, but then they need to blame Stone and my 7 posts per day limit for any untimely reply. But not a one has the balls to do so. Personally I'm not wasting my time on it anymore, because this bunch sure can't shoot straight and I have nothing further to offer that hasn't already been said. mininggold  posted on  2012-03-09   1:42:34 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #64. To: mininggold (#60) Personally I'm not wasting my time on it anymore, because this bunch sure can't shoot straight and I have nothing further to offer that hasn't already been said. They are completely invested in the rightness of their theory and will not be dissuaded - true believers in a false reality. lucysmom  posted on  2012-03-09   8:22:48 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #66. To: lucysmom, Murron, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, mininggold, (#64) "Personally I'm not wasting my time on it anymore, because this bunch sure can't shoot straight and I have nothing further to offer that hasn't already been said." They are completely invested in the rightness of their theory and will not be dissuaded - true believers in a false reality. And of course the problem is that nothing has been said, (by mininggold or lucysmom)that answered the question. If anyone has a simple explanation then let's hear it and stop the juvenile resort to kicking the sand out of the box. The 'false reality' is of your own devise, lucy. harrowup  posted on  2012-03-09   8:40:29 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #77. To: harrowup, A K A Stone (#66) If anyone has a simple explanation then let's hear it and stop the juvenile resort to kicking the sand out of the box. Sometimes it's helpful to go back to original material - look what I found: #67. To: Wood_Chopper (#65) (Edited) Hey yukon, you're answering a post I made to lucysmom and claiming it as yours. Too many windows open??? Are you and lucysmom one and the same? Sorry, I forgot someone as perfect as yourself never makes mistakes. I see you put a call in to your mommy to help you out. mininggold posted on 2011-06-21 13:01:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Why wasn't mininggold's explanation been included in Stone's "proof"? Do you reject mininggold's explanation? BTW, Wood_Chopper is on my bozo list and has been for a long time - does it make sense to you that I would bozo someone as lucysmom, and not as mininggold? You fearless investigators could check out your theory by reviewing both mininggold's and my posting history over - say - the past year. lucysmom  posted on  2012-03-09   9:34:48 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #79. To: lucysmom (#77) Someone I trust thinks I'm wrong. I still think I'm right but will probably let it pass. I hope you would at least admit the comment is suspicious? Can you admit that much? I've already bumped mings posting limit up. Maybe I will remove it entirely. Let me think on it. I would also hope you agree that it is fair for me to want people to only have one screen name. I will also admit that if someone slips by and has 2 names it is not the end of the world. Buck does it all the time. I zap them as I find them. His are easier as he has the same ip numbers. This wasn't because of your politics which are different then mine. If you remember I took the thread down a while back because I was going to let it pass until I received the message containing the comment in question. Then I opened it back up because my interest stirred. Sincerely A K A Stone A K A Stone  posted on  2012-03-09   9:42:28 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #88. To: A K A Stone (#79) I still think I'm right but will probably let it pass. Weasel words! I hope you would at least admit the comment is suspicious? Can you admit that much? mininggold said at the time, she made a mistake, did you bother to read that far before launching your attack, or just ignore what she said? This wasn't because of your politics which are different then mine. Then funny you should mention it. lucysmom  posted on  2012-03-09   10:03:44 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 88. #89. To: lucysmom (#88) mininggold said at the time, she made a mistake, did you bother to read that far before launching your attack, or just ignore what she said? Of course if you fuck up and are caught you are going to say you made a mistake. Mininggold also said I changed the post. Which is it? A K A Stone  posted on  2012-03-09 10:06:07 ET  [Locked]   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   End Trace Mode for Comment # 88. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com