United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Talk Show Host Calls Woman A Slut...The Video (Must See)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 5, 2012
Author: Ed Schultz
Post Date: 2012-03-05 18:24:24 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 4330
Comments: 17
Poster Comment: Carbonite advertises on MSNBC. Sounds like a hypocrite.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
He apologized and was suspended from MSNBC for a couple of weeks.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'! Could you post this at the peoples forum. For some balance. I understand if you are afraid of the wrath of Robin for posting something like this.
No. I would have to activate some features in my browser that I do not use on these type forums to grab the video. Sorry. ;) BTW, why are you so concerned about 'balance' on The Peoples Forum? Thought you hated the place.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'! I just don't like liberal places.
Have you examined the positions of GOP candidates with any depth other than a cursory glance? They are MORE liberal than any conservatives at the moment other than Ron Paul.
We don't have the best choices. Ron Paul isn't perfect either. He doesn't support constitutional ban on queers pretending they are married. He is a little soft on abortion. He's for legalizing silly drugs like heroin. He isn't going to win. Who knows how I will vote tomorrow.
That is because YOU don't ask for better governance. One area that I see as YOUR weak point, is that YOU base just about everything on single issues without many principles; this is the same problem that confronts America no matter who you vote for ... with the singular exception of Ron Paul. So find some "dirt" on him. Your viewpoint is not written in the US Constitution. Where is it written that your concern a federal issue? You are a nutcase, as is usual. It is a state's rights issue. Again, you are a nutcase, as is usual. It is a state's rights issue. That is because you place yourself into a fixated or rigid idea, that a man is BIG because they have the GOP behind them. Kinda like your idea of "yukon" being a good guy. You can not establish yourself on political principles because of your own rigid and often make-believe ideas that have nothing to do with reality.
Why would anyone consider a murderer as a viable candidate? Or someone who says some people are less equal and subject to being killed without recourse. Only a sicko would vote for someone like that.
You are a nutcase, as is usual. It is a state's rights issue. No it isn't. No stat has a right to deprive you of liberty or life without due process of law. Any system that says a state has a right to kill innocent human beings is a system I want no part of. You're wrong.
Whom is murderer? The GOP/Dem political parties? Name NAMES... it isn't Ron Paul.
Oh, horseSHIT yet again. The federal government does this same ACTION ALL the time violating the US Constitution.
The abortionist. The mother who hires or has the state hire the abortionist. Every politician that ever voted for legal abortion. All supreme court "justices" who usurped power and sentenced millions of babies to death.
Yes that is true. But truly illegitimate.
And what is your silly point? I corrected YOU?
Ron Paul was NEVER an abortionist. The US Constitution sets no precedence for this matter is all. There is no federal reason to be involved JUST LIKE AMERICA MURDERING HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD PLAYING GOD IN WARLIKE GAMES SINCE 1947.
You are a nutcase, as is usual. It is a state's rights issue. He's for legalizing silly drugs like heroin. Again, you are a nutcase, as is usual. It is a state's rights issue. who says? the us constitution? you people just can't be consistent can you? gotta fling in some nuance or slick interpretation / opinion to round those corners. yeah yeah...i know. border issues, dope, baby whacking, various other items that formulate any concept of a country's moral / cultural fiber etc.... all state's right issues. again...says who other than the libertarian / anarchist who is cornered on such things? thanks but i like the fact that new mexico can't just up and place benevidos signs, sluts from colorado can't just cross over to nebraska for 3rd trimester baby killing, georgia folks can't just trek down to florida for their crystal meth -- all without any "state's rights" consequences since the "majority rules" in your moblike scenario . make these example states the mini nation hellholes you anarchists hope for and the normal people remaining will exodus right on out to normal states leaving these "mob rule democracies" to be ruled by whatever groups can manage to suck in as many like minded voters - which means we really have no united states. fyi we are supposed to reside in a constitutionally based representative republic. Got it? Not a mish mash of mini countries. holland is nice from your perspective - sounds like just the place for you all.
Death to everybody who does not get outta my way. (decided to retire the beatdowns on old worthless retread posters that are bozoed)
false. just that your supposition must be that a fetus really has no human rights until it's actually out of the chute and crying it's first cry. that's how you people can make such a doofus statement. afterall we all know a fetus is just a blob of organic matter right? no certainty that that blob might won't just come out of the mother as something less than human right?
Death to everybody who does not get outta my way. (decided to retire the beatdowns on old worthless retread posters that are bozoed)
#2. To: Brian S (#1)
#3. To: A K A Stone (#2)
Could you post this at the peoples forum. For some balance.
#4. To: Brian S (#3)
#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)
I just don't like liberal places.
#6. To: buckeroo (#5)
#7. To: A K A Stone (#6)
We don't have the best choices.
Ron Paul isn't perfect either.
He doesn't support constitutional ban on queers pretending they are married.
He is a little soft on abortion.
He's for legalizing silly drugs like heroin.
He isn't going to win. Who knows how I will vote tomorrow.
#8. To: buckeroo (#7)
That is because YOU don't ask for better governance. One area that I see as YOUR weak point, is that YOU base just about everything on single issues without many principles; this is the same problem that confronts America no matter who you vote for ... with the singular exception of Ron Paul.
#9. To: buckeroo (#7)
He is a little soft on abortion.
#10. To: A K A Stone (#8)
#11. To: A K A Stone (#9)
No it isn't. No stat has a right to deprive you of liberty or life without due process of law.
#12. To: buckeroo (#10)
Whom is murderer? The GOP/Dem political parties? Name NAMES... it isn't Ron Paul.
#13. To: buckeroo (#11)
Oh, horseSHIT yet again. The federal government does this same ACTION ALL the time violating the US Constitution.
#14. To: A K A Stone (#13)
Yes that is true. But truly illegitimate.
#15. To: A K A Stone (#12)
The abortionist. The mother who hires or has the state hire the abortionist. Every politician that ever voted for legal abortion. All supreme court "justices" who usurped power and sentenced millions of babies to death.
#16. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone (#7)
(Edited)
He is a little soft on abortion.
#17. To: buckeroo (#15)
The US Constitution sets no precedence for this matter is all.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]