Title: Democratic Women Boycott House Contraception Hearing After Republicans Prevent Women From Testifying Source:
http://thinkprogress.org URL Source:http://thinkprogress.org/health/201 ... venting-women-from-testifying/ Published:Feb 16, 2012 Author:Igor Volsky Post Date:2012-02-16 15:42:35 by Ferret Mike Keywords:None Views:38056 Comments:90
This morning, Democrats tore into House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) for preventing women from testifying before a hearing examining the Obama administrations new regulation requiring employers and insurers to provide contraception coverage to their employees. Republicans oppose the administrations rule and have sponsored legislation that would allow employers to limit the availability of birth control to women.
Ranking committee member Elijah Cummings (D-MD) had asked Issa to include a female witness at the hearing, but the Chairman refused, arguing that As the hearing is not about reproductive rights and contraception but instead about the Administrations actions as they relate to freedom of religion and conscience, he believes that Ms. Fluke is not an appropriate witness.
And so Cummings, along with the Democratic women on the panel, took their request to the hearing room, demanding that Issa consider the testimony of a female college student. But the California congressman insisted that the hearing should focus on the rules alleged infringement on religious liberty, not contraception coverage, and denied the request. Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) walked out of the hearing in protest of his decision, citing frustration over the fact that the first panel of witnesses consisted only of male religious leaders against the rule. Holmes Norton said she will not return, calling Issas chairmanship an autocratic regime.
Watch a compilation of the heated exchange:
ky on Feb 16, 2012 at 10:52 am
This morning, Democrats tore into House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) for preventing women from testifying before a hearing examining the Obama administrations new regulation requiring employers and insurers to provide contraception coverage to their employees. Republicans oppose the administrations rule and have sponsored legislation that would allow employers to limit the availability of birth control to women.
Ranking committee member Elijah Cummings (D-MD) had asked Issa to include a female witness at the hearing, but the Chairman refused, arguing that As the hearing is not about reproductive rights and contraception but instead about the Administrations actions as they relate to freedom of religion and conscience, he believes that Ms. Fluke is not an appropriate witness.
And so Cummings, along with the Democratic women on the panel, took their request to the hearing room, demanding that Issa consider the testimony of a female college student. But the California congressman insisted that the hearing should focus on the rules alleged infringement on religious liberty, not contraception coverage, and denied the request. Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) walked out of the hearing in protest of his decision, citing frustration over the fact that the first panel of witnesses consisted only of male religious leaders against the rule. Holmes Norton said she will not return, calling Issas chairmanship an autocratic regime.
Watch a compilation of the heated exchange:
A picture of the witness table:
Issa also dismissed the Democrats woman witness as a college student who does not have the appropriate credentials to testify before his committee.
I guess that makes you an advocate of exposing babies to the elements. If the baby dies, well, hey - it was God's will; or at least someone else's fault.
I guess that makes you an advocate of exposing babies to the elements. If the baby dies, well, hey - it was God's will; or at least someone else's fault.
No I am in favor of wrapping a baby in a warm blanket. You are for Obama who is for killing babies adults and foreigners. Why do you a person who is supposed to be good support evil people?
You might be in favor yet you would do nothing to provide the same to a baby in need. To do so would brand the parents as socialists.
I've wrapped plenty of babies in warm blankets. Your words have no basis in truth or fact. I think it is strange that you think wrapping a baby up in a warm blanket is considered socialist by anyone. Did anyone ever run over your head with a truck? Just curious.