LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Communism by ... insurance --- mandate
Source:
rightwingnews.com
URL Source: http://rightwingnews.com/column-2/communism-by-insurance-mandate/
Published: Feb 16, 2012
Author: Ann Coulter
Post Date: 2012-02-16 12:40:54 by BorisY
Keywords: nazis, nazis, nazis
Views: 18011
Comments: 43
Communism by insurance mandate Written By : Ann Coulter One theory for why Barack Obama pushed the contraception mandate right now is that it helps Rick Santorum. Others theorize it’s because Obama is an anti-religious bigot with a left-wing agenda. Reasonable minds can disagree on this. But it may end up helping Mitt Romney by reminding people that the “individual mandate” is the least of the problems with ObamaCare. (The “individual mandate” is simply the legal argument for why ObamaCare is unconstitutional in a country that has accepted Social Security and Medicare as constitutional.) This isn’t a Catholic issue or even a religious issue. Conservatives are falling into the Democrats’ trap by denouncing it as such. It’s a freedom issue. (Or, as Democrats call it, “the F-word.”) If liberals like it, it’s subsidized; if they don’t, it’s prohibited. And now they can impose their left-wing authoritarianism on the entire country by calling their mandates and prohibitions “insurance.” Liberal fundamentalists say: I don’t see why anyone needs to hunt; I don’t know why anyone needs to eat meat; I don’t see why anyone needs to bathe every day; I don’t know why anyone minds looking at urine in a low-flow toilet; I don’t know why anyone needs an incandescent light bulb … Screw you, liberals. I don’t know why anyone needs an abortion, free contraception, crap-ass “art” with photos of vaginas on the Virgin Mary, non-farming farmers or a $1 million pension for Anthony Weiner. But I’m forced to subsidize all of that. And now we’re all going to be forced to subsidize the entire wish list of the Berkeley City Council, recast as “health insurance.” Insurance is not supposed to be for normal expenses in the ordinary course of events, such as multivitamins, house painting or oil changes. Insurance is for unexpected catastrophes: fires, accidents, cancer. The basic idea is to spread the risk of unforeseen disasters. Filling up your gas tank, for example, is not an unforeseen disaster (though it’s getting to be under Obama). So why is birth control covered by insurance? Birth control pills aren’t that expensive — generics are about $20 a month — nor is the need for them a bolt out of the blue. Why not have health insurance cover manicures, back massages, carrot cake and nannies? Liberals huffily ask why it’s so important to the Catholic Church not to pay for insurance plans that cover birth control, but the better question is: Why is it so important to liberals to force them to? (Wait until they have to buy coverage for vibrating butt-plugs!) The answer is: They want the government giving official sanction to birth control and, later, abortion. That comes next. They want it for same reason gays want gay marriage — it’s purely symbolic. Following Betty Friedan, gender feminists believe the pill is so central to what we are as a nation that it must be paid for by all, i.e. by insurance. The argument for fully subsidized abortions will be: We don’t vote on a basic human right! Whether or not it’s a “right,” it’s not an area for “insurance.” Abortion is an elective procedure. No families are going bankrupt because they had to pay for an abortion — which costs about as much as a haircut for John Edwards or Bill Clinton. Can’t we limit the health insurance we are all required by federal law to purchase to financially ruinous, actual medical problems? No, that is not in the cards. Just as liberals have turned the Constitution into a vehicle for achieving all the left-wing policies they could never get Americans to vote for, now they are going to use “insurance” for the same purpose. Their new method doesn’t even require them to get votes from five justices on the Supreme Court. The secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, will do it all on her own. Anything close to the beating heart of feminism is about to become a mandatory part of insurance coverage: fertility treatments, chemical sensitivities, a year’s leave of absence for fathers after the birth of a child, attention deficit disorder, massages, aromatherapy, watching MSNBC, sex change operations, gender reassignment surgery, gender re-reassignment surgery. And then, once every single insurance plan in the country is required by federal law to cover one million liberal causes having nothing to do with medical problems, Democrats will be happy to let us purchase health insurance across state lines. Sure, buy your insurance from Utah or Kentucky. Every insurance plan in the country, by federal law, will be identical. The contraception diktat is only the beginning of the government controlling your life under ObamaCare. There are approximately 100,000 more decisions the HHS Secretary will have to make under ObamaCare that you will not be able to appeal. The bill should have been called “Kathleen Sebelius’ Dream Journal.” As we have seen, Sebelius is not a go-with-the-flow kind of secretary. She is a doctrinaire feminist who thinks it’s important to make a statement by ordering something that has only a tangential connection to health care but will have the effect of costing everyone more money. Are you getting why this isn’t a Catholic issue? So what if some “compromise” is reached that makes the Catholic bishops happy? They supported ObamaCare to begin with! They ought to be forced to live with the consequences of the totalitarian regime they helped foist on the rest of us. Maybe they’ll get a waiver from the contraception mandate on religious grounds — just like unions and Obama-friendly corporations got waivers on the grounds that they realized ObamaCare would suck and they didn’t want to be a part of it. What about the rest of us? You know, the ones who didn’t support ObamaCare? We still have to live under the thumb of a nutcase gender-feminist with unlimited authority to ban whatever she doesn’t like, subsidize whatever she does like and call it “insurance.” If Obama is re-elected this November and ObamaCare is not repealed, Republicans’ only option will be to make Rick Santorum the head of HHS under the next Republican president (if we ever have one). He can prohibit insurance companies from covering anything related to contraception, AIDS and substance abuse, and mandate that insurance plans pay subsidies to stay-at-home mothers, tuition for home-schooled kids and cover the purchase of his book, “It Takes a Family.” Those particular lifestyle choices have as much to do with “insurance” as contraceptives do.
Poster Comment: TYRANNY - WHITE SLAVERY BY ENDLESS MASSAGE - GIMMEES
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-2) not displayed.
.
.
.
#3. To: BorisY (#2)
The sentence is easily understandable to anyone who comprehends English. Which I doubt you do since you ask questions using an exclamation mark.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
stupid ! It's not a question ! Communism by ... insurance --- mandate - massage - butt licking ! You like it don't you !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Even I, the official LF bimbo, understood what you meant.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
The Church's tax exempt status means that I am subsidizing a massive institution that is actively working to limit my freedom, particularly my freedom as a women.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
How about a Nothing's free Republic - party ! That's how we got ourselves in this mess ! Suicide - murder is an option - freedom - choice ! Even owl gore said a fall not exceeding the height of the jump is fun - free !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
That's how we got ourselves in this mess ! Suicide - murder is an option - freedom - choice ! Even owl gore said a fall not exceeding the height of the jump is fun - free ! How about you learning proper punctuation before you preach to others about their deficiencies?
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
I do have some pity on the brainwashed masses ! It seemed that indeed the truth would be 'forever on the scaffold, and wrong forever on the throne'. With great eagerness he listened to the query, 'How long shall be the vision?'(Daniel 8:13)." Daniel and the Coming King Chapter 16 The Gospel In Daniel 9:24 By Dr.Desmond Ford "It would be tragic if we contented ourselves with an analytical examination of this passage of Scripture. It is not merely a scintillating gem to be admired, but the bread of life to be eaten. It consists of 'the everlasting gospel' in minature." "That which should concern us all the more than the issues of hermeneutics is the issue of life---our life. Not minutiae of prophetic interpretation, but sin, sorrow, and death constitute our problems. Daniel 9:24 assures us that the world is a ship and not an iceberg, that God is intensely interested in our dilemma, and, best of all, that He has done something to extricate us from the apparent cul-de-sac of existence. In Christ, the Melchizedekan King-Priest, He has brought in everlasting righteousness, freely offered to all who believe." Chapter 14 Daniel and the Coming King---Daniel 9 By Dr.Desmond Ford "Sir Isaac Newton, the greatest of scientists prior to the modern period, wrote a commentary upon the prohecies of Daniel and Revelations. He desribed Daniel 9:24-27 as "the foudation-stone of the Christian religion" because centuries in advance it gave the time of appearance of the Messiah and His death, as well as a comprehensive description of His saving work in heaven and earth. The prophecy likewise tells what would be the fate of the Jews consequent upon their rejection of the One whose coming they had long anticpated. The destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, foretold in Daniel 9:24-27, was history's testimony that the offerings and services of the sanctuary had met their fulfillment in the advent of the promised Messiah." Newton, Isaac. Observsations Upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalpse of St. John. London: J. Darby and T. Browne, 1733 (Isaac Newton) Chapter 14 Daniel and the Coming King---Daniel 9 by Dr.Desmond Ford Seal Up the Vision "The expression 'to seal up the vision' (v.24) should be considered. This expression, 'the vision', occurs eleven times in Daniel 8:1 to 10:1, and in all these cases it refers to the vision described in the eighth chapter of Daniel. The reader is advised to read again the entire passage. In pictorial, symbolic form the prophet was shown the unfolding of all future centuries till the second advent of Christ. The famous empires, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome, which long oppressed the people of God, are described; but particular emphasis is given to the persecution of the church during the Christian era and also to the supremacy of the couterfeit, apostate religion over most of that period. Christ's mediatorial ministry in heaven is alluded to, but its eclipse from men's mind through a counterfeit system is fortold. The sanctuary mentioned refers both to the church temple indwelt by the Holy Spirit on earth, as well as Israel's typical sanctuary. No doubt Daniel was dazed by this revelation of the apparent triumph of evil. In his lifetime he had witnessed the destruction of Jerusalem's temple, the center of true religion, and the carrying into captivity of the people of God by an idolatrous and desolating nation. Now in vision he is informed that this state of affairs is to continue on a much greater scale throughout most of the earth's history. It seemed that indeed the truth would be 'forever on the scaffold, and wrong forever on the throne'. With great eagerness he listened to the query, 'How long shall be the vision?'(Daniel 8:13)." "Now in the revelation of 9:24-27 the mourning seer is told that there is a greater Prince of the house of Judah, a greater atonement, a greater sanctuary, and a greater redemption than any ever before experienced by Israel. The long- awaited Messiah, the Prince, a Priest-King, will take away the sin of the world and end earth's dark night. Thus 9:24 and 8:14 point to the same reality---the kingdom of God ignaugurated at the first advent and consummated at the second." Don't think many of you - your kind will fit in ! ... ps Re reading revelations I saw that the return will be a chainsaw - lightning bolt in hand - mouth ! Why are you so worried about punctuation - trivial matters !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Now the battle of the battling 'Christian' Bible quoter begins. Yet not one word or phrase from Jesus will be quoted.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
I doubt any punctuation could make that jumble of a post intelligible.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
And she might as well be a fortune teller.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
Are you going to barter your destiny ! It will be too late - after the fact - for that ! Most of the Christian world is on bated breath !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Is Boris a woman? His/her post #13 proves you correct.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
I know a LA cop who told a minority his mother in law expired ! He asked how bad is that ! Such love - innocence is inspiring !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
It will be too late - after the fact - for that ! Most of the Christian world is on bated breath ! So when are you going to treat Jesus, the whole reason that the Bible exists in the first place, as someone worthy of quoting?
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
How about ... on this rock I will build my people --- the gates of hell will not prevail against them ! kind of amazing when you think of what they are unloading on them !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
So, Jesus knocks down all your OT predictions in one quote.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
Did you see ! The ... real OT goldi --- is reading the NT - revelations ! http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=319085&Disp=19#C19
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
The real OT goldi is reading the NT - revelations ! All you need to do is supply examples from Jesus's teachings to back up your arguments. Most of Revelations happened centuries ago. But it makes convenient fodder for fortune tellers.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
You piano needs tuning ! too many knots - splices - rat nests ! More like a player piano in a freak show !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
too many knots - splices - rat nests ! More like a player piano in a freak show ! Which doesn't obscure the fact that as a professed Christian YOU should be able to quote or use Jesus Christ as an example for your thesis.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
The anarchist obomba Jesus ! This is the 2nd coming - 10 commandment Jesus I'm channelling Him !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Boris quotes Desmond Ford who redefines the role of Jesus As Ford teaches it the justification by grace alone on the cross needs to be complimented by a second movement of grace which is justification by faith alone. It is here Ford’s thinking becomes confusing. In his teaching the justification by grace (on the cross) is a divine pronouncement of forgiveness that remains suspended and accomplishes nothing on its own account until the sinner comes to accept it. When the sinner comes to believe he puts his faith, not in Christ directly, but in God’s sovereign decree. The sinner’s faith energises a decree made on their behalf 2000 years ago and that decree is then put into effect for that individual. In Ford’s teaching faith is not faith in Christ, it is faith in the validity of a divine pronouncement. Ford has invented a way of denying Christ under the pretext of honouring Him. Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
I personally saw him lecture ... " the evil will be at the end times resurrected along with the righteous all because of Jesus Christ they will automatically have been given forgiveness - eternal life --- so they will have to be put to death again for not accepting it " ! Take you chances with the liberal jesus bs I won't !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
"The sentence is easily understandable to anyone who comprehends English." "Even I, the official LF bimbo, understood what you meant." You, the 'official LF bimbo, is easely stumped if someone mis-spells a word..by one letter. I noticed that when Stone mis-spelled a word, any 'retard' (but yourself) understood what the word was, but you, you are either really, really as stupid as you come off, or you just like showing yourself for the smart ass you are. jmho!
(Ferret Mike: "The best way to lead is by example. If we got rid of nuclear weapons, it would be profoundly easier to justify acting against other nations should they act to develop them.")
That probably explains why role of Jesus Christ in the religious movement named for him seems anathema to Boris.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
or maybe I was giving Stone more credit than he deserved.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Apparently Boris' relationship with Jesus is such that he/she needs Ford to interpret for him/her.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Hey Mammy! How are things down in Dogpatch these days?
You know, as long as I have lived here, I have never seen Dogpatch.
(Ferret Mike: "The best way to lead is by example. If we got rid of nuclear weapons, it would be profoundly easier to justify acting against other nations should they act to develop them.")
You know, as long as I have lived here, I have never seen Dogpatch. Liberals not only insist on their leaders embrace child murder but they are also rude to ladies.
I've noticed. If we were to really get into a discussion about stereotypes, we could find them all over the map, in every state of the union, and those who insult me have NO PLACE to brag. And you're right, they are very rude to ladies, could be their upbringing, or the area they were raised. ;)
(Ferret Mike: "The best way to lead is by example. If we got rid of nuclear weapons, it would be profoundly easier to justify acting against other nations should they act to develop them.")
Mammy ain't no lady.
So Murron is really a dude pretending to be a lady?
I'm using the term "lady" as one that implies some class. I think I'll go do a search on you and lucysmom to see if you're a liberal too.
I think I'll go do a search on you and lucysmom to see if you're a liberal too. Honestly. You would have better luck searching my posts to mininggold. I'm nicer to lucysmom.
So you've got three women who post here? I'm not counting diva or mel, because I'm not sure what they are.
Then there is diva, mel and maybe someone else.
Well, yeah, but as I mentioned to Biff today, I think they're the same person. No matter what site you go to, if one of them is there, the other one will be there too.
You never know. But I've never thought that.
The so-called conservatives on your site prove everyday that liberals don't have a patent on rude to ladies.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
You may have a point. Unless I use Skippys answer and say it has to do with class. ;)
Are you talking about our govt school system !
#4. To: mininggold (#3)
(Edited)
#5. To: mininggold (#3)
The sentence is easily understandable to anyone who comprehends English.
#6. To: BorisY (#4)
You like it don't you !
#7. To: lucysmom (#6)
#8. To: BorisY (#7)
(Edited)
How about a Nothing's free Republic - party !
#9. To: lucysmom (#6)
(Edited)
#10. To: BorisY (#9)
#11. To: mininggold, BorisY (#8)
How about you learning proper punctuation.
#12. To: lucysmom (#11)
I doubt any punctuation could make that jumble of a post intelligible.
#13. To: mininggold (#10)
Yet not one word or phrase from Jesus will be quoted
#14. To: mininggold (#12)
And she might as well be a fortune teller.
#15. To: lucysmom (#11)
#16. To: BorisY (#13)
Are you going to barter your destiny !
#17. To: mininggold (#16)
(Edited)
the whole reason that the Bible exists
#18. To: BorisY (#17)
(Edited)
How about ... on this rock I will build my people --- the gates of hell will not prevail against it !
#19. To: mininggold (#18)
(Edited)
#20. To: BorisY (#19)
Did you see !
#21. To: mininggold (#20)
(Edited)
#22. To: BorisY (#21)
You piano needs tuning !
#23. To: mininggold (#22)
(Edited)
#24. To: mininggold (#22)
Which doesn't obscure the fact that as a professed Christian YOU should be able to quote or use Jesus Christ as an example for your thesis.
#25. To: lucysmom (#24)
In his teaching the justification by grace (on the cross) is a divine pronouncement of forgiveness that remains suspended and accomplishes nothing on its own account until the sinner comes to accept it.
#26. To: lucysmom, mininggold, A K A Stone (#5)
#27. To: lucysmom (#24)
Boris quotes Desmond Ford who redefines the role of Jesus
#28. To: Murron (#26)
I noticed that when Stone mis-spelled a word, any 'retard' (but yourself) understood what the word was, but you, you are either really, really as stupid as you come off...
#29. To: mininggold (#27)
That probably explains why role of Jesus Christ in the religious movement named for him seems anathema to Boris.
#30. To: Murron (#26)
You, ....., is easely stumped
#31. To: Skip Intro (#30)
Hey Mammy! How are things down in Dogpatch these days?
#32. To: Murron (#31)
Hey Mammy! How are things down in Dogpatch these days?
#33. To: A K A Stone (#32)
Liberals not only insist on their leaders embrace child murder but they are also rude to ladies.
#34. To: A K A Stone (#32)
#35. To: Skip Intro (#34)
Mammy ain't no lady.
#36. To: A K A Stone (#35)
So Murron is really a dude pretending to be a lady?
#37. To: Skip Intro (#36)
I'm using the term "lady" as one that implies some class.
#38. To: A K A Stone (#37)
#39. To: Skip Intro (#38)
#40. To: A K A Stone (#39)
hen there is diva, mel and maybe someone else.
#41. To: Skip Intro (#40)
#42. To: A K A Stone (#32)
Liberals not only insist on their leaders embrace child murder but they are also rude to ladies.
#43. To: lucysmom (#42)
The so-called conservatives on your site prove everyday that liberals don't have a patent on rude to ladies.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]