United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: FR and LP, All In for Newt
Source:
buzzfeed
URL Source: http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/i ... et-callista-gingrichs-hair-but
Published: Feb 11, 2012
Author: me
Post Date: 2012-02-11 12:19:29 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 88781
Comments: 200
The two most prominent newt supporters on FR and LP rimjob and marguerite have decided to try anything to built up Newt's sagging campaign. Since they're are both stone call broke and too cheap to donate anyway, they have come up with a new ploy to bolster newt. The callistra You too can show your support for newt but going to Buzzfeed http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/it-costs-400-to-get-callista-gingrichs-hair-but
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-122) not displayed.
.
.
.
#123. To: buckeroo (#120)
At the risk of being accused of torturing an idiot, I'll ask anyway. What the hell are you jibbering about now.
Yeah, it is, or you'd be able to answer the question outright. You're not fooling anyone, especially not yourself.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
The question has been answered multiple times in multiple venues. bucky says he is preparing a bio; ask him to search his database.
Posting to you has become a FUCKING waste of time, admiral. You are so FUCKING stupid that you are boring me further. FUCK OFF.
Oh, dear me, poopsie. Don't let everyone known you're not up to the task of playing with a toy that keeps whacking you up the side the head. Head over to ToonTown and get yourself some Acme protection.
The quiet of the night, and your thoughts, are inevitable, and inescapable.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
You got a screw loose in your cockpit equipment. And there is no cohesive method to repair your FUCKING self. You shall just have to live with your own echo worthless chamber consisting of two demented brain cells rubbing together from time to time. Let us see where you have solidly wrecked yourself, admiral: you have your lips locked on yukon's genitals, you have your misplaced head up your own ass and a tongue up Sally's ass. And, there is no way of repair.
What? Do you and bucky exchange the gibberish manual?
A common treatment for dyslexia is for the subject to read what they have written 24 hours after the message. They are asked then to edit or otherwise interpret the message again. If they recognize the errors they are then asked to always write their sentences twice before using. It is tedious but helpful and doesn't require additional pharmaceutical adjunct therapy. Then of course, there is always the possibility that your drug/alcohol use will always interfere with any treatment applied. Good luck, get happy with who you are; your family is getting frustrated.
Nightey night.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
silly boy, i have no anger with LP or Goldi, she said no hit pieces on candidates and I did three breaking news articles in a row against her preferred candidate. Did I expect to get banned, Yes. Did I get banned, Yes. So it's over and done. I'm not a whiny little girl like you clowns who come up with some ridiculous CT to try in cover one of your boys indiscretions.
And sonny, guilt is not in my lexicon. wood_chopper can you believe this silly old man, my all in for newt thread was a joke thread about FR and LP owners going crazy over Newt. it's primary purpose was to post funny pics of people in Newt wife's hairdo wigs. his wife so cracks me up. so my big lie was a joke thread clearly intended for laughs. you way off your game tonight, admiral
you way off your game tonight, admiral The admiral's an idiot? Who knew? (other than the entire internet crowd after witnessing the "I wuz hacked" saga). ;-)
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
Episode 147: December 6, 2008 General Grammar Comments (44) Tip Sponsored By Grammar Girl here. Today's topic is mixed metaphors. Politicians often provide good fodder for language commentary, and one of Barack Obama's comments during the debates has been rattling around in my head for a while now. He made a comment that some people think he's "green behind the ears," and that struck me as a mixed metaphor. What Is a Metaphor? I'll back up. First, a metaphor is a way of comparing two unrelated things to make your point more vivid. For example, Shakespeare said, "All the world's a stage." He compared the world to a stage to make his point that we're all like actors in a play. That's a metaphor. Another example of a well-known metaphor is to say someone is walking on thin ice. It is a way of saying someone is doing something dangerous and creates a vivid image of a person needing to behave carefully to avoid falling through an ice covered lake. The big difference between a metaphor and a simile is that a metaphor doesn't use the word "like" and a simile does. For example, it's a metaphor to say "All the world's a stage," and it's a simile to say "All the world is like a stage." Not a big difference in meaning, but it's the kind of thing you can get tripped up on if you're in school and you have to take a test about similes and metaphors. You can remember that similes use the word "like" because "simile" has the letter "l" in it. What Is a Mixed Metaphor? So back to mixed metaphors. A mixed metaphor is when someone combines two unrelated metaphors. For example, two common metaphors someone can use to tell you to get a clue are “wake up and smell the coffee,” implying you need to be more alert, and “read the writing on the wall,” implying you need to see the bad news that is already right in front of you. A radio host once told me his favorite mixed metaphor combined those two. Someone told him to “Wake up and smell the coffee on the wall.” Suddenly the imagery doesn't make so much sense. Did someone throw coffee on the wall? Sports metaphors tend to be popular and they're also easy to mix. For example, if you tried to motivate your co-workers by saying, “It's our turn at bat, so let's make this touchdown for the company,” you'd have mixed baseball and American football metaphors, and if you try to imagine the image that goes with the metaphor, you don't know whether to put your players on a baseball field or a football field. Can Mixed Metaphors Be Fun? Because they usually undermine the imagery of both of the metaphors that are combined, mixed metaphors are generally considered bad form. But sometimes people also like to play with mixed metaphors. It can be a fun way to turn a cliché on its head. For example, I've seen people mix the metaphors “Let's cross that bridge when we come to it,” meaning let's put off the decision, and “Don't burn your bridges” meaning don't destroy a something you'll need later. They get “We'll burn that bridge when we come to it,” which combines the meaning of the two metaphors into something like “We're ready to fight when the right time comes,” and still maintains imagery that makes sense. Did Obama Mix Metaphors? So back to Obama and his “green behind the ears” statement. I immediately thought that he was mixing “wet behind the ears” with “green” -- two different metaphors that mean someone is naïve, young, or inexperienced. The most common explanation for why “wet behind the ears” means young is that new babies are born covered in fluid, so they're wet, and behind the ears is one of the last places that dries if they aren't wiped off (1, 2). There are a few reasons “green” can mean young and inexperienced – branches are green before they harden into brown wood, and apparently horns can also be green in young animals, thus the word “greenhorn (3, 4).” Obama certainly wasn't the first person to utter “green behind the ears.” I found multiple examples of previous use in publications including The New York Times (5, 6), The Economist (7), and the Financial Times (8), but just because other people said it first doesn't mean it isn't a mixed metaphor. Commentators on Ben Zimmer's column about Obama's mixed metaphor pointed out that the German equivalent of “green behind the ears” -- “grün hinter den Ohren” -- is common in Germany (9), and a Google search does show that it comes up more frequently than “green behind the ears,” so I tend to believe the commentators although I have no first-hand knowledge of the saying in German*. Finally, I surveyed my Twitter friends, and a couple of people said that “green behind the ears” is a common metaphor used by corn farmers and refers to young ears of corn. I was unable to verify this, but Obama is from Illinois – a corn growing region – so the explanation seems plausible. So Obama may have heard this expression around his home state, although I still suspect that if farmers are using “green behind the ears” it's still just a widely adopted mix of “wet behind the ears” and “green” because the imagery of “green behind the ears” doesn't make sense to me. But I'll be the first to admit I don't know much about corn farming, so if someone out there wants to leave a comment and set me straight, I welcome the information. So I don't feel as if I can give you a definitive answer to the question of whether Obama used a mixed metaphor, the best I can do is to say “Probably,” but I do hope I've given you a better idea of what mixed metaphors are and why it's usually best to avoid them. Administrative If you haven't checked out our show called The Nutrition Diva, I encourage you to do so. She has a great show about soy this week, and her show was just named one of the best podcasts of 2008 by iTunes, along with Grammar Girl. Thank you for all the nice comments you leave at iTunes, it helps spread the word about our shows and and also helps us win awards like that. That's all. Thanks for listening. * Although there are only about 12,000 more entries for “grün hinter den Ohren” than “green behind the ears” I tend to think the difference is significant because I believe a much higher proportion of Web pages are in English than German. References 1. "Wet Behind the Ears," The Phrase Finder. http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/404400.html (accessed December 5, 2008). 2. "Wet Behind the Ears," The Idiom Site. http://www.idiomsite.com/wetbehindthe.htm (accessed December 5, 2008). 3. greenhorn. Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/greenhorn (accessed: December 05, 2008). 4. green. Dictionary.com. Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper, Historian. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/green (accessed: December 05, 2008). 5. Bell, E. "Long Island Opinion; Out of the Bag and on with the New," The New York Times. April 13, 1986. http://tinyurl.com/64qw3g (accessed December 5, 2008). 6. Nocera, J. "Wall Street Research: A New Low," The New York Times. August 28, 2008. http://executivesuite.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/wall-street-research-a- new-low/ (accessed December 5, 2008). 7. "France: Voting Green," The Economist. January 23, 1993. Vol. 326, Iss. 7795, p. 47-48. 8. Woodsworth, N. "My very own French connection Nicholas Woodsworth has seen the film and bought the T-shirt. But he still loves Marseilles for its physical and sensual nature, even when more genteel resorts beckon; [London edition]" Financial Times. February 9, 2002, p. 18. 9. Zimmer, B. "Green Behind the Ears?" Visual Thesaurus. October 14, 2008. http://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/wordroutes/1572/ (accessed December 5, 2008). Cite This Article APA Style Fogarty, M. (2008, December 5) Mixed Metaphors. Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. Retrieved Dec. 5, 2008, from http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/mixed-metaphors.aspx Chicago Style Mignon Fogarty, “Mixed Metaphors,” Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing, December 5, 2008, http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/mixed- metaphors.aspx (accessed Dec. 5, 2008). MLA Style Fogarty, Mignon. “Mixed Metaphors.” Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing (accessed Dec. 5, 2008).. Was this Tip Helpful? Comments for Mixed Metaphors Wayne 1/6/2012 there's nothing wrong with mixed metaphors with a dash of irony ;) Emka 3/1/2011 The mixed metaphor "green behind the ears"/"grün hinter den Ohren" is also a mixed one in German. It combines "nicht ganz trocken hinter den Ohren" (not yet quite dry behind the ears) with "Grünschnabel" (green beak, referring to the greenish-yellow root of young birds' beaks). Mr. IZ 2/22/2011 My pet peeve is overly pedantic grammar neophites misidentifying errors in other people's speech and writing when their own grammar has plenty of room for improvement. It's great to offer constructive feedback and ask a percieved offender if they want feedback, but so often I see people using their limited knowledge of grammar as a way to belittle or discount someone's point simply. The beauty of language is that it is living. It breathes. The most common error that gets me is putting the period and comma outside of closing quotation marks. It's a small thing. wes
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
excuse me admiral but #27. To: yukon, slam WARNING (#25) No one was more against free trade agreements than me. I worked with the Perot campaign, went on tv, and radio, and worked with several talking heads while in Maryland. If "I" can look past Newt's vote on the Free Trade Agreements, then YOU had better just shut the hell up about them. ============= The issue here is the BEST candidate for President against oBASTARD. Newt is the best candidate. flawed, yes, but still the best...even WITH his Free Trade Votes. I WILL NOT CONTINUE TO TOLERATE YOU DRAGGING HIM DOWN ON THIS SITE. This election is too critical, and too IMPORTANT to be caught up one one- issue politics....which is exactly what you are doing. Conservatives have got to unite behind either Santorum or Newt. And frankly, I don't think Santorum can beat Obastard. He's too whiney and wimpy. MAN UP FOR CRAP'S SAKE! SUCK IT UP AND SUPPORT ONE OF THEM, AND STOP SLAMMING THE OTHER. If you don't like one of them, then support/promote the other one. I'm not putting up with a Republican circular firing squad on LP. We find one CONSERVATIVE candidate we support and promote them. THAT's THE OPERATIVE RULE HERE!!! NO MORE UNDERMINING CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATES...WE'RE DOING OBASTARD'S JOB FOR HIM...AND IT STOPS NOW! I'm not concerned too much about blasting Romney, he's NOT conservative, except by expediency. And Paul has liberal leanings, and does well in liberal states. These two may be Republicans, but are a far cry from being Conservative. Goldi-Lox posted on 2012-02-12 23:36:46 ET Reply Trace
LMFAO!
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
when i saw the yukon article posted by newsjunky, i couldn't resist poking the old man with a stick
See, little one, you need to go into the cave to poke the bear. Pretending to be yukon here and at LP only got you exiled from LP and gave you a sour look here, not to mention the self-imposed hiding by the perps. You continue to prove my point about you silly little twits. You mouth off like Lord of the Flies and end up looking like six year olds laughing at the teacher's pet getting a wedgie. Except for one thing. Yukon isn't the teacher's pet. Yukon's response was a sensible rebuttal to an unreasonable demand in an open forum. You want a food fight? Use some of your other IDs at LP to kick the evil Goldi who owns you 24/7 plus one extra 24 this year. You seem to want to criticize forum hosts regardless of their basic fairness and you should note how tolerant Stone is to your abuse. I certainly wouldn't tolerate it. That's why I don't have a forum. Nobody else would pass the smell test.
. gee, the admiral gets "pwned" last night and now he's whining to stone, if you don't like being laughed at why do you come here and pester everyone, btw, you boys seems to like the new alias i'm using at LP and have accepted me into your crew. can you figure out who i am? (clue not a recent sign up look for an alias created close to the yukon coming out party)
I'm one of the funniest guys on LP and LF. Laughter is what keeps me happy. You twits aren't laughing. You keep trying to convince yourselves that you 'pwn' someone when you don't and never have. You couldn't get rid of yukon even using false identity and fraudulent posts. Most of you have to hide outside of your little hamster cage and guess what? Nobody I know gives a blivet who you are because what you are is a coward. I've had to look at some old posts recently going back 10-12 years because issues arise that I've not remembered well. Some of the folks I dumped on then are still around and most of them still get dumped on. There are a few, however, who deserve an apology and in those cases they have received them. The major point is that I'm still 'harrowup' and nobody cares who you are. Which makes you look really stupid.
you still upset over being PWNED, get over it, it's not the first time nor will it be the last. #137. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, (#122) What pray tell do abortions have to do with why calcon intentionally lied about LP being all in for Newt? excuse me admiral but #27. To: yukon, slam WARNING (#25) No one was more against free trade agreements than me. I worked with the Perot campaign, went on tv, and radio, and worked with several talking heads while in Maryland. If "I" can look past Newt's vote on the Free Trade Agreements, then YOU had better just shut the hell up about them. ============= The issue here is the BEST candidate for President against oBASTARD. Newt is the best candidate. flawed, yes, but still the best...even WITH his Free Trade Votes. I WILL NOT CONTINUE TO TOLERATE YOU DRAGGING HIM DOWN ON THIS SITE. This election is too critical, and too IMPORTANT to be caught up one one- issue politics....which is exactly what you are doing. Conservatives have got to unite behind either Santorum or Newt. And frankly, I don't think Santorum can beat Obastard. He's too whiney and wimpy. MAN UP FOR CRAP'S SAKE! SUCK IT UP AND SUPPORT ONE OF THEM, AND STOP SLAMMING THE OTHER. If you don't like one of them, then support/promote the other one. I'm not putting up with a Republican circular firing squad on LP. We find one CONSERVATIVE candidate we support and promote them. THAT's THE OPERATIVE RULE HERE!!! NO MORE UNDERMINING CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATES...WE'RE DOING OBASTARD'S JOB FOR HIM...AND IT STOPS NOW! I'm not concerned too much about blasting Romney, he's NOT conservative, except by expediency. And Paul has liberal leanings, and does well in liberal states. These two may be Republicans, but are a far cry from being Conservative. Goldi-Lox posted on 2012-02-12 23:36:46 ET Reply Trace calcon posted on 2012-02-13 0:01:26 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
i guess your next step is to start whining to stone, that i'm being mean to you
That's better
That's better someone needs to introduce him to reality, they appear to be complete strangers
EWWWWW! Don't get to close, their gaydom might rub off on you. Marguerite, gatlin, 22rifle, harrowup, GrandIsland, yukon, whitesands and Goldie-Lox might require that you drink from their satanic fountain of sexual frenzy in the backroom.
The importance they put on bullying posters on small chit chat sites seems a bit over the top too. If I was Newt, and I ever managesd to stumbled upon LP, I would demand they stop supporting me with their thuggish zealous tactics.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
goat herd reacts to the admiral's getting pwned
how else can I celebrate the anniversary of the great coming out without a way to repost the threads on LP, you got something better??? btw, dbr is over at lp poking tater with a new CT
Not a whiner. Just chasing the hamsters back into their wheel is all I need to keep me happy and an audience like Nose Junky with no sense of humor, incapable of understanding sarcasm. Don Rickles would love NoseJunky in the audience. For the last time, junior: LP is not in the tank for Newt. Just because I opine with a phrase, Give a Hoot, Vote for Newt doesn't mean I would vote for him in a primary. I'll be voting in the Democrat primary in Wisconsin this year in that Kathleen Falk needs my support so she can scare off everyone else in the race and then I can vote for Walker in the recall sham. That said, Goldi and Marge are certainly pro Newt to the extreme but after six months of the Paulista BS it is a relief and since Marge bozoed me I'm safe from the overload. Most are lukewarm to Newt by my estimate. While Romney will probably get the nod it will be a disaster for the GOP, so in one respect the other option whether Newt or Santorum will at least keep the House and hopefully get the Senate since they are going to lose to the current plick in office. Never have seen for whom you would like to vote? Obama?
they sound like people who've been "picked on" their entire lives and this is their way of playing tough guy
Harrowup - Are YOU or were YOU a bona-fide, certified, licensed, stamped&approved doctor of medicine within any state or region of the USA? Without reading all your continuous bally-hoo about nothing concerning politics, please answer yes or no. I am a constitutionalist. I know that some people (such as yourself and gatlin and GrandIsland) think chit-chat channels don't care about what you say......... but, as your legacy of posting your own personal details on the Internet is a trend of your own posting history, many people want to know if you were fooling around or is there any truth. At stake is the issue of credibility in these chit-chat forums. If you lie about yourself then it is simple to understand that you lie about the entire world around yourself and your posts are complete TRASH, therefore.
Da.
Have you learned that form of gutteral English from your goats?
lol I do have a sense of humor. I find you extremely amusing in the same way I find a drunk stumbling around trying to find his keys when they are in his hands the whole time.
Bucky, you said it yourself: It's the whole point of the bozo filter, remember? Besides, whorin'-up isn't interested in discussing reality, as much as pushing an overtly socialist agenda. Should you choose to question that agenda, he/she/it will wrap you around the axle of liberal stupidity, where you'll need an 8" bowie to cut yourself free... With such posters as whorin'-up, the only way to win, is not to play their game. Same deal for complete loons like rabid-dog. I see he's back, but taking him off the bozo-list is an open invitation to waste my time on know- nothing posters, who clearly have lots of time to waste. As am I. I've learned (fairly late in life, unfortunately) that the GOP/DNC version of politics is a rigged game, so I'm in the same boat as you. They describe this as a "chit-chat forum" to demean the forum. It's the same as Israelis who call anyone who reports some improper action of theirs, as "anti- semitic." Very effective as a propaganda tool... But the fact that this label is constantly used indicates that it's isn't so little and powerless... I mean, if they thought it was worthless, why do they insist on posting here, and echoing the socialist talking-points, day-in, day-out? Why bother, unless they fear the truth...? Whorin-up, loonybitch, Ming, Brian S(ocialist) and the rest... if this place was a complete waste of time, they'd be over at DU(h), or whatever the latest socialist website was... If your views, my views, those of jwpegler, hondo and the Stone were really so easily dismissed, then why do they spend so much energy and time attacking??? I think you underestimate the power of conservative sites like LF... And being a constitutionalist... means that you're the #1 enemy of the socialist scum- bags which try their best, to destroy this forum.
To: mcToejam, rat-boy, drippy, Alzheimer Fred, whitesands, t-bird, loonymom/ming, e-type jackoff, goober56, wreck, cal-CON, rabid dog, dummy DwarF, biff, harrowup the communist, and meguro. You're on the "a waste of human flesh" list. Piss off.
Have you learned that form of gutteral English from your goats? Your bio is going to be a phunny laff if you don't know I speak 5 languages fluently and a few others I can tell you how to get your ass in line; so anyway, that was Russian for yes. Help Erica out; she doesn't know you are not in the same camp.
Nah, I piss you off. And that is a good thing, missy.
Where did you graduate?
I don't recall attacking pegler, hondo and Stone for their views. I find their outlook to be new and instructive. Pegler's very good on economics and hondo is very funny and Stone is very tolerant. You, on the other hand, are just an asswipe, which is sort of like toilet paper, but more like dry grass.
Dalton.
Comments (163 - 200) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestYou don't know ANYTHING. You only have your suspicions which are based on rumour.
#124. To: harrowup (#122)
And sonny, guilt is not in my lexicon.
#125. To: Wood_Chopper (#124)
#126. To: harrowup (#123)
#127. To: buckeroo (#126)
FUCK OFF.
#128. To: harrowup (#125)
The question has been answered multiple times in multiple venues.
#129. To: harrowup (#127)
(Edited)
#130. To: Wood_Chopper (#128)
The quiet of the night, and your thoughts, are inevitable, and inescapable.
#131. To: buckeroo (#129)
...meaningless drivel...
#132. To: harrowup (#130)
#133. To: harrowup (#111)
Your vendetta little man is not about me. It is about LP and your inability to get your way.
#134. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, calcon (#122)
(Edited)
What pray tell do abortions have to do with why calcon intentionally lied about LP being all in for Newt?
#135. To: calcon. harrowup (#134)
so my big lie was a joke thread clearly intended for laughs.
#136. To: hondo68 (#113)
#137. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, (#122)
What pray tell do abortions have to do with why calcon intentionally lied about LP being all in for Newt?
#138. To: calcon, harrowup.harrowup (#137)
excuse me admiral but
#139. To: Wood_Chopper, newsjunky (#138)
#140. To: calcon, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone (#139)
#141. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone (#140)
(Edited)
You seem to want to criticize forum hosts regardless of their basic fairness and you should note how tolerant Stone is to your abuse.
#142. To: calcon (#141)
if you don't like being laughed at why do you come here and pester everyone,
You continue to prove my point about you silly little twits.
You mouth off like Lord of the Flies and end up looking like six year olds laughing at the teacher's pet getting a wedgie.
Except yukon isn't the teacher's pet...
#143. To: harrowup (#142)
#144. To: harrowup (#143)
#145. To: harrowup (#142)
I'm one of the
funniest most egotistical guys on LP and LF. My Laughter own pompousness is what keeps me happy.
#146. To: NewsJunky (#145)
I'm one of the funniest most egotistical guys on LP and LF. My Laughter own pompousness is what keeps me happy.
#147. To: calcon (#141)
btw, you boys seems to like the new alias i'm using at LP and have accepted me into your crew.
#148. To: calcon (#146)
someone needs to introduce him to reality, they appear to be complete strangers
#149. To: buckeroo (#147)
#150. To: buckeroo (#147)
#151. To: calcon, NewsJunky (#144)
...guess your next step is to start whining to stone, that i'm being mean to you
#152. To: mininggold (#148)
The importance they put on bullying posters on small chit chat sites seems a bit over the top too.
#153. To: harrowup, NewsJunky, calcon, We The People, ALL (#151)
#154. To: buckeroo (#153)
#155. To: harrowup (#154)
#156. To: harrowup (#151)
I need to keep me happy and an audience like Nose Junky with no sense of humor, incapable of understanding sarcasm. Don Rickles would love NoseJunky in the audience.
#157. To: buckeroo, A K A STONE, jwpegler, hondo68 (#153)
Bucky to harrowup: Without reading all your continuous bally-hoo about nothing concerning politics, please answer yes or no.
Posting to you has become a FUCKING waste of time, admiral. You are so FUCKING stupid that you are boring me further. FUCK OFF.
I am a constitutionalist.
At stake is the issue of credibility in these chit-chat forums.
#158. To: buckeroo (#155)
"Da."
#159. To: NewsJunky (#156)
...find you extremely amusing...
#160. To: harrowup (#158)
#161. To: Capitalist Eric, A K A STONE, jwpegler, hondo68 (#157)
If your views, my views, those of jwpegler, hondo and the Stone were really so easily dismissed, then why do they spend so much energy and time attacking???
#162. To: buckeroo (#160)
Where did you graduate?
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]