United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: FR and LP, All In for Newt
Source:
buzzfeed
URL Source: http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/i ... et-callista-gingrichs-hair-but
Published: Feb 11, 2012
Author: me
Post Date: 2012-02-11 12:19:29 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 88125
Comments: 200
The two most prominent newt supporters on FR and LP rimjob and marguerite have decided to try anything to built up Newt's sagging campaign. Since they're are both stone call broke and too cheap to donate anyway, they have come up with a new ploy to bolster newt. The callistra You too can show your support for newt but going to Buzzfeed http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/it-costs-400-to-get-callista-gingrichs-hair-but
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
(Edited)
I had to use older pics of rimjob and marguerite to try and inject some youth into newt's campaign
Hilarious! I though Nook was old news by now.
Just wait until tater, harrowup and yukon find out that you are picking on their princess. Now, YOU have a real problem on your hands.
When JR endorsed Gingrich I called it "the kiss of death". Now it's what, a month later, and the Gingrich campaign - riding high at the time of the JR endorsement - is now broke, with the big money backer, the only reason Gingrich held on as long as he did, backing out. I hope they all jump ship and endorse Santorum now, just to watch the same thing happen. Four candidates in a row crashed and burned shortly after becoming the favored candidate of FR: Bachmann, Perry, Cain, Gingrich - can they add to that string of epic fail?
Comprehension has never been your strong suit.
Well, it all started with Hair Docktor Ambassador Keyes.
Now, I remember ... you are also a clinical psychiatrist beyond all the other careers you have established in just one lifetime: lawyer, admiral, communist, ACLU defender, supporter and legal council, goat-herder, maggie's beau and yukon's best butt buddy. WoW! The list is growing.
yukon's not a newt fan, he's been taking some pretty good shots at marguerite
But, his love for maggie reigns supreme above all else. Their little recent squabbles are akin to nothing more than who is going to pump harder on the duo-dildoe.
Saint sarah goes for newt
Glen's in too
And as usual you've got it all wrong, again; almost like deja vue all over again, dimmy.
Now it's what, a month later, and the Gingrich campaign - riding high at the time of the JR endorsement - is now broke, with the big money backer, the only reason Gingrich held on as long as he did, backing out. I don't mean to step on your toes ... but, that insignificant out of the way chit-chat channel has about as much political influence as my dog's pile of shit in the backyard. All that can be done with the crud is scoop it up with a poop-scooper and toss it in the trash or step on it and shake the shit off the bottom of your boots. Those are the only two options.
That's right ... you were called by Johns Hopkins School of Medicine to lecture several times... I am going to find your post on LP when I have some free time. As I said, your integrated and self-acclaimed biography is going to be a phun day on the Internet when it is published. Man, oh man ... I think I going to publish it on
i think they're still in the newt camp. the eurotrash at lp immediately started attacking santorum after his victories this week. She was however in keeping with LP's policy of not attacking conservative candidates unless of course they are: romney, santorum, paul or anyone other then newt.
I don't think FR per se is very significant anymore, but I do think they are representative of a mindset that probably represents 10% or so of the electorate - mindless sheep being led around by the nose by the media.
yes this is funny to watch as they repeatedly cast their hopes at doomed candidates... you watch, they will convert to Santorum just before he crashes and burns too Then the really funny part happens, when they have to choose between Romney and Paul!
Yukon has never been for Newt; Gatlin found him acceptable but was waiting for Santorum to get a grip; Goldi has stated she would find Santorum acceptable. Most at LP want to beat Obama.
When I received the ZOT back in ~2001 because of my stance on Israel (I don't like all this international BS that the USA promulgates) it was really a good experience. Frankly, since then ... I haven't brought up that chit-chat channel much ... there was one time that I wanted JR to ride down Lombard Street in San Francisco in his wheelchair, though ... I had heard he went to SF with about 2 of his FReepers to Support the Troops! in support of Iraqi invasion. Well, that was about 8 years ago or so.
when i stated "eurotrash" at LP, i meant of course the israeli, eurotrash marguerite. you must admit that the skank immediately shifted attacks from romney to santorum you, yukon and gatlin as americans can support whoever you want and i have no problem with that
You are 12 years late.
Rick Santorum's Voting Record As you decide which candidate is worthy of your vote in the primary, Liberty Counsel Action encourages you to review the positions of all of the candidates on controversial issues. Here is Rick Santorum's voting record on some key issues. Each vote linked to senate.gov roll call record. NEA Voted for taxpayer funding of the National Endowment for the Arts. Voted against a 10% cut in the budget for National Endowment for the Arts. Bankruptcy Voted for a Schumer amendment to make the debts of pro-life demonstrators not dischargeable in bankruptcy. Defense and Foreign Policy Voted for the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Voted against requiring the President to certify that the CWC is effectively verifiable. Voted against requiring the President to certify that that Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, North Korea, China, and all other countries determined to be state sponsors of terror have joined CWC prior to submitting the instrument of ratification. Voted for the START II Treaty Voted to allow the sale of supercomputers to China. Voted to ban antipersonnel landmines Voted against increasing defense spending offset by equivalent cuts in non-defense spending. Voted to require that Federal bureaucrats get the same payraises as uniformed military. Voted to allow food and medicine sales to state sponsors of terror and tyranical regimes such as Libya and Cuba. Voted to limit the President’s authority to impose sanctions on nations for reasons of national security unless the sanctions were approved by a multilateral regime. Voted against requiring Congressional authorization for military action in Bosnia. Voted to give $25 million in foreign aid to North Korea Voted to weaken alien terrorist deportation provisions. If the Court determines that the evidence must be withheld for national security reasons, the Justice Department must still provide a summary of the evidence sufficient for the alien terrorist to mount a defense against deportation. Voted against delaying the India Nuclear until the President certified that India had agreed to suspend military-to-military exchanges with Iran. Voted against the Conventional Trident Missile Program Nominations Voted for Richard Paez to the 9th Curcuit (cloture) Voted for Sonia Sotomayor, Circuit Judge Voted for Richard Holbrooke to be Ambassador to the UN Voted for Margaret Morrow to be District Judge Voted twice for Marsha Berzon to the 9thg Circuit Voted for Mary McLaughlin to be District Judge Voted for Tim Dyk to be District Judge Voted for James Brady to be District Judge Labor Voted against National Right to Work Act Voted against Real of Davis-Bacon Prevailing union wages Voted for Alexis Herman to be Secretary of Labor Voted for mandatory Federal child care funding Voted for Trade Adjustment Assistance. Voted for Job Corps funding Voted twice in support of Fedex Unionization Voted against allowing a waiver of Davis-Bacon in emergency situations. Voted for minimum wage increases six times here here here here here and here Voted to require a union representative on an IRS oversight board. Voted to exempt IRS union representative from criminal ethics laws. Voted against creating independent Board of Governors to investigate IRS abuses. Guns Voted to require pawn shops to do background checks on people who pawn a gun. Voted twice to make it illegal to sell a gun without a secure storage or safety device Voted for a Federal ban on possession of “assault weapons” by those under 18. Voted for Federal funding for anti-gun education programs in schools. Voted for anti-gun juvenile justice bill. Reform Voted for funding for the legal services corporation. Voted twice for a Congressional payraise. Voted to impose a uniform Federal mandate on states to force them to allow convicted rapits, arsonists, drug kingpins, and all other ex-convicts to vote in Federal elections.<> Voted for the Specter “backup plan” to allow campaign finance reform to survive if portions of the bill were found unconstitutional. Voted to mandate discounted broadcast times for politicians. Voted for a McCain amendment to require State and local campaign committees to report all campaign contributions to the FEC and to require all campaign contributions to be reported to the FEC within 24 hours within 90 days of an election. Immigration Voted against increasing the number of immigration investigators Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens Voted to give SSI benefits to legal aliens. Voted to give welfare benefits to naturalized citizens without regard to to the earnings of their sponsors. Voted against hiring an additional 1,000 border partrol agents, paid for by reductions in state grants. Taxes Voted against a flat tax. Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for Medicare prescription drugs Voted to increase tobacco taxes to fund health insurance subsidies for small businesses. Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for an $8 billion increase in child healh insurance. Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for an increase in NIH funding. Voted twice for internet taxes. Voted to allow gas tax revenues to be used to subsidize Amtrak. Voted to strike marriage penalty tax relief and instead provide fines on tobacco companies. Voted against repealing the Clinton 4.3 cent gas tax increase. Voted to increase taxes by $2.3 billion to pay for an Amtrak trust fund. Voted to allow welfare to a minor who had a child out of wedlock and who resided with an adult who was on welfare within the previous two years. Voted to increase taxes by $9.4 billion to pay for a $9.4 billion increase in student loans. Voted to say that AMT patch is more important than capital gains and dividend relief. Welfare Voted against food stamp reform Voted against Medicaid reform Voted against TANF reform Voted to increase the Social Services Block Grant from $1 billion to $2 billion Voted to increase the FHA loan from $170,000 to $197,000. Also opposed increasing GNMA guaranty from 6 basis points to 12. Voted for $2 billion for low income heating assistance. Waste Sponsored An amendment to increase Amtrak funds by $550 million Voted to use HUD funds for the Joslyn Art Museum (NE), the Stand Up for Animals project (RI) and the Seattle Art Museum’s Olympic Sculpture Project (WA) Voted to increase spending on social programs by $7 billion Voted to increase NIH funding by $1.6 billion. Voted to increase NIHnding by $700 million Voted to for a $2 million earmark to renovate the Vulcan Monument (AL) Voted for a $1 billion bailout for the steel industry Voted against requiring that highway earmarks would come out of a state’s highway allocation Voted to allow Market Access Program funds to go to foreign companies. Voted to allow OPIC to increase its administrative costs by 50% Voted against transferring $20 million from Americorps to veterans. Voted for the $140 billion asbestos compensation bill. Voted against requiring a uniform medical criteria to ensure asbestos claims were legitimate. Voted to increase community development programs by $2 billion. Spending and Entitlements Voted to make Medicare part B premium subsidies an new entitlement. Voted against paying off the debt ($5.6 trillion at the time) within 30 years. Voted to give $18 billion to the IMF. Voted to raid Social Security instead of using surpluses to pay down the debt. Health Care Voted to allow states to impose health care mandates that are stricter than proposed new Federal mandates, but not weaker. Voted twice for Federal mental health parity mandates in health insurance. Voted against a allow consumers the option to purchase a plan outside the parity mandate. Education Voted to increase Federal funding for teacher testing Voted to increase spending for the Department of Education by $3.1 billion. Voted against requiring courts to consider the impact of IDEA awards on a local school district. Energy Voted to allow the President to designate certain sites as interim nuclear waste storage sites in the event that he determines that Yucca Mountain is not a suitable site for a permanent waste repository. Those sites are as follows: the nuclear waste site in Hanford, Washington; the Savannah River Site in South Carolina; Barnwell County, South Carolina; and the Oak Ridge Reservation in Tennessee. Voted to make fuel price gouging a Federal crime.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
Thanks for your time posting the boilerplate but I already have made my decision to vote against Obama. It doesn't matter who holds the spot.
Romney is conservative, who knew? Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
I am confident you have dementia from all your many and grandiose life experiences that you celebrate on the Internet with all your "friends." However, it is time to expose your biography on April 1, 2012 about 2AM on Sunday; the infamous, re-occurring and thematic LP Sunday playtyme time slot. I am wondering if the biography could be re-channeled to an apparent "harrowup" auto-biography thread on LP. I shall study this idea, too.
Could you please tell me which of these bills Obama also supported? I don't think you even know.
Hey calcon! Add a fifth photo-shopped picture into your photo-bucket repertoire: 0bama with Callista wig. They are all the same people.
As previously stated you are many years late to no purpose. Oh, thank you, thank you sir; you are too gracious. LOL.
thank you for your kind words
Still a little weasel. Ask Mike what makes the difference in value.
PERFECT! Thank you.
I know harrowup but you've just got to keep trying to improve. I support you in your efforts.
Are you really a goat herder?
Ok, so he's a republican, why would you expect him to vote otherwise? As you decide which candidate is worthy of your vote in the primary. If you gopers run willard, gingrich or mclovin against obama - you will lose. IMHO
Why would anyone that is not insane pick Obama for any reason? Those aren't the best Republicans but all would be preferable to the freak in the white house.
Indeed. Well said. The gop will again, offer our nation a lame, country club, big-government, douche-bag candidate who will continue to send our young men and women to the middle east to die and be maimed for Israel/big oil...... NOT a winning position. and - quite possibly these 3 are the worst republicans...... what do you think - which gopers would be worse?
Guilianni, McCain, Olympia Snow, Richard Lugar, John Warner, Huntsman, Lisa Murkowski. There are a few.
Tell your pal, Jameson, why YOU voted for McCain in 2008 knowing the bastard had no principles to begin with. We all enjoy your tall-tale. It is absolutely superb!
heh heh.... I don't see much difference...... do you?
We all enjoy your tall-tale. It is absolutely superb! I was hoping McCain would die in office making Palin president. That was in the back of my mind. Also I learned that Obama sucked real bad.
Newt and Santorum are more conservative. I don't care much for them either. But they are better then Obama. I would prefer a Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Ronald Reagan, Jim Demint type of candidate.
Palin? Thanks for reminding me. Palin would be far worse than the others we've mentioned. that would be funny!
He's a right-wing socialist. Not much different than Obama, the left-wing socialist. The political spectrum doesn't start with Joseph Stalin and end with Benito Mussolini.
Thanks for reminding me. Palin would be far worse than the others we've mentioned. that would be funny! I disagree. What positions of Palins do you disagree with? She comes across as genuine patriotic American.
Funny ! good one! if these 2 are the poster-children for small government, low taxes and personal freedom - we're in big trouble! I would prefer a Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Ronald Reagan, Jim Demint type of candidate. Buchanan? do you remember his last presidential campaign? Reagan - was a lot like Obama..... except on the "social conservative" issues which no one cares about anyway. Demint? the military industrial complex's favorite son? The Pauls? great choice! but the gop will never allow either to rise to that level - and you know it.
Actually those are important issues. Take abortion. If someone is for murdering babies that is a disqualifer. If they are that evil I wouldn't want anything to do with them. Take the assault on family values by the queers. That is important too.
He didn't get many votes. But his message was on. He is correct on a whole host of issues. If they had listened to him we wouldn't have the Mexican invasion problem we now face. He is right on abortion. He was right on NAFTA and GATT. We need to get out of those awful agreements. Buchanan is right on most all issues imo.
Not one thing in common.
I honestly don't know about Demint and the military industrial complex. If you have anything that you think is interesting or important please share. Either here on its own thread.
Newt did help balance the budget back in the nineties. Or at least move it in that direction. They are both more conservative then those I mentioned and certainly the freak asshole in the white house.
Absolutely wrong. Rick Santorum is a lot like Obama. Neither is like Reagan.
If that's good enough for you, then by all means - Sarah barely made it through college, had to abandon her job as governor of a state with fewer people than most medium sized cities, failed as a reality TV star, and puts the best interests of Israeli citizens at the same level as the best interests of Americans.
That just just BS talking points.
Both inherited terrible economies - both expanded government, and used the power of the federal government to try and revive the economy. Both were very popular within their own parties, and were hated by the other party.
Sarah loves America and wants the best for us. Obama looks at America as the enemy and wants to drown us in debt and murder out babies. I'd pick Sarah over the freak any day of the week.
believe whatever you wish - I don't have talking points
Ok - you have your opinion but being in favor with the extreme right will not necessarily win a national election.
The Sarah will not be on the ballot......sorry
Anyway - I'll restate my point - Santorum, based on his voting record is a typical republican, gingrich and romney are big-government out of touch elitists country clubbers...... None of these three offer much of anything to middle class non-partisan America.... and without some issue that will rally the independent vote.....any of the 3 will lose in November. That's all - IMHO
I have to admit, you know how to clobber mere statists with a SMACKDOWN! You can go far on LF. I think a lot of viewers/posters welcome your opinions. It is a breathe of fresh-aire.
good points, none of these guys have come up with a clear "message" to the american people and until they do they wouldn't touch obama
Perhaps.... - thanks for your comments.
we agree.
That never works to your advantage, dumb and dumber.
You are welcome. Sometimes, especially on a boring evening when no news is apparent worthy of comment, I view LP for phun&laffs&giggles. Check this out: Who the heck is LaPierre? Never heard of him. Isn't maggie a hoot?
We are still waiting for your legal restraints and lock-down epiphany from last year, casually entitled, "the failed EPIC." Are we still going into this "legal" challenge? Where is your recursive picture about some maggot named 'whitesands' that protected you with a gif? Where is the legal team of "harrowup, gatlin, whitesands, and 22rifle & LP, et al" when you really need them in 2012? Oh man... the phun is just beginning... and its not even March first!
How often do we have to remind you that your dyslexia becomes painful to read; almost makes normal folks worry about your liver.
C'mon goat-herder, within your mind whom are the "we" you celebrate within the limited chemistry of all your background: legal, political, military, medical and "goat-herding when the wife ain't watching" ... these are questions that I place to you since you have just a few more moments of re-kindling the fond memories of your own mind. Spill the beans. Tell us what you have to say ... this is America!
Step away from sharp objects slowly.
gee, i'm beginning to think you don't like me.
Is that all you can caution? Why is that? Is it a reflection of your own mind? I'm sitting here within my den, having some redbreast; there are no sharp objects, Councillor; it is just pure unadulterated joy watching you suffer eating your mind-meld from last year. BTW and as a strong recommendation, strengthen your personal LP password. The one you presently have, "Iloveacock" just doesn't cut it anymore with modern technology.
That is just one of your problems bucky. Calcon, there's nothing to like about you.
My post directed to you was OVER three hours ago. What happened, admiral taking one of three hour cruises again with tater?
I have it on good authority that he and tater currently have their "heads" together as we speak, trying to figure out how to cram the value "291" into an eight bit byte.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
Say what?
Fred Fred Fred! Don't you remember? During the great "I wuz hacked" episode, the admiral and tater were busy tracking down an ip with the value "291" in it, and couldn't quite understand what the problem was. As hard as I've tried, 255 is the largest value I could cram into an 8 bit byte.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
All, I'm doing is watching some re-runs of Gilligan's Island this evening while occasionally enjoying LP when getting up in a blue moon for another cool one from the icebox.
I also want to say, harrowup&yukon&gatlin wouldn't know what to do with an android, if they thought of one. They are too busy falling over themselves (perhaps swallowing) ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvlGLdBaZ-U
then why do you keep pestering me, you are of no interest to me
this guys pushing his luck . #26. To: Marguerite (#21) Romney will not get all the delegates in Florida From where do you get your knowledge? Oh, I know, you pull it out of you European Jewish Ass, right? Final Authority posted on 2012-02-12 1:39:12 ET Reply Trace
Although, I can't speak for the admiral, I can say he walks on the "wild side." It is a day of reckoning, I tell ya!
"Calcon, there's nothing to like about you." then why do you keep pestering me, you are of no interest to me You mischaracterize discussions in order to bait a response. You remind me of WTP who interjects himself into a discussion and then feigns innocence. Apparently LP is of some interest to you since you claimed you were banned and wish to continue your irrational attacks. Therefore, since you lie constantly you can expect to be challenged, not because it will change any opinions, just to kick your hamster ass one more time.
Ah, so it's in the blue moon that you keep the 291, since there isn't one just now. You don't need a cool one of anything, bucky, except a personality.
let's bring it back to the real world there admiral, you keep bringing my name up and posting to me, you're getting quite boring
I KNEW IT! You'll come around to Bong Paul yet! Then, you can be a paultard, like the rest of us Paultards! LOL!
Huh? I do that? To calcon: Therefore, since you lie constantly you can expect to be challenged, not because it will change any opinions, just to kick your hamster ass one more time. In all honesty, I've seen your internet battles, in the present and even those past glorious battles you keep dredging up, and I've yet to see you kick anyone's ass. Have you ever performed an abortion? And remember, you just accused another of lying constantly, so set a good example and tell the truth.
if newt's the candidate, i'm writing in paul
like when tater had to be medevac'd back to LP,
"You remind me of WTP who interjects himself into a discussion and then feigns innocence." Huh? I do that? Yeah, all the time. http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=27479&Disp=116#C116 #115. To: sneakypete (#112) "I had forgotten all about Cal and her being from Louisiana. Last I heard she was making her living as some sort of political press assistant. " I saw her column at Human Events a few months ago. www.humanevents.com/search.php? author_name=Connie+Hair harrowup posted on 2012-01-30 20:22:30 #116. To: harrowup (#115) Wasn't Connie Hair tied up somehow with Simcox? We The People posted on 2012-01-30 20:27:31 ET #117. To: We The People, buckeroo (#116) Connie's worked for quite a few right wing groups and was a good friend of Hannity and Tony Snow. ... harrowup posted on 2012-01-30 20:32:46 ET #139. To: Murron, buckeroo, harrowup, sneakypete, mel-living, A K A Stone (#138) I don't know who the people are that you all are talking about. I'm not sure how I even got into this conversation. We The People posted on 2012-01-31 20:04:45 ET
Stop lying and you're home free. Works everytime. I'm not here to entertain you this time.
Ah, yes, now I remember; thanks for the reminder.
he's like a mormon or jehovah's witness, they keep knocking on your door until you have to answer,
LMFAO!!! Had to be one of the best lines of the year.
Yes, I asked the question, because I saw that name, Connie Hair, and I thought I'd read somewhere, back in the day, that she was somehow connected with Simcox. When I saw the name here, curiosity took over. One small part of that conversation pertained to my question. The majority of the rest of the conversation was between you long timers who were dredging up old wounds in your thousands of years old, arabs v jews, holy land blood feud.
Have you ever performed an abortion?
So, you were lying. Case closed.
#49. To: We The People (#43) Harrowup, didn't I read a post of yours in which you claimed to have performed abortions? I don't know whether you did or did not. harrowup posted on 2012-02-07 7:14:02 ET Let me know whether you remember whether you did or didn't and whether I did or didn't and then let me know why you want to know. No more wiggling; admit you always try to avoid looking like the weasel you are. Those are your instructions.
Case closed. I'm confused now, harrowup. You accused me of lying and WTP of interjecting himself into a discussion and then feigns innocence. so which case is closed, my lying or his interjecting???
"you keep bringing my name up and posting to me," Stop lying and you're home free. Works everytime. "you're getting quite boring" I'm not here to entertain you this time. You have failed miserably in your vendetta.
No more wiggling; admit you always try to avoid looking like the weasel you are. Those are your instructions. I definitely remember it, and I remember that you stated that YES, you had in fact performed abortions. I just want to see you admit to it here. It's a very simple, yes or no question. No more wiggling LOL! Good one.
No, I wasn't. The ONE question that I asked was answered. That should have been the end of it. Then I was being pinged to a conversation between you and others that had nothing to do with the question I had asked. THAT was the conversation that I wasn't sure why I was being included. Let me know if you still don't understand and I'll attempt to clarify... again. Have you ever performed an abortion?
LOL! It's always so funny when you try to hurt my feelings.
"So, you were lying." No, I wasn't. The ONE question that I asked was answered. That should have been the end of it. Then you should have thanked me for the courteous answer. And now you are still trying to wiggle out of your nosiness. You did not, so until you do, it makes no sense to answer any other of your questions since they are out of order. Follow your instructions previously described.
If you think when other people insult you it is an attempt to hurt your feelings there is a good chance you are suffering from more than a giant inferiority complex. Have someone look into it and buck up; when you're as petulant as you there is not much further to go down into that deep hole you keep exploring.
Me? Inferiority complex? LOL! I think you know better. You should sue for the money that you spent on your education, doctor. Because that was either a misdiagnosis, or a fabricated bucket of BS. Now, have you ever performed an abortion? If I remember correctly, you have performed "the procedure" a few times. Why would you be afraid to answer an honest question honestly?
You have your instructions.
vendetta, you kidding?? your just amusing to me harrowup and certainly not worthy of a vendetta quite amusing
stone cold broke Obomba in the debate said he wasn't green behind the ears ! It was supposed to be wet behind the ears !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Your vendetta little man is not about me. It is about LP and your inability to get your way.
How long have you been posting? When you put a "period" after buckeroo's handle, even though you posted my name, I don't get pinged. Looks to others like you pinged me, but you didn't. But you knew that, didn't you. So admiral, how exactly can you get a value greater than 255 out of an 8 bit byte. So how do you get "291"??? There are only 256 values possible in an 8 bit byte (0-255), but a value greater than 255 is impossible in an 8 bit byte. Wadda putz you are! A complete bullshitter.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
It's a long swim from Kenya, no wonder he's still wet! Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Can you believe all the hamster-wheel postings over who's going to be the nominee?
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
I can not speak for calcon or anyone else but you are nothing more than a toy to kick around when I am bored (potentially a number of others, too) and it all primarily stems from your belief system about yukon from last year. I want to give you credit, though. You seem to enjoy being kicked around on LF since you pop by from time to time. Strangely, I have read a number of yukon's posts on LP and although he lapses back into his old BS on occasion, he actually is starting to come out of his delirium about the way he posts. For one, his frequency of posting has dropped way down. This is significant because others can actually see good comments now AND intelligent discussions without continuous interfering, nasty, trite remarcks that are out of line. Better than that, he has made some good points recently and on a number of issues. But your awful lying and exaggerations and finger pointing accusing good posters of wrong doing shall always get you into trouble.
Looks to others like you pinged me, but you didn't. But you knew that, didn't you. Paranoid much? Been there, done that:
Sorry, I missed you saying you lied about not knowing whether I did or I didn't say something. And now you claim you have an answer but still complain you want an answer? You are conflicted beyond my understanding. You waste a great deal of your time chasing retribution only to be rebuked which reminds you of your childhood. How many times were you the butt of the joke when you were 12? Get a life, sonny.
Apparently not.
Admiral, admiral, admiral! It's not "Paranoid", it's "CT"! Didn't you pay attention to yuktard when he told you that? I still get a kick out of you having lied your ass off trying to pretend you had a secret way to get 291 out of a 8 bit byte. Math doesn't lie admiral ... you do.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
You don't have a leg to stand on, admiral. You don't know ANYTHING. You only have your suspicions which are based on rumour.
Did you? Perform abortions? If you did and won't say so, it would indicate guilt feelings on your part. In the quiet of the night, alone with your thoughts, are the feelings of guilt there?
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
What pray tell do abortions have to do with why calcon intentionally lied about LP being all in for Newt? And sonny, guilt is not in my lexicon.
At the risk of being accused of torturing an idiot, I'll ask anyway. What the hell are you jibbering about now.
Yeah, it is, or you'd be able to answer the question outright. You're not fooling anyone, especially not yourself.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
The question has been answered multiple times in multiple venues. bucky says he is preparing a bio; ask him to search his database.
Posting to you has become a FUCKING waste of time, admiral. You are so FUCKING stupid that you are boring me further. FUCK OFF.
Oh, dear me, poopsie. Don't let everyone known you're not up to the task of playing with a toy that keeps whacking you up the side the head. Head over to ToonTown and get yourself some Acme protection.
The quiet of the night, and your thoughts, are inevitable, and inescapable.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
You got a screw loose in your cockpit equipment. And there is no cohesive method to repair your FUCKING self. You shall just have to live with your own echo worthless chamber consisting of two demented brain cells rubbing together from time to time. Let us see where you have solidly wrecked yourself, admiral: you have your lips locked on yukon's genitals, you have your misplaced head up your own ass and a tongue up Sally's ass. And, there is no way of repair.
What? Do you and bucky exchange the gibberish manual?
A common treatment for dyslexia is for the subject to read what they have written 24 hours after the message. They are asked then to edit or otherwise interpret the message again. If they recognize the errors they are then asked to always write their sentences twice before using. It is tedious but helpful and doesn't require additional pharmaceutical adjunct therapy. Then of course, there is always the possibility that your drug/alcohol use will always interfere with any treatment applied. Good luck, get happy with who you are; your family is getting frustrated.
Nightey night.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
silly boy, i have no anger with LP or Goldi, she said no hit pieces on candidates and I did three breaking news articles in a row against her preferred candidate. Did I expect to get banned, Yes. Did I get banned, Yes. So it's over and done. I'm not a whiny little girl like you clowns who come up with some ridiculous CT to try in cover one of your boys indiscretions.
And sonny, guilt is not in my lexicon. wood_chopper can you believe this silly old man, my all in for newt thread was a joke thread about FR and LP owners going crazy over Newt. it's primary purpose was to post funny pics of people in Newt wife's hairdo wigs. his wife so cracks me up. so my big lie was a joke thread clearly intended for laughs. you way off your game tonight, admiral
you way off your game tonight, admiral The admiral's an idiot? Who knew? (other than the entire internet crowd after witnessing the "I wuz hacked" saga). ;-)
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
Episode 147: December 6, 2008 General Grammar Comments (44) Tip Sponsored By Grammar Girl here. Today's topic is mixed metaphors. Politicians often provide good fodder for language commentary, and one of Barack Obama's comments during the debates has been rattling around in my head for a while now. He made a comment that some people think he's "green behind the ears," and that struck me as a mixed metaphor. What Is a Metaphor? I'll back up. First, a metaphor is a way of comparing two unrelated things to make your point more vivid. For example, Shakespeare said, "All the world's a stage." He compared the world to a stage to make his point that we're all like actors in a play. That's a metaphor. Another example of a well-known metaphor is to say someone is walking on thin ice. It is a way of saying someone is doing something dangerous and creates a vivid image of a person needing to behave carefully to avoid falling through an ice covered lake. The big difference between a metaphor and a simile is that a metaphor doesn't use the word "like" and a simile does. For example, it's a metaphor to say "All the world's a stage," and it's a simile to say "All the world is like a stage." Not a big difference in meaning, but it's the kind of thing you can get tripped up on if you're in school and you have to take a test about similes and metaphors. You can remember that similes use the word "like" because "simile" has the letter "l" in it. What Is a Mixed Metaphor? So back to mixed metaphors. A mixed metaphor is when someone combines two unrelated metaphors. For example, two common metaphors someone can use to tell you to get a clue are “wake up and smell the coffee,” implying you need to be more alert, and “read the writing on the wall,” implying you need to see the bad news that is already right in front of you. A radio host once told me his favorite mixed metaphor combined those two. Someone told him to “Wake up and smell the coffee on the wall.” Suddenly the imagery doesn't make so much sense. Did someone throw coffee on the wall? Sports metaphors tend to be popular and they're also easy to mix. For example, if you tried to motivate your co-workers by saying, “It's our turn at bat, so let's make this touchdown for the company,” you'd have mixed baseball and American football metaphors, and if you try to imagine the image that goes with the metaphor, you don't know whether to put your players on a baseball field or a football field. Can Mixed Metaphors Be Fun? Because they usually undermine the imagery of both of the metaphors that are combined, mixed metaphors are generally considered bad form. But sometimes people also like to play with mixed metaphors. It can be a fun way to turn a cliché on its head. For example, I've seen people mix the metaphors “Let's cross that bridge when we come to it,” meaning let's put off the decision, and “Don't burn your bridges” meaning don't destroy a something you'll need later. They get “We'll burn that bridge when we come to it,” which combines the meaning of the two metaphors into something like “We're ready to fight when the right time comes,” and still maintains imagery that makes sense. Did Obama Mix Metaphors? So back to Obama and his “green behind the ears” statement. I immediately thought that he was mixing “wet behind the ears” with “green” -- two different metaphors that mean someone is naïve, young, or inexperienced. The most common explanation for why “wet behind the ears” means young is that new babies are born covered in fluid, so they're wet, and behind the ears is one of the last places that dries if they aren't wiped off (1, 2). There are a few reasons “green” can mean young and inexperienced – branches are green before they harden into brown wood, and apparently horns can also be green in young animals, thus the word “greenhorn (3, 4).” Obama certainly wasn't the first person to utter “green behind the ears.” I found multiple examples of previous use in publications including The New York Times (5, 6), The Economist (7), and the Financial Times (8), but just because other people said it first doesn't mean it isn't a mixed metaphor. Commentators on Ben Zimmer's column about Obama's mixed metaphor pointed out that the German equivalent of “green behind the ears” -- “grün hinter den Ohren” -- is common in Germany (9), and a Google search does show that it comes up more frequently than “green behind the ears,” so I tend to believe the commentators although I have no first-hand knowledge of the saying in German*. Finally, I surveyed my Twitter friends, and a couple of people said that “green behind the ears” is a common metaphor used by corn farmers and refers to young ears of corn. I was unable to verify this, but Obama is from Illinois – a corn growing region – so the explanation seems plausible. So Obama may have heard this expression around his home state, although I still suspect that if farmers are using “green behind the ears” it's still just a widely adopted mix of “wet behind the ears” and “green” because the imagery of “green behind the ears” doesn't make sense to me. But I'll be the first to admit I don't know much about corn farming, so if someone out there wants to leave a comment and set me straight, I welcome the information. So I don't feel as if I can give you a definitive answer to the question of whether Obama used a mixed metaphor, the best I can do is to say “Probably,” but I do hope I've given you a better idea of what mixed metaphors are and why it's usually best to avoid them. Administrative If you haven't checked out our show called The Nutrition Diva, I encourage you to do so. She has a great show about soy this week, and her show was just named one of the best podcasts of 2008 by iTunes, along with Grammar Girl. Thank you for all the nice comments you leave at iTunes, it helps spread the word about our shows and and also helps us win awards like that. That's all. Thanks for listening. * Although there are only about 12,000 more entries for “grün hinter den Ohren” than “green behind the ears” I tend to think the difference is significant because I believe a much higher proportion of Web pages are in English than German. References 1. "Wet Behind the Ears," The Phrase Finder. http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/404400.html (accessed December 5, 2008). 2. "Wet Behind the Ears," The Idiom Site. http://www.idiomsite.com/wetbehindthe.htm (accessed December 5, 2008). 3. greenhorn. Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/greenhorn (accessed: December 05, 2008). 4. green. Dictionary.com. Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper, Historian. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/green (accessed: December 05, 2008). 5. Bell, E. "Long Island Opinion; Out of the Bag and on with the New," The New York Times. April 13, 1986. http://tinyurl.com/64qw3g (accessed December 5, 2008). 6. Nocera, J. "Wall Street Research: A New Low," The New York Times. August 28, 2008. http://executivesuite.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/wall-street-research-a- new-low/ (accessed December 5, 2008). 7. "France: Voting Green," The Economist. January 23, 1993. Vol. 326, Iss. 7795, p. 47-48. 8. Woodsworth, N. "My very own French connection Nicholas Woodsworth has seen the film and bought the T-shirt. But he still loves Marseilles for its physical and sensual nature, even when more genteel resorts beckon; [London edition]" Financial Times. February 9, 2002, p. 18. 9. Zimmer, B. "Green Behind the Ears?" Visual Thesaurus. October 14, 2008. http://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/wordroutes/1572/ (accessed December 5, 2008). Cite This Article APA Style Fogarty, M. (2008, December 5) Mixed Metaphors. Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. Retrieved Dec. 5, 2008, from http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/mixed-metaphors.aspx Chicago Style Mignon Fogarty, “Mixed Metaphors,” Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing, December 5, 2008, http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/mixed- metaphors.aspx (accessed Dec. 5, 2008). MLA Style Fogarty, Mignon. “Mixed Metaphors.” Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing (accessed Dec. 5, 2008).. Was this Tip Helpful? Comments for Mixed Metaphors Wayne 1/6/2012 there's nothing wrong with mixed metaphors with a dash of irony ;) Emka 3/1/2011 The mixed metaphor "green behind the ears"/"grün hinter den Ohren" is also a mixed one in German. It combines "nicht ganz trocken hinter den Ohren" (not yet quite dry behind the ears) with "Grünschnabel" (green beak, referring to the greenish-yellow root of young birds' beaks). Mr. IZ 2/22/2011 My pet peeve is overly pedantic grammar neophites misidentifying errors in other people's speech and writing when their own grammar has plenty of room for improvement. It's great to offer constructive feedback and ask a percieved offender if they want feedback, but so often I see people using their limited knowledge of grammar as a way to belittle or discount someone's point simply. The beauty of language is that it is living. It breathes. The most common error that gets me is putting the period and comma outside of closing quotation marks. It's a small thing. wes
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
excuse me admiral but #27. To: yukon, slam WARNING (#25) No one was more against free trade agreements than me. I worked with the Perot campaign, went on tv, and radio, and worked with several talking heads while in Maryland. If "I" can look past Newt's vote on the Free Trade Agreements, then YOU had better just shut the hell up about them. ============= The issue here is the BEST candidate for President against oBASTARD. Newt is the best candidate. flawed, yes, but still the best...even WITH his Free Trade Votes. I WILL NOT CONTINUE TO TOLERATE YOU DRAGGING HIM DOWN ON THIS SITE. This election is too critical, and too IMPORTANT to be caught up one one- issue politics....which is exactly what you are doing. Conservatives have got to unite behind either Santorum or Newt. And frankly, I don't think Santorum can beat Obastard. He's too whiney and wimpy. MAN UP FOR CRAP'S SAKE! SUCK IT UP AND SUPPORT ONE OF THEM, AND STOP SLAMMING THE OTHER. If you don't like one of them, then support/promote the other one. I'm not putting up with a Republican circular firing squad on LP. We find one CONSERVATIVE candidate we support and promote them. THAT's THE OPERATIVE RULE HERE!!! NO MORE UNDERMINING CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATES...WE'RE DOING OBASTARD'S JOB FOR HIM...AND IT STOPS NOW! I'm not concerned too much about blasting Romney, he's NOT conservative, except by expediency. And Paul has liberal leanings, and does well in liberal states. These two may be Republicans, but are a far cry from being Conservative. Goldi-Lox posted on 2012-02-12 23:36:46 ET Reply Trace
LMFAO!
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
when i saw the yukon article posted by newsjunky, i couldn't resist poking the old man with a stick
See, little one, you need to go into the cave to poke the bear. Pretending to be yukon here and at LP only got you exiled from LP and gave you a sour look here, not to mention the self-imposed hiding by the perps. You continue to prove my point about you silly little twits. You mouth off like Lord of the Flies and end up looking like six year olds laughing at the teacher's pet getting a wedgie. Except for one thing. Yukon isn't the teacher's pet. Yukon's response was a sensible rebuttal to an unreasonable demand in an open forum. You want a food fight? Use some of your other IDs at LP to kick the evil Goldi who owns you 24/7 plus one extra 24 this year. You seem to want to criticize forum hosts regardless of their basic fairness and you should note how tolerant Stone is to your abuse. I certainly wouldn't tolerate it. That's why I don't have a forum. Nobody else would pass the smell test.
. gee, the admiral gets "pwned" last night and now he's whining to stone, if you don't like being laughed at why do you come here and pester everyone, btw, you boys seems to like the new alias i'm using at LP and have accepted me into your crew. can you figure out who i am? (clue not a recent sign up look for an alias created close to the yukon coming out party)
I'm one of the funniest guys on LP and LF. Laughter is what keeps me happy. You twits aren't laughing. You keep trying to convince yourselves that you 'pwn' someone when you don't and never have. You couldn't get rid of yukon even using false identity and fraudulent posts. Most of you have to hide outside of your little hamster cage and guess what? Nobody I know gives a blivet who you are because what you are is a coward. I've had to look at some old posts recently going back 10-12 years because issues arise that I've not remembered well. Some of the folks I dumped on then are still around and most of them still get dumped on. There are a few, however, who deserve an apology and in those cases they have received them. The major point is that I'm still 'harrowup' and nobody cares who you are. Which makes you look really stupid.
you still upset over being PWNED, get over it, it's not the first time nor will it be the last. #137. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, (#122) What pray tell do abortions have to do with why calcon intentionally lied about LP being all in for Newt? excuse me admiral but #27. To: yukon, slam WARNING (#25) No one was more against free trade agreements than me. I worked with the Perot campaign, went on tv, and radio, and worked with several talking heads while in Maryland. If "I" can look past Newt's vote on the Free Trade Agreements, then YOU had better just shut the hell up about them. ============= The issue here is the BEST candidate for President against oBASTARD. Newt is the best candidate. flawed, yes, but still the best...even WITH his Free Trade Votes. I WILL NOT CONTINUE TO TOLERATE YOU DRAGGING HIM DOWN ON THIS SITE. This election is too critical, and too IMPORTANT to be caught up one one- issue politics....which is exactly what you are doing. Conservatives have got to unite behind either Santorum or Newt. And frankly, I don't think Santorum can beat Obastard. He's too whiney and wimpy. MAN UP FOR CRAP'S SAKE! SUCK IT UP AND SUPPORT ONE OF THEM, AND STOP SLAMMING THE OTHER. If you don't like one of them, then support/promote the other one. I'm not putting up with a Republican circular firing squad on LP. We find one CONSERVATIVE candidate we support and promote them. THAT's THE OPERATIVE RULE HERE!!! NO MORE UNDERMINING CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATES...WE'RE DOING OBASTARD'S JOB FOR HIM...AND IT STOPS NOW! I'm not concerned too much about blasting Romney, he's NOT conservative, except by expediency. And Paul has liberal leanings, and does well in liberal states. These two may be Republicans, but are a far cry from being Conservative. Goldi-Lox posted on 2012-02-12 23:36:46 ET Reply Trace calcon posted on 2012-02-13 0:01:26 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
i guess your next step is to start whining to stone, that i'm being mean to you
That's better
That's better someone needs to introduce him to reality, they appear to be complete strangers
EWWWWW! Don't get to close, their gaydom might rub off on you. Marguerite, gatlin, 22rifle, harrowup, GrandIsland, yukon, whitesands and Goldie-Lox might require that you drink from their satanic fountain of sexual frenzy in the backroom.
The importance they put on bullying posters on small chit chat sites seems a bit over the top too. If I was Newt, and I ever managesd to stumbled upon LP, I would demand they stop supporting me with their thuggish zealous tactics.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
goat herd reacts to the admiral's getting pwned
how else can I celebrate the anniversary of the great coming out without a way to repost the threads on LP, you got something better??? btw, dbr is over at lp poking tater with a new CT
Not a whiner. Just chasing the hamsters back into their wheel is all I need to keep me happy and an audience like Nose Junky with no sense of humor, incapable of understanding sarcasm. Don Rickles would love NoseJunky in the audience. For the last time, junior: LP is not in the tank for Newt. Just because I opine with a phrase, Give a Hoot, Vote for Newt doesn't mean I would vote for him in a primary. I'll be voting in the Democrat primary in Wisconsin this year in that Kathleen Falk needs my support so she can scare off everyone else in the race and then I can vote for Walker in the recall sham. That said, Goldi and Marge are certainly pro Newt to the extreme but after six months of the Paulista BS it is a relief and since Marge bozoed me I'm safe from the overload. Most are lukewarm to Newt by my estimate. While Romney will probably get the nod it will be a disaster for the GOP, so in one respect the other option whether Newt or Santorum will at least keep the House and hopefully get the Senate since they are going to lose to the current plick in office. Never have seen for whom you would like to vote? Obama?
they sound like people who've been "picked on" their entire lives and this is their way of playing tough guy
Harrowup - Are YOU or were YOU a bona-fide, certified, licensed, stamped&approved doctor of medicine within any state or region of the USA? Without reading all your continuous bally-hoo about nothing concerning politics, please answer yes or no. I am a constitutionalist. I know that some people (such as yourself and gatlin and GrandIsland) think chit-chat channels don't care about what you say......... but, as your legacy of posting your own personal details on the Internet is a trend of your own posting history, many people want to know if you were fooling around or is there any truth. At stake is the issue of credibility in these chit-chat forums. If you lie about yourself then it is simple to understand that you lie about the entire world around yourself and your posts are complete TRASH, therefore.
Da.
Have you learned that form of gutteral English from your goats?
lol I do have a sense of humor. I find you extremely amusing in the same way I find a drunk stumbling around trying to find his keys when they are in his hands the whole time.
Bucky, you said it yourself: It's the whole point of the bozo filter, remember? Besides, whorin'-up isn't interested in discussing reality, as much as pushing an overtly socialist agenda. Should you choose to question that agenda, he/she/it will wrap you around the axle of liberal stupidity, where you'll need an 8" bowie to cut yourself free... With such posters as whorin'-up, the only way to win, is not to play their game. Same deal for complete loons like rabid-dog. I see he's back, but taking him off the bozo-list is an open invitation to waste my time on know- nothing posters, who clearly have lots of time to waste. As am I. I've learned (fairly late in life, unfortunately) that the GOP/DNC version of politics is a rigged game, so I'm in the same boat as you. They describe this as a "chit-chat forum" to demean the forum. It's the same as Israelis who call anyone who reports some improper action of theirs, as "anti- semitic." Very effective as a propaganda tool... But the fact that this label is constantly used indicates that it's isn't so little and powerless... I mean, if they thought it was worthless, why do they insist on posting here, and echoing the socialist talking-points, day-in, day-out? Why bother, unless they fear the truth...? Whorin-up, loonybitch, Ming, Brian S(ocialist) and the rest... if this place was a complete waste of time, they'd be over at DU(h), or whatever the latest socialist website was... If your views, my views, those of jwpegler, hondo and the Stone were really so easily dismissed, then why do they spend so much energy and time attacking??? I think you underestimate the power of conservative sites like LF... And being a constitutionalist... means that you're the #1 enemy of the socialist scum- bags which try their best, to destroy this forum.
To: mcToejam, rat-boy, drippy, Alzheimer Fred, whitesands, t-bird, loonymom/ming, e-type jackoff, goober56, wreck, cal-CON, rabid dog, dummy DwarF, biff, harrowup the communist, and meguro. You're on the "a waste of human flesh" list. Piss off.
Have you learned that form of gutteral English from your goats? Your bio is going to be a phunny laff if you don't know I speak 5 languages fluently and a few others I can tell you how to get your ass in line; so anyway, that was Russian for yes. Help Erica out; she doesn't know you are not in the same camp.
Nah, I piss you off. And that is a good thing, missy.
Where did you graduate?
I don't recall attacking pegler, hondo and Stone for their views. I find their outlook to be new and instructive. Pegler's very good on economics and hondo is very funny and Stone is very tolerant. You, on the other hand, are just an asswipe, which is sort of like toilet paper, but more like dry grass.
Dalton.
There is no sense of participating in a forum with a fixed or rigid filter unless you know that the reincarnation of Beelzebub posts there. I am speaking of mel_living, of course. As for harrowup, he is mere toy. He is the quintessence of a caricature about a bum in his neighbor's backyard fucking their goats and when caught ... well.... Well, you get the picture.
Trust me Dr. Freud I know me better than you do. I find you amusing in your pathetic attempts at self promotion.
Are you talking about THE Dalton? Manhattan Upper East Side coed private school for grades K -12? How did you acquire your advanced degrees to practice medicine at such an early age? Did you advance in chronological years before graduating as the institution held you back with liberal doses of EST, until you became a complete vegetable as GWBush withheld funding because of his "No Child Left Behind Socialist Program"?
If there was a question in there you mangled it, which come to think of it is more than apropos for dyslexia given that mangles are meant to press cloth neatly and quickly.
Being a medical doctor sanctioned by any one of the US states/territories normally requires a method of substantiating an advanced degree beyond having been successfully treated under EST as Boris has performed. So, you acquired your medical degree(s) at Dalton, correct? Beyond playing in the school ground sandbox (taking a break from EST and the strap-down gurney with a leather strap clamped between your jaws) did you personally write your impressive credentials with a little shovel?
You asked, Where did you graduate? I answered you. I only graduated once. All the rest were just pomp and circumstance and cost more than they are worth. I preferred to just wait for the mail and use all the money I saved getting drunk after the last exam. That was on record in 1998 at FR. You'll have to keep hunting 'cause I'm not getting paid to write my autobiography and if you expect anyone to read your biography of me you'll have to back it up with better information than you currently possess.
If Obungler has a young yukon canary talking in his ear, it's no wonder that he's an F'd up libtard! Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Have you ever been involved with direct teaching, instructing, coaching, lecturing, authoritatively preparing, consulting or administering any sanctioned formal classrooms or material (thereof) at any accredited US University, college or other graduate learning center stateside? I am sure you have been "delivering" BS so, as a compliment to you and others I intentionally left that idea out of my question.
See Erica, hondo is very funny. And incidentally, that Men Who Stare @ Goats movie was hogwash. But fainting goats are not.
So, I guess you don't want my help anymore. Thanks; I'm in the barn right now and really don't have the time.
why do they insist on posting here, and echoing the socialist talking-points, day-in, day-out? I think you underestimate the power of conservative sites like LF.. I don't bozo anyone, enjoy watching them make fools of themselves too much. I do sometimes skip over stuff especially long winded bloviating over the wonders of socialism. They're evangelical communists. Class warfare, race pimpin, divide and conquer, is their stock in trade. I can't prove it but, I have a notion that occasionally an idea escapes from these forums and hits the mainstream consciousness. If it's a great idea it can go viral.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
And now you claim you have an answer but still complain you want an answer? You are conflicted beyond my understanding. You waste a great deal of your time chasing retribution only to be rebuked which reminds you of your childhood. How many times were you the butt of the joke when you were 12? Get a life, sonny. LMAO!!!!! Look at the lengths you go to, in a desperate attempt to dodge your own past.
EDIT WARNING!!!!! img src="http://5cense.com/11/napoli/39_satyr_goat_fuck.jpg I'm sure you are ... you little EBIL, DEBIL.
There is never any problem keeping you hamsters chasing your tails, dumbass.
LOL!!! I ask a simple question, and you get all twisted sister and call me names. Funny.
The admiral with all his advanced degrees in both scientific/medical studies beyond his solid Juris Doctoral degree has finally told the forum about the origins of his humble grade school. He claims: At least I have one answer to his educational strengths but upon asking further he denies me anymore data. He is a wasically wabbit for sure!
He certainly won't answer a direct question, will he. He'll tell you everything in the world that you DON'T care about, carry on for days about nothing, but ask him one question and he gets his goat herding boots all twisted.
You're the guys chasing your tails. No effort needed.
Have you ever posted that you are or were a forensic psychiatrist as hondo68 humorously suggested? He said in post 169: Hondo68 does a great job from time to time letting
You continue to prove you are not up to the task, little one. You are even more inept than wimpypimples. Seriously though, if I didn't know how old you were the way you twits carry on it is like suffering through having the great misfortune of being home when a teenage daughter throws a slumber party and the giggling fantasies shatter the calm night. Won't some of you surprise me and talk like carbon lifeform human males with just a touch of natural testosterone? Any takers? Probably not.
I am starting to think you don't like me. All I am asking for is the truth. Jesus of Nazareth said, Think of myself as just asking questions to understand the truth of and about yourself that you personally gab about. You are among friends here on LF. You can come clean with us on LF. We won't tell anyone about your past skeletons.
You don't like me, do you? When you were playing in the sandbox during your education at Did you tell the truth to all your klassmates in the game of marbles while playing in the sandbox? Or did you paint your marbles in such a way as to convince others someone stole your marbles (when they didn't) and then received a beating from just about every Tom,Dick&Harry requiring the teacher to save you? During, your residency at Did you often wear the dunce-cap while sitting on a stool gazing at the corner walls for hours on end? And at recess, did some of your klassmates slap your back with a "KICK-ME" sign while you sat there thinking they liked you in the first place? This is important stuff to discuss about your educational background and probable credentials.
You've had to put in a small amount of effort, don't lie. It's no small task to dodge a direct question multiple times in just a few short days. Good thing that question wasn't a dodge ball, you'd be tuckered out! Then, there's all the name calling. LOL! That takes a little bit of effort.
Your problem is you don't know how to ask a direct question. Tying you up in your panties is simple from the gitgo. Do you have a candidate you like for POTUS besides Obama?
Awwwwwww, that's soo cute! It's always a hoot when you try to hurt my feelings! See, let me show you how that's done. You flounder around for ever, making up stupid little pet names for me, that besides being stupid have no effect whatsoever. I, on the other hand, can call you something like...... abortionist and that is a very serious and deeply personal secret of your own past that you'd rather not come to the light, and because of that it cuts to the very core of who you are! LOL!!! Now, what were you saying about testosterone, you silly little man?
Good morning! Glad to see you up and about. Why are you trying to change the subject to presidential candidates? But here, this is a perfect opportunity for me to show you how to honestly answer a direct question. Do you have a candidate you like for POTUS besides Obama? I do not like Obama, and I didn't vote for Obama. In fact, I've never voted for a Democrat in my entire life. I DO like, and support Ron Paul. Now, have you ever performed an abortion?
abortionist and that cuts to the very core! LOL!!! Nah, that's been done with actual effect: Well, that's easy. I'll repeat my observation that you and most of your 'pals' sound like silly little girls.
That happens to be the subject of the thread. You are fruitlessly attempting to change it to abortion. My opinion on abortion is well known.
Reason: abortionist troll Am I trolling an abortionist? LMAO!!!
That happens to be the subject of the thread. The subject of the thread is FR and LP. Did you not do well in English?
It's always a pleasure, Dr. Strangelove, but I must head off to the mines. Have a great day, and try not to kill any fetuses!
Did you not do well in English? You have never done well in full disclosure: The two most prominent newt supporters on FR and LP rimjob and marguerite have decided to try anything to built up Newt's sagging campaign.
My vet and I are both quite skilled with breech birth expertise and we've never lost one yet for which I am eternally grateful for his skill and my experience.
Since you were passed on to society by the "No Child Left Behind" program, you could at least get on your hands & knees sucking GWBush's private member to ensure you made it! After-all, being in grade-school for some 60 years of life beyond posting on mere chit-chat channels for the nearly last 15 years using your elementary teacher's computer has gotten you nowhere, admiral. I am sorry to say but you just don't cut it. Perhaps, GWBush's scholarly reading of "My Pet Goat" is your cup of tea?
In spite of all the wealth at Dalton they did not have the Eniac. We did have #2 pencils. If you expect me to reply to you in the future you are going to have to forego any more evidence of your homosexual and bestiality guilt complex.
I don't expect you to do anything other than milking your goats in the barn, goat-herder. As far as replies from you, as I have suggested before you are nothing more than a toy. I kick you like a bobble-head and you spring back up. How strange/bizarre that you would suggest such things to me. You defend yukon over his announcement of "coming out of the closet" for about one year AND you possess goats in the barn to attend to, when you can't take the pressure. I find your attempt towards personal projection and displacement an amazing "gift" about your own self, admiral.
#2. To: calcon (#0)
#3. To: calcon, gatlin, harrowup, yukon (#0)
#4. To: calcon (#0)
#5. To: buckeroo (#3)
#6. To: thoughtomator (#4)
...the favored candidate of FR: Bachmann, Perry, Cain, Gingrich - can they add to that string of epic fail?
#7. To: harrowup, We The People (#5)
#8. To: buckeroo (#3)
#9. To: calcon (#8)
#10. To: All (#0)
#11. To: All (#10)
#12. To: buckeroo (#7)
#13. To: thoughtomator (#4)
(Edited)
When JR endorsed Gingrich I called it "the kiss of death".
#14. To: harrowup (#12)
March 28, 2012 , 2012 ( about 2AM) just for phun on LP and ping your minions and fellow cohorts.
#15. To: thoughtomator (#4)
hope they all jump ship and endorse Santorum now, just to watch the same thing happen. Four candidates in a row crashed and burned shortly after becoming the favored candidate of FR: Bachmann, Perry, Cain, Gingrich - can they add to that string of epic fail?
#16. To: buckeroo (#13)
#17. To: calcon (#15)
#18. To: calcon (#15)
i think they're still in the newt camp.
#19. To: thoughtomator (#16)
#20. To: harrowup (#18)
#21. To: buckeroo (#14)
#22. To: harrowup (#18)
#23. To: mininggold (#22)
#24. To: calcon, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#15)
conservative candidates unless of course they are: romney,
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#25. To: harrowup (#21)
#26. To: mininggold (#22)
#27. To: calcon (#11)
#28. To: buckeroo (#27)
#29. To: buckeroo (#27)
#30. To: buckeroo, calcon (#25)
...it is time to expose your biography...
...you, yukon and gatlin as americans can support whoever you want and i have no problem with that...
#31. To: harrowup (#30)
Oh, thank you, thank you sir; you are too gracious. LOL.
#32. To: calcon, Ferret Mike (#31)
...thank you for your kind words
#33. To: calcon (#28)
#34. To: harrowup (#32)
(Edited)
Still a little weasel.
#35. To: harrowup (#30)
#36. To: mininggold (#22)
Rick Santorum's Voting Record
#37. To: Jameson (#36)
(Edited)
#38. To: A K A Stone (#37)
Those aren't the best Republicans.....
#39. To: Jameson (#38)
what do you think - which gopers would be worse?
#40. To: A K A Stone, Jameson (#39)
#41. To: A K A Stone (#39)
Guilianni, McCain, Olympia Snow, Richard Lugar, John Warner, Huntsman, Lisa Murkowski. There are a few.
#42. To: buckeroo (#40)
Tell your pal, Jameson, why YOU voted for McCain in 2008 knowing the bastard had no principles to begin with.
#43. To: Jameson (#41)
#44. To: A K A Stone (#42)
I was hoping McCain would die in office making Palin president.
#45. To: mininggold (#22)
Iran’s main drive for acquiring atomic weapons is not for use against Israel but as a deterrent against U.S. intervention -- Major General Zeevi Farkash, head of the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate
#46. To: Jameson (#44)
Palin?
#47. To: A K A Stone (#43)
Newt and Santorum are more conservative.
#48. To: Jameson (#47)
"social conservative" issues which no one cares about anyway.
#49. To: Jameson (#47)
Buchanan? do you remember his last presidential campaign?
#50. To: Jameson (#47)
Reagan - was a lot like Obama.
#51. To: Jameson (#47)
#52. To: Jameson (#47)
Funny ! good one! if these 2 are the poster-children for small government, low taxes and personal freedom - we're in big trouble!
#53. To: Jameson (#47)
Reagan - was a lot like Obama.....
Iran’s main drive for acquiring atomic weapons is not for use against Israel but as a deterrent against U.S. intervention -- Major General Zeevi Farkash, head of the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate
#54. To: A K A Stone (#46)
She comes across as genuine patriotic American.
#55. To: Jameson (#54)
best interests of Israeli citizens at the same level as the best interests of Americans.
#56. To: A K A Stone (#50)
Not one thing in common.
#57. To: Jameson (#54)
If that's good enough for you, then by all means -
#58. To: A K A Stone (#55)
That just just BS talking points.
#59. To: A K A Stone (#52)
They are both more conservative then those I mentioned and certainly the freak asshole in the white house.
#60. To: A K A Stone (#57)
I'd pick Sarah over the freak any day of the week.
#61. To: A K A Stone (#57)
#62. To: Jameson (#61)
... and without some issue that will rally the independent vote.....any of the 3 will lose in November.
#63. To: Jameson (#61)
#64. To: buckeroo (#62)
I think a lot of viewers/posters welcome your opinions. It is a breathe of fresh-aire.
#65. To: calcon (#63)
none of these guys have come up with a clear "message" to the american people and until they do they wouldn't touch obama
#66. To: calcon, buckeroo (#34)
#67. To: Jameson, calcon (#64)
- thanks for your comments.
#7. To: phi (#6)
Marguerite posted on 2012-02-11 19:40:37
#68. To: harrowup, calcon (#66)
That never works to your advantage
#69. To: buckeroo (#68)
...drunken gibberish...
#70. To: harrowup (#69)
#71. To: buckeroo (#70)
...insane gibberish...
#72. To: harrowup (#66)
That never works to your advantage, dumb and dumber.
#73. To: harrowup (#71)
#74. To: buckeroo, calcon (#73)
I'm sitting here within my den
#75. To: harrowup (#74)
#76. To: buckeroo, harrowup (#75)
My post directed to you was OVER three hours ago. What happened, admiral taking one of three hour cruises again with tater?
#77. To: Wood_Chopper (#76)
#78. To: Fred Mertz (#77)
Say what?
#79. To: Wood_Chopper, harrowup, tater (#76)
#80. To: Wood_Chopper (#76)
#81. To: harrowup (#74)
Calcon, there's nothing to like about you.
#82. To: buckeroo (#79)
#83. To: calcon (#81)
#84. To: calcon, WeThePeople (#81)
#85. To: buckeroo. Wood_Chopper (#79)
...when getting up in a blue moon for another cool one from the icebox.
#86. To: harrowup (#84)
Apparently LP is of some interest to you since you claimed you were banned and wish to continue your irrational attacks.
#87. To: calcon (#63)
good points, none of these guys have come up with a clear "message" to the american people and until they do they wouldn't touch obama
#88. To: harrowup, calcon (#84)
You remind me of WTP who interjects himself into a discussion and then feigns innocence.
#89. To: We The People (#87)
#90. To: We The People (#88)
and I've yet to see you kick anyone's ass.
#91. To: We The People (#88)
#92. To: calcon (#86)
you keep bringing my name up and posting to me,
you're getting quite boring
#93. To: Wood_Chopper (#78)
Fred Fred Fred! Don't you remember?
#94. To: We The People (#88)
#95. To: calcon (#90)
like when tater had to be medevac'd back to LP
#96. To: harrowup (#91)
(Edited)
#97. To: harrowup (#91)
#98. To: We The People (#96)
Yes, I asked the question
I'm not sure how I even got into this conversation.
#99. To: We The People (#97)
Have you ever performed an abortion?
#100. To: harrowup, we the people (#98)
So, you were lying.
#101. To: calcon (#100)
#102. To: harrowup (#99)
Let me know whether you remember whether you did or didn't and whether I did or didn't and then let me know why you want to know.
#103. To: harrowup (#98)
So, you were lying.
#104. To: harrowup (#99)
admit you always try to avoid looking like the weasel you are.
#105. To: We The People (#103)
#106. To: We The People (#104)
It's always so funny when you try to hurt my feelings.
#107. To: harrowup (#106)
If you think when other people insult you it is an attempt to hurt your feelings there is a good chance you are suffering from more than a giant inferiority complex.
#108. To: We The People (#107)
#109. To: harrowup (#101)
You have failed miserably in your vendetta.
#110. To: calcon (#0)
stone call broke
#111. To: calcon (#109)
#112. To: harrowup (#85)
buckeroo. Wood_Chopper
#113. To: BorisY, *Arab Spring Jihad* (#110)
(Edited)
was supposed to be wet behind the ears !
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#114. To: hondo68 (#113)
#115. To: harrowup, calcon (#111)
vendetta
#116. To: Wood_Chopper (#112)
When you put a "period" after buckeroo's handle, even though you posted my name, I don't get pinged.
a value greater than 255 is impossible in an 8 bit byte.
Ah, so it's in the blue moon that you keep the 291, since there isn't one just now.
#117. To: We The People (#102)
I definitely remember it, and I remember that you stated that YES, you had in fact performed abortions. I just want to see you admit to it here.
#118. To: buckeroo (#115)
...accusing good posters of wrong doing shall always get you into trouble.
#119. To: harrowup (#116)
Paranoid much?
#120. To: harrowup (#118)
#121. To: harrowup (#117)
(Edited)
#122. To: Wood_Chopper, calcon (#121)
#123. To: buckeroo (#120)
You don't know ANYTHING. You only have your suspicions which are based on rumour.
#124. To: harrowup (#122)
And sonny, guilt is not in my lexicon.
#125. To: Wood_Chopper (#124)
#126. To: harrowup (#123)
#127. To: buckeroo (#126)
FUCK OFF.
#128. To: harrowup (#125)
The question has been answered multiple times in multiple venues.
#129. To: harrowup (#127)
(Edited)
#130. To: Wood_Chopper (#128)
The quiet of the night, and your thoughts, are inevitable, and inescapable.
#131. To: buckeroo (#129)
...meaningless drivel...
#132. To: harrowup (#130)
#133. To: harrowup (#111)
Your vendetta little man is not about me. It is about LP and your inability to get your way.
#134. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, calcon (#122)
(Edited)
What pray tell do abortions have to do with why calcon intentionally lied about LP being all in for Newt?
#135. To: calcon. harrowup (#134)
so my big lie was a joke thread clearly intended for laughs.
#136. To: hondo68 (#113)
#137. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, (#122)
What pray tell do abortions have to do with why calcon intentionally lied about LP being all in for Newt?
#138. To: calcon, harrowup.harrowup (#137)
excuse me admiral but
#139. To: Wood_Chopper, newsjunky (#138)
#140. To: calcon, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone (#139)
#141. To: harrowup, Wood_Chopper, A K A Stone (#140)
(Edited)
You seem to want to criticize forum hosts regardless of their basic fairness and you should note how tolerant Stone is to your abuse.
#142. To: calcon (#141)
if you don't like being laughed at why do you come here and pester everyone,
You continue to prove my point about you silly little twits.
You mouth off like Lord of the Flies and end up looking like six year olds laughing at the teacher's pet getting a wedgie.
Except yukon isn't the teacher's pet...
#143. To: harrowup (#142)
#144. To: harrowup (#143)
#145. To: harrowup (#142)
I'm one of the
funniest most egotistical guys on LP and LF. My Laughter own pompousness is what keeps me happy.
#146. To: NewsJunky (#145)
I'm one of the funniest most egotistical guys on LP and LF. My Laughter own pompousness is what keeps me happy.
#147. To: calcon (#141)
btw, you boys seems to like the new alias i'm using at LP and have accepted me into your crew.
#148. To: calcon (#146)
someone needs to introduce him to reality, they appear to be complete strangers
#149. To: buckeroo (#147)
#150. To: buckeroo (#147)
#151. To: calcon, NewsJunky (#144)
...guess your next step is to start whining to stone, that i'm being mean to you
#152. To: mininggold (#148)
The importance they put on bullying posters on small chit chat sites seems a bit over the top too.
#153. To: harrowup, NewsJunky, calcon, We The People, ALL (#151)
#154. To: buckeroo (#153)
#155. To: harrowup (#154)
#156. To: harrowup (#151)
I need to keep me happy and an audience like Nose Junky with no sense of humor, incapable of understanding sarcasm. Don Rickles would love NoseJunky in the audience.
#157. To: buckeroo, A K A STONE, jwpegler, hondo68 (#153)
Bucky to harrowup: Without reading all your continuous bally-hoo about nothing concerning politics, please answer yes or no.
Posting to you has become a FUCKING waste of time, admiral. You are so FUCKING stupid that you are boring me further. FUCK OFF.
I am a constitutionalist.
At stake is the issue of credibility in these chit-chat forums.
#158. To: buckeroo (#155)
"Da."
#159. To: NewsJunky (#156)
...find you extremely amusing...
#160. To: harrowup (#158)
#161. To: Capitalist Eric, A K A STONE, jwpegler, hondo68 (#157)
If your views, my views, those of jwpegler, hondo and the Stone were really so easily dismissed, then why do they spend so much energy and time attacking???
#162. To: buckeroo (#160)
Where did you graduate?
#163. To: Capitalist Eric (#157)
#164. To: harrowup (#159)
#165. To: harrowup (#162)
#166. To: buckeroo (#165)
...dyslexic gibberish alert...
#167. To: harrowup (#166)
#168. To: buckeroo (#167)
(Edited)
...more dyslexic gibberish...
#169. To: BorisY, Vermin Exterminator, yukon, Tater, gaylin, harrowup, forensic goat psychiatrists, save the canary foundation, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#136)
The mixed metaphor "green behind the ears"/"grün hinter den Ohren" is also a mixed one in German. It combines "nicht ganz trocken hinter den Ohren" (not yet quite dry behind the ears) with "Grünschnabel" (green beak, referring to the greenish-yellow root of young birds' beaks).
Canary in a coal mine
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#170. To: harrowup (#168)
#171. To: hondo68, Capitalist Eric (#169)
...forensic goat psychiatrists,
#172. To: buckeroo (#170)
I am sure you have been "delivering" BS
#173. To: Capitalist Eric, *Ron Paul for President* (#157)
It's the whole point of the bozo filter
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#174. To: harrowup (#117)
Sorry, I missed you saying you lied about not knowing whether I did or I didn't say something.
#175. To: harrowup (#172)
(Edited)
I'm in the barn right now and really don't have the time.
#176. To: We The People (#174)
#177. To: harrowup (#176)
#178. To: We The People, harrowup (#177)
Dalton.
#179. To: buckeroo, harrowup (#178)
He is a wasically wabbit for sure!
#180. To: We The People, buckeroo (#179)
#181. To: harrowup, hondo68, We The People, calcon, NewsJunky, ALL (#180)
(Edited)
#169. To: BorisY, Vermin Exterminator, yukon, Tater, gaylin, , save the canary foundation, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#136)
the cat of of the bag err.. canary in a gilded cage perform its tweet, tweet. I like how hondo68 subtly and artfully followed his clever banner immediately after your monicker, harrowup. It is a SNICKER par excellent!
#182. To: buckeroo (#181)
#183. To: harrowup (#182)
"Most certainly I tell you, unless you turn, and become as little children, you will in no way enter into the Kingdom of Heaven."
The truth shall set you free.
#184. To: buckeroo (#183)
You continue to prove you are not up to the task, little one. You are even more inept than wimpypimples.
#185. To: harrowup (#184)
Dalton.
Dalton.
#186. To: buckeroo (#185)
You continue to prove you are not up to the task.
#187. To: harrowup (#180)
No effort needed.
#188. To: We The People (#187)
#189. To: harrowup (#182)
(Edited)
You are even more inept than wimpypimples.
#190. To: harrowup (#188)
#191. To: We The People (#189)
I, on the other hand, can call you something like......
Your posting privilege has been revoked.
Reason: abortionist troll
Now, what were you saying about testosterone, you silly little man?
#192. To: We The People (#190)
Why are you trying to change the subject to presidential candidates?
#193. To: harrowup (#191)
Your posting privilege has been revoked.
#194. To: harrowup (#192)
Why are you trying to change the subject to presidential candidates?
#195. To: harrowup (#192)
#196. To: We The People (#194)
The subject of the thread is FR and LP.
#197. To: We The People (#195)
...try not to kill any fetuses!
#198. To: harrowup (#186)
Dalton.
#199. To: buckeroo (#198)
using your elementary teacher's computer
#200. To: harrowup (#199)
If you expect me to reply to you
forego any more evidence of your homosexual and bestiality guilt complex.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]