United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: FR and LP, All In for Newt
Source:
buzzfeed
URL Source: http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/i ... et-callista-gingrichs-hair-but
Published: Feb 11, 2012
Author: me
Post Date: 2012-02-11 12:19:29 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 88981
Comments: 200
The two most prominent newt supporters on FR and LP rimjob and marguerite have decided to try anything to built up Newt's sagging campaign. Since they're are both stone call broke and too cheap to donate anyway, they have come up with a new ploy to bolster newt. The callistra You too can show your support for newt but going to Buzzfeed http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/it-costs-400-to-get-callista-gingrichs-hair-but
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-39) not displayed.
.
.
.
#40. To: A K A Stone, Jameson (#39)
Tell your pal, Jameson, why YOU voted for McCain in 2008 knowing the bastard had no principles to begin with. We all enjoy your tall-tale. It is absolutely superb!
heh heh.... I don't see much difference...... do you?
We all enjoy your tall-tale. It is absolutely superb! I was hoping McCain would die in office making Palin president. That was in the back of my mind. Also I learned that Obama sucked real bad.
Newt and Santorum are more conservative. I don't care much for them either. But they are better then Obama. I would prefer a Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Ronald Reagan, Jim Demint type of candidate.
Palin? Thanks for reminding me. Palin would be far worse than the others we've mentioned. that would be funny!
He's a right-wing socialist. Not much different than Obama, the left-wing socialist. The political spectrum doesn't start with Joseph Stalin and end with Benito Mussolini.
Thanks for reminding me. Palin would be far worse than the others we've mentioned. that would be funny! I disagree. What positions of Palins do you disagree with? She comes across as genuine patriotic American.
Funny ! good one! if these 2 are the poster-children for small government, low taxes and personal freedom - we're in big trouble! I would prefer a Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Ronald Reagan, Jim Demint type of candidate. Buchanan? do you remember his last presidential campaign? Reagan - was a lot like Obama..... except on the "social conservative" issues which no one cares about anyway. Demint? the military industrial complex's favorite son? The Pauls? great choice! but the gop will never allow either to rise to that level - and you know it.
Actually those are important issues. Take abortion. If someone is for murdering babies that is a disqualifer. If they are that evil I wouldn't want anything to do with them. Take the assault on family values by the queers. That is important too.
He didn't get many votes. But his message was on. He is correct on a whole host of issues. If they had listened to him we wouldn't have the Mexican invasion problem we now face. He is right on abortion. He was right on NAFTA and GATT. We need to get out of those awful agreements. Buchanan is right on most all issues imo.
Not one thing in common.
I honestly don't know about Demint and the military industrial complex. If you have anything that you think is interesting or important please share. Either here on its own thread.
Newt did help balance the budget back in the nineties. Or at least move it in that direction. They are both more conservative then those I mentioned and certainly the freak asshole in the white house.
Absolutely wrong. Rick Santorum is a lot like Obama. Neither is like Reagan.
If that's good enough for you, then by all means - Sarah barely made it through college, had to abandon her job as governor of a state with fewer people than most medium sized cities, failed as a reality TV star, and puts the best interests of Israeli citizens at the same level as the best interests of Americans.
That just just BS talking points.
Both inherited terrible economies - both expanded government, and used the power of the federal government to try and revive the economy. Both were very popular within their own parties, and were hated by the other party.
Sarah loves America and wants the best for us. Obama looks at America as the enemy and wants to drown us in debt and murder out babies. I'd pick Sarah over the freak any day of the week.
believe whatever you wish - I don't have talking points
Ok - you have your opinion but being in favor with the extreme right will not necessarily win a national election.
The Sarah will not be on the ballot......sorry
Anyway - I'll restate my point - Santorum, based on his voting record is a typical republican, gingrich and romney are big-government out of touch elitists country clubbers...... None of these three offer much of anything to middle class non-partisan America.... and without some issue that will rally the independent vote.....any of the 3 will lose in November. That's all - IMHO
I have to admit, you know how to clobber mere statists with a SMACKDOWN! You can go far on LF. I think a lot of viewers/posters welcome your opinions. It is a breathe of fresh-aire.
good points, none of these guys have come up with a clear "message" to the american people and until they do they wouldn't touch obama
Perhaps.... - thanks for your comments.
we agree.
That never works to your advantage, dumb and dumber.
You are welcome. Sometimes, especially on a boring evening when no news is apparent worthy of comment, I view LP for phun&laffs&giggles. Check this out: Who the heck is LaPierre? Never heard of him. Isn't maggie a hoot?
We are still waiting for your legal restraints and lock-down epiphany from last year, casually entitled, "the failed EPIC." Are we still going into this "legal" challenge? Where is your recursive picture about some maggot named 'whitesands' that protected you with a gif? Where is the legal team of "harrowup, gatlin, whitesands, and 22rifle & LP, et al" when you really need them in 2012? Oh man... the phun is just beginning... and its not even March first!
How often do we have to remind you that your dyslexia becomes painful to read; almost makes normal folks worry about your liver.
C'mon goat-herder, within your mind whom are the "we" you celebrate within the limited chemistry of all your background: legal, political, military, medical and "goat-herding when the wife ain't watching" ... these are questions that I place to you since you have just a few more moments of re-kindling the fond memories of your own mind. Spill the beans. Tell us what you have to say ... this is America!
Step away from sharp objects slowly.
gee, i'm beginning to think you don't like me.
Is that all you can caution? Why is that? Is it a reflection of your own mind? I'm sitting here within my den, having some redbreast; there are no sharp objects, Councillor; it is just pure unadulterated joy watching you suffer eating your mind-meld from last year. BTW and as a strong recommendation, strengthen your personal LP password. The one you presently have, "Iloveacock" just doesn't cut it anymore with modern technology.
That is just one of your problems bucky. Calcon, there's nothing to like about you.
My post directed to you was OVER three hours ago. What happened, admiral taking one of three hour cruises again with tater?
I have it on good authority that he and tater currently have their "heads" together as we speak, trying to figure out how to cram the value "291" into an eight bit byte.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
Say what?
Fred Fred Fred! Don't you remember? During the great "I wuz hacked" episode, the admiral and tater were busy tracking down an ip with the value "291" in it, and couldn't quite understand what the problem was. As hard as I've tried, 255 is the largest value I could cram into an 8 bit byte.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
All, I'm doing is watching some re-runs of Gilligan's Island this evening while occasionally enjoying LP when getting up in a blue moon for another cool one from the icebox.
I also want to say, harrowup&yukon&gatlin wouldn't know what to do with an android, if they thought of one. They are too busy falling over themselves (perhaps swallowing) ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvlGLdBaZ-U
Comments (81 - 200) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#41. To: A K A Stone (#39)
Guilianni, McCain, Olympia Snow, Richard Lugar, John Warner, Huntsman, Lisa Murkowski. There are a few.
#42. To: buckeroo (#40)
Tell your pal, Jameson, why YOU voted for McCain in 2008 knowing the bastard had no principles to begin with.
#43. To: Jameson (#41)
#44. To: A K A Stone (#42)
I was hoping McCain would die in office making Palin president.
#45. To: mininggold (#22)
Iran’s main drive for acquiring atomic weapons is not for use against Israel but as a deterrent against U.S. intervention -- Major General Zeevi Farkash, head of the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate
#46. To: Jameson (#44)
Palin?
#47. To: A K A Stone (#43)
Newt and Santorum are more conservative.
#48. To: Jameson (#47)
"social conservative" issues which no one cares about anyway.
#49. To: Jameson (#47)
Buchanan? do you remember his last presidential campaign?
#50. To: Jameson (#47)
Reagan - was a lot like Obama.
#51. To: Jameson (#47)
#52. To: Jameson (#47)
Funny ! good one! if these 2 are the poster-children for small government, low taxes and personal freedom - we're in big trouble!
#53. To: Jameson (#47)
Reagan - was a lot like Obama.....
Iran’s main drive for acquiring atomic weapons is not for use against Israel but as a deterrent against U.S. intervention -- Major General Zeevi Farkash, head of the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate
#54. To: A K A Stone (#46)
She comes across as genuine patriotic American.
#55. To: Jameson (#54)
best interests of Israeli citizens at the same level as the best interests of Americans.
#56. To: A K A Stone (#50)
Not one thing in common.
#57. To: Jameson (#54)
If that's good enough for you, then by all means -
#58. To: A K A Stone (#55)
That just just BS talking points.
#59. To: A K A Stone (#52)
They are both more conservative then those I mentioned and certainly the freak asshole in the white house.
#60. To: A K A Stone (#57)
I'd pick Sarah over the freak any day of the week.
#61. To: A K A Stone (#57)
#62. To: Jameson (#61)
... and without some issue that will rally the independent vote.....any of the 3 will lose in November.
#63. To: Jameson (#61)
#64. To: buckeroo (#62)
I think a lot of viewers/posters welcome your opinions. It is a breathe of fresh-aire.
#65. To: calcon (#63)
none of these guys have come up with a clear "message" to the american people and until they do they wouldn't touch obama
#66. To: calcon, buckeroo (#34)
#67. To: Jameson, calcon (#64)
- thanks for your comments.
#7. To: phi (#6)
Marguerite posted on 2012-02-11 19:40:37
#68. To: harrowup, calcon (#66)
That never works to your advantage
#69. To: buckeroo (#68)
...drunken gibberish...
#70. To: harrowup (#69)
#71. To: buckeroo (#70)
...insane gibberish...
#72. To: harrowup (#66)
That never works to your advantage, dumb and dumber.
#73. To: harrowup (#71)
#74. To: buckeroo, calcon (#73)
I'm sitting here within my den
#75. To: harrowup (#74)
#76. To: buckeroo, harrowup (#75)
My post directed to you was OVER three hours ago. What happened, admiral taking one of three hour cruises again with tater?
#77. To: Wood_Chopper (#76)
#78. To: Fred Mertz (#77)
Say what?
#79. To: Wood_Chopper, harrowup, tater (#76)
#80. To: Wood_Chopper (#76)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]