Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Senate Passes Bill Allowing Airports To Evict TSA Screeners
Source:
InfoWars
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/senate-pass ... rports-to-evict-tsa-screeners/
Published: Feb 7, 2012
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2012-02-07 19:02:09 by Murron
Keywords: None
Views: 1639
Comments: 4
Senate Passes Bill Allowing Airports To Evict TSA Screeners Legislation could lead to despised federal agency being marginalized from aviation security Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Tuesday, February 7, 2012 The Senate has passed legislation that includes a provision allowing airports to replace TSA screeners with private security, opening the door for the widely loathed federal agency to be marginalized from aviation security altogether. The bill was primarily concerned with how the Federal Aviation Authority would be funded for the next four years, but also included measures that would force the TSA to reconsider applications from airports to replace TSA workers with their own privately hired screeners. “Security companies would have an easier time winning contracts to operate airport checkpoints,” reports Businessweek. Following a massive nationwide backlash against the TSA’s invasive groping policies and its use of radiation-firing naked body scanners, linked by many prestigious health bodies to cancer, an increasing number of airports attempted to take responsibility for their own screening procedures by replacing TSA workers with privately hired personnel. However, in January 2011, when the number of airports attempting to opt-out of the TSA had risen to 16, TSA head John Pistole put a freeze on the process, refusing to consider new applications from airports. The newly approved legislation “would require the TSA to reconsider applications for private screeners that it had rejected.” Should airports choose to replace TSA screeners with their own private security, it would not only mean the screeners were better trained and more responsible for their actions, alleviating the problems of thefts and abuse by TSA workers, but it would also create tens of thousands of much needed jobs for the private sector. “Some airport executives have argued that contract security personnel are more courteous than government workers,” reports CNN. “It was felt that a private contractor would provide friendlier customer service to the traveling public,” the head of a Roswell, New Mexico, airport wrote to Congress.” A November 2010 poll found that the TSA’s “enhanced pat downs,” some of which include touching genitalia, angered 57% of regular adult fliers. West Yellowstone Airport in Montana has already replaced its TSA screeners with private security. Bert Mooney Airport, also in Montana, and Orlando Sanford International Airport in Florida will also be able to have their rejected applications to evict the TSA reconsidered under the new law. Resentment towards the TSA has raged over the last two years amongst Americans, primarily as a result of the rampant criminality in which TSA workers habitually engage. The latest example concerns TSA agent Alexandra Schmid, who stole $5,000 in cash from a passenger’s jacket as he was going through security at John F. Kennedy International Airport. The TSA’s habit of never admitting wrongdoing even when caught has also riled the traveling public. Even when the agency was forced to apologize for strip-searching two women in their 80′s just before Christmas, the TSA claimed its agents had merely violated protocol, when in fact they had sexually molested the women by forcing them to undress.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Murron (#0)
Yeah, right, sure.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
What kind of further crap is this? FUCKIN' ELIMINATE THE TSA ALONG WITH THE DHS. These assholes in government still have their heads up their asses as they work FURTHER legislative "work rounds" because of their own doings in legislature to begin with. GWBUSH is the worst FUCKIN' SCUM BAG ON THE PLANET for initiating this shit.
Evidently, there are those who believe "requiring the TSA to reconsider applications for private screeners that it had rejected" is equivalent to "Allowing Airports To Evict TSA Screeners". Senate: "RECONSIDER!!" Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so! (Boris Y) "I'd vote for obama" (Mad Dog, Paul voter) IF RonniePAULIE runs as a repukelican't, (OR even as a demonRAT), against the messiah "king" obammy; I'd vote FOR him.
The small, nearly meaningless fixes that are implemented AFTER major bills are passed into law portrays how ineffective American government is. Nothing is ever accomplished but a further white-wash of understanding the true nature of and about governance.
Senate Passes Bill Allowing Airports To Evict TSA Screeners
#2. To: Murron (#0)
(Edited)
Senate Passes Bill Allowing Airports To Evict TSA Screeners
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE [NEWT GINGRICH]IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED ~ Goldi-Lox, eternal mad&angry mistress of LP, circa February 5, 2012
#3. To: buckeroo (#2)
TSA: "OK. We reconsidered. The answer is STILL no."
Senate: "Oh, OK."
#4. To: Wood_Chopper (#3)
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE [NEWT GINGRICH]IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED ~ Goldi-Lox, eternal mad&angry mistress of LP, circa February 5, 2012
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]