Humor
See other Humor Articles
Title: Newt Gingrich, Lesbian Shocker?
Source:
national inquirer
URL Source: http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64 ... newt-gingrich-lesbian-shocker/
Published: Feb 5, 2012
Author: staff
Post Date: 2012-02-05 15:37:49 by calcon
Keywords: None
Views: 6409
Comments: 13
Got your attention? Well, read on. News today is that Gingrich is planning to hold a press conference after the Nevada caucuses wrap up. This comes as the National Enquirer hits the stands today with the blaring headline, NEWT GINGRICH’S WIFE, LESBIAN SHOCKER. Oh oh. Remember when the National Enquirer reported that John Edwards was screwing around and had a love child? So ask yourself, would the National Enquirer risk a lawsuit by making a false, unsubstantiated claim against the potential First Lady? Is this why Newt is going to hold a press conference? Fold his tent rather than put his family life under further scrutiny? I don’t think this kind of allegation, if true, necessarily is disqualifying. If it is false Newt may become the owner of the Enquirer. If this story catches legs then Newt is toast with the Christian right. My issue with Gingrich remains his lack of competence, not his wife’s sexual preference. How can you trust someone to be a competent President when he fails to meet the basic requirements to be on the ballot in Virginia, Missouri or Arizona?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
damn, damn, damn, banned from lp one day to soon, i could have really gotten the newtwits heads spinning with this article.
Gingrich and his second wife were divorced in 2000 having produced no children. On January 19, 2012, Marianne Gingrich alleged in an interview on ABC's Nightline that she had declined to accept Gingrich's suggestion of an open marriage. Doesn't an "open marriage" include all the carnal sins that are antithetical about the Catholic faith? Gingrich shall burn in HELL.
Failing to make the Arizona ballot in and of itself should be disqualifying. I was considering doing it myself just to show how easy it is - download a form off the state website, fill it in, mail it in by the deadline.
no one has ever accused newt of being the brightest bulb in the pack
The person doesn't have anything to do with the petitions. The STATE CAMPAIGN MANAGER IS IN CHARGE OF THIS. It appears even the famous packbot is getting pissed towards Sally. BTW, I am just idling away my time for a few hours waiting the Superbowl. Of course, the Patriots are going to win.
yep, the newt purges at FR and Fr lite are going to rival FR's purge of all those against open borders. of course the Pats will win, brady and bellick want revenge for their superbowl loss to the giants
What's the big deal? Barry made one dyke Secretary of State and put two more on the Supreme Court.
i hope the hell she is. She gives me the willies. The pasty skin and those blank unresponsive eyes scare the crap out of me. Looks like something that comes out late at night to steal your soul.
You and me both... She's like a Stepford Wife on stage... Creepy...
packrat1145 posted on 2012-02-05 15:52:53 ET This one is rich. Is packbutt on work release or parole?
Update ... just moments ago: I'm on it.
Really? :-)
#2. To: calcon (#1)
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE [NEWT GINGRICH]IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED ~ Goldi-Lox, eternal mad&angry mistress of LP, circa February 5, 2012
#3. To: calcon (#0)
#4. To: thoughtomator (#3)
#5. To: calcon, thoughtomator (#4)
#15. To: Goldi-Lox (#12)
MORON!
One of the main reasons I no longer waste only a fraction of the amount of time I used to spend here is because of the constant name calling for no reason. You are not giving me any reason to return on a more regular basis.
The person doesn't have anything to do with the petitions.
Assuming that by "the person," you are referring to Gingrich, if you go back and read (and comprehend) my comment, you will see that I never said he did have anything to do with the petitions.
I mentioned "the possibility that Newt was involved;" and since that possibility IS a possibility, I also surmised that an "investigation is warranted in order to determine if the campaign worker was alone in committing the crime or if Newt was in on it."
I see that in a different post you refer to your own experience with campaigns and petitions. However, that post was entered AFTER my own. Well,I don't happen to have the benefit of YOUR experience. Furthermore, at the time I posted my comment, I did not even have the benefit of YOUR experience by way of the fact that you related that experience here.
Therefore, you calling me a MORON is totally out of line and warrants an apology from you to me.
packrat1145 posted on 2012-02-05 15:52:53 ET
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE [NEWT GINGRICH]IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED ~ Goldi-Lox, eternal mad&angry mistress of LP, circa February 5, 2012
#6. To: buckeroo (#5)
#7. To: calcon (#0)
#8. To: Happy Quanzaa (#7)
What's the big deal?
#9. To: calcon (#8)
She gives me the willies. The pasty skin and those blank unresponsive eyes scare the crap out of me.
Iran’s main drive for acquiring atomic weapons is not for use against Israel but as a deterrent against U.S. intervention -- Major General Zeevi Farkash, head of the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate
#10. To: buckeroo, war (#5)
Therefore [Goldi], you calling me a MORON is totally out of line and warrants an apology from you to me.
#11. To: Fred Mertz (#10)
#19. To: Goldi-Lox (#17) (Edited)
I'm really sorry that you made comments indicating you had knowledge about stuff you admittedly knew nothing about.
Goldi, I have been frequenting Liberty Post for a long time; albeit, not so much lately. I've been participating here so long, in fact, that I don't even remember when I first started posting here; but, I'm pretty sure it was prior to or soon after the 2000 election. In all this time, I have defended you and your website many times. Admittedly, we have had disagreements; some were minor and sometimes we strongly disagreed. However, they were infrequent; and, on those rare occasions when we did not agree, I have always acquiesced to your authority and power to operate your site as you see fit; and, I have always tried to show you the respect you deserve as the owner of this site. I think is also safe to say that I have always apologized, sincerely, I might add, to you and others here when it was shown that I was in the wrong. Whatever our disagreements, I have never once resorted to name calling of ANY nature when replying to you or about you to others.
Especially in light of the above, I'm both surprised and disappointed by your flippant response to my earlier post. I might have expected such frivolous disrespect from many others here; but, not from you. As it is, you have left me in a state of pity for you rather than having any desire to reply in kind; so, if that is the way you wish to leave it, so be it.
packrat1145 posted on 2012-02-05 22:03:34 ET
ANYONE WHO UNDERMINES A CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE [NEWT GINGRICH]IS AT RISK OF BEING BANNED ~ Goldi-Lox, eternal mad&angry mistress of LP, circa February 5, 2012
#12. To: buckeroo (#11)
#13. To: buckeroo (#5)
BTW, I am just idling away my time for a few hours waiting the Superbowl. Of course, the Patriots are going to win.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]