Title: Newt: I supported Rockefeller, Newt: I supported Goldwater Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jan 24, 2012 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2012-01-24 07:23:59 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:16470 Comments:53
Newt says he supported Rockefeller in the past. Now he says he supported Goldwater. Here watch and you decide which Newt is telling the truth.
Gingrich started in politics as self-declared liberal Republican, so I suspect that his earlier statement that he supported Rockefeller over Goldwater was the truth.
But, now, how on earth could Newt Gingrich win the South Carolina primary when the day before the vote he had to cancel a major campaign stop because of lack of attendance?
The Associated Press reported: Newt Gingrich has cancelled a campaign appearance in South Carolina because of poor attendance.
The November 2012 USA presidential will go down into the history books as the most corrupt farce of an election of a presidential candidate in the history of the USA
#6. To: mcgowanjm, *The Two Parties ARE the Same*, *Ron Paul for President* (#5)
The November 2012 USA presidential will go down into the history books as the most corrupt farce of an election of a presidential candidate in the history of the USA
The GOP is hated across Amerika.
Like 2008 both the D&R candidates will be ineligible to be president of the US. Romney's father was Mexican, and Obama's was British Kenyan. McCain was Panama born.
The Democrat party is equally despised. America really is the land of equal opportunity, both are hated equally for being traitorous scum and corrupt tyrants.
" However, Lawton noticed that, even as he arrived, the projector was displaying 726 -746 votes which were broken down by candidates. He says he then inquired as to where these votes came from and was told that the votes were tabulated at 9:00 am that day and as mail came in. He claims he was then instructed that he could not be in a secure area.
Eventually, he stated, he gathered himself together and decided to assert himself as per his rights to witness the count personally under State law. He says, “[They were] very unfriendly and appeared agitated at my presence. When I got my wits I went back and declared State law allowed me to witness all aspects of this process. I was told there was little space and [to] stand out of the way and not be talking on the phone.”
Mr. Lawton then states that at 8:00 pm a precinct which he believes to be Prater’s Creek came into the office without the “zero” tape; the device that shows the voting machines were started at a vote count of zero. Without the “zero” tape, there is no certainty that the voting machines did not begin operation loaded with votes for specific candidates, a very serious issue to say the least.
