Title: Newt: I supported Rockefeller, Newt: I supported Goldwater Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jan 24, 2012 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2012-01-24 07:23:59 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:16506 Comments:53
Newt says he supported Rockefeller in the past. Now he says he supported Goldwater. Here watch and you decide which Newt is telling the truth.
Gingrich started in politics as self-declared liberal Republican, so I suspect that his earlier statement that he supported Rockefeller over Goldwater was the truth.
But, now, how on earth could Newt Gingrich win the South Carolina primary when the day before the vote he had to cancel a major campaign stop because of lack of attendance?
The Associated Press reported: Newt Gingrich has cancelled a campaign appearance in South Carolina because of poor attendance.
But, now, how on earth could Newt Gingrich win the South Carolina primary when the day before the vote he had to cancel a major campaign stop because of lack of attendance?
The Associated Press reported: Newt Gingrich has cancelled a campaign appearance in South Carolina because of poor attendance.
Why....that's not what was reported by our very own SC Israel Firster and political rally attender, Happy Quanzaa!
Always look at the background. If you can see around the cameras.
Gingrich will be the most hated figure to ever get into the WH.
The ostensible aim of all these sanctions, we are told, is to "force Iran back to the negotiating table" on its nuclear program. This is patent nonsense. Innumerable "negotiations" -- including major concessions by Iran -- have been rejected by Washington and the puppies. For example, who can forget Barack Obama's "major diplomatic initiative" in 2010, when he proposed a solution to the impasse: Iran should ship its nuclear fuel to Brazil and Turkey for processing. What happened? Well, as we noted here at the time:
Obama puts forth what is purported to be a major "diplomatic" solution to have Iran ship its nuclear fuel to Brazil and Turkey for processing. This was, of course, a hollow gesture, meant to show how intransigent and untrustworthy Iran really is; the nuke-hungry mullahs would naturally reject the deal. But when Iran made an agreement with Brazil to do exactly what Obama requested, this was immediately denounced -- by Obama -- as .... a demonstration of how intransigent and untrustworthy Iran really is. Meet a benchmark, and the masters simply change the rules. That's how it works until they get what they want: regime change in strategic lands laden with natural resources.
I missed that charade. They really do want to start a war with Iran, don't they?
Iran is left as the only real remaining obstacle to the King of Saudi Arabia being crowned as the King of a United Arabia.
We are going to continue to have wars there until he is crowned. After all,so many prominent politicians and businessmen count on payments from him to keep them rich.
