[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

Rare Van Halen Leicestershire, Donnington Park August 18, 1984 Valerie Bertinelli Cameo

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Dems propose 'Reasonable Profits Board' to regulate oil company profits
Source: The Hill
URL Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti ... o-regulate-oil-company-profits
Published: Jan 19, 2012
Author: Pete Kasperowicz
Post Date: 2012-01-20 19:20:36 by Wood_Chopper
Keywords: None
Views: 6852
Comments: 33

Dems propose 'Reasonable Profits Board' to regulate oil company profits By Pete Kasperowicz - 01/19/12 10:20 AM ET

Six House Democrats, led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), want to set up a "Reasonable Profits Board" to control gas profits.

The Democrats, worried about higher gas prices, want to set up a board that would apply a "windfall profit tax" as high as 100 percent on the sale of oil and gas, according to their legislation. The bill provides no specific guidance for how the board would determine what constitutes a reasonable profit.

The Gas Price Spike Act, H.R. 3784, would apply a windfall tax on the sale of oil and gas that ranges from 50 percent to 100 percent on all surplus earnings exceeding "a reasonable profit." It would set up a Reasonable Profits Board made up of three presidential nominees that will serve three-year terms. Unlike other bills setting up advisory boards, the Reasonable Profits Board would not be made up of any nominees from Congress.

The bill would also seem to exclude industry representatives from the board, as it says members "shall have no financial interests in any of the businesses for which reasonable profits are determined by the Board."

According to the bill, a windfall tax of 50 percent would be applied when the sale of oil or gas leads to a profit of between 100 percent and 102 percent of a reasonable profit. The windfall tax would jump to 75 percent when the profit is between 102 and 105 percent of a reasonable profit, and above that, the windfall tax would be 100 percent. The bill also specifies that the oil-and-gas companies, as the seller, would have to pay this tax.

Kucinich said these tax revenues would be used to fund alternative transportation programs when oil-and-gas prices spike.

"Gas prices continue to rise, creating a hardship for the American people," he said. "At the same time, oil companies are making record profits gouging their customers. This bill would tax only the excess profits and create forward-thinking transportation alternatives."

Specifically, he said the money would be used to fund a tax credit on the purchase of fuel-efficient cars and set up a grant program for mass transit programs when oil-and-gas prices are high.

The bill does not estimate the size of these grants or the amount of money that might be collected through the tax.

Co-sponsoring the bill are five other Democrats: Reps. John Conyers Jr. (Mich.), Bob Filner (Calif.), Marcia Fudge (Ohio), Jim Langevin (R.I.), and Lynn Woolsey (Calif.).

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#1. To: Wood_Chopper (#0)

Who is John Galt?

Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2012-01-20   19:22:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Happy Quanzaa (#1)

Who is John Galt?

Are you another reader of those Ayn Rand fables too? Too bad she couldn't practice what she preached.

mininggold  posted on  2012-01-21   12:03:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: mininggold (#8)

So, what do you think of this 'Reasonable Profits Board'?

Do you support its creation?

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2012-01-21   12:09:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Wood_Chopper (#9)

So, what do you think of this 'Reasonable Profits Board'?

Do you support its creation?

Nixon proved it couldn't be done.

mininggold  posted on  2012-01-21   12:14:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: mininggold (#12)

Nixon proved it couldn't be done.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but my view is that Nixon proved it CAN be done, and did it, while at the same time proving it didn't work.

It can still be done.

Should the govt have the power to be able to impose this type of thing in the first place?

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2012-01-21   12:27:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Wood_Chopper (#16)

Not to put too fine a point on it, but my view is that Nixon proved it CAN be done, and did it, while at the same time proving it didn't work.

It can still be done.

Should the govt have the power to be able to impose this type of thing in the first place?

Okay... he proved it wouldn't last.

Are you saying that government shouldn't represent the interests of the people?

mininggold  posted on  2012-01-21   12:31:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: mininggold (#18)

Are you saying that government shouldn't represent the interests of the people?

I'm asking you, should the govt have the power to be able to impose this type of thing in the first place?

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2012-01-21   12:35:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Wood_Chopper (#19)

I'm asking you, should the govt have the power to be able to impose this type of thing in the first place?

Of course it should, if the people who elected their representatives want it.

Why should businesses and corporations be the sacred exemptions to the will of the people?

mininggold  posted on  2012-01-21   12:39:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: mininggold (#21)

(wc)I'm asking you, should the govt have the power to be able to impose this type of thing in the first place?

(mg)Of course it should, if the people who elected their representatives want it.

Even though Nixon proved it didn't work?

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2012-01-21   12:53:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Wood_Chopper (#24)

Even though Nixon proved it didn't work?

Most voters have no idea it failed under Nixon but that was also before corps are considered to have first amendment rights.

mininggold  posted on  2012-01-21   13:02:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

#27. To: mininggold (#25)

Most voters have no idea it failed under Nixon but that was also before corps are considered to have first amendment rights.

Would you agree then, that the govt should have the power to set what is a "Reasonable Profit" for you at your job, and take 100% of anything you make over that?

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2012-01-21 13:07:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: mininggold (#25)

(wc)Even though Nixon proved it didn't work?

(mg)Most voters have no idea it failed under Nixon but that was also before corps are considered to have first amendment rights.

That doesn't answer the question.

Do you believe the govt should have the power to impose this type of thing, even though Nixon proved it didn't work?

Wood_Chopper  posted on  2012-01-21 13:13:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com