U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: NYPD, Feds Testing Gun-Scanning Technology, But Civil Liberties Groups Up In Arms
Source:
CBS NY
URL Source: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/01 ... sting-gun-scanning-technology/
Published: Jan 17, 2012
Author: CBS NY
Post Date: 2012-01-17 18:50:51 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 859
Comments: 1
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) – The NYPD is stepping up their war against illegal guns, with a new tool that could detect weapons on someone as they walk down the street. But is it violating your right to privacy? Police, along with the U.S. Department of Defense, are researching new technology in a scanner placed on police vehicles that can detect concealed weapons. “You could use it at a specific event. You could use it at a shooting-prone location,” NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly told CBS 2′s Hazel Sanchez on Tuesday. It’s called Terahertz Imaging Detection. It measures the energy radiating from a body up to 16 feet away, and can detect anything blocking it, like a gun. “I think it’s good. People will be safer and it will be a safer environment,” Jessica Ramos said. “I think it’s all about invading people’s lives more and more and more,” Antonio Gabriel added. Police Commissioner Kelly said the scanner would only be used in reasonably suspicious circumstances and could cut down on the number of stop-and-frisks on the street. But the New York Civil Liberties Union is raising a red flag. “It’s worrisome. It implicates privacy, the right to walk down the street without being subjected to a virtual pat-down by the Police Department when you’re doing nothing wrong,” the NYCLU’s Donna Lieberman said. “We have involved our attorneys as we go forward with this issue. We think it’s a very positive development,” Kelly said. People on the street have differing opinions on the price they’d be willing to pay for safety. “If they search you, you’re not giving consent, so they can do what they want, meaning they can use that as an excuse to search you for other means. I don’t think that’s constitutional at all,” Devan Thomas said. “I think it’s good. I think if someone has something to hide and they’re going to worry about it, who cares?” Robert McDougall added. Do you think this is an invasion of privacy? Or are you in favor of relinquishing some freedoms to keep the streets safe? Please offer your thoughts in the comments section below. …
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Brian S, *Ron Paul for President* (#0)
There's no such thing as an illegal gun, all arms are protected under the second amendment. Garbage in, garbage out.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
war against illegal guns
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]