United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Ohio woman loses appeal on "White Only" pool sign
Source:
Reuters
URL Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012 ... ion-pool-idUSTRE80B24120120112
Published: Jan 12, 2012
Author: Kim Palmer
Post Date: 2012-01-12 21:46:21 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 22006
Comments: 52
(Reuters) - A Cincinnati landlord found to have violated state anti-discrimination laws after she hung a "white only" sign outside her swimming pool lost an appeal with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission on Thursday. The ruling clears the way for the case to be referred to the state attorney general's office for possible state civil charges and the possibility of being forced to pay compensatory and punitive damages. The commission ruled the sign, which read "Public Swimming Pool, White Only," violated state housing discrimination laws, and dismissed landlord Jamie Hein's claim that it was simply a decorative antique. The commission's ruling followed a complaint by Michael Gunn, a former tenant who brought his 10-year-old biracial daughter to a Memorial Day weekend pool party on Hein's property attended by about 20 other guests. Gunn said Hein later questioned him about the "chemicals" his daughter used in her hair and blamed the girl, the only non-Caucasian at the party, for making the pool water "cloudy." Gunn told the commission that about a week later he saw the "white only" sign on the gate leading to the pool. He said he and his fiancé decided to move away immediately so "as not to expose my daughter to the sign and humiliation." As part of the commission's investigation, Gunn produced copies of texts he said Hein had sent to his fiancé shortly after the family moved out, blaming "grease" in his daughter's hair for the cloudy condition of the pool. After an investigation into the allegations and "informal efforts to resolve the case," the Civil Rights Commission ruled in September that Hein had violated the law. Hein requested an appeal after the initial findings but neither she nor her attorney attended the hearing on Thursday.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.
#5. To: A K A Stone (#0)
If it's a public pool,you have to allow the public access to it. You don't get to pick and choose.
sign outside her swimming pool
The sign even states it is a public pool. She doesn't have a leg to stand on.
What is stupid is to go to court over this. If they didn't like the sign they should have just ripped it off one night. I doubt it would have been replaced. I mean where do you go to buy signs like that anyway?
Your sense of freedom is non existent. You are not free to limit the freedom of others. You'll never get that, Commissar.
What a dumb statment you made. I think i am going to come over to your house tonight. Do you have a Big Screen TV. I am going to exercise my freedom to take it. You are the commie.
Again underscoring that you don't understand very much...in this case, the difference between public and private. I don't have a sign on my TV stating "PUBLIC VIEWING"...
#27. To: war (#26)
The lady may be a bitch. But that is no reason to deny anyone private property rights. If a black man owned it and put up a sign that said no whites. That would be within his rights too.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: sneakypete (#5)
If it's a public pool,you have to allow the public access to it. You don't get to pick and choose.
#9. To: A K A Stone (#6)
sign outside her swimming pool
#11. To: sneakypete (#9)
#12. To: A K A Stone (#11)
#18. To: war (#12)
Your sense of freedom is non existent. You are not free to limit the freedom of others.
#26. To: A K A Stone (#18)
Replies to Comment # 26. Again underscoring that you don't understand very much...in this case, the difference between public and private.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]