New World Order
See other New World Order Articles
Title: Eric Holder approves Dear Leader's unconstitutional appointments
Source:
The Hill
URL Source: http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis ... troversial-recess-appointments
Published: Jan 12, 2012
Author: Alexander Bolton
Post Date: 2012-01-12 13:03:28 by Happy Quanzaa
Keywords: Obama-doma-ding-dong, Holder, Dear Leader
Views: 2176
Comments: 3
The Department of Justice offered a defense Thursday for President Obama’s controversial decision to make several recess appointments while Congress was holding pro forma sessions. In a memo, Justice argued the pro forma sessions held every third day in the Senate do not constitute a functioning body that can render advice and consent on the president’s nominees. It said the president acted consistently under the law by making the appointments. “Although the Senate will have held pro forma sessions regularly from January 3 to January 23, in our judgment, those sessions do not interrupt the intrasession recess in a manner that would preclude the president from determining that the Senate remains unavailable throughout to ‘receive communications from the president or participate as a body in making appointments,’” Virginia Seitz, assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, wrote in the memo dated Jan. 6. The Office of Legal Counsel concluded the president has authority to make recess appointments during a recess and that Congress can only prevent the president from making such appointments “by remaining continuously in session and available to receive and act on nominations,” not by holding pro forma sessions. Republicans, who had set up the pro forma sessions to prevent Obama from making the appointments, are expected to challenge them in court. Obama used his recess-appointment powers to place Richard Cordray as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. He also named three people to the National Labor Relations Board. Seitz offered several points in defense of Obama’s actions. The memo noted that pro forma sessions typically last only a few seconds and require the presence of only one senator. It cited statements from Republican and Democratic senators, including James Inhofe (R-Okla.), John Thune (R-S.D.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), indicating the lawmakers themselves did not consider the cursory sessions as true breaks in the Senate recess. The memo noted that the Senate’s website does not recognize pro forma sessions as breaking up extended recesses into mini-recesses, as Republicans now argue. It also notes that messages from the president received during recess are not laid before the Senate or entered into the Congressional Record until the full Senate returns to work, even if pro forma sessions have been convened in the interim. The federal judiciary has shown reluctance to limit the president’s power to make recess appointments. In 2004, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals validated the presidential power and refused to set a minimum length of recess for such appointments to be valid. “The Constitution, on its face, does not establish a minimum time that an authorized break in the Senate must last to give legal force to the President’s appointment power under the Recess Appointments Clause. And we do not set the limit today,” the court ruled in Evans v. Stephens. On Thursday, Tom Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the business trade association has not made a decision on challenging the recess appointments in court, a sign the administration might have a strong case. “We are not going to sue today because one has to see what [Cordray] does and what the three new guys at the National Labor Relations Board do,” Donohue said. “On this one, we’re working our way through it.”
Justice memo argues Obama recess appointments were legal
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: Happy Quanzaa (#0)
Headline is a lie.
#3. To: Capitalist Eric (#2)
Snappy dialogue there, Junior. Meanwhile, the headline is a lie.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestEric Holder approves Dear Leader's unconstitutional appointments
#2. To: war (#1)
war: Headline is a lie.
Replies to Comment # 2.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]