Title: In Three Minutes, Romney Takes Three Different Positions On Whether Contraception Is Protected By The Constitution Source:
THINKPROGRESS URL Source:http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20 ... omney-contraception-flip-flop/ Published:Jan 10, 2012 Author:Ian Millhiser Post Date:2012-01-10 13:31:29 by Brian S Keywords:None Views:2167 Comments:4
Last week, GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum claimed that a pair ofSupreme Court decisions establishing the constitutional right to use contraception were wrongly decided. In Saturday’s GOP presidential candidates debate, moderator George Stephanopoulos asked former Gov. Mitt Romney (R-MA) whether he agrees with Santorum. During the awkward three minutes that followed, Romney managed to give three completely different answers:
He Doesn’t Know: Romney initially pleaded ignorance, claiming “I don’t whether a state has a right to ban contraception” and even asking Stephanopoulous whether the Supreme Court has weighed in on this issue. As Stephanopoulous pointed out, however, it’s likely that Romney was merely feigning ignorance to avoid answering the question because he is a graduate of Harvard Law School and would have almost certainly read the Supreme Court’s contraception decisions while he was studying law.
Banning Contraception Would Require An Amendment: After Stephanopoulous reminded Romney of the Supreme Court’s decisions, Romney took an fairly absolutist view of support for past Supreme Court precedents, stating that the only way to overrule them is through a constitutional amendment: “I believe that the law of the land is as spoken by the Supreme Court, and that if we disagree with the Supreme Court…then we have a process under the Constitution to change that decision, and it’s known as the amendments process.”
The Court Did Not Decide The Contraception Cases Correctly: Finally, Stephanopoulous asked whether the Supreme Court correctly decided there is a right to privacy under the Constitution — this right to privacy was the basis of the Court’s initial decision protecting contraception. Romney replied that “I don’t believe that they decided that correctly,” and explained that the kind of justices he supports “might well decide to return this issue to states instead of saying it is in the federal Constitution.”
Watch it:
To be fair, Romney also indicated that he would not personally support banning contraception, and complained several times that the question is academic because “I can’t imagine a state banning contraception.” Unfortunately, however, this simply reflects a failure of imagination on Romney’s part. Several states have considered so-called “Personhood” legislation or ballot initiatives which are intended to outlaw many forms of birth control. Under Romney’s third of three positions, such laws would be perfectly constitutional.
Actually Romney used three minutes to ridicule the liberal moderator for posing such a stupid hypothetical question, explained his position on Roe v. Wade (among other things) and managed to give fellow candidate Ron Paul some kudos.
I guess my question is how is this relevent!!!!! It's only to keep the debate conversation away from Obozo and the Leftards and how bad they suck...... (By the way Romney is a douchebag)!!!!
Quiz of the Day: Who made the statement "The world would be a better place if only Men were to vote?????? HINT: It was a woman!!!
(By the way Romney is a douchebag)!!!! .... Who is going to be the GOP nominee for potus. {{{chuckle}}}
Beings he can't get above 25% I wouldn't say that he is a lock....
But he is the douchebag that the establishment Republicans want as the nominee, even though he has so much "Leftard" baggage it isn't funny..... Can't figure out why they are pushing that loser other than they have deluded themselves into believing the people want useless "Leftard" leaning presidents!!!!!
Quiz of the Day: Who made the statement "The world would be a better place if only Men were to vote?????? HINT: It was a woman!!!
