Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Big Wall Street money for occutard/hypocrite MA Dem Sen candidate Dizzy Lizzy Warren
Source:
Boston Herald
URL Source: http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/n ... /wall-street-money-for-warren/
Published: Jan 6, 2012
Author: Boston Herald
Post Date: 2012-01-06 15:12:08 by Happy Quanzaa
Keywords: Democrat, hypocrite, cronies, con artists
Views: 5900
Comments: 12
Accountability for Murray? The Oklahoma Professor has been criticizing Scott Brown for being “Wall Street’s favorite Senator.” She has also denounced “Wall Street cash in politics.” But it turns out she may be indirectly accepting Wall Street money. The Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee, which is helping the Harvard Professor, has taken over $40 million from Wall Street during the last 7 years according to records from OpenSecrets.org. In fact, Wall Street is the biggest contributors to them. They beat lawyers and labor union. Just during this election season the DSCC has already received $1.5 million from Wall Street. If Lizzy Warden is truly opposed to Wall Street money, then shouldn’t she reject the DSCC’s money? Otherwise she is just using the DSCC to funnel in Wall Street money.
Wall Street money for Warren
I thought Elizabeth Warren was all about transparency. We are all still waiting for her to file the required financial disclosure form.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Happy Quanzaa (#0)
A Leftard and transparency just aren't compatible, because if people really knew the truth nobody would vote for them...... except for the criminally stupid!!
Quiz of the Day: Who made the statement "The world would be a better place if only Men were to vote?????? HINT: It was a woman!!!
A Leftard and transparency just aren't compatible, because if people really knew the truth nobody would vote for them...... except for the criminally stupid!! Wow, that's damning.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
It is if she doesn't give the dirty money back.
Do you mean the money that maybe she indirectly accepted?
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
This is a desperate hit piece. I wonder why they're stooping this low.
She's scary, and they ain't got nothing.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
She can indirectly un-accept it too. She can kick it back to the DNC & they can kick it back to their 1%er capitalist cronies. Reverse kickbacks, as it were. Even Dear Leader gives back kickbacks, bribes, & payoffs, when he gets caught...sometimes...when it's an election year.
What does the word "may" mean to you in this context ...it turns out she may be indirectly accepting Wall Street money? To me it means could be, but then again, perhaps not.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
What difference does it make? She has dirty money, she can keep it or give it back, one or the other, yes or no. How stupid does a Dimtard have to be not to understand something that simple?
Sen. Scott Brown may have indirectly accepted campaign contributions from pedophiles. What's wrong with the above statement?
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
What's wrong with the above statement? I would think he would more likely be taking it from wife beaters.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
LOL, perhaps both.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
I thought Elizabeth Warren was all about transparency.
#2. To: CZ82, Happy Quanzaa (#1)
...it turns out she may be indirectly accepting Wall Street money.
#3. To: lucysmom (#2)
Wow, that's damning.
#4. To: Happy Quanzaa (#3)
It is if she doesn't give the dirty money back.
#5. To: lucysmom (#4)
#6. To: Fred Mertz (#5)
This is a desperate hit piece. I wonder why they're stooping this low.
#7. To: lucysmom (#4)
she indirectly accepted
#8. To: Happy Quanzaa (#7)
She can indirectly un-accept it too.
#9. To: lucysmom (#8)
#10. To: Happy Quanzaa (#9)
#11. To: lucysmom (#10)
Sen. Scott Brown may have indirectly accepted campaign contributions from pedophiles.
#12. To: mininggold (#11)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]