United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Acting Like A King Isn't Among The President's Duties
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://news.investors.com/Article/5 ... a-more-king-than-president.htm
Published: Jan 4, 2012
Author: IBD EDITORIALS
Post Date: 2012-01-05 04:10:26 by Mad Dog
Keywords: IMPEACH, this, INSANE COMMIE monster
Views: 5691
Comments: 21
Leadership: A spokesman says the president "can't wait for Congress to act" and promised that he's "going to take action." This is the president who was "ready to rule" in 2008. Is he an elected chief executive or an emperor? In November 2008, shortly after Barack Obama was elected president, Valerie Jarrett, co-chair of his transition team, appeared on "Meet the Press." She told host Tom Brokaw that "Obama is prepared to really take power and begin to rule day one." Shouldn't someone who had reached the political heights that Jarrett had reached know that kings rule but presidents are elected to serve and are accountable to Congress, the courts and the voters? One would think that she and the rest of the administration are aware of a president's legal limitations, but simply aren't interested in respecting them. A little more than three years after Jarrett declared Obama's majesty, his spokesman Jay Carney warned on the day of the Iowa caucuses that "if Republicans choose the path of obstruction rather than cooperation, then the president is not going to sit here . .. he's going to take the actions that he can take using his executive authority." Within a day, Obama made good on the threat. On Wednesday, he bypassed the congressional approval process and named Richard Cordray as head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The appointment, made while the Senate is in a pro forma session and not in recess, came after that chamber blocked Cordray's confirmation last month. Not only is Obama trampling precedent that says recess appointments are to be done only after the Senate has been out of session for 10 days or more, he's also trying to circumvent legislation. As noted by Mark Calabria of the Cato Institute, the Dodd-Frank bill that created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau requires the CFPB's authority to remain with the Treasury secretary until the CFPB director is "confirmed by the Senate." Cordray still lacks that confirmation. Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast Apparently feeling like a gambler on a roll, Obama followed up the Cordray appointment by placing Sharon Block, Terence Flynn and Richard Griffin on the National Labor Relations Board. Of little concern to Obama are the wishes of the Senate Republicans, who had blocked these appointments, which they have the right to do within our system. Clearly our American arrangement of checks and balances written into the Constitution is an impediment to this president. Before Carney made his statement Tuesday, Obama himself said in October that "we can no longer wait for Congress to do its job. ... So where Congress won't act, I will." He, of course, is talking more about the House, which voters turned over to the Republicans in 2010, than the Senate, which is still in Democrats' hands. The president might not like it that he no longer has a Democratic majority in the House to help him ram through legislation. But he should stay within the constitutional obstructions that the opposition party is expected to place in front of him. In Wednesday's Cleveland speech when he announced the CFPB and NLRB appointments, Obama said anyone who "plays by the rules can get ahead." Yet the president is playing outside the rules and pretending he's doing it as a favor for the country. His motives, though, are clear. He wants to wield power that exceeds what the Constitution delegated to the president. Maybe First Lady Michelle Obama wasn't acting when she said on a kids television sitcom that she enjoyed being called "your excellency." Maybe she was speaking for her husband, too.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
. This question, if answered HONESTLY, will sort the goats from the sheep. Can ANY AMERICAN who actually LOVES AMERICA really defend the WAY that this insane commie monster and his regime DOES things? I mean EVEN IF he is doing things that you like, are you really OK with the way this insane commie monster DOES it? Because to my mind no AMERICAN can defend this LAWLESS son of a bitch. He was ELECTED PRESIDENT NOT F' ING KING. I'd DESPISE him and his agenda even MORE if he had CLAIMED to be a CONSERVATIVE. I know that most libTURD whores have no honor or intellectual HONESTY. I bet that they won't DIRECTLY answer my question.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
Your own signature answers your question. oBUMa is merely the most obvious symptom of a problem that is endemic to our current government; absolute corruption. That does NOT mean I agree with anything oBUMa does. In fact, I absolutely despise everything he is, everything he stands for. He is a coward and a crook. Worse, he not only lacks any sense of moral core, he's a willing shill for the elites. Sadly, he continues the agenda that has been pushed by every POTUS since Bush-I. Which leads me to my main point: every MSM-endorsed GOP candidate is simply another puppet, bought-and-paid-for. At this point, there are only two future scenarios which will play out for the country: political revolution via the ballot-box, or real revolution via the ammo-box. In the first scenario, the only viable candidate which represents a rejection of the corruption in government, is Ron Paul. If this latest example of political revolution fails, the second scenario becomes a certainty. Even if Ron Paul wins, there is still the chance of civil war. But if he loses, it is assured. Oh, I know you'll bark and spit, saying nothing... Whatever. But as you have observed, while oBUMa deserves condemnation for being a willing participant in this mess, he is not the problem, but merely a symptom of the sickness which permeates our society.
“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” -- Samuel Adams --
now you know exactly how folks, that love the Constitution, feel about the current crop of RNC "conservatives" being shoved down our throat...with the exception of Ron Paul, who is a staunch supporter of that document they hate. You have made OUR point exquisitely!
That does NOT mean I agree with anything oBUMa does. In fact, I absolutely despise everything he is, everything he stands for. He is a coward and a crook. Worse, he not only lacks any sense of moral core, he's a willing shill for the elites. No it does NOT. It only answers my question in regards to myself. Which should be kind of obvious. the question is; "This question, if answered HONESTLY, will sort the goats from the sheep. Can ANY AMERICAN who actually LOVES AMERICA really defend the WAY that this insane commie monster and his regime DOES things? I mean EVEN IF he is doing things that you like, are you really OK with the way this insane commie monster DOES it? Because to my mind no AMERICAN can defend this LAWLESS son of a bitch. He was ELECTED PRESIDENT NOT F' ING KING. I'd DESPISE him and his agenda even MORE if he had CLAIMED to be a CONSERVATIVE. I know that most libTURD whores have no honor or intellectual HONESTY." -------------------------------- I'm putting you down for a NO. You will please note how many REFUSE to answer the question.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
This is exactly why I hate the Republican Party.
WTF are you gibbering about CULT boy? I've been a TRADITIONAL AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVE ALL of MY F' ing life. Since before you were sh!tting yellow punk. My family voted for GOLDWATER punk. You don't know sh!t about LOVING and LIVING the US CONSTITUTION you absurd little CULT boy b!tch. You don't know sh!t about being a REAL CONSERVATIVE you little gibbering b!tch. No REAL CONSERVATIVE, with a working BRAIN and a knowledge of what' RonniePaulie's positions actually ARE cult boy, could ever support your wee failed FRAUD hero CULT boy. ............................................................... Why ron paul has ZERO chance to win the republican presidential primary Posted by mikeymike143 (Diary) 1. His foreign policy ideas are simply the same recycled bad ideas that Jimmy Carter had. A foreign policy of ”let’s hide our head in the sand like an ostrich and blame big bad America and hope that everyone leaves us alone” is not only ignorant, but also dangerous for our country. And the big winners in last November’s elections were the ones who espoused ”american exceptionalism”, not the ones who espoused ”anti-american apologism”. Now I will admit Ron Paul’s foreign policy message would go over well with the Code Pink/Dennis Kucinich voters, but those type of people tend to be Democrats, not Republicans. One of my facebook friends put it best when he said ”if Ron Paul had been president during World War 2, we would all be speaking German now”. 2. He has no real political power. And this was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in 2008. Yes, he can win any ONLINE presidential poll. So what. In 2007 the paulbots hijacked the same online polls and Ron Paul won them all. His followers then posed articles all over the internet touting his candidacy. He then suckered his gullible followers telling them that the ”polls showed he could win” and send to him money. Then came the 2008 primaries. Out of the 50 states that were availible for Ron Paul to win, guess how many he won? ZERO. And that is spelled Z-E-R-O. Now let’s go to the present day. His internet saavy paulbots are again winning all the online and straw polls for their idol. His followers are again posting articles about him like he actually has a legitimate chance to win. Next is going to come the annual ”moneybomb” when Ron Paul once again fleeces his followers by pointing out that he is ahead in the polls and has a chance to win this time. But their delusional fantasy is going to run into a buzzsaw called Republican primary voters. Paul got absolutely destroyed when he ran in 1988, got whipped by John McCain in 2008, and he will be a three time loser in 2012. 3. There are plenty of people who are ”one issue voters” in politics. And in the Republican party there are plenty of people that ”opposition to islam” is the one issue they feel strongly about. You can go to any anti islam or conservative jewish site and see that the two politicians that are diliked the most are Obama and Ron Paul. Ron Paul has said ”I don’t believe for one minute the religion of islam is our enemy”. And Paul also attacked the Sunshine Patriots for their oppostion to the ground zero mosque. Now i am not going to debate the muslim issue here, but the fact that a decent sized voting group in your own party considers you one of their main foes is certainly not good news for your campaign. Now to be fair, you will get the people who think Israel is oppressing Palestine and the pro muslim agenda voters will be on Paul’s side. The only problem with that is almost all of that crowd are Democrats who support Obama. 4. Let’s look at Ron Paul’s position on crack cocaine and heroin. Now I am totally fine with legalizing pot and prostitution in any state if the voters want it. If somebody wants to get laid or smoke a joint it sure isn’t any of my business. But we are talking about legalizing hard drugs because Ron Paul says that the government is unconstitutionally sticking its nose in peoples business by not allowing it. I say once it becomes legal, who is going to cover the costs of the people that get addicted to it to go to rehab or treatment centers. And please don’t say the addict. Probably the government will have to. Great, now here comes a great big expansion of government to fight the drug war that was ”caused by the tea party candidate”. Which by the way, I as a taxpayer will have to cover. Increased police and court costs etc, etc. But the issue isn’t what I think or Ron Paul thinks, the issue is what does the Republican primary voter think of this policy. The ”religious right” will certainly oppose it full force. And I would think that anyone that has had a family member suffer through the addiction process will be opposed to it. That’s two groups opposed. Of course, Paul will pick up the ”left wing hippie” vote and the anarchists vote. Except the left wing hippies are already card carrying members of the Democratic party. And all the anarchists who want to overthrow big bad America are already his supporters. 5. If he were alive today, Ronald Reagan would strongly oppose him. Reagan believed in spending generously on our national defense and certainly had an interventionist foreign policy. And according to the Ron Paul playbook, that would make the greatest president of my era ”a neocon”. Their policies and beliefs are totally and completely different. Naturally Ron Paul’s followers will attempt to hide that fact by showing you an old video of Ronald Reagan praising Ron Paul as a candidate and using that as proof that Ronald Reagan would support Ron Paul in 2012. Now watch me dismantle that silly argument!!! Does anyone remember Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania? Arlen was the senator that everyone on tea party and conservative sites called a liberal RINO. He was challenged by a tea party backed conservative in the primary named Pat Toomey and when Specter saw how opposed conservatives were to his candidacy he changed parties to Democrat. He voted for TARP, Obama’s socialized health care plan, and was pro affirmative action and amnesty. Yet, Reagan praised him as a true conservative back in the 198082;s and even cut a campaign ad for him. But go ask a Pennsylvania tea partier what they think of Specter today. LOL. If you were a House or Senate member, and of course running as a Republican, Ronald Reagan would praise you as a candidate for office. That’s part of what a sitting president does for members of his party. But rather than look at a 30 year old video let’s look at Ron Paul has to say about Ronald Reagan. In 1987, Ron Paul wrote a letter to Frank Fahrenkopf, chairman of the Republican National Committee, starting that he wanted to totally publically disassociate himself with the policies of Ronald Reagan(funny but he yet to publically disassociate with the 9-11 truther movement or Code Pink). He later told the Dallas Morning News that the presidency of Ronald Reagan was a ”dramatic failure”. OK, let’s take a look at the political success of both politicians and decide if that is true. In 2008 Ron Paul ran in the Republican primary for president. He got 5% of the vote. In other words, 19 OUT OF 20 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY VOTERS DID NOT VOTE FOR RON PAUL IN THE LAST ELECTION. In 1984, Ronald Reagan was reelected as the president of the United States in a landslide, winning 49 out of 50 states, and his 525 electoral votes were the the most of any candidate in American history. Hmmm, I think we have to score this one for the Gipper. 6. Illegal Immigration. According to the highly respected anti immigation group NUMBERS USA, Ron Paul has the lowest grade of any Republican presidential candidate out there, coming in with an F. Naturally, his paulbots try to put a spin on this by saying ”welfare and benefit programs should be unconsititutional so illegal immigrants wont come here”. If Ron Paul threw puppies off a tall building his hynoptized followers would be applauding and yelling it was ”constitutional”. That argument wont cut it with the voters. Polls overwhelmingly show that Americans are in favor of closing our borders and against all forms of amnesty. And that really holds true with Republican voters. April has posted articles by former Ron Paul allies like Tom Tancrdeo that blast Paul on the immigration issue. Yet again, Ron Paul thinks like a liberal Democrat, and in fact even has the same ”F” grade that NUMBERS USA gave Obama. 7. Paul’s pork problem. One thing career politicians learn to do is talk conservative while picking the taxpayers pocket for money. And ”Porkulus Paul” has this shady routine down pat. First of all, let’s go back to last November’s elections to get the proper perspective on this issue. The Republicans destroyed the Democrats on November 3 due to the energy and votes of the tea party!!!!! Now the tea party came in and deservedly wanted to flex it muscles. And decided to take a principled stand against the unethical practice of pork(earmarks). The fight against earmarks was led by the Tea Party Patriots(TPP) and other tea party and conservative groups against the pork loving Democrats. In fact, TPP leader Mark Meckler considered this such an important issue that he promised to run a tea party challenger against any Republican that accepted them. “We’ll do what we always do,” said Meckler. “Our members will put immense pressure on every senator to vote against earmarks. This is a fundamental issue — it’s both substantive and symbolic. Will they vote against the politics of the past or are they still stuck in it? This is a vote that will never go away, like TARP. Tea Partiers have long memories. Politicians have always taken advantage of the fact that voters have short memories, but we’ll know, we’ll remember, and in 2012 when they have aggressive, well-funded primary challengers, they’ll know why.” Then it came out that a Republican asked for 150 MILLION DOLLARS IN PORK FOR HIS DISTRICT!!! Surely this was a RINO. Maybe Olympia Snowe or Scott Brown? No, it was actually Ron Paul. U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) was one of only four House Republicans to break rank from the party and request earmarks despite a Republican Conference earmark moratorium. Paul sent 41 earmark requests totaling $157,093,544 for the 2011 Fiscal Year. Ron Paul is to the far left of the tea party on just about every major issue. Actually he looks just like a liberal Democrat to me. SAY NO TO THE FAR LEFT TURN, STAY RIGHT. NO PAUL IN 2012.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
This is exactly why I hate the Republican Party. There is NO way on earth that you could despise the repukelican't partee more than I do. Then your fellow CULTISTS all insist since I despise YOUR wee failed hero FRAUD, that I MUST then NOT be a "real" CONSERVATIVE. What a bunch of MOUTH BREATHERS. I'm ME nobody else is ME. I'm an INDIVIDUAL not a part of some PHUCKING GROUP. It cracks me up how absolutely STUPID so many of your fellow CULTISTS are.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
rant on child...The ONLY one supporting the Constitution is Ron Paul...deal with it..
Is Mormonism a cult?
LOL! Your grade school logic and level of grammar and vocabulary little boy are expected. Got you with that shitting yellow comment didn't I little boy? Well the TRUTH HURTS eh little boy? Well it just hurts YOU little BOY. RP effectively "supports" the US CONSTITUTION exactly as much as the messiah "king" obammy does. Well that's what his RECORD of "accomplishments" shows. He NEVER does anything that he says that he wants to do, does he CULT boy? But it's always somebody else's fault isn't it CULT boy? Look DEEPLY into a mirror little boy, you see the reason why wolves eat their young. Let me know if I'm going too fast for you CULT boy. IDIOT.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
Not like you PaulTARD's CULT stone. Here maybe THIS will help you understand? (btw, I don't care what religion anybody running for President claims except moo-slums.)
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
. BTW stone I notice that ALL of you CULT members have pissed and moaned about your wee failed FRAUD of a hero here, without even once addressing the content of THIS THREAD, which is the PRESENT VIOLATION OF THE US CONSTITUTION BY A SITTING US PRESIDENT. You'd think that such a BIG bunch of CONSTITUTION LOVERS abnd DEFENDERS might just make a comment about an INSANE COMMIE monster raping it and US RIGHT NOW? But NO, YOU limp dicked CULTISTS whine about how wonderful you wee hero is and how ebil I am for NOT kissing his PHONY AZZ. What a bunch of pathetic do nothing FRAUDS you ALL are. PITIFUL.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
Hilarius...I bet you stamp your feet as you rage, type and throw your incoherent tantrum. How old ARE you? Grow up and we'll talk again...maybe, but in the meantime, thanks for the laugh.
Who are you supporting now that Bachman is out? Here is what the leader of our cult said. Ron Paul on Cordray appointment: ‘The president is not a dictator or a king’ By Felicia Sonmez Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) on Thursday became the latest presidential hopeful to criticize President Obama’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, saying in a statement that Obama “has acted in clear disregard of the Constitution” and “must be called to account for his actions.” “It is disappointing that a former constitutional law professor does not understand that the president is not a dictator or a king who can simply ignore the Constitution whenever he feels frustrated by the system of checks and balances wisely put in place by our Founders,” Paul said in a statement. Paul added that he has opposed “unconstitutional power grabs” by presidents of both parties and argued that that consistency makes him “the only Republican candidate with the credibility and the record” to challenge Obama. “If the president insists on behaving in such a cavalier manner with regard to requirements set forth by the Constitution, then action by Congress may become necessary to rein in his flagrant contempt for the rules,” he said. Paul’s statement Thursday follows one by Mitt Romney on Wednesday. The former Massachusetts governor charged that Obama’s recess appointment “represents Chicago-style politics at its worst and is precisely what then-Senator Obama claimed would be ‘the wrong thing to do.’ ” Reactions to the Cordray appointment have largely fallen along party lines – even Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who was one of three Senate Republicans to vote in favor of the 2012 Dodd-Frank legislation that established the watchdog agency, said in a statement Wednesday that she was “deeply troubled” by Obama’s recess appointment of Cordray. So far, only one prominent Republican – Sen. Scott Brown (Mass.) – has come out in favor of the recess appointment. Brown, of course, is facing Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren in what’s expected to be one of the most competitive Senate races of the year; Warren was Obama’s initial choice to head the CFPB. At stake in the Cordray debate is not simply the matter of his nomination or even of the jurisdiction of the consumer watchdog agency but rather the manner in which Obama made his recess appointment Wednesday. By making the appointment during a recess of less than 10 days, Obama made a move that has been unprecedented in the past decade – and one that Republicans say could open to the door to similar actions by the Obama White House and others in the future. Democrats have countered that by holding “pro-forma” sessions every three days throughout the winter recess, congressional Republicans have essentially moved to block permanently any recess appointments by the White House.
Not like you PaulTARD's CULT stone. A cult is a religious organization that denies christ. That is the basic definition. Ron Paul says he is a christian. Mormons deny Jesus is Christ. So according to your words "PaulTARD's" are worse then that. What is a PaulTARD anyway? Is it everyone that votes for Ron Paul or just certain ones.?
All evidence to the contrary. You'll vote for whichever big-government Republican the RNC tells you to vote for because you have no principles. Take your vitriol towards Ron Paul for instance. He is hands-down the MOST Conservative Republican running for President, yet your fear of freedom won't allow you to see it.
“America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.”---Claire Wolfe Bull. The "basic" definition of a cult is pick any religion. And I defy you to post any mainstream definition, e.g. Oxford English Dictionary, American Standard, Merriam-Webster etc. and not some Church of His Most Holy Toilet's definition, to the contrary.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
LOL! Your typical PaulTARD grade school logic and grammar and vocabulary little boy shows what you are little boy. Got you with that shitting yellow comment didn't I little boy? Well the TRUTH HURTS eh little boy? Well it just hurts YOU little BOY. RP effectively "supports" the US CONSTITUTION exactly as much as the messiah "king" obammy does. Well that's what his RECORD of "accomplishments" shows. RP NEVER does anything that he says that he wants to do, does he CULT boy? But it's always somebody else's fault isn't it CULT boy? Look DEEPLY into a mirror little boy, you see the reason why wolves eat their young. Let me know if I'm going too fast for you CULT boy. IDIOT.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
Not like you PaulTARD's CULT stone. A cult is a religious organization that denies christ. That is the basic definition. Ron Paul says he is a christian. Mormons deny Jesus is Christ. So according to your words "PaulTARD's" are worse then that. What is a PaulTARD anyway? Is it everyone that votes for Ron Paul or just certain ones.? I KNOW what the Church of Latter Day Saints is and what they teach. BUT no Stone that is just ONE definition of a CULT. Read and LEARN, cultdefinition.com/ RP says he's a "Christian"? So do the LDS stone, so what? We're talking the election of a US PRESIDENT not of a POPE. PaulTARDS are RP CULTISTS. If you will listen to the TRUTH about RP and not attack just the messenger you aren't a TARD, if you are really interested in the actual OBJECTIVE TRUTH about RP's record and NOT in just spin and apologetics for him you aren't a TARD. If you are more interested in what is good for AMERICA and AMERICAN'S than what the touchy feeley "world community" wants you are not a TARD. If you would LIE and spin and apologize for RP, no matter what, you are a PaulTARD. If I support somebody in politics that does not mean that I agree with that person 100% of the time on 100% of matters. The ONLY people who do THAT are CULTISTS and TARDS. TARDS are only interested in winning , no matter what the truth is about their candidate. Claro?
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
Can you give 3 examples of the people you called Paultards doing this?
Can you give 3 examples of the people you called Paultards doing this? That's so F' ing EASY and OBVIOUS! I could do it ALL DAY LONG. 1.) Your wee failed FRAUD hero is claiming to be a CONSERVATIVE. YOU claim that he is CONSERVATIVE. It's CULT boy/PaulTARD DOGMA that your wee failed FRAUD hero is CONSERVATIVE. 2.) How about how ALL of you PaulTARDS defend and TRY to spin your wee failed FRAUD hero's role in the so-called racist content of HIS news letters? The so-called "racism" is certainly up to debate, BUT your wee failed FRAUD hero claims to know NOTHING about how it happened, for YEARS. At all. He GOT PAID, he ran fewer than twenty people who put this content into HIS news letters, that had HIS name on them for YEARS and your hero claims to know absolutely NOTHING about it? REALLY? Your hero can't run fewer than twenty people and he wants to be PRESIDENT?, and you PaulTARDS support it? F' ing GOOD ONE! LOL! ad nauseam.) ... Your wee failed FRAUD hero is a LIAR and a PHONY SOB. He's not even a CONSERVATIVE of ANY SORT. CULT boy FOOLS.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
#2. To: Mad Dog (#1)
#3. To: Mad Dog (#1)
I'd DESPISE him and his agenda even MORE if he had CLAIMED to be a CONSERVATIVE.
#4. To: Capitalist Eric (#2)
Your own signature answers your question. oBUMa is merely the most obvious symptom of a problem that is endemic to our current government; absolute corruption.
#5. To: Mad Dog (#4)
I'd DESPISE him and his agenda even MORE if he had CLAIMED to be a CONSERVATIVE.
#6. To: freedomsnotfree (#3)
now you know exactly how folks, that love the Constitution, feel about the current crop of RNC "conservatives" being shoved down our throat...with the exception of Ron Paul, who is a staunch supporter of that document they hate. You have made OUR point exquisitely!
#7. To: We The People (#5)
I'd DESPISE him and his agenda even MORE if he had CLAIMED to be a CONSERVATIVE.
#8. To: Mad Dog (#6)
#9. To: Mad Dog (#7)
It cracks me up how absolutely STUPID so many of your fellow CULTISTS are.
#10. To: freedomsnotfree (#8)
rant on child...The ONLY one supporting the Constitution is Ron Paul...deal with it..
#11. To: A K A Stone (#9)
(Edited)
Is Mormonism a cult?
#12. To: A K A Stone (#9)
#13. To: Mad Dog (#10)
#14. To: Mad Dog (#12)
BTW stone I notice that ALL of you CULT members have pissed and moaned about your wee failed FRAUD of a hero here, without even once addressing the content of THIS THREAD
#15. To: Mad Dog (#11)
Is Mormonism a cult?
#16. To: Mad Dog (#6)
(Edited)
I've been a TRADITIONAL AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVE ALL of MY F' ing life.
#17. To: A K A Stone (#15)
(Edited)
A cult is a religious organization that denies christ. That is the basic definition.
#18. To: freedomsnotfree (#13)
Hilarius (sic) ...I bet you stamp your feet as you rage, type and throw your incoherent tantrum. How old ARE you? Grow up and we'll talk again...maybe, but in the meantime, thanks for the laugh.
#19. To: A K A Stone (#15)
Is Mormonism a cult?
#20. To: Mad Dog (#19)
If you would LIE and spin and apologize for RP, no matter what, you are a PaulTARD.
#21. To: A K A Stone (#20)
If you would LIE and spin and apologize for RP, no matter what, you are a PaulTARD.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]