U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: Obama defies Senate, appointing consumer, labor officials
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.thesunnews.com/2012/01/0 ... a-make-recess-appointment.html
Published: Jan 4, 2012
Author: Lesley Clark and Tony Pugh
Post Date: 2012-01-04 23:22:22 by Mad Dog
Keywords: IMPEACH, this, INSANE COMMIE monster
Views: 141419
Comments: 237
WASHINGTON — A defiant President Barack Obama sidestepped Congress on Wednesday and appointed a new consumer watchdog, locking horns with Republicans, who immediately accused the president of exceeding his authority to appoint a director to an agency they oppose. Speaking at a high school in the election battleground state of Ohio with his nominee for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau by his side, Obama struck a populist tone and blamed congressional Republicans for stalling the appointment of former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray as “America’s consumer watchdog.” “I’ve got an obligation to act on behalf of the American people,” the president said. “And I’m not going to stand by while a minority in the Senate puts party ideology ahead of the people that we were elected to serve.” Obama defies Senate, appoints consumer and labor officials Obama defies Senate, appoints consumer and labor officials A defiant President Barack Obama sidestepped Congress on Wednesday and appointed a new consumer watchdog, locking horns with Republicans, who immediately accused the president of exceeding his authority to appoint a director to an agency they oppose. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau opens Consumer Financial Protection Bureau opens The most tangible government reform to grow out of the Great Recession officially goes live this week when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau assumes its regulatory authority on Thursday. Ex-Ohio attorney general picked to lead consumer finance watchdog agency Ex- Ohio attorney general picked to lead consumer finance watchdog agency President Barack Obama will nominate Richard Cordray, who as Ohio's attorney general was a leader in state policing of financial industry abuses, to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that formally opens its doors this week, the White House said Sunday. Stirring up a fight, Obama names consumer watchdog Stirring up a fight, Obama names consumer watchdog Defying Republican lawmakers, President Barack Obama on Wednesday barreled by the Senate and installed a national consumer watchdog on his own, provoking GOP threats of a constitutional showdown in the courts. Setting a fierce tone in the election-year fight for middle-class voters, Obama said: "I refuse to take 'no' for an answer." Senate Republicans block Obama nominee to head consumer finance agency Senate Republicans block Obama nominee to head consumer finance agency As expected, Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked a confirmation vote on President Barack Obama's choice to lead the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Hours later, the White House announced that Obama also had appointed three members to the National Labor Relations Board, in defiance of Senate Republicans. In Ohio, the president noted that he'd nominated Cordray last summer to serve as a beat cop against deceptive, abusive and predatory loan products in the financial marketplace, but that Senate Republicans had blocked the appointment, not because Cordray was unqualified, but because “they don’t agree with the law that set up a consumer watchdog in the first place,” he said. Senate Republicans have made clear that is, indeed, their motive.“They want to weaken the law. They want to water it down,” Obama said, adding that, “by the way, a lot of folks in the financial industry have poured millions of dollars to try to water it down.” Senate Republicans blocked a confirmation vote on Cordray last month and Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky accused Obama on Wednesday of making an unprecedented appointment, because the Senate isn't in official recess. Traditionally, McConnell said, presidents make such appointments only when the Senate is in recess for 10 days or longer. Obama has “arrogantly circumvented the American people,” McConnell said, adding that the move “lands this appointee in uncertain legal territory, threatens the confirmation process and fundamentally endangers the Congress’ role in providing a check on the excesses of the executive branch. ”He said that Republicans wanted structural changes to the agency, which was “subject to none of the checks that independent agencies normally operate under.”White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer accused Senate Republicans of coming up with a “gimmick” to prevent the president from exercising his recess appointment authority: being out of town for weeks but convening every few days in a “pro forma” session.Sarah Binder, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a center-left policy-research center, said the Constitution “doesn’t define what constitutes a valid recess for the purpose of the president’s proper exercise of the recess appointment power, leaving it open to interpretation. ”She said that in the most recent court case on the matter _ when the late Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., challenged the recess appointment of William Pryor to an appeals court by President George W. Bush _ the administration’s right to make a recess appointment on the seventh day of a 10-day intra-session recess was upheld. The back and forth over Cordray underscores the partisan fighting that's characterized every development of the new consumer protection bureau, the most tangible government response to the nation's 2008 economic meltdown. After failing last month to get the 60 votes needed for a straight up-or-down Senate confirmation vote on Cordray, Obama hinted that he might use a recess appointment to bypass the GOP filibuster that's left the new agency without a director since its regulatory authority began in July. At the time, the president also voiced frustration over GOP efforts to delay his many other nominations, including federal judges and assistant treasury secretaries. Senate Republicans also have blocked appointments to the National Labor Relations Board; Obama appointed three members Wednesday. The NLRB appointments allow the board to decide cases again. That authority was lost earlier this week when the five-member panel was down to only two members and was unable to field a quorum. Kimberly Freeman Brown, the executive director of American Rights at Work, commended the president’s NLRB appointments.“Without a functioning board, employers and employees alike would have been stuck in legal limbo on a range of critical issues, including the rights of certain workers to form unions and the appropriate use of social media to discuss workplace concerns,” Brown said.Created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau monitors deceptive, abusive and predatory loan products in the financial marketplace. A division of the Federal Reserve, the bureau works as a stand-alone agency to make sure consumers understand the terms of loan products by reducing fine print, simplifying forms and helping to illuminate costly penalties and fees that often are hidden.Senate Republicans see the bureau as a vast overreach of government authority and have blocked any nominee for director until the agency's structure is revamped. Without a director, the bureau could examine and oversee large banks, but it couldn't oversee non-depository institutions such as mortgage companies, payday lenders and credit bureaus.The U.S. Chamber of Commerce decried Obama’s move as “unprecedented, constitutionally questionable” and said it put the authority of the director and the bureau’s work “in legal jeopardy.”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 89.
#2. To: Mad Dog, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#0)
. Don't you like your President who YOUR vote help elect CULT boy? especially wearing the CMH? Only ignorant, lazy, shallow "thinker" FOOLS believe that "the two parties are the same". I'm waiting for the repukelican't messiah "king" obammy. Oh yeah "it was all de ebil BOOOOOOSH'S fault", right you CULT boy moron? EVERY vote that RonniePaulie takes in his coming third party run will be a vote FOR the messiah "king" obammy. F' ing CULTIST IDIOTS.
Yes, that's true...you're glorious saviour in the republican party will do NOTHING about any of these issue...not ONE thing. 1) is the TSA going to be dismantled 2) the IRS going to be phased out 3) the Federal Reserve phased out 4) unconstitutional agencies abolished 5) these fake wars ended 6) NDAA repealed 7) Patriot Act repealed 8) 1 Trillion in spending cut the first year 9) Obamacare repealed The ONLY one even talking about these issues is Paul. The fact YOU don't see that BOTH parties are own by the global interests doesn't mean others don't see it. Bush, with his open borders, Patriot act, free trade the Constitution is "just a GD piece of paper", was just as bad as Obama...the difference is the can has been kicked farther down the road and the blatant acts of treason that go with it. Educate yourself and stop acting like a fool...
Yes, that's true...you're glorious saviour in the republican party will do NOTHING about any of these issue...not ONE thing. The ONLY one even talking about these issues is Paul. The fact YOU don't see that BOTH parties are own by the global interests doesn't mean others don't see it. Bush, with his open borders, Patriot act, free trade the Constitution is "just a GD piece of paper", was just as bad as Obama...the difference is the can has been kicked farther down the road and the blatant acts of treason that go with it. Educate yourself and stop acting like a fool... LOL! First, you gibbering CULTIST azzwipe, "you're" is a contraction of YOU ARE. You make absolutely ZERO sense CULT boy. Which is SOP for you paulTARDS azzwipes. Second, you gibbering CULTIST azzwipe, you need to educate yourself and stop acting like a FOOL .......................................................................... Why ron paul has ZERO chance to win the republican presidential primary Posted by mikeymike143 (Diary) 1. His foreign policy ideas are simply the same recycled bad ideas that Jimmy Carter had. A foreign policy of ”let’s hide our head in the sand like an ostrich and blame big bad America and hope that everyone leaves us alone” is not only ignorant, but also dangerous for our country. And the big winners in last November’s elections were the ones who espoused ”american exceptionalism”, not the ones who espoused ”anti-american apologism”. Now I will admit Ron Paul’s foreign policy message would go over well with the Code Pink/Dennis Kucinich voters, but those type of people tend to be Democrats, not Republicans. One of my facebook friends put it best when he said ”if Ron Paul had been president during World War 2, we would all be speaking German now”. 2. He has no real political power. And this was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in 2008. Yes, he can win any ONLINE presidential poll. So what. In 2007 the paulbots hijacked the same online polls and Ron Paul won them all. His followers then posed articles all over the internet touting his candidacy. He then suckered his gullible followers telling them that the ”polls showed he could win” and send to him money. Then came the 2008 primaries. Out of the 50 states that were availible for Ron Paul to win, guess how many he won? ZERO. And that is spelled Z-E-R-O. Now let’s go to the present day. His internet saavy paulbots are again winning all the online and straw polls for their idol. His followers are again posting articles about him like he actually has a legitimate chance to win. Next is going to come the annual ”moneybomb” when Ron Paul once again fleeces his followers by pointing out that he is ahead in the polls and has a chance to win this time. But their delusional fantasy is going to run into a buzzsaw called Republican primary voters. Paul got absolutely destroyed when he ran in 1988, got whipped by John McCain in 2008, and he will be a three time loser in 2012. 3. There are plenty of people who are ”one issue voters” in politics. And in the Republican party there are plenty of people that ”opposition to islam” is the one issue they feel strongly about. You can go to any anti islam or conservative jewish site and see that the two politicians that are diliked the most are Obama and Ron Paul. Ron Paul has said ”I don’t believe for one minute the religion of islam is our enemy”. And Paul also attacked the Sunshine Patriots for their oppostion to the ground zero mosque. Now i am not going to debate the muslim issue here, but the fact that a decent sized voting group in your own party considers you one of their main foes is certainly not good news for your campaign. Now to be fair, you will get the people who think Israel is oppressing Palestine and the pro muslim agenda voters will be on Paul’s side. The only problem with that is almost all of that crowd are Democrats who support Obama. 4. Let’s look at Ron Paul’s position on crack cocaine and heroin. Now I am totally fine with legalizing pot and prostitution in any state if the voters want it. If somebody wants to get laid or smoke a joint it sure isn’t any of my business. But we are talking about legalizing hard drugs because Ron Paul says that the government is unconstitutionally sticking its nose in peoples business by not allowing it. I say once it becomes legal, who is going to cover the costs of the people that get addicted to it to go to rehab or treatment centers. And please don’t say the addict. Probably the government will have to. Great, now here comes a great big expansion of government to fight the drug war that was ”caused by the tea party candidate”. Which by the way, I as a taxpayer will have to cover. Increased police and court costs etc, etc. But the issue isn’t what I think or Ron Paul thinks, the issue is what does the Republican primary voter think of this policy. The ”religious right” will certainly oppose it full force. And I would think that anyone that has had a family member suffer through the addiction process will be opposed to it. That’s two groups opposed. Of course, Paul will pick up the ”left wing hippie” vote and the anarchists vote. Except the left wing hippies are already card carrying members of the Democratic party. And all the anarchists who want to overthrow big bad America are already his supporters. 5. If he were alive today, Ronald Reagan would strongly oppose him. Reagan believed in spending generously on our national defense and certainly had an interventionist foreign policy. And according to the Ron Paul playbook, that would make the greatest president of my era ”a neocon”. Their policies and beliefs are totally and completely different. Naturally Ron Paul’s followers will attempt to hide that fact by showing you an old video of Ronald Reagan praising Ron Paul as a candidate and using that as proof that Ronald Reagan would support Ron Paul in 2012. Now watch me dismantle that silly argument!!! Does anyone remember Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania? Arlen was the senator that everyone on tea party and conservative sites called a liberal RINO. He was challenged by a tea party backed conservative in the primary named Pat Toomey and when Specter saw how opposed conservatives were to his candidacy he changed parties to Democrat. He voted for TARP, Obama’s socialized health care plan, and was pro affirmative action and amnesty. Yet, Reagan praised him as a true conservative back in the 198082;s and even cut a campaign ad for him. But go ask a Pennsylvania tea partier what they think of Specter today. LOL. If you were a House or Senate member, and of course running as a Republican, Ronald Reagan would praise you as a candidate for office. That’s part of what a sitting president does for members of his party. But rather than look at a 30 year old video let’s look at Ron Paul has to say about Ronald Reagan. In 1987, Ron Paul wrote a letter to Frank Fahrenkopf, chairman of the Republican National Committee, starting that he wanted to totally publically disassociate himself with the policies of Ronald Reagan(funny but he yet to publically disassociate with the 9-11 truther movement or Code Pink). He later told the Dallas Morning News that the presidency of Ronald Reagan was a ”dramatic failure”. OK, let’s take a look at the political success of both politicians and decide if that is true. In 2008 Ron Paul ran in the Republican primary for president. He got 5% of the vote. In other words, 19 OUT OF 20 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY VOTERS DID NOT VOTE FOR RON PAUL IN THE LAST ELECTION. In 1984, Ronald Reagan was reelected as the president of the United States in a landslide, winning 49 out of 50 states, and his 525 electoral votes were the the most of any candidate in American history. Hmmm, I think we have to score this one for the Gipper. 6. Illegal Immigration. According to the highly respected anti immigation group NUMBERS USA, Ron Paul has the lowest grade of any Republican presidential candidate out there, coming in with an F. Naturally, his paulbots try to put a spin on this by saying ”welfare and benefit programs should be unconsititutional so illegal immigrants wont come here”. If Ron Paul threw puppies off a tall building his hynoptized followers would be applauding and yelling it was ”constitutional”. That argument wont cut it with the voters. Polls overwhelmingly show that Americans are in favor of closing our borders and against all forms of amnesty. And that really holds true with Republican voters. April has posted articles by former Ron Paul allies like Tom Tancrdeo that blast Paul on the immigration issue. Yet again, Ron Paul thinks like a liberal Democrat, and in fact even has the same ”F” grade that NUMBERS USA gave Obama. 7. Paul’s pork problem. One thing career politicians learn to do is talk conservative while picking the taxpayers pocket for money. And ”Porkulus Paul” has this shady routine down pat. First of all, let’s go back to last November’s elections to get the proper perspective on this issue. The Republicans destroyed the Democrats on November 3 due to the energy and votes of the tea party!!!!! Now the tea party came in and deservedly wanted to flex it muscles. And decided to take a principled stand against the unethical practice of pork(earmarks). The fight against earmarks was led by the Tea Party Patriots(TPP) and other tea party and conservative groups against the pork loving Democrats. In fact, TPP leader Mark Meckler considered this such an important issue that he promised to run a tea party challenger against any Republican that accepted them. “We’ll do what we always do,” said Meckler. “Our members will put immense pressure on every senator to vote against earmarks. This is a fundamental issue — it’s both substantive and symbolic. Will they vote against the politics of the past or are they still stuck in it? This is a vote that will never go away, like TARP. Tea Partiers have long memories. Politicians have always taken advantage of the fact that voters have short memories, but we’ll know, we’ll remember, and in 2012 when they have aggressive, well-funded primary challengers, they’ll know why.” Then it came out that a Republican asked for 150 MILLION DOLLARS IN PORK FOR HIS DISTRICT!!! Surely this was a RINO. Maybe Olympia Snowe or Scott Brown? No, it was actually Ron Paul. U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) was one of only four House Republicans to break rank from the party and request earmarks despite a Republican Conference earmark moratorium. Paul sent 41 earmark requests totaling $157,093,544 for the 2011 Fiscal Year. Ron Paul is to the far left of the tea party on just about every major issue. Actually he looks just like a liberal Democrat to me. SAY NO TO THE FAR LEFT TURN, STAY RIGHT. NO PAUL IN 2012. ................................................................................ You stupid simpering CULT boy FOOL.
poor, blind MD...still trying to convince everyone the earth is flat. Hopefully the blinders will come off as you mature...until then, you're rants are cheap entertainment...thanks
The saddest part is that despite the insane obscene rants you see him spew in his typical posts,he really is a very bright guy.
...not bright enough to look outside the box Sneaky...that will be his downfall.
. You mincing punk azzed little b!tch. I sh!t out smarter libertarians than you every day. If I was in a COMA I'd still be at least to the sixth power MORE aware and intelligent than you are on your best day you little pissant. "I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" BARRY GOLDWATER (unlike RP, an actual, real CONSERVATIVE
...MD breathlessly screams into the ether, as he stamps his feet and flails his little fist in the air...desperately trying to get attention as he throws his juvenile temper tantrum...Thanks MD, I needed a chuckle...HILARIOUS...!!!
. plop, PLOP ... ploP; PLOP! Hey CULT boy, I just made four more PaulTARDS!
Hey CULT boy, I just made four more PaulTARDS! No, you just crapped out the remnants of your brain...you truly are hilarious.
Pretty much your level of discourse TARD. LEARN something FOOL. ------------------------------------------------------------ Why ron paul has ZERO chance to win the republican presidential primary Posted by mikeymike143 (Diary) 1. His foreign policy ideas are simply the same recycled bad ideas that Jimmy Carter had. A foreign policy of ”let’s hide our head in the sand like an ostrich and blame big bad America and hope that everyone leaves us alone” is not only ignorant, but also dangerous for our country. And the big winners in last November’s elections were the ones who espoused ”american exceptionalism”, not the ones who espoused ”anti-american apologism”. Now I will admit Ron Paul’s foreign policy message would go over well with the Code Pink/Dennis Kucinich voters, but those type of people tend to be Democrats, not Republicans. One of my facebook friends put it best when he said ”if Ron Paul had been president during World War 2, we would all be speaking German now”. 2. He has no real political power. And this was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in 2008. Yes, he can win any ONLINE presidential poll. So what. In 2007 the paulbots hijacked the same online polls and Ron Paul won them all. His followers then posed articles all over the internet touting his candidacy. He then suckered his gullible followers telling them that the ”polls showed he could win” and send to him money. Then came the 2008 primaries. Out of the 50 states that were availible for Ron Paul to win, guess how many he won? ZERO. And that is spelled Z-E-R-O. Now let’s go to the present day. His internet saavy paulbots are again winning all the online and straw polls for their idol. His followers are again posting articles about him like he actually has a legitimate chance to win. Next is going to come the annual ”moneybomb” when Ron Paul once again fleeces his followers by pointing out that he is ahead in the polls and has a chance to win this time. But their delusional fantasy is going to run into a buzzsaw called Republican primary voters. Paul got absolutely destroyed when he ran in 1988, got whipped by John McCain in 2008, and he will be a three time loser in 2012. 3. There are plenty of people who are ”one issue voters” in politics. And in the Republican party there are plenty of people that ”opposition to islam” is the one issue they feel strongly about. You can go to any anti islam or conservative jewish site and see that the two politicians that are diliked the most are Obama and Ron Paul. Ron Paul has said ”I don’t believe for one minute the religion of islam is our enemy”. And Paul also attacked the Sunshine Patriots for their oppostion to the ground zero mosque. Now i am not going to debate the muslim issue here, but the fact that a decent sized voting group in your own party considers you one of their main foes is certainly not good news for your campaign. Now to be fair, you will get the people who think Israel is oppressing Palestine and the pro muslim agenda voters will be on Paul’s side. The only problem with that is almost all of that crowd are Democrats who support Obama. 4. Let’s look at Ron Paul’s position on crack cocaine and heroin. Now I am totally fine with legalizing pot and prostitution in any state if the voters want it. If somebody wants to get laid or smoke a joint it sure isn’t any of my business. But we are talking about legalizing hard drugs because Ron Paul says that the government is unconstitutionally sticking its nose in peoples business by not allowing it. I say once it becomes legal, who is going to cover the costs of the people that get addicted to it to go to rehab or treatment centers. And please don’t say the addict. Probably the government will have to. Great, now here comes a great big expansion of government to fight the drug war that was ”caused by the tea party candidate”. Which by the way, I as a taxpayer will have to cover. Increased police and court costs etc, etc. But the issue isn’t what I think or Ron Paul thinks, the issue is what does the Republican primary voter think of this policy. The ”religious right” will certainly oppose it full force. And I would think that anyone that has had a family member suffer through the addiction process will be opposed to it. That’s two groups opposed. Of course, Paul will pick up the ”left wing hippie” vote and the anarchists vote. Except the left wing hippies are already card carrying members of the Democratic party. And all the anarchists who want to overthrow big bad America are already his supporters. 5. If he were alive today, Ronald Reagan would strongly oppose him. Reagan believed in spending generously on our national defense and certainly had an interventionist foreign policy. And according to the Ron Paul playbook, that would make the greatest president of my era ”a neocon”. Their policies and beliefs are totally and completely different. Naturally Ron Paul’s followers will attempt to hide that fact by showing you an old video of Ronald Reagan praising Ron Paul as a candidate and using that as proof that Ronald Reagan would support Ron Paul in 2012. Now watch me dismantle that silly argument!!! Does anyone remember Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania? Arlen was the senator that everyone on tea party and conservative sites called a liberal RINO. He was challenged by a tea party backed conservative in the primary named Pat Toomey and when Specter saw how opposed conservatives were to his candidacy he changed parties to Democrat. He voted for TARP, Obama’s socialized health care plan, and was pro affirmative action and amnesty. Yet, Reagan praised him as a true conservative back in the 198082;s and even cut a campaign ad for him. But go ask a Pennsylvania tea partier what they think of Specter today. LOL. If you were a House or Senate member, and of course running as a Republican, Ronald Reagan would praise you as a candidate for office. That’s part of what a sitting president does for members of his party. But rather than look at a 30 year old video let’s look at Ron Paul has to say about Ronald Reagan. In 1987, Ron Paul wrote a letter to Frank Fahrenkopf, chairman of the Republican National Committee, starting that he wanted to totally publically disassociate himself with the policies of Ronald Reagan(funny but he yet to publically disassociate with the 9-11 truther movement or Code Pink). He later told the Dallas Morning News that the presidency of Ronald Reagan was a ”dramatic failure”. OK, let’s take a look at the political success of both politicians and decide if that is true. In 2008 Ron Paul ran in the Republican primary for president. He got 5% of the vote. In other words, 19 OUT OF 20 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY VOTERS DID NOT VOTE FOR RON PAUL IN THE LAST ELECTION. In 1984, Ronald Reagan was reelected as the president of the United States in a landslide, winning 49 out of 50 states, and his 525 electoral votes were the the most of any candidate in American history. Hmmm, I think we have to score this one for the Gipper. 6. Illegal Immigration. According to the highly respected anti immigation group NUMBERS USA, Ron Paul has the lowest grade of any Republican presidential candidate out there, coming in with an F. Naturally, his paulbots try to put a spin on this by saying ”welfare and benefit programs should be unconsititutional so illegal immigrants wont come here”. If Ron Paul threw puppies off a tall building his hynoptized followers would be applauding and yelling it was ”constitutional”. That argument wont cut it with the voters. Polls overwhelmingly show that Americans are in favor of closing our borders and against all forms of amnesty. And that really holds true with Republican voters. April has posted articles by former Ron Paul allies like Tom Tancrdeo that blast Paul on the immigration issue. Yet again, Ron Paul thinks like a liberal Democrat, and in fact even has the same ”F” grade that NUMBERS USA gave Obama. 7. Paul’s pork problem. One thing career politicians learn to do is talk conservative while picking the taxpayers pocket for money. And ”Porkulus Paul” has this shady routine down pat. First of all, let’s go back to last November’s elections to get the proper perspective on this issue. The Republicans destroyed the Democrats on November 3 due to the energy and votes of the tea party!!!!! Now the tea party came in and deservedly wanted to flex it muscles. And decided to take a principled stand against the unethical practice of pork(earmarks). The fight against earmarks was led by the Tea Party Patriots(TPP) and other tea party and conservative groups against the pork loving Democrats. In fact, TPP leader Mark Meckler considered this such an important issue that he promised to run a tea party challenger against any Republican that accepted them. “We’ll do what we always do,” said Meckler. “Our members will put immense pressure on every senator to vote against earmarks. This is a fundamental issue — it’s both substantive and symbolic. Will they vote against the politics of the past or are they still stuck in it? This is a vote that will never go away, like TARP. Tea Partiers have long memories. Politicians have always taken advantage of the fact that voters have short memories, but we’ll know, we’ll remember, and in 2012 when they have aggressive, well-funded primary challengers, they’ll know why.” Then it came out that a Republican asked for 150 MILLION DOLLARS IN PORK FOR HIS DISTRICT!!! Surely this was a RINO. Maybe Olympia Snowe or Scott Brown? No, it was actually Ron Paul. U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) was one of only four House Republicans to break rank from the party and request earmarks despite a Republican Conference earmark moratorium. Paul sent 41 earmark requests totaling $157,093,544 for the 2011 Fiscal Year. Ron Paul is to the far left of the tea party on just about every major issue. Actually he looks just like a liberal Democrat to me. SAY NO TO THE FAR LEFT TURN, STAY RIGHT. NO PAUL IN 2012. ................................................................................ You stupid simpering CULT boy FOOL.
Seriously...don't waste your time trying to convince me of anything. Your childish, immature, rants, while hilarious, show you to be an immature fool. I don't pay serious attention to fools...you're funny though, in a "court jester" kind of way.
. LOL! Hey MORON I'm NOT trying to "convince" you of anything, you gibbering substandard LOSER. You are a fucking retarded herd dweller who buys RonniePAULIE'S BULLSHIT lock stock and fishing boat. LOL! You don't have the mental ability to think or act independently, you are RonniePAULIE'S unthinking TOOL/FOOL/WHORE. YOU are the reason the LORD made involuntary muscles TARD, otherwise, since you are so stupid, you'd forget to breathe and just keel over DEAD. Hell there would be DEAD PaulTARDS all over. Thank GOD eh TARD? You CULT boys stink pretty bad alive, I wouldn't want a bunch of you ripening in the sun. THAT would be BAD. PHEEEEEEEEwwwwwwww.
Hilarious....WHAYYYYYYYY!!! The court jester speaks!!!LOL
. I'm Soooooooooooooooooooooo happy you enjoyed it CULT boy. Just for you CULT boy ... . LOL! Hey MORON I'm NOT trying to "convince" you of anything, you gibbering substandard LOSER. You are a fucking retarded herd dweller who buys RonniePAULIE'S BULLSHIT lock stock and fishing boat. LOL! You don't have the mental ability to think or act independently, you are RonniePAULIE'S unthinking TOOL/FOOL/WHORE. YOU are the reason the LORD made involuntary muscles TARD, otherwise, since you are so stupid, you'd forget to breathe and just keel over DEAD. Hell there would be DEAD PaulTARDS all over. Thank GOD eh TARD? You CULT boys stink pretty bad alive, I wouldn't want a bunch of you ripening in the sun. THAT would be BAD. PHEEEEEEEEwwwwwwww.
the court jester, the buffoon, is STILL demanding to be noticed. oh my sides...be still, hilarious!!!! thanks child, I mean mad dog!!!
YAWN... Insipid and WEAK! Just like YOU CULT boy! LOL! Does that sort of clumsy and weak attempts to manipulate work in your school yard little bitch? LMAO!!! YOU PaulTARDS are the "gold standard" of BUFFOONS chongo LOL! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ROTFLMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hey MORON I'm NOT trying to "convince" you of anything, you gibbering substandard LOSER. You are a fucking retarded herd dweller who buys RonniePAULIE'S BULLSHIT lock stock and fishing boat. LOL! You don't have the mental ability to think or act independently, you are RonniePAULIE'S unthinking TOOL/FOOL/WHORE. YOU are the reason the LORD made involuntary muscles TARD, otherwise, since you are so stupid, you'd forget to breathe and just keel over DEAD. Hell there would be DEAD PaulTARDS all over. Thank GOD eh TARD? You CULT boys stink pretty bad alive, I wouldn't want a bunch of you ripening in the sun. THAT would be BAD. PHEEEEEEEEwwwwwwww.
nurse Cratchett...paging nurse Cratchett...there's a nutter roaming the halls and posting on the internet again...paging nurse Cratchett...LOL!
The voices in your head arguing again?
. You feel real safe in the herd don't you little "man"? Unlike YOU little "man" I don't get a feral gooberment check because of YOUR mental problems. You are pitiful, little "man".
Yeah,that's me alright. That's why I always support whatever RINO the party picks for a candidate no matter how much he sucks,and that's why I enlisted in the army and volunteered for SF so I would always be surrounded by hundreds of shipmates just like the guys in the Navy. Unlike YOU little "man" I don't get a feral gooberment check because of YOUR mental problems. I don't get one for mental problems because I have no mental problems and YOU don't get one for mental problems because you didn't do anything dangerous to earn one even though you are a definite nutcase. BTW,what's with all the "litte man" stuff. You still trying to overcompensate for being a closeted homo? Do you think this makes you look "Butch". Guess what? It ain't working. All it does is make you look like a foolish 12 year old.
LMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!! Whatever you say little "man". YOU belong in the PaulTARD herd little "man", YOU are a born follower and a TOOL. It's just gotta be kinda of SAD and DESPERATE when your so called service is ALL that you have or are in your life "little man". You love to PLAY the "hero" "little man", too bad you are a FRAUD "little man". How's that gooberment tit working out for you "little man"? How's the free cheese? "Little man"? "little man"? PITIFUL.
My "so called service"? There are people posting here and on LP that know I have made no untrue claims. And *I* am not the running around trying to act macho. You love to PLAY the "hero" "little man", too bad you are a FRAUD "little man". Really? When have *I* ever claimed to have shot down 3 MIG's? How's the free cheese? It's no secret to anybody here that you never did anything to EARN a VA disability check,and have a chip on your shoulder for hiding out and avoiding combat. PITIFUL. Yes,you are.
What is a classic symptom of INSANITY? Doing the same thing over and over and hoping for a different conclusion. I don't "act" anything. You know as well as I do anybody can CLAIM anything on the web. It means nothing. As usual, you purposely distort what I have said, which is the TRUTH, I have PART of THREE Mig KILLS. Only a person ignorant of NAVAL WARSHIPS and their weapons systems would even consider that a single person of a DESTROYER crews does anything alone. But ... it's handy to TRY to insult me because you are just an ignorant lubber. Which is not a dig or insult. I don't know anything about being in the Army, but then I've never claimed to either. I could have been on a Feral or a STATE or a CITY or a UNION pension if I wanted to, years ago. BUT I REFUSED to be a PIG who lives off of the American people. Why would anyone think that they deserve to be paid for doing NOTHING? I'm not going to file for my SS until I'm 70 either, if then, and then, only if I run out of money or options by then. Although I think the odds are low that it will even be available to me, even if I live the next seven years. I do apologize for my out of line comments regarding your VA benefits, it was just anger. IF you served, and IF they say that you deserve it, you F' ing deserve it. I'm sorry for talking shit about your disability, please pardon my anger and stupidity regarding that. What's pitiful is that YOU think that you get to say who is and who is not a "real" vet. What IS pitiful is living in the past. Although I understand that living with the physical results of your service is unavoidable for you. You simply aren't the judge of anything or anybody, except of course for your own self , and neither am I. What's pitiful is how you can't see the scam RonniePAULIE is running. I'd be happy to talk cars and lift a cold one with you anytime. I don't expect people to be clones of each other.
#91. To: Mad Dog (#89)
Doing the same thing over and over and hoping for a different conclusion. Which pretty much defines almost all of your posts. u know as well as I do anybody can CLAIM anything on the web. You mean like shooting down 3 MIG's? As usual, you purposely distort what I have said, which is the TRUTH, I have PART of THREE Mig KILLS. Only a person ignorant of NAVAL WARSHIPS and their weapons systems would even consider that a single person of a DESTROYER crews does anything alone. Only a person ignorant of combat would claim "part of a kill". Using YOUR standards a US Army or USMC artillery spotter killed thousands of NVA. Which isn't really accurate since neither you or the ship was ever in the slightest danger and the artillery spotters were always in considerable danger since they were always within eyeball sight of the enemy when they called in fire missions. Either YOU personally killed them,or you didn't. You might as well say YOU have a part in those kills because you drove a forklift in a factory in Illinois that shipped the food the crew ate. I would also like to add I have NEVER heard anybody that has ever been in combat brag about "my number of kills",and I have literally known several hundred that were in combat as infantrymen in WW-2,the Korean War,and multiple tours in VN. You must be about 12 years old emotionally to even consider laying claim to being a "part of 3 kills". But ... it's handy to TRY to insult me because you are just an ignorant lubber. Yeah,because serving in the Navy during the VN war was SUCH a difficult thing to do,what with there being a waiting list to enlist because of all the people wanting to join the Navy to avoid being drafted and serving on the ground in VN as a infantryman in either the Army or the Marine Corps. And what is the big freaking deal about serving on a boat that floats around and has no oppossing force? Hell,my uncle has a better claim to combat than you do,and he was in the Merchant Marines and had to tie up in port. He claims he thinks the ship he was on received small arms fire while sailing up the river. Why would anyone think that they deserve to be paid for doing NOTHING? It's clear you don't understand the concept of "EARNING" something because it's much easier to just make claims. I'm not going to file for my SS until I'm 70 either, Ain't YOU "special"! Then again,that is easy to say when all you have ever done is sit around on your fat ass and not do anything dangerous. Running your mouth at people on the internet that you don't know and will never see is about as close to getting hurt as you have ever came,Twinkie. I do apologize for my out of line comments regarding your VA benefits, it was just anger. Too little,too late. You have been pulling this shit for months. The time to apologize was when you started it. Don't pull it for months and then try to claim a fit of anger. Although it is very likely you have anger management problems and this is why you bray like a jackass in almost every post you make. IF you served, and IF they say that you deserve it, you F' ing deserve it. And here you are at it again,DESPITE having been told that dozens of people who know me personally who have either served with me or know people personally that did serve with me who have verified my service in the US Army Special Forces and more spefically with MACV-SOG during the VN war. Do a web search for MACV-SOG Operations 35 and learn a little. It was classified as a Top Secret operation for decades,but practically everything about it is public knowledge now. INCLUDING a list of people who served and in what capacity they served. Steve Sherman even published a book with the title "The Little Yellow Book of SOG" with the names and duty assignments of almost everybody who was ever in SOG. Yeah,there are a few names that were left off by accident,but MY name is in the book. And I spoke about what I did in VN so little that not even my mother or my father knew what I had done when they went to their graves. They thought I was working in a army post office the whole time I was there because that's what I told them I was doing. I saw no need to worry them while I was there and once I got back there was no reason to tell them because they wouldn't understand it and because it was still Top Secret. And you KNOW I am who I say I am because even if you weren't around during the FR days,there are people on LP that have verified I am who I say I am because they either know me personally or people they know and trust know me and have verified my service. What's pitiful is that YOU think that you get to say who is and who is not a "real" vet. Once again you are lying. Probably because of that chip on your shoulder that REQUIRES you to think you are a combat veteran. You ain't. It's pretty simple,really. You were either in combat or you weren't. If you haven't been within eyeball range of the man shooting at you and you are shooting back at,you haven't been in combat. And the whole "partial kill" thing is absolute bullshit. Either YOU killed him,or you didn't. And on top of all that,killing somebody is nothing to brag about. You do it if you need to do it,but you don't brag about it. Now,to finish this thing off (hopefully) I will add one more time. EVERYBODY that wore a uniform served and is a veteran. It doesn't matter if they served during wartime or peacetime and it doesn't matter if they charged up the beaches of Guadal Canal or served meals at the Naval Training base at Great Lakes their whole military career,they are BOTH veterans. The difference is that while both of the above examples are war veterans,only one of them is a combat veteran. What IS pitiful is living in the past. Then give it up. You write about your past service in most of the posts you make,and I only mention mine when attacked by you or somebody asks me something. There are people around here that I have known since grammar school that still don't know anything about what I did in the army.Most know I was in the army because I quit high school to enlist and in a high school of around 220 total pupils,people notice when you aren't there anymore and ask where you are. Most of the people I have known for the last 40+ years don't even know I was in the army unless they have asked me or seen the "US Paratrooper" tatoo on my upper bicep I got when I was 17. It's even up so high it can't been seen when I am wearing a t-shirt. Although I understand that living with the physical results of your service is unavoidable for you. I appreciate the thought,but it is what it is and since there is nothing I can do about it I do my best to ignore it as much as I can. It does you no good and a lot of harm to let crap like that dominate your mind. I'd be happy to talk cars and lift a cold one with you anytime. I don't have any real problems with you other than two. One is your constant insistence that you are a COMBAT veteran and then going insane when corrected,and the other is your constant over the top and out of control obscene mindless rants. You can do better and I have seen you do better. You really are a bright guy. You need to do whatever it is you need to do to control your anger so you can post in a civilized manner without constantly attacking everybody except Yu-Tard,Fire Island,and Gatlin. Of the hundreds (thousands?) of posts you have made since I noticed your posting,those three are the ONLY ones I haven't seen you attack. 3 people out of the hundreds you interact with,and those three are the only ones you don't attack or attack you in return. Think about that one for a minute. Go back and search out the posts you have posted to others over just the last year and see if you can spot a trend.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
"The constitution's just a God damned piece of paper" ~George W. Bush
#3. To: hondo68 (#2)
#7. To: Mad Dog (#3)
"the two parties are the same".
#11. To: freedomsnotfree (#7)
"the two parties are the same".
#25. To: Mad Dog (#11)
#35. To: freedomsnotfree (#25)
poor, blind MD...still trying to convince everyone the earth is flat. Hopefully the blinders will come off as you mature...until then, you're rants are cheap entertainment...thanks
#36. To: sneakypete (#35)
#39. To: freedomsnotfree (#36)
#41. To: Mad Dog (#39)
I sh!t out smarter libertarians than you every day.
#43. To: freedomsnotfree (#41)
#49. To: Mad Dog (#43)
plop, PLOP ... ploP; PLOP!
#50. To: freedomsnotfree (#49)
blah bhal lbah hhabbbbl,la all HAil the wee failed FRAUD no kind of conservative + 30 years DC POLITICIAN.
#51. To: Mad Dog (#50)
#52. To: freedomsnotfree (#51)
#53. To: Mad Dog (#52)
#59. To: freedomsnotfree (#53)
#60. To: Mad Dog, sneaktpete (#59)
#64. To: freedomsnotfree (#60)
#66. To: Mad Dog (#64)
#68. To: freedomsnotfree (#66)
#74. To: Mad Dog (#68)
#76. To: sneakypete (#74)
#80. To: Mad Dog (#76)
You feel real safe in the herd don't you little "man"?
#85. To: sneakypete (#80)
#87. To: Mad Dog (#85)
(Edited)
It's just gotta be kinda of SAD and DESPERATE when your so called service is ALL that you have or are in your life "little man".
#89. To: sneakypete (#87)
Replies to Comment # 89. What is a classic symptom of INSANITY?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 89.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]