politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: New Ron Paul TV Ad - "The One Who Can Beat Obama"
Source:
youtube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D58v4eiUuI
Published: Dec 27, 2011
Author: Ron Paul2012.com
Post Date: 2011-12-27 09:42:00 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 40424
Comments: 75
Best Ron Paul TV ad I've seen yet.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-14) not displayed.
.
.
.
#15. To: We The People (#14)
Gotcha. I meant that as a reference to Ron Paul. He's not an Israel worshipper so he's called names.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
I've heard that a LOT from the talking heads. I've heard that a ham sandwich could beat Obama. I don't believe it. If Gingrich or Romney are nominated, watch Obama start rising in the polls. Leftists and a majority of independents will return to the flock. They will not support neoconservatives, and neither will conservatives/libertarians. That's my prediction for Nov. Gingrich or Romney will hand another 4 years to Obama. Could I be wrong? Of course. But I don't think so.
Gotcha. I meant that as a reference to Ron Paul. He's not an Israel worshipper so he's called names. Gotcha.
The girl across the street voted for him. She wont this time. No way. My sister in law voted for him. No way in hell this time. One of my cousins voted for him. No way in hell this time. The lady who used to live across the street voted for him. She hates him now. A guy who works with me. His dad voted for Obama. He wont make that mistake again. I know that isn't exactly a scientific poll. But I encounter people all the time who despise him. Ad drive thrus, carryouts and people on the street I talk to. He is universally hated.
A lot of the folks that I work with voted for him, and they're planning to do so again. Like I said, I could be wrong. We'll see.
I guess we are both hoping you are wrong. :) Would you vote for Gingrich against Obama if he won the nomination?
Have you ever considered flattening their tires on election eve? Do they actually like him or see him as a lesser evil?
No, I would not. I could no more vote for Gingrich than I could Obama. I'd write in Ron Paul or vote for an acceptable 3rd party candidate, if there was one.
No. They like him and believe he's doing the right thing.
I disagree with this premise. Ron Paul has been treated fairly well by the Republicans this time out and his political legacy is invested with his son. I think Paul recognizes that enabling Obama to a second term will cause irreparable harm to the United States.
I'll be supporting the Republican nominee against Obama, not some goofy third party challenger.
I disagree with this premise. I don't think Ron will run third party either. If he does I will have to vote for him though.
If that were so, do you think he'd care?
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
Do you care about the harm that >zero is doing to us all?
Do you support the racism expressed in his newsletter, or a leadership style that permitted such despicable statements to be disseminated in his name?
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
What racism? I don't know of any racism. Give me some quotes.
Do you support Obamas racism?
That's the wrong question.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
* "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal." Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
Give me some quotes.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
I'll be supporting the Republican nominee against Obama, not some goofy third party challenger. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/insanity
That isn't racist. That is just an opinion based on how many blacks in DC commit crimes and are in jail as compared to whites or asians.
That doesn't bother me. It is true. Do you walk in bad black neighborhoods at nightime? No you don't.
I'll have to check into this one. When did the riots end again? Beginning or end of month?
That isn't racist and may or may not be true. I don't know I wasn't there.
I remember that bitch. Wasn't she for legalized baby killing? I'd call her a lot worse if I had a newsletter.
A vote for Mitts or Newt, is a vote for Obungler. It appears that you want four more years of whining about Obummer.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Give me some quotes. Obama supports hiring quotas and affirmative action. He hired holder because he was black. He hates whites in Arizona who don't want to be victimized by invading savages from Mexico.
"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out, many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs. . . It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names" Barack Hussein Obama from Dreams of My Father "I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race" Barack Hussein Obama from Dreams of My Father Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/elections/293823-racist-quotes-barack-hussein-obamas-dreams.html#ixzz1hlN8t4ZO
I live in one of the country's wealthiest zip codes and don't walk around here at night either.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
He hired holder because he was black. He hates whites in Arizona who don't want to be victimized by invading savages from Mexico. Umm - Stone, those aren't quotes.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
No. But they are actions. Obama is a liar so sometimes you have to look at his actions. But don't worry. The next post of mine had a couple of quotes. That you are probably responding to as I type this.
Wrong again; they are assumptions regarding state of mind. That kind of testimony isn't even admissible in court. Obama supports hiring quotas and affirmative action. As a woman old enough to remember your good old days, I support affirmative action (which applies to women as well as minorities) too. He hired holder because he was black. "He hired Holder" is an "action"; the rest of the sentence speaks to state of mind. He hates whites in Arizona who don't want to be victimized by invading savages from Mexico. Ain't no part of the above that refers to "action".
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
You forgot about him defending his buddy Henry Louis Gates....
"CHANGE" you can step in..... Why? Because you were also FOR the $700 billion TARP bailout? Because you also support fingerprinting gun owners? Because you support the individual health care mandate? Because you supported Romney when he banned an entire class of firearms in his home state of Massachusetts? Because you support open borders and nonexistent immigration law enforcement? Because you support the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the recent National Defense Authorization Act? Or is it because you're just being a good sucker Republican? Because your nominee will most likely be FOR these things, while that goofy third party challenger is against it all.
What a loser you are. Why should some people get privelages. You must hate Martin Luther King. He had no such vision. You should be careful what you say about Martin Luther King. You could be labeled a racist.
Why should some people get privelages. If I call you a loser in return, will you ban me? You must hate Martin Luther King. He had no such vision. and you know that because...? You should be careful what you say about Martin Luther King. You could be labeled a racist. Now you're speaking for me as well as MLK? Obviously you don't need either one of us for a three-way conversation.
Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1 We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul
You are in no danger of being banned. So go ahead and call me a loser.
and you know that because...? If I call you a loser in return, will you ban me?
and you know that because...?
It was rhetorical. A liberal I used to work for (I liked him) told me that they have actual college courses on rhetoric.
Comments (56 - 75) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestAhhhh, Israel first.
#16. To: A K A Stone (#13)
Anyone can beat Obama. He is hated by almost everyone.
#17. To: mininggold (#15)
Ahhhh, Israel first.
#18. To: We The People (#16)
#19. To: A K A Stone (#18)
#20. To: We The People (#19)
Like I said, I could be wrong. We'll see.
#21. To: We The People (#19)
A lot of the folks that I work with voted for him, and they're planning to do so again.
#22. To: A K A Stone (#20)
Would you vote for Gingrich against Obama if he won the nomination?
#23. To: A K A Stone (#21)
Do they actually like him or see him as a lesser evil?
#24. To: Happy Quanzaa (#5)
And he's going to run 3rd Party.
#25. To: We The People (#6)
...who are you supporting?
#26. To: Thunderbird (#24)
And he's going to run 3rd Party.
#27. To: Thunderbird (#24)
I think Paul recognizes that enabling Obama to a second term will cause irreparable harm to the United States.
#28. To: lucysmom (#27)
(Edited)
If that were so, do you think he'd care?
#29. To: A K A Stone (#26)
I don't think Ron will run third party either. If he does I will have to vote for him though.
#30. To: lucysmom (#29)
Do you support the racism expressed in his newsletter, or a leadership style that permitted such despicable statements to be disseminated in his name?
#31. To: lucysmom (#29)
#32. To: A K A Stone (#28)
Do you care about the harm that >zero is doing to us all?
#33. To: A K A Stone (#30)
What racism? I don't know of any racism.
* "We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational."
* After the Los Angeles riots, one article in a newsletter claimed, "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."
* One referred to Martin Luther King Jr. as "the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours" and who "seduced underage girls and boys."
* Another referred to Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist and congresswoman as "Barbara Morondon," the "archetypical half-educated victimologist."
#34. To: A K A Stone (#31)
Do you support Obamas racism?
#35. To: Thunderbird (#25)
...who are you supporting?
#36. To: lucysmom (#33)
* "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."
#37. To: lucysmom (#33)
"We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational."
#38. To: lucysmom (#33)
* After the Los Angeles riots, one article in a newsletter claimed, "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."
#39. To: lucysmom (#33)
* One referred to Martin Luther King Jr. as "the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours" and who "seduced underage girls and boys."
#40. To: lucysmom (#33)
* Another referred to Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist and congresswoman as "Barbara Morondon," the "archetypical half-educated victimologist."
#41. To: Thunderbird, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#2)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#42. To: lucysmom (#34)
Do you support Obamas racism?
#43. To: lucysmom (#34)
#44. To: A K A Stone (#37)
Do you walk in bad black neighborhoods at nightime? No you don't.
#45. To: A K A Stone (#42)
Obama supports hiring quotas and affirmative action.
#46. To: lucysmom (#45)
Umm - Stone, those aren't quotes.
#47. To: A K A Stone (#46)
But they are actions. Obama is a liar so sometimes you have to look at his actions.
#48. To: A K A Stone (#42)
My dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the self appointed Messiah!!! Quiz: Who made the statement "The world would be a better place if only Men were to vote?????? HINT: It was a woman!!!
#49. To: Thunderbird (#25)
(Edited)
I'll be supporting the Republican nominee against Obama, not some goofy third party challenger.
#50. To: lucysmom (#47)
As a woman old enough to remember your good old days, I support affirmative action (which applies to women as well as minorities) too.
#51. To: A K A Stone (#50)
What a loser you are.
#52. To: lucysmom (#51)
If I call you a loser in return, will you ban me?
#53. To: lucysmom (#51)
You must hate Martin Luther King. He had no such vision.
#54. To: lucysmom (#51)
You must hate Martin Luther King. He had no such vision.
#55. To: lucysmom (#51)
Now you're speaking for me as well as MLK? Obviously you don't need either one of us for a three-way conversation.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]