[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: No, Really, Ron Paul Cannot Win
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/12/really-ron-paul-cannot-win.html
Published: Dec 19, 2011
Author: Jonathan Chait
Post Date: 2011-12-19 19:46:45 by Mad Dog
Keywords: the TRUTH, HURTS, PaulTards
Views: 55941
Comments: 135

Andrew Sullivan, following up his (Republican primary) endorsement of Ron Paul, argues today that campaign reporters and pundits who say he can’t win the nomination are all wrong: We were told one thing after his extensive riff last week on the paranoia around Iran's nuclear weapons, his defense of blowback theory in our encounters with Jihadist terrorism, and his open denunciation of the greatest mistake of his own party in the last decade, the Iraq war (where every other candidate is silent). We were told this ended his candidacy, that there was no constituency for this in the current GOP, that he was throwing it all away, that he has, as the Ailes memo clearly has it, zero chance of getting the nomination.

Well: now he's ahead in Iowa. And, yes, it remains a long, long, long shot. But you know what?

Yes he can.

No, he really can’t.

It would be nearly impossible to imagine the Republican Party nominating a candidate who spent years and years publishing a racist newsletter and has deep associations with the fringe far right.

(Here he is speaking to the John Birch Society on the occasion of its 50th anniversary.)

It would be even more impossible to imagine the Party nominating a candidate who favors total withdrawal from world affairs and takes a Chomsky-ite line on American power. The notion that the Party might nominate a candidate who does both these things is totally preposterous.

Now, Andrew is framing his argument as an argument against a zero chance.

Well, sure. It’s not zero. Paul could win the nomination. It’s also possible that Democrats will follow the Schoen–Caddell plan of nominating Hillary Clinton over President Obama, and Obama will flip to the GOP, and Republicans will nominate Obama, and the general election will be Clinton-Obama II: This Time It’s for All the Marbles.

It’s possible Newt Gingrich will announce the result of a secret experiment he undertook to resurrect Ronald Reagan through saved brain DNA, implanted in the body of a dinosaur created through similar methods, and that Reaganosaurus will rampage through the Republican field, capture the nomination and, in a climactic debate with Obama, devour him in a single bite.

But reporters have good reason to ignore possibilities such as those or a Ron Paul nomination.

Paul’s supporters seem to believe that the media ignoring him is the only thing keeping him from challenging for the Party nomination.

More likely, it’s the only thing that’s allowed his candidacy to progress to this point.

If more people actually understood the full scope of Paul’s fringe-right views, a huge portion of his support would peel off.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-67) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#68. To: A K A Stone (#67)

You have been "educated" beyond your intelligence.

Please explain that expression for the many that are not familiar with your profound wisdom and holy presence amongst us mere mortals.

There are no references within the Holy Bible ANYWHERE, NO MATTER WHAT VERSION you decide to pick&choose from to include even the Catholic canonical books written in ~200 CE.

You are just re-piping myth and hearsay.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   21:14:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: buckeroo (#68)

Please explain that expression for the many that are not familiar with your profound wisdom and holy presence amongst us mere mortals.

We are all mortals.

Here is what I'm saying. You don't know what you are talking about. You are parroting fools and dumb asses. I'm talking specifically about this subject.

You do have great insight into other things.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:10:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: buckeroo (#68)

There are no references within the Holy Bible ANYWHERE, NO MATTER WHAT VERSION you decide to pick&choose from to include even the Catholic canonical books written in ~200 CE.

I take it you are back to talking about the "king" quote.

I never said Jesus said he was king. I just pointed out that when asked by pilate if he was the son of God. Jesus simply said you said I was. Or however it was phrased.

So just because Jesus didn't specifically say he was the "king" doesn't mean that he isn't.

He never denied he was king either.

He is depicted as sitting at the right hand of God in a future "kingdom" of heaven.

That is my take.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:13:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: A K A Stone, Moderator X (#69)

You do have great insight into other things.

X ... get rid of this guy (A K A Stone) immediately; we need to start LF on the correct foot from this moment forward.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   22:25:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: A K A Stone (#70)

He is depicted as sitting at the right hand of God in a future "kingdom" of heaven.

Where did you come up with that faerie tale?

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   22:31:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: buckeroo (#68)

There are no references within the Holy Bible ANYWHERE, NO MATTER WHAT VERSION you decide to pick&choose from to include even the Catholic canonical books written in ~200 CE.

New International Version (©1984) Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place."

New Living Translation (©2007) Jesus answered, "My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. If it were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But my Kingdom is not of this world."

English Standard Version (©2001) Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.”

New American Standard Bible (©1995) Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm."

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

International Standard Version (©2008) Jesus answered, "My kingdom does not belong to this world. If my kingdom belonged to this world, my servants would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But for now my kingdom is not from here."

Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010) Yeshua said to him, “My Kingdom is not from this world; if my Kingdom were of this world, my servants would be fighting that I would not have been delivered up to the Judeans, but now my Kingdom is not from here.”

GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995) Jesus answered, "My kingdom doesn't belong to this world. If my kingdom belonged to this world, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. My kingdom doesn't have its origin on earth."

King James 2000 Bible (©2003) Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from here.

American King James Version Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

American Standard Version Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Douay-Rheims Bible Jesus answered: My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would certainly strive that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now my kingdom is not from hence.

Darby Bible Translation Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world; if my kingdom were of this world, my servants had fought that I might not be delivered up to the Jews; but now my kingdom is not from hence.

English Revised Version Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Webster's Bible Translation Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Weymouth New Testament "My kingdom," replied Jesus, "does not belong to this world. If my kingdom did belong to this world, my subjects would have resolutely fought to save me from being delivered up to the Jews. But, as a matter of fact, my kingdom has not this origin."

World English Bible Jesus answered, "My Kingdom is not of this world. If my Kingdom were of this world, then my servants would fight, that I wouldn't be delivered to the Jews. But now my Kingdom is not from here."

Young's Literal Translation Jesus answered, 'My kingdom is not of this world; if my kingdom were of this world, my officers had struggled that I might not be delivered up to Jews; but now my kingdom is not from hence.'

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:51:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: A K A Stone, Mad Dog (#73)

We were discussing that Jesus was/is a King or a KING OF KINGS or something like that; it has nothing to do with the metaphor of a "kingdom" or "my kingdom" as you attempt to point out. If you were traveling to say, England and an indigenous British subject asked you, "where did you come from?" it is possible to answer properly in the possessive form, "my country is America." But that doesn't mean you own or rule or are the President.

Why is it important? Because of Mad Dog's earlier rebuttal using his own phrases that are incorrect and worthless about his self-proclaimed Christianity side tracking the major focus of his dialog; that he (Mad Dog) is only subservient to Jesus and not a government. But, Jesus NEVER said he was/is a KING. Mad Dog and YOU have distorted FACTS (even from your own citations) to prove he said so. Both of you are wrong.

Jesus of Nazareth is discussing, "PARADISE"; of "not of this world." It is a mythological time/place/setting far removed from the Earth and the chains that bind us from reaching PARADISE. All of your rants have proven nothing but that YOU and Mad Dog don't understand the simplest of Jesus' parables.

All of this KING and KING OF KINGS crapola came from hearsay, movies, rants, gossip and BS.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   12:18:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: buckeroo (#74)

We were discussing that Jesus was/is a King or a KING OF KINGS or something like that; it has nothing to do with the metaphor of a "kingdom" or "my kingdom" as you attempt to point out. If you were traveling to say, England and an indigenous British subject asked you, "where did you come from?" it is possible to answer properly in the possessive form, "my country is America." But that doesn't mean you own or rule or are the President.

My kingdom has meaning.

An ordinary Brit wouldn't say welcome to my kingdom. The King of England would say that though.

I don't really care if you believe it or not. It doesn't matter to me.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:20:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: A K A Stone (#75)

An ordinary Brit wouldn't say welcome to my kingdom.

What are you saying? Are you saying that "kingdoms" were the proper word for "city-state" governments of the time? And now, some two thousand years later, people use "kingdom" for the same or similar idea of expression? No, they use the term "country."

Jesus NEVER said, "welcome to my kingdom" anyway. He talked about heaven or more appropriately, PARADISE and how to escape the Sadducees' distorted interpretation of the Tanakh. It was all delivered on Jesus' Sermon of the Mount.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   12:38:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: buckeroo (#76)

What are you saying? Are you saying that "kingdoms" were the proper word for "city-state" governments of the time?

No. That is what you are saying.

A king would say welcome to my kingdom.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:44:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: buckeroo (#76)

I don't claim to know everything or even a lot about the Bible.

But here is another passage confirming that Jesus is king.

Zechariah 9:9

King James Version (KJV)

9Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.

I'm not going to quote it. But I'm sure you've read about Jesus instructing his follower to go get the ass for him that he rode in on.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:48:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: buckeroo (#76)

Thanks for making me study this harder. Now I have confirmed that Jesus is in fact King. Thank You.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:50:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: A K A Stone (#79)

He is not a KING. He NEVER said he was a KING. It is misquoted and worthless to adopt such an expression as it distorts the entire focus of what Jesus was attempting to convey. The only idea of "King" was from the Roman guard with, "King of the Jews."

You fine folks don't know your asses from a hole in the ground.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   12:54:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: buckeroo (#80)

Zechariah 9:9

King James Version (KJV)

9Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.

I'm not going to quote it. But I'm sure you've read about Jesus instructing his follower to go get the ass for him that he rode in on.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:56:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: buckeroo (#80)

You think he was a fraud and a liar. So of course you don't think he was king. So your opinion is worthless. Since I've already showed you from multiple places in scripture that point out that he is in fact King.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:57:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: A K A Stone (#81)

You keep repeating a singular passage from Zechariah as though it is profound and relevant to the point of view that Jesus NEVER claimed to be a KING. The Book of Zechariah is in the Old Testament, circa 500 BCE. Even the Jews discount it as a prophesy towards Jesus later arrival circa 32 CE.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   13:07:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: A K A Stone (#82)

You think he [Jesus] was a fraud and a liar. So of course you don't think he was king. So your opinion is worthless. Since I've already showed you from multiple places in scripture that point out that he is in fact King.

Not true at all. I am saying YOU and Mad Dog are frauds and liars. Jesus NEVER claimed to be a KING.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   13:09:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: buckeroo (#84)

You're making a fool of yourself Buck. You should go talk about something you know about.

Matthew 21:5-7 Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass. And the disciples went, and did as Jesus commanded them And brought the ass, and the colt, and put on them their clothes, and they set him thereon.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   13:11:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: buckeroo (#84)

You think he [Jesus] was a fraud and a liar. So of course you don't think he was king. So your opinion is worthless. Since I've already showed you from multiple places in scripture that point out that he is in fact King.

Not true at all.

From your post 64. You're really confused today.

Do you deny Jesus was/is the Christ?

The way you think he was/is? No, he proved the same, too.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   13:13:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: buckeroo (#84)

Jesus NEVER claimed to be a KING.

That is irrelevant. I don't go around telling people I am a human. But I still am.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   13:21:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: A K A Stone (#85)

Your recitation of a passage in the book Matthew is a regurgitation of a passage in the book of Zechariah. Jesus NEVER said he was a KING.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   13:23:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: buckeroo (#88)

Jesus telling them to get the ass. Proves he was king. You don't have to tell someone what you are. I don't go around telling everyone I have blue eyes.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   13:26:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: A K A Stone (#89)

Jesus NEVER claimed to be a KING. He knew however that he pissed offed a lot of the Sadducees and might as well enjoy a comfort ride towards his own fate; those Jews were nasty people, oh yeah, they still are.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   13:56:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone (#74)

We were discussing that Jesus was/is a King or a KING OF KINGS or something like that;

No you vile pus filled piece of crap.

We were not discussing the FACT that Jesus has ALWAYS been called "KING OF KINGS".

I used the American Revolutionary WAR battle cry "NO KINGS BUT JESUS!" as an example of how CULTS of personality, (ie your PaulTard CULT), are ANTI/UN/AMERICAN.

You serpent, have pissed yourself trying to say that WE have said that Jesus said it in scripture, which neither Stone or I have done.

YOU said it you vile pus filled CREEP.

The FACT REMAINS that JESUS is the CHRIST; and the CHRIST who IS GOD; IS the literal KING OF ALL KINGS.

THIS FACT is IN ALL Christian SCRIPTURE, and ALWAYS has been.

What is going on here is a vile pus filled serpent, who hates and denies the DIVINITY of JESUS and of GOD, is trying to change the subject, (quite successfully so far). From my original point that PaulTards are members of a CULT.

Now this vile pus filled CREEP, is twisting my words and trying to say that I claimed that Jesus has claimed that he was a KING, which he NEVER did, directly; and I NEVER claimed that he did.

Of course, JESUS certainly referred to his KINGDOM, and nobody but KINGS have "KINGdoms" do they?

Fuckeroo has no purpose here other than to DENY the DIVINITY of the CHRIST, and to TRY to F with me. ("He" succeeds at neither.)

Which "the CREEP" tries to do while POSING as a Christian.

Which "the CREEP" obviously is NOT.

Because ALL Christians KNOW and HONOR that Jesus the Christ IS the KING of KINGS.

Don't like that CREEP?

Too bad CREEP.

JESUS IS KING OF KINGS!

NO KINGS BUT JESUS!

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-28   16:30:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: Mad Dog, buckeroo (#91)

Of course, JESUS certainly referred to his KINGDOM, and nobody but KINGS have "KINGdoms" do they?

Buckeroo doesn't seem to understand that.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   17:21:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: A K A Stone, buckeroo (#92)

Mad Dog; Of course, JESUS certainly referred to his KINGDOM, and nobody but KINGS have "KINGdoms" do they?

Buckeroo doesn't seem to understand that.

IMO "he" understands just fine.

TRUTH isn't this CREEP'S goal.

"His" goal is spreading division, contempt, hate and bile, towards GOD and AMERICA and AMERICANS, dividing Americans. TRYING to dis-spirt and push us all down into the mire and muck where "he" lives "his" sick bitter excuse for a life.

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-28   18:21:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Mad Dog (#91)

I used the American Revolutionary WAR battle cry "NO KINGS BUT JESUS!" as an example of how CULTS of personality, (ie your PaulTard CULT), are ANTI/UN/AMERICAN.

Why? Why didn't you answer my direct question from WWAAYY-UP the thread to freely admit that YOU lied about your references about Jesus of Nazareth within the Holy Bible? I caught you in fabrications as you perpetrated some senile fraud from your local church colleagues that lie to you all the time; you perpetuated the same as though their slack-jawed gossip was truth.

Well, I am happy you have researched some of your lies and moved the goal posts toward some educational rewards. It is good that you looked into your gibberish and moved the discussion towards ALL new vistas ... I shall also beat you down within those as I find time, dawg.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   20:39:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: Mad Dog (#91)

“And He (Jesus Christ) said: ‘I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.’” (Matthew 18:3-4)

New International Version (©1984) And he said: "I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. New Living Translation (©2007) Then he said, "I tell you the truth, unless you turn from your sins and become like little children, you will never get into the Kingdom of Heaven.

English Standard Version (©2001) and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

New American Standard Bible (©1995) and said, "Truly I say to you, unless you are converted and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

International Standard Version (©2008) Then he said, "I tell you with certainty, unless you change and become like little children, you will never get into the kingdom of heaven.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010) And he said, “Truly I say to you, unless you will be converted and become like children, you will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven.”

GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995) Then he said to them, "I can guarantee this truth: Unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

King James 2000 Bible (©2003) And said, Verily I say unto you, Except you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

American King James Version And said, Truly I say to you, Except you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

American Standard Version and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye turn, and become as little children, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Douay-Rheims Bible And said: Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Darby Bible Translation and said, Verily I say to you, Unless ye are converted and become as little children, ye will not at all enter into the kingdom of the heavens.

English Revised Version and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye turn, and become as little children, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Webster's Bible Translation And said, Verily I say to you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Weymouth New Testament said, "In solemn truth I tell you that unless you turn and become like little children, you will in no case be admitted into the Kingdom of the Heavens.

World English Bible and said, "Most certainly I tell you, unless you turn, and become as little children, you will in no way enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.

Young's Literal Translation and said, 'Verily I say to you, if ye may not be turned and become as the children, ye may not enter into the reign of the heavens;

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   21:05:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: Mad Dog (#91)

JESUS IS KING OF KINGS!

NO KINGS BUT JESUS!

Jesus of Nazareth never claimed to be a KING. All your personal beliefs shows you just want a Freudian psychological crutch for your own personal failings in a make-believe land called BS.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   21:31:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: buckeroo (#94)

I used the American Revolutionary WAR battle cry "NO KINGS BUT JESUS!" as an example of how CULTS of personality, (ie your PaulTard CULT), are ANTI/UN/AMERICAN.

Why? Why didn't you answer my direct question from WWAAYY-UP the thread to freely admit that YOU lied about your references about Jesus of Nazareth within the Holy Bible? I caught you in fabrications as you perpetrated some senile fraud from your local church colleagues that lie to you all the time; you perpetuated the same as though their slack-jawed gossip was truth.

Well, I am happy you have researched some of your lies and moved the goal posts toward some educational rewards. It is good that you looked into your gibberish and moved the discussion towards ALL new vistas ... I shall also beat you down within those as I find time, dawg.

The only LIAR here you vile puss filled sh!tbag CREEP is YOU.

QUOTE me LYING via ""references" to Jesus you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP.

Oh yeah you can't because, you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP, I haven't.

Your only purpose here is to LIE, and spread your hate and bile of GOD, AMERICA and AMERICANS, and of ME of course, you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP.

Keep jabbering away you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP.

Tick

TIck

TICk

TICK

Uh Yeah ............. SURE you betcha, you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP.

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   16:50:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: buckeroo (#95)

.

You really are a foul vile beyond words pus filled sh!tbag CREEP serpent.

You quote scripture that does NOT apply to the present "discussion" in any way, as what you vile beyond words pus filled sh!tbag CREEP?

An example of how substandard your so called mind is?

How much of a gibbering hate filled bile swilling LOSER YOU are LOSER?

You HATE GOD and JESUS!

Then you TRY to use scripture? AGAINST others?

LOL!

LOL!

LOL!

You despicable serpent, you LOSE, YOU ALWAYS LOSE WHEN YOU DENY GOD!

LOL!

Even if I wanted to, I couldn't F you up any more than YOU have F' ed YOURSELF UP!

LOSER!

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   16:58:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: buckeroo (#96) (Edited)

Md; CHRISTIANS and AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARIES SAID;

"JESUS IS KING OF KINGS!"

"NO KINGS BUT JESUS!"

serpent; Jesus of Nazareth never claimed to be a KING. All your personal beliefs shows you just want a Freudian psychological crutch for your own personal failings in a make-believe land called BS.

Now you TRY to backpedal eh serpent?

SHOW ME serpent, WHERE I EVER CLAIMED THAT JESUS HAD DIRECTLY CLAIMED TO BE A KING, YOU LYING, PUS FIILED, SCUMBAG SERPENT.

Now, TRY to change the subject, again, SERPENT.

You pitiful, hate filled, lying, pus filled sh!tbag, GOD hating, AMERICA and AMERICANS hating serpent MOO-ROOOON punk beeeeeyach.

SQUIRM SNAKE!

Be WHAT YOU ARE SNAKE!

SQUIRM!

LOL!

Poetic!

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   17:08:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: Mad Dog (#53) (Edited)

Aw shucks you IGNORANT vile pus filled CREEP, the BIBLE is FULL of references to the "crown rights" of the MESSIAH the CHRIST.

An actual CHRISTIAN, knows this basic fact.

You call yourself a Christian?

Laughs, you are not Dawg.

Your vile, demonic posts display you allegiance with Satan. You make a mockery of Christianity, and you are a soul-less evil man.

I pray that someday you will seek help.

Ecclesiastes 10:12 Words from a wise man's mouth are gracious, but a fool is consumed by his own lips.


Matthew 12:34 You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks.

International Standard Version (©2008)
Let no filthy talk be heard from your mouths, but only what is good for building up people and meeting the need of the moment. This way you will administer grace to those who hear you.

Proverbs 10:18 ESV /

The one who conceals hatred has lying lips, and whoever utters slander is a fool. Proverbs 19:1 ESV /

Better is a poor person who walks in his integrity than one who is crooked in speech and is a fool. Proverbs 10:11 ESV /

The mouth of the righteous is a fountain of life, but the mouth of the wicked conceals violence.

Ecclesiastes 7:9 ESV

Be not quick in your spirit to become angry, for anger lodges in the bosom of fools.

“America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.”---Claire Wolfe

Bill D Berger  posted on  2011-12-29   18:25:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: Mad Dog (#0) (Edited)

No, he really can’t.

It would be nearly impossible to imagine the Republican Party nominating a candidate who spent years and years publishing a racist newsletter and has deep associations with the fringe far right.

Your anti-Paul smear campaign isn't working. You are an unwitting tool of the MSM.

Your seething hatred for Ron Paul has got you obsessed. You'll keep slinging s**t just to see what sticks, you back-pedal and spit libelous venom just like the good little liberal Alinsky disciple you are.

Possible Ron Paul Iowa Win Drives NeoCons to Apoplexy

Rep. Ron Paul’s top-tier status heading into Iowa and New Hampshire means he definitely can’t be totally ignored by the major media, as he has been in the past. So the censors and blackout artists have been replaced by the smear bund. This past week they got pretty well revved up, but they’re still probably a long way from being in high gear.

As The New American's Jack Kenny noted here a couple of days ago in his article, “Campaign Could Get 'Downright Ugly' if Paul Wins Iowa,” the Big Government Republicans are sharpening their knives for a bloodfest.


But they’re not waiting for the results of the January 3, 2012 Iowa caucuses to get ugly.

Over the past week, the apoplectic attack dogs of the neoconservative kennel were unleashed for a rabid, howling blitz against the Texas Congressman. It’s testimony to Dr. Paul’s squeaky clean personal and political life that the attackers have been forced to fabricate issues with which to clobber him. No sex scandals.

No political payoffs from Freddie Mac or favoritism for Goldman Sachs.

No political flip-flops on issues. No sellouts to special interests.

So how do you attack a straight arrow such as Dr. Paul who is a constitutional purist and has doggedly stuck to his convictions for over three decades of public life?

Well, they’re dusting off their playbook from the 2008 presidential campaign, and adding a few new twists. The smear bund is harping on several memes, hoping that sufficient repetition from multiple voices will convince voters that Ron Paul is “dangerous,” “crazy,” a “pacifist,” an “isolationist,” a “conspiracy crank,” and a “grumpy old man.”

And, let’s not forget, most of all, the “racist” and “anti-Semite” labels the smear bund is attempting to affix to Ron Paul. In adopting this tactic, the neocon attack dogs have torn a page from the Obama/Democrat/MSM “progressive” playbook.

Smear Attacks Have No Effect, Ron Paul Still On Course To Win Iowa

The establishment media is losing its power to sabotage the march of liberty

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Despite a barrage of smear attacks from every single corner of the mainstream media over the last two weeks, Ron Paul’s chances of winning the Iowa Republican Primary have if anything increased, with a new poll showing Paul increasing his lead over Mitt Romney while the New York Times’ primary projection shows Paul’s chances of winning at 60% compared with Romney at 31%.


The sheer desperation of the establishment in its efforts to topple Ron Paul are staggering to behold. Everything from bitter former employees of the Paul campaign, to ludicrous You Tube videos of crying women, to the re-hashed debunked 15-year-old smears about ‘racist’ newsletters, every single piece of dirt imaginable has been thrown at Paul – but nothing has stuck.

This phenomenon once again illustrates the fact, as we saw during Rand Paul’s senatorial campaign, that the corporate press is now so distrusted by a significant portion of Americans that their coordinated smear attacks, which used to have the power to sink candidates almost overnight, are now rapidly losing influence.

It also highlights the fact that the smear attacks against Paul have been completely hyped and exaggerated out of all proportion.

Whereas Herman Cain’s adventurous sex life cost him the frontrunner’s position and forced him to drop out of the race altogether, likewise with Gingrich when the exposure of his true political inclinations decimated his commanding lead, the so-called scandals about Ron Paul are so transparently weak and have been distorted out of all rational proportions, that their impact has been non-existent on the polling figures.

That assertion is proven by the numbers – which show Paul’s lead in Iowa has held firm

A new Public Policy Polling survey shows Ron Paul at 24% with Romney in second at 20% and Gingrich in third at 13%. That’s a one percentage point increase in Paul’s lead compared to the last PPP poll conducted ten days ago.

“Paul continues to have much more passionate support than Romney. 77% of his voters are firmly committed to him, compared to 71% for Romney. Among voters who say their minds are completely made up Paul’s lead expands to 7 points at 28-21. If Paul’s lead holds on through next Tuesday it appears he’ll have won this on the ground,” reports PPP.

In addition, the New York Times’ primary projection shows that Paul now has a 60% chance of winning Iowa compared to Romney with a 31% chance. Last week, the two candidates were level by this measurement but now Paul has pulled ahead.

If there’s anything that frightens the establishment as much as Ron Paul gaining the kind of momentum that could catapult him into the frontrunner position in other primary states, it’s the fact that the corporate press and all their simpering hangers-on no longer have the power to dictate reality.

The smear attacks have failed – Ron Paul is still on course to win Iowa and his momentum will continue to build.

********************* *******

BTW, I want to thank you and your ilk for showing the complete lunacy of the anti-Paul zealots.

You are drawing more supporters to our side every time you post your bilge.

You must be very pleased with yourself for doing the bidding of the liberal MSM.

Voters can see through the lies of the MSM hit pieces, so just keep posting your disinformation. The more that frightened little neo-clowns like you post your ignorant bilge, the more supporters Ron Paul gains.

Paul maintains his lead

Paul maintains his lead

The last week and a half has brought little change in the standings for the Iowa Republican caucus: Ron Paul continues to lead Mitt Romney by a modest margin, 24-20. Newt Gingrich is in 3rd at 13% followed by Michele Bachmann at 11%, Rick Perry and Rick Santorum at 10%, Jon Huntsman at 4%, and Buddy Roemer at 2%.

Paul's strength in Iowa continues to depend on a coalition of voters that's pretty unusual for a Republican in the state.  Romney leads 22-20 with those who are actually Republicans, while Paul has a 39-12 advantage with the 24% who are either independents or Democrats.

Two new polls (CNN/Time and PPP) released in the last 36 hours show that Mitt Romney and Ron Paul are locked in a tight race for first place in Iowa with the caucuses just five days away.

Named the “#1 Tax Cutter in Congress” - Human Events magazine

Nine consecutive years as the “Taxpayers’ Friend” - National Taxpayers Union

One of the “50 Most Effective Legislators in Congress” - Congressional Quarterly

Has NEVER voted to raise taxes

Has NEVER taken a junket during his service in Congress

Refused to accept the plush Congressional pension

Regularly returns funds from his Congressional office budget to the U.S. Treasury

Image description

"if you're not cop, you're little people"

Deckard  posted on  2011-12-29   18:46:38 ET  (3 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: Bill D Berger (#100)

serious POT; You call yourself a Christian?

Laughs, you are not Dawg.

Your vile, demonic posts display you allegiance with Satan. You make a mockery of Christianity, and you are a soul-less evil man.

I pray that someday you will seek help.

.

LOL!

The vilest of HYPOCRITES and LIARS, the steaming filth that thinks child molesting is FUNNY, Bill D Berger, "I'm just HYPOCRITICAL lying SCUM", speaks!

Tell ya what SCUM, attend to YOUR own judgement and I'll attend to my own.

I wouldn't want yours in any case.

SCUM.

LOL!

See the FOUR pointing back at ya SCUM?

Of course YOU don't!

LOL!

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   21:41:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: Mad Dog (#102) (Edited)

Tell ya what SCUM, attend to YOUR own judgement and I'll attend to my own.

You are a hypocrite pointing out the words of others when your own vile posts demonstrate the evil that is overflowing from your heart.

Matthew 12:34 You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks.

"It's better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt"

Words you should ponder.

“America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.”---Claire Wolfe

Bill D Berger  posted on  2011-12-29   21:44:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: Deckard (#101)

Your anti-Paul smear campaign isn't working. You are an unwitting tool of the MSM.

Your seething hatred for Ron Paul has got you obsessed. You'll keep slinging s**t just to see what sticks, you back-pedal and spit libelous venom just like the good little liberal Alinsky disciple you are.

ROTFLMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Whatever you say CULT boy.

You're a F' ing Mo-roon CULT boy.

You call the TRUTH about your wee failed FRAUD of a hero an "anti-paul smear campaign"?

LOL! You are tooo F' ing STOOOPID to post on the web CULT boy!

I don't HATE your wee FRAUD failed hero CULT boy I judge him on what he HAS DONE not on what he SAYS.

OVER THIRTY YEARS CULT boy.

I also love how you PaulTards TRY to set up the false choice your wee failed FRAUD hero or the COMMIES!

Newsflash CULT boy I knew who Barry Goldwater was before you were shitting yellow.

I HAVE BLOOD IN THE ANTI-COMMUNIST GAME YOU LITTE BITCH.

Just because I spit with contempt on your POLITICIAN hero CULT boy does NOT mean that I am of the so called "left".

The major thing that your wee failed FRAUD hero REALLY has going AGAINST him is you PaulTards, you insipid azz sucking CULT boy beeeeeyach.

He's just as bad, almost, as the messiah "king" obammy,

(pause to hear all the CULT members scream and cry ...........

BUT .... CULT BOY, I'm on record here, several times CULT boy saying that I'd vote FOR RonniePaulie IF HE WAS THE ONLY CHOICE AGAINST THE MESSIAH "KING" OBAMMY!

So shut the F' up CULT boy.

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   22:09:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: Mad Dog (#104)

Whatever you say CULT boy.

You're a F' ing Mo-roon CULT boy.

Keep it up, you drooling liberal shill, keep carrying water for the MSM. Keep getting your talking points from the Alinsky/Progressive playbook.

Like I said earlier, when others see the unprecedented ignorance of you Ron Paul haters, it only draws more supporters to our side.

Man, you make yukon look sane by comparison.

BTW, do you miss your little queer friend?

"if you're not cop, you're little people"

Deckard  posted on  2011-12-29   22:23:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: Deckard (#105)

OH RonniePaulie you're the one!

Oh ... Oh ... OH .... RONNIEPAULIE!

You'r de ONE RonniePaulie! YOU'RE de ONLY ONE Ronnie Paulie

ROTFLMAOAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Whatever you say CULT boy.

You're a F' ing Mo-roon CULT boy.

You call the TRUTH about your wee failed FRAUD of a hero an "anti-paul smear campaign" CULT boy?

LOL! You are tooo F' ing STOOOPID to post on the web CULT boy!

I don't HATE your wee FRAUD failed hero CULT boy I judge him on what he HAS DONE not on what he SAYS.

OVER THIRTY YEARS CULT boy.

I also love how you PaulTards TRY to set up the false choice your wee failed FRAUD hero or the COMMIES!

Newsflash CULT boy I knew who Barry Goldwater was before you were shitting yellow.

I HAVE BLOOD IN THE ANTI-COMMUNIST GAME YOU LITTLE CULT boy BITCH.

Just because I spit with contempt on your POLITICIAN hero CULT boy does NOT mean that I am of the so called "left".

The major thing that your wee failed FRAUD hero REALLY has going AGAINST him is you PaulTards, you insipid azz sucking CULT boy beeeeeyach.

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   23:05:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: Mad Dog (#106)

I don't HATE your wee FRAUD failed hero CULT boy I judge him on what he HAS DONE not on what he SAYS.

OVER THIRTY YEARS CULT boy.

I also love how you PaulTards TRY to set up the false choice your wee failed FRAUD hero or the COMMIES!

Once again, you have said nothing of substance, nothing other than outright lies, and vile, obscene name calling, menopausal emoting and childish, tiny-fisted temper tantrums..

That is the problem with those of your ilk.

You don't have the mental capacity to debate like an adult, and what's even more obvious, you have some serious emotional and self-control issues.

Like I said, right out of the MSM/Liberal playbook, that's right doggie, you are using the same leftist tactics that the obamabots use, but of course you are too dense to see that.

You'd rather sit in your one room cabin in the hinterlands of Alaska and spew your venom at anyone who dares to disagree with you.

You're a real low-class act Dawg.....almost as low class as that donut-munching cop over at LP.

"if you're not cop, you're little people"

Deckard  posted on  2011-12-29   23:22:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: Mad Dog (#106)

The major thing that your wee failed FRAUD hero REALLY has going AGAINST him is you PaulTards, you insipid azz sucking CULT boy beeeeeyach.

Yet America is + 26 Trillion in debt now Dog
Clinton's admin had a surplus,....[not saying Clinton is good,....or clean,...ie...he's Globalist trash]
Yet Bush 43 launched these wars.....these wars which have documented thinktank desire behind them
Project for a New American Century PNAC...

"New Pearl Harbor"

Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" (51).[14]

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[41][42][43] investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman,[44] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[45] all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans. [Wiki]

We can go around and around with this....from Banker/Globalist leverage that period...to US/NATO/AFRICOM taking Libya from Kaddafi
the same overt presence.....running drones over Iran,....Predator drone attacks over Pakistan and other locals worldwide.
Its out of control Dog,.....Ron Paul stands for accountability
None of the other trash running will break up the Illegal Jeckyll Island Federal Reserve which has enslaved America,
or turn off*...these overt military adventures which eventually end up on Russia and China's doorstep
and we both know what happens then.
America's Military has served with honor and great endurance in its history
yet that* military is now being hijacked into a Globalist design which we know exists,...via Zbigniew Brzeinski's The Grand Chessboard,....the ramblings of Gravel tone [Henry Kissinger]....PNAC and the other Neo con think tanks.

War with Iran will clobber America financially ...bring severe hardship to an already strung out/stressed out nation,....coping with ever increasing Fascism and the lies of its Gov.
and ya....the chess pieces move ever closer to Russia and China
who may in some future decade push back from the perceived threat.

Is wanting this madness stopped wrong?
Ron Paul wants it stopped!

Parrot with speed dial  posted on  2011-12-29   23:44:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (109 - 135) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com