[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: No, Really, Ron Paul Cannot Win
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/12/really-ron-paul-cannot-win.html
Published: Dec 19, 2011
Author: Jonathan Chait
Post Date: 2011-12-19 19:46:45 by Mad Dog
Keywords: the TRUTH, HURTS, PaulTards
Views: 56002
Comments: 135

Andrew Sullivan, following up his (Republican primary) endorsement of Ron Paul, argues today that campaign reporters and pundits who say he can’t win the nomination are all wrong: We were told one thing after his extensive riff last week on the paranoia around Iran's nuclear weapons, his defense of blowback theory in our encounters with Jihadist terrorism, and his open denunciation of the greatest mistake of his own party in the last decade, the Iraq war (where every other candidate is silent). We were told this ended his candidacy, that there was no constituency for this in the current GOP, that he was throwing it all away, that he has, as the Ailes memo clearly has it, zero chance of getting the nomination.

Well: now he's ahead in Iowa. And, yes, it remains a long, long, long shot. But you know what?

Yes he can.

No, he really can’t.

It would be nearly impossible to imagine the Republican Party nominating a candidate who spent years and years publishing a racist newsletter and has deep associations with the fringe far right.

(Here he is speaking to the John Birch Society on the occasion of its 50th anniversary.)

It would be even more impossible to imagine the Party nominating a candidate who favors total withdrawal from world affairs and takes a Chomsky-ite line on American power. The notion that the Party might nominate a candidate who does both these things is totally preposterous.

Now, Andrew is framing his argument as an argument against a zero chance.

Well, sure. It’s not zero. Paul could win the nomination. It’s also possible that Democrats will follow the Schoen–Caddell plan of nominating Hillary Clinton over President Obama, and Obama will flip to the GOP, and Republicans will nominate Obama, and the general election will be Clinton-Obama II: This Time It’s for All the Marbles.

It’s possible Newt Gingrich will announce the result of a secret experiment he undertook to resurrect Ronald Reagan through saved brain DNA, implanted in the body of a dinosaur created through similar methods, and that Reaganosaurus will rampage through the Republican field, capture the nomination and, in a climactic debate with Obama, devour him in a single bite.

But reporters have good reason to ignore possibilities such as those or a Ron Paul nomination.

Paul’s supporters seem to believe that the media ignoring him is the only thing keeping him from challenging for the Party nomination.

More likely, it’s the only thing that’s allowed his candidacy to progress to this point.

If more people actually understood the full scope of Paul’s fringe-right views, a huge portion of his support would peel off.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-58) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#59. To: buckeroo (#56)

.

BTW you vile pus filled CREEP.

"Contradiction is NOT argument."

All you are is a sh!t tossing simian retard.

You aren't worth the time.

You NEED the attention.

Ta ta.

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-27   16:34:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Mad Dog (#57)

?

Where are your citations for KING OF KINGS in the HOLY BIBLE? I thought, for sure, that you were off looking at a website to prove your perspective. As always, you have wasted your time claiming that I am DBR or some someone else. You are getting creepy, now.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   16:41:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Mad Dog (#58)

It's PRIMA FACIE!

Really?

So why did the crowd of Jews, heretics, Romans, agnostics and everyone else in the celebrations crucify their KING of KINGS?

It wasn't It's PRIMA FACIE! as YOU claim.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   16:47:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Mad Dog (#59)

"Contradiction is NOT argument."

Oh my! All, I am asking is about yours, of course.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   16:48:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: buckeroo (#55)

That is because of the various Hebrew and Greek interpretations you have read, called the Holy Bible. Messiah is the end-time king, descended from King David and expected to redeem Israel; only a handful of early "Christians" (prior to 200AD) identified Jesus as the Messiah. (Greek: Christos)

Do you deny Jesus was/is the Christ?

Be careful of your answer. It has eternal consequences.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   19:07:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: A K A Stone (#63)

Do you deny Jesus was/is the Christ?

The way you think he was/is? No, he proved the same, too. No one has seen him come out of the clouds strumming a harp or wearing a halo for just about ever.

Your problem is all about the eschatological writings contained in the version of the Holy Bible that you read or believe in. And no one can solve your problem but yourself.

Be careful of your answer. It has eternal consequences.

Again, you believe in the "end of the world" at some point in time. It isn't unique among so-called conservative, Evangelical "Christians" swearing "fire&brimstone" either. Your ideas are just popular based upon the myths you believe in (and repeated at your Sunday services) and largely borrowed from Iranian Zoroastrian thoughts and principles from about 4000 BCE. That was before Judaism (2000 BCE) and the covenants of organized Christian (200 CE) mythology or even Muslims (500 CE).

Sorry, pal but you guys can discuss KING OF KINGS all you want, but there are no documented sources about the idea at all other than via myth.... and it isn't even contained in the Bible. For Christians, the idea of a "Holy Trinity" doesn't even exist in the Bible.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   20:36:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: buckeroo (#64)

and largely borrowed from Iranian Zoroastrian

You're a moron if you believe that.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   20:39:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: A K A Stone (#65)

OK, Christian mystic, tell us how Abraham borrowed the idea of a "ONE GOD" theory known as monotheism as the Jews didn't practice that idea until he created spread the word. Surely you know. And of course, you know that the clans of Jews were exiled to Babylon (~600 BCE) from Jerusalem, right? They didn't even have a pot to piss in but were smart enough to adopt Zoroastrian thought and principles and eventually came back to Jerusalem (~500 BCE) with the borrowed ideas.

Poor ol' Abraham and Sarah must be shaking in their harps up there in heaven for your own renouncement of historical FACT.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   20:55:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: buckeroo (#66)

Here is what I have to say. You have been "educated" beyond your intelligence.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   20:58:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: A K A Stone (#67)

You have been "educated" beyond your intelligence.

Please explain that expression for the many that are not familiar with your profound wisdom and holy presence amongst us mere mortals.

There are no references within the Holy Bible ANYWHERE, NO MATTER WHAT VERSION you decide to pick&choose from to include even the Catholic canonical books written in ~200 CE.

You are just re-piping myth and hearsay.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   21:14:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: buckeroo (#68)

Please explain that expression for the many that are not familiar with your profound wisdom and holy presence amongst us mere mortals.

We are all mortals.

Here is what I'm saying. You don't know what you are talking about. You are parroting fools and dumb asses. I'm talking specifically about this subject.

You do have great insight into other things.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:10:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: buckeroo (#68)

There are no references within the Holy Bible ANYWHERE, NO MATTER WHAT VERSION you decide to pick&choose from to include even the Catholic canonical books written in ~200 CE.

I take it you are back to talking about the "king" quote.

I never said Jesus said he was king. I just pointed out that when asked by pilate if he was the son of God. Jesus simply said you said I was. Or however it was phrased.

So just because Jesus didn't specifically say he was the "king" doesn't mean that he isn't.

He never denied he was king either.

He is depicted as sitting at the right hand of God in a future "kingdom" of heaven.

That is my take.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:13:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: A K A Stone, Moderator X (#69)

You do have great insight into other things.

X ... get rid of this guy (A K A Stone) immediately; we need to start LF on the correct foot from this moment forward.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   22:25:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: A K A Stone (#70)

He is depicted as sitting at the right hand of God in a future "kingdom" of heaven.

Where did you come up with that faerie tale?

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-27   22:31:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: buckeroo (#68)

There are no references within the Holy Bible ANYWHERE, NO MATTER WHAT VERSION you decide to pick&choose from to include even the Catholic canonical books written in ~200 CE.

New International Version (©1984) Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place."

New Living Translation (©2007) Jesus answered, "My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. If it were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But my Kingdom is not of this world."

English Standard Version (©2001) Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.”

New American Standard Bible (©1995) Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm."

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

International Standard Version (©2008) Jesus answered, "My kingdom does not belong to this world. If my kingdom belonged to this world, my servants would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But for now my kingdom is not from here."

Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010) Yeshua said to him, “My Kingdom is not from this world; if my Kingdom were of this world, my servants would be fighting that I would not have been delivered up to the Judeans, but now my Kingdom is not from here.”

GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995) Jesus answered, "My kingdom doesn't belong to this world. If my kingdom belonged to this world, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. My kingdom doesn't have its origin on earth."

King James 2000 Bible (©2003) Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from here.

American King James Version Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

American Standard Version Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Douay-Rheims Bible Jesus answered: My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would certainly strive that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now my kingdom is not from hence.

Darby Bible Translation Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world; if my kingdom were of this world, my servants had fought that I might not be delivered up to the Jews; but now my kingdom is not from hence.

English Revised Version Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Webster's Bible Translation Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Weymouth New Testament "My kingdom," replied Jesus, "does not belong to this world. If my kingdom did belong to this world, my subjects would have resolutely fought to save me from being delivered up to the Jews. But, as a matter of fact, my kingdom has not this origin."

World English Bible Jesus answered, "My Kingdom is not of this world. If my Kingdom were of this world, then my servants would fight, that I wouldn't be delivered to the Jews. But now my Kingdom is not from here."

Young's Literal Translation Jesus answered, 'My kingdom is not of this world; if my kingdom were of this world, my officers had struggled that I might not be delivered up to Jews; but now my kingdom is not from hence.'

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:51:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: A K A Stone, Mad Dog (#73)

We were discussing that Jesus was/is a King or a KING OF KINGS or something like that; it has nothing to do with the metaphor of a "kingdom" or "my kingdom" as you attempt to point out. If you were traveling to say, England and an indigenous British subject asked you, "where did you come from?" it is possible to answer properly in the possessive form, "my country is America." But that doesn't mean you own or rule or are the President.

Why is it important? Because of Mad Dog's earlier rebuttal using his own phrases that are incorrect and worthless about his self-proclaimed Christianity side tracking the major focus of his dialog; that he (Mad Dog) is only subservient to Jesus and not a government. But, Jesus NEVER said he was/is a KING. Mad Dog and YOU have distorted FACTS (even from your own citations) to prove he said so. Both of you are wrong.

Jesus of Nazareth is discussing, "PARADISE"; of "not of this world." It is a mythological time/place/setting far removed from the Earth and the chains that bind us from reaching PARADISE. All of your rants have proven nothing but that YOU and Mad Dog don't understand the simplest of Jesus' parables.

All of this KING and KING OF KINGS crapola came from hearsay, movies, rants, gossip and BS.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   12:18:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: buckeroo (#74)

We were discussing that Jesus was/is a King or a KING OF KINGS or something like that; it has nothing to do with the metaphor of a "kingdom" or "my kingdom" as you attempt to point out. If you were traveling to say, England and an indigenous British subject asked you, "where did you come from?" it is possible to answer properly in the possessive form, "my country is America." But that doesn't mean you own or rule or are the President.

My kingdom has meaning.

An ordinary Brit wouldn't say welcome to my kingdom. The King of England would say that though.

I don't really care if you believe it or not. It doesn't matter to me.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:20:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: A K A Stone (#75)

An ordinary Brit wouldn't say welcome to my kingdom.

What are you saying? Are you saying that "kingdoms" were the proper word for "city-state" governments of the time? And now, some two thousand years later, people use "kingdom" for the same or similar idea of expression? No, they use the term "country."

Jesus NEVER said, "welcome to my kingdom" anyway. He talked about heaven or more appropriately, PARADISE and how to escape the Sadducees' distorted interpretation of the Tanakh. It was all delivered on Jesus' Sermon of the Mount.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   12:38:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: buckeroo (#76)

What are you saying? Are you saying that "kingdoms" were the proper word for "city-state" governments of the time?

No. That is what you are saying.

A king would say welcome to my kingdom.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:44:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: buckeroo (#76)

I don't claim to know everything or even a lot about the Bible.

But here is another passage confirming that Jesus is king.

Zechariah 9:9

King James Version (KJV)

9Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.

I'm not going to quote it. But I'm sure you've read about Jesus instructing his follower to go get the ass for him that he rode in on.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:48:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: buckeroo (#76)

Thanks for making me study this harder. Now I have confirmed that Jesus is in fact King. Thank You.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:50:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: A K A Stone (#79)

He is not a KING. He NEVER said he was a KING. It is misquoted and worthless to adopt such an expression as it distorts the entire focus of what Jesus was attempting to convey. The only idea of "King" was from the Roman guard with, "King of the Jews."

You fine folks don't know your asses from a hole in the ground.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   12:54:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: buckeroo (#80)

Zechariah 9:9

King James Version (KJV)

9Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.

I'm not going to quote it. But I'm sure you've read about Jesus instructing his follower to go get the ass for him that he rode in on.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:56:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: buckeroo (#80)

You think he was a fraud and a liar. So of course you don't think he was king. So your opinion is worthless. Since I've already showed you from multiple places in scripture that point out that he is in fact King.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:57:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: A K A Stone (#81)

You keep repeating a singular passage from Zechariah as though it is profound and relevant to the point of view that Jesus NEVER claimed to be a KING. The Book of Zechariah is in the Old Testament, circa 500 BCE. Even the Jews discount it as a prophesy towards Jesus later arrival circa 32 CE.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   13:07:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: A K A Stone (#82)

You think he [Jesus] was a fraud and a liar. So of course you don't think he was king. So your opinion is worthless. Since I've already showed you from multiple places in scripture that point out that he is in fact King.

Not true at all. I am saying YOU and Mad Dog are frauds and liars. Jesus NEVER claimed to be a KING.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   13:09:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: buckeroo (#84)

You're making a fool of yourself Buck. You should go talk about something you know about.

Matthew 21:5-7 Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass. And the disciples went, and did as Jesus commanded them And brought the ass, and the colt, and put on them their clothes, and they set him thereon.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   13:11:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: buckeroo (#84)

You think he [Jesus] was a fraud and a liar. So of course you don't think he was king. So your opinion is worthless. Since I've already showed you from multiple places in scripture that point out that he is in fact King.

Not true at all.

From your post 64. You're really confused today.

Do you deny Jesus was/is the Christ?

The way you think he was/is? No, he proved the same, too.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   13:13:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: buckeroo (#84)

Jesus NEVER claimed to be a KING.

That is irrelevant. I don't go around telling people I am a human. But I still am.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   13:21:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: A K A Stone (#85)

Your recitation of a passage in the book Matthew is a regurgitation of a passage in the book of Zechariah. Jesus NEVER said he was a KING.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   13:23:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: buckeroo (#88)

Jesus telling them to get the ass. Proves he was king. You don't have to tell someone what you are. I don't go around telling everyone I have blue eyes.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   13:26:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: A K A Stone (#89)

Jesus NEVER claimed to be a KING. He knew however that he pissed offed a lot of the Sadducees and might as well enjoy a comfort ride towards his own fate; those Jews were nasty people, oh yeah, they still are.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   13:56:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone (#74)

We were discussing that Jesus was/is a King or a KING OF KINGS or something like that;

No you vile pus filled piece of crap.

We were not discussing the FACT that Jesus has ALWAYS been called "KING OF KINGS".

I used the American Revolutionary WAR battle cry "NO KINGS BUT JESUS!" as an example of how CULTS of personality, (ie your PaulTard CULT), are ANTI/UN/AMERICAN.

You serpent, have pissed yourself trying to say that WE have said that Jesus said it in scripture, which neither Stone or I have done.

YOU said it you vile pus filled CREEP.

The FACT REMAINS that JESUS is the CHRIST; and the CHRIST who IS GOD; IS the literal KING OF ALL KINGS.

THIS FACT is IN ALL Christian SCRIPTURE, and ALWAYS has been.

What is going on here is a vile pus filled serpent, who hates and denies the DIVINITY of JESUS and of GOD, is trying to change the subject, (quite successfully so far). From my original point that PaulTards are members of a CULT.

Now this vile pus filled CREEP, is twisting my words and trying to say that I claimed that Jesus has claimed that he was a KING, which he NEVER did, directly; and I NEVER claimed that he did.

Of course, JESUS certainly referred to his KINGDOM, and nobody but KINGS have "KINGdoms" do they?

Fuckeroo has no purpose here other than to DENY the DIVINITY of the CHRIST, and to TRY to F with me. ("He" succeeds at neither.)

Which "the CREEP" tries to do while POSING as a Christian.

Which "the CREEP" obviously is NOT.

Because ALL Christians KNOW and HONOR that Jesus the Christ IS the KING of KINGS.

Don't like that CREEP?

Too bad CREEP.

JESUS IS KING OF KINGS!

NO KINGS BUT JESUS!

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-28   16:30:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: Mad Dog, buckeroo (#91)

Of course, JESUS certainly referred to his KINGDOM, and nobody but KINGS have "KINGdoms" do they?

Buckeroo doesn't seem to understand that.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   17:21:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: A K A Stone, buckeroo (#92)

Mad Dog; Of course, JESUS certainly referred to his KINGDOM, and nobody but KINGS have "KINGdoms" do they?

Buckeroo doesn't seem to understand that.

IMO "he" understands just fine.

TRUTH isn't this CREEP'S goal.

"His" goal is spreading division, contempt, hate and bile, towards GOD and AMERICA and AMERICANS, dividing Americans. TRYING to dis-spirt and push us all down into the mire and muck where "he" lives "his" sick bitter excuse for a life.

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-28   18:21:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Mad Dog (#91)

I used the American Revolutionary WAR battle cry "NO KINGS BUT JESUS!" as an example of how CULTS of personality, (ie your PaulTard CULT), are ANTI/UN/AMERICAN.

Why? Why didn't you answer my direct question from WWAAYY-UP the thread to freely admit that YOU lied about your references about Jesus of Nazareth within the Holy Bible? I caught you in fabrications as you perpetrated some senile fraud from your local church colleagues that lie to you all the time; you perpetuated the same as though their slack-jawed gossip was truth.

Well, I am happy you have researched some of your lies and moved the goal posts toward some educational rewards. It is good that you looked into your gibberish and moved the discussion towards ALL new vistas ... I shall also beat you down within those as I find time, dawg.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   20:39:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: Mad Dog (#91)

“And He (Jesus Christ) said: ‘I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.’” (Matthew 18:3-4)

New International Version (©1984) And he said: "I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. New Living Translation (©2007) Then he said, "I tell you the truth, unless you turn from your sins and become like little children, you will never get into the Kingdom of Heaven.

English Standard Version (©2001) and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

New American Standard Bible (©1995) and said, "Truly I say to you, unless you are converted and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

International Standard Version (©2008) Then he said, "I tell you with certainty, unless you change and become like little children, you will never get into the kingdom of heaven.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010) And he said, “Truly I say to you, unless you will be converted and become like children, you will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven.”

GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995) Then he said to them, "I can guarantee this truth: Unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

King James 2000 Bible (©2003) And said, Verily I say unto you, Except you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

American King James Version And said, Truly I say to you, Except you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

American Standard Version and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye turn, and become as little children, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Douay-Rheims Bible And said: Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Darby Bible Translation and said, Verily I say to you, Unless ye are converted and become as little children, ye will not at all enter into the kingdom of the heavens.

English Revised Version and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye turn, and become as little children, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Webster's Bible Translation And said, Verily I say to you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Weymouth New Testament said, "In solemn truth I tell you that unless you turn and become like little children, you will in no case be admitted into the Kingdom of the Heavens.

World English Bible and said, "Most certainly I tell you, unless you turn, and become as little children, you will in no way enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.

Young's Literal Translation and said, 'Verily I say to you, if ye may not be turned and become as the children, ye may not enter into the reign of the heavens;

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   21:05:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: Mad Dog (#91)

JESUS IS KING OF KINGS!

NO KINGS BUT JESUS!

Jesus of Nazareth never claimed to be a KING. All your personal beliefs shows you just want a Freudian psychological crutch for your own personal failings in a make-believe land called BS.

buckeroo  posted on  2011-12-28   21:31:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: buckeroo (#94)

I used the American Revolutionary WAR battle cry "NO KINGS BUT JESUS!" as an example of how CULTS of personality, (ie your PaulTard CULT), are ANTI/UN/AMERICAN.

Why? Why didn't you answer my direct question from WWAAYY-UP the thread to freely admit that YOU lied about your references about Jesus of Nazareth within the Holy Bible? I caught you in fabrications as you perpetrated some senile fraud from your local church colleagues that lie to you all the time; you perpetuated the same as though their slack-jawed gossip was truth.

Well, I am happy you have researched some of your lies and moved the goal posts toward some educational rewards. It is good that you looked into your gibberish and moved the discussion towards ALL new vistas ... I shall also beat you down within those as I find time, dawg.

The only LIAR here you vile puss filled sh!tbag CREEP is YOU.

QUOTE me LYING via ""references" to Jesus you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP.

Oh yeah you can't because, you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP, I haven't.

Your only purpose here is to LIE, and spread your hate and bile of GOD, AMERICA and AMERICANS, and of ME of course, you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP.

Keep jabbering away you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP.

Tick

TIck

TICk

TICK

Uh Yeah ............. SURE you betcha, you vile pus filled sh!tbag CREEP.

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   16:50:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: buckeroo (#95)

.

You really are a foul vile beyond words pus filled sh!tbag CREEP serpent.

You quote scripture that does NOT apply to the present "discussion" in any way, as what you vile beyond words pus filled sh!tbag CREEP?

An example of how substandard your so called mind is?

How much of a gibbering hate filled bile swilling LOSER YOU are LOSER?

You HATE GOD and JESUS!

Then you TRY to use scripture? AGAINST others?

LOL!

LOL!

LOL!

You despicable serpent, you LOSE, YOU ALWAYS LOSE WHEN YOU DENY GOD!

LOL!

Even if I wanted to, I couldn't F you up any more than YOU have F' ed YOURSELF UP!

LOSER!

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   16:58:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: buckeroo (#96) (Edited)

Md; CHRISTIANS and AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARIES SAID;

"JESUS IS KING OF KINGS!"

"NO KINGS BUT JESUS!"

serpent; Jesus of Nazareth never claimed to be a KING. All your personal beliefs shows you just want a Freudian psychological crutch for your own personal failings in a make-believe land called BS.

Now you TRY to backpedal eh serpent?

SHOW ME serpent, WHERE I EVER CLAIMED THAT JESUS HAD DIRECTLY CLAIMED TO BE A KING, YOU LYING, PUS FIILED, SCUMBAG SERPENT.

Now, TRY to change the subject, again, SERPENT.

You pitiful, hate filled, lying, pus filled sh!tbag, GOD hating, AMERICA and AMERICANS hating serpent MOO-ROOOON punk beeeeeyach.

SQUIRM SNAKE!

Be WHAT YOU ARE SNAKE!

SQUIRM!

LOL!

Poetic!

Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-12-29   17:08:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (100 - 135) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com