[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
New World Order Title: The Fed Bailouts: Money for Nothing (Read at your own risk!) The Fed Bailouts: Money for Nothing Posted by Alan Grayson in General Discussion Mon Dec 05th 2011, 02:45 PM I think its fair to say that Congressman Ron Paul and I are the parents of the GAOs audit of the Federal Reserve. And I say that knowing full well that Dr. Paul has somewhat complicated views regarding gay marriage. Anyway, one of our love children is a massive 251-page GAO report technocratically entitled Opportunities Exist to Strengthen Policies and Processes for Managing Emergency Assistance. It is almost as weighty as that 13-lb. baby born in Germany last week, named Jihad. It also is the first independent audit of the Federal Reserve in the Feds 99-year history. Feel free to take a look at it yourself, its right here. It documents Wall Street bailouts by the Fed that dwarf the $700 billion TARP, and everything else youve heard about. I wouldnt want anyone to think that Im dramatizing or amplifying what this GAO report says, so Im just going to list some of my favorite parts, by page number. Page 131 The total lending for the Feds broad-based emergency programs was $16,115,000,000,000. Thats right, more than $16 trillion. The four largest recipients, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America, received more than a trillion dollars each. The 5th largest recipient was Barclays PLC. The 8th was the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC. The 9th was Deutsche Bank AG. The 10th was UBS AG. These four institutions each got between a quarter of a trillion and a trillion dollars. None of them is an American bank. Pages 133 & 137 Some of these broad-based emergency program loans were long-term, and some were short-term. But the term-adjusted borrowing was equivalent to a total of $1,139,000,000,000 more than one year. Thats more than $1 trillion out the door. Lending for these programs in fact peaked at more than $1 trillion. Pages 135 & 196 Sixty percent of the $738 billion Commercial Paper Funding Facility went to the subsidiaries of foreign banks. 36% of the $71 billion Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility also went to subsidiaries of foreign banks. Page 205 Separate and apart from these broad-based emergency program loans were another $10,057,000,000,000 in currency swaps. In the currency swaps, the Fed handed dollars to foreign central banks, no strings attached, to fund bailouts in other countries. The Feds only collateral was a corresponding amount of foreign currency, which never left the Feds books (even to be deposited to earn interest), plus a promise to repay. But the Fed agreed to give back the foreign currency at the original exchange rate, even if the foreign currency appreciated in value during the period of the swap. These currency swaps and the broad-based emergency program loans, together, totaled more than $26 trillion. Thats almost $100,000 for every man, woman, and child in America. Thats an amount equal to more than seven years of federal spending -- on the military, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, interest on the debt, and everything else. And around twice Americans total GNP. Page 201 Here again, these swaps were of varying length, but on Dec. 4, 2008, there were $588,000,000,000 outstanding. Thats almost $2,000 for every American. All sent to foreign countries. Thats more than twenty times as much as our foreign aid budget. Page 129 In October 2008, the Fed gave $60,000,000,000 to the Swiss National Bank with the specific understanding that the money would be used to bail out UBS, a Swiss bank. Not an American bank. A Swiss bank. Pages 3 & 4 In addition to the broad-based programs, and in addition to the currency swaps, there have been hundreds of billions of dollars in Fed loans called assistance to individual institutions. This has included Bear Stearns, AIG, Citigroup, Bank of America, and some primary dealers. The Fed decided unilaterally who received this assistance, and who didnt. Pages 101 & 173 You may have heard somewhere that these were riskless transactions, where the Fed always had enough collateral to avoid losses. Not true. The Maiden Lane I bailout fund was in the hole for almost two years. Page 4 You also may have heard somewhere that all this money was paid back. Not true. The GAO lists five Fed bailout programs that still have amounts outstanding, including $909,000,000,000 (just under a trillion dollars) for the Feds Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities Purchase Program alone. Thats almost $3,000 for every American. Page 126 In contemporaneous documents, the Fed apparently did not even take a stab at explaining why it helped some banks (like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley) and not others. After the fact, the Fed referred vaguely to strains in the financial markets, transitional credit, and the Feds all-time favorite rationale for everything it does, increasing liquidity. 81 different places in the GAO report The Fed applied nothing even resembling a consistent policy toward valuing the assets that it acquired. Sometimes it asked its counterparty to take a haircut (discount), sometimes it didnt. Having read the whole report, I see no rhyme or reason to those decisions, with billions upon billions of dollars at stake. Page 2 As massive as these enumerated Fed bailouts were, there were yet more. The GAO did not even endeavor to analyze the Feds discount window lending, or its single-tranche term repurchase agreements. Pages 13 & 14 And the Fed wasnt the only one bailing out Wall Street, of course. On top of what the Fed did, there was the $700,000,000,000 TARP program authorized by Congress (which I voted against). The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) also provided a federal guarantee for $600,000,000,000 in bonds issued by Wall Street. There is one thing that Id like to add to this, which isnt in the GAOs report. All this is something new, very new. For the first 96 years of the Feds existence, the Feds primary market activities were to buy or sell U.S. Treasury bonds (to change the money supply), and to lend at the discount window. Neither of these activities permitted the Fed to play favorites. But the programs that the GAO audited are fundamentally different. They allowed the Fed to choose winners and losers. So what does all this mean? Here are some short observations: (1) In the case of TARP, at least The Peoples representatives got a vote. In the case of the Feds bailouts, which were roughly 20 times as substantial, there was never any vote. Unelected functionaries, with all sorts of ties to Wall Street, handed out trillions of dollars to Wall Street. Thats now how a democracy should function, or even can function. (2) The notion that this was all without risk, just because the Fed can keep printing money, is both laughable and cryable (if that were a word). Leaving aside the example of Germanys hyperinflation in 1923, we have the more recent examples of Iceland (75% of GNP gone when the central bank took over three failed banks) and Ireland (100% of GNP gone when the central bank tried to rescue property firms). (3) In the same way that American troops cannot act as police officers for the world, our central bank cannot act as piggy bank for the world. If the European Central Bank wants to bail out UBS, fine. But there is no reason why our money should be involved in that. (4) For the Fed to pick and choose among aid recipients, and then pick and choose who takes a haircut and who doesnt, is both corporate welfare and socialism. The Fed is a central bank, not a barber shop. (5) The main, if not the sole, qualification for getting help from the Fed was to have lost huge amounts of money. The Fed bailouts rewarded failure, and penalized success. (If you dont believe me, ask Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan.) The Fed helped the losers to squander and destroy even more capital. (6) During all the time that the Fed was stuffing money into the pockets of failed banks, many Americans couldnt borrow a dime for a home, a car, or anything else. If the Fed had extended $26 trillion in credit to the American people instead of Wall Street, would there be 24 million Americans today who cant find a full-time job? And heres what bothers me most about all this: it can happen again. Ive called the GAO report a bailout autopsy. But its an autopsy of the undead. Courage, Alan Grayson
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: mininggold (#0)
It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. ~ Henry Ford
Criminy! I want my refund.
I guess hiring a private corporation to be the US's banker and money changer hasn't been such a good idea.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
Every once in a while I agree with you. It must be a blue moon tonight.
But, but, but... government can't do anything right.
Wall Street owns the country
Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us
Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
That is correct. They have abandoned their oaths which require a gold standard. And sold us out to the Federal Reserve.
What oath to a gold standard?
Wall Street owns the country
Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us
Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
The US and all the state governments combined are pikers compared to the Federal Reserve private corporation, which seems to be set on buying up the world.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
Exactly! You just proved the private sector is more efficient.
Wall Street owns the country
Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us
Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
The constitution. Ok a coin standard. Gold and silver.
It is the politicians cronies. Not a regular private enterprise business.
Especially when they can get the US government to legally mandate them to be the sole monopoly. If the Post Office had the same power they would be in the black too.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
Just how would you know that since you generally aren't allowed to see the books of other private corps.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
You really doubt that. lol.
A private corp doesn't have to show it's books or financial statements to the public..period, unless under court order.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
Is that the unreasonable search and seizure thingie in the Bill of Rights?
Wall Street owns the country
Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us
Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|