LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Top 10 Liberal Hypocrisies
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 4, 2011
Author: Brandon Vallorani
Post Date: 2011-12-04 10:09:05 by CZ82
Keywords: None
Views: 16407
Comments: 45
Top 10 Liberal Hypocrisies Written on December 3, 2011 by Brandon Vallorani Have you ever wondered how Liberals can be pro-abortion and anti-capital punishment? I’ve identified ten such beliefs that liberals hold, which are self-contradictory. Afterwards, I will explain the underlying reason they fight tenaciously for these hypocritical beliefs. Contradiction #1: Pro-Abortion vs. Anti-Capital Punishment Liberals support the killing of unborn children in the name of convenience, choice, etc. These children have committed no crimes; however, if that child survives abortion and grows up to commit murder later in life, a Liberal will scream “injustice” if that person is sentenced to death. Contradiction #2: Pro-Technology vs. Anti-Free Market I love Apple products. I think Steve Jobs was a genius. I have a MacBook Pro, an iPad, and an iPhone 4s. Many liberals (especially Occupiers) love Apple products too. As a capitalist, I am consistent in purchasing Apple products. They are not. They build web sites to promote their socialist causes while using software and technology that is only made possible in a free market environment. Apple products would not (and could not) have been created in a socialist nation. There’s no way liberals could fight capitalism without the very tools capitalism provides! Contradiction #3: Pro-Homosexual vs. Pro-Muslim Muslims want to kill homosexuals. Yet, Liberals promote the Homosexual agenda and Shariah Law. If the Muslims take over the United States, they will start by expunging the land of Homosexuals and Liberals. (Please see my conclusion to explain why Liberals really hold to these two contradictory positions.) Contradiction #4: Pro-Darwinian Evolution vs. Anti-Human Domination Most liberals believe in Darwinian evolution, as opposed to special Creation by God. They believe that all species arose naturally through a concept known as “survival of the fittest.” The weak die out and the strong survive. Yet, Liberals spend so much time (and other people’s money) fighting to protect endangered species, rare ecosystems, wet lands, etc. Isn’t this incredibly inconsistent? After all, evolutionists believe many species died out over millions of years because of natural selection. As consistent evolutionists, shouldn’t they be happy that humans are now dominating the planet and all sub-species? Incidentally, as a Christian, I believe God requires us to be good stewards of the environment (not tree huggers). But I can hold my position consistently. Read an article on Christians and the Environment by my good friend, Dr. Carl Wieland. Contradiction #5: Christianity vs. All Other Religions Liberals want religious freedom for all religions except Christianity. “Take down that cross… No nativity scenes on public property… No prayer at high school graduation ceremonies!” The list goes on, all in the name of “tolerance.” Isn’t it ironic that Christianity is the only religion that tolerates others? Our Lord Jesus Christ taught us to love our enemies, not to kill them. The Koran, however, teaches Muslims to kill the infidels! Read Obama’s Thanksgiving Address Fails to Mention God on GodfatherPolitics.com. Contradiction #6: Pro-Education vs. Anti-School Choice Liberals like to pride themselves on being intellectuals and supporters of education. They claim that conservatives and Republicans are against education. Laughable. If education is so important, why do liberals force everyone to pay taxes to support the failing public education system when private and home-schooling are so much more effective? The answer is easy. They can only brainwash our children to become atheists and socialists in the public schools. You must watch the documentary, Indoctrination: Public Schools and the Decline of Christianity in America. Contradiction #7: Hateful vs. Anti-Hate Liberals claim that anyone who disagrees with their lifestyle is promoting “hate.” Do you want to see real hate? Just read for yourself the hate-filled comments on our first episode of PolitiChicks.TV, where we discussed homosexuality in America. Not one hateful word was said against homosexuals on this show. Not one. In fact, Victoria Jackson stated, “I love gays!” The only hate I found was from the thousands of liberals who were commenting. 99% of all hate is spewed from the Left. Read Are You a Member of a Hate Group on GodfatherPolitics.com Contradiction #8: Pro-Women vs. Anti-Sarah Palin The left says they’re for women’s rights. So why did they attempt to destroy Sarah Palin and her beautiful family in 2008 when she was chosen as John McCain’s running mate? The left says they’re pro-choice, but they are against educating a woman before she goes into an Abortion clinic. Liberals undermine the marriage, the very institution where women are honored by fidelity and womanhood is celebrated. And if a conservative women succeeds outside the home, they are told they should stay at home. Contradiction #9: Racism If Liberals aren’t racist, why do they evaluate and categorize everyone by the color of their skin? Why are they so angry when Blacks leave the Democrat plantation and achieve the American Dream? Why do they continue to promote abortion when far more blacks are killed by abortion than whites? Why do they continue to promote social programs that enslave blacks at poverty level? Contradiction #10: Pro-Jew vs. Anti-Israel Liberals say they are pro-Jew. So, why do they hate the nation of Israel? Why are so many Jews members and supporters of the Democrat Party? This is one of most mind-boggling of liberal contradictions. Conclusion: There are many more liberal contradictions which could be listed. Why do liberals hold beliefs that appear to be self-contradictory? The answer is simple: All liberal positions are ultimately Anti-God to the core. Islam and homosexuality are not supported by the Bible. The Bible promotes personal responsibility, private property, and an ultimate standard for right and wrong. Liberals hold positions that are counter to the Word of God or at best they twist the Word of God to support their positions. This is the only way one can explain the top ten Liberal contradictions.
[Thread Locked] Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#1. To: CZ82 (#0)
Contradiction number 11. How conservatives love to stereotype all 'normal' Jews as being Israel lovers and supporters... thinly disguising their lust for the creation of their own theocratic state.
That isn't true.
see you met my girlfriend on LP. Heh heh hmmmm, and here I thought I was your girlfriend mike~ &;-) (“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.”- RebelGal) Murron posted on 2008-09-24 19:31:11 ET Reply Trace Private Reply http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=4665&Disp=2#C2 You asked for proof that Mom_Grandmother/Rebel Gal/Murron does plagiarism. I figured I'd wait until found an example when mining history for something, and I ran across one such example where she steals an Albert Camus quote So, are you going to hyena up and say this is just one of a zillion 'accidental' misrepresentations, or man up and admit gambling that no one would find an example of plagiarism was a foolish gambit on your part? Albert Camus quotes (French Novelist, Essayist and Playwright, 1957 Nobel Prize for Literature, 1913-1960) http://thinkexist.com/quotation/the_only_way_to_deal_with_an_unfree_world_is_to/346776.html
Ok Mike. You found one possible example.
I suppose there was some tongue in cheek humor to your response. Still, now feel free go to your master and get a good hyena yummie treat for calling the obvious possible.
Is mogowenjim a plagiarist. The case could be made that 95 percent of what he posts is plagiarism. I understand how he posts. But there are never any sources or rarely.
Is that a question? It is punctuated like a statement. This is deflection to try to take heat off your Kentucky friend in any event. She should avoid the plagiarism and do things like type out her posts using Firefox that shows misspellings where a right click on them offers choices of correct spellings to improve her posts. She often uses a metaphorical tactic where she wants to say something and so she looks up stories where people express her opinion and she cuts and pastes small parts of their work to create a collage that often sounds disjointed, but expresses her view. She does this to to get past her shortcomings in grammar, sentence construction and spelling. She might think this does not get noticed, but it does. Very often the plagiarism software gives a high percentage of possible copying on her posts that are constructed like that too. There is nothing wrong with her just doing the best she can without the cut and paste to make her posts or to try to impress. She has gotten much better at writing then her days on Free Republic or as Mom_Grandmother at LP. Something that is pleasing to give her due credit for and is good to see. On a personal note, I was a horrible speller when I started posting in the mid 1990s. My writing and spelling has also gotten significantly better over the years, so I say this about her improvement with no intent to try to talk down to her.
My dad can't spell for shit. He is 1000 times smarter then you Mike. I used to work for a man who asked me how to spell a 3 or 4 letter word. He was a genius at restoration and putting old buildings back together. Murron may have a spelling shortcoming. But a moral one she does not. Mike you don't even know the difference between right and wrong in a whole host of issues. I'd rather have good morals and know the difference between right and wrong then to know how to spell every word. That is my take.
Just some food for thought about some of the aspects of you that is none too Christian like in ways common with right-wingers like yourself.
Jesus never FORCED anyone to do anything. He never collected a tax. He never issued a regulation. He never sent the police to arrest people who disobeyed his rules... Jesus was about free will -- people deciding for themselves whether to be moral or immoral. Conversely, the government is 100% about force and coercion. That's the bottom line, which leftists just don't understand, because leftists are all about force and coercion.
Anti-homosexual activity has no proof of wrong or immorality to it. The six or so 'clobber' passages often quoted from the Old Testament of the Bible are vague and can indeed be interpreted quite easily to not mean any distaste of homosexuality. The research on this has been extensive and has been exhaustively vetted, but the change in the DMS. the DMS V will be out soon and if anything reinforces the correction that removed homosexuality as an affliction in it.) Any research or writings with an anti-homosexual caste to it is never done impartially using scientific methods to insure biases are not reflected in them. The authors of such works starts with an anti-homosexual agenda and only seek to reinforce bigotry and hatred of the authors. Only well done, impartial research proving this orientation is an affliction could gain traction in changing the basis used to end this useless bigotry against such people. As for Christianity and it's principle icon Jesus Christ goes, the better among such folks never hate homosexuals. If they believe such a nature is 'sinful,' they chose to hate the alleged sin and not the sinner. I see only hanger, and revengeful hatred emanating from people like A K A Stone, and this speaks more of personal insecurities, agendas and baggage then it does in regards to whether homosexuality is right or wrong. I disagree respectfully with that common stance of those trying as hard as they can to live by their faith. But people who are revengefully into using gays and lesbians as a tool to clobber and hate toward the end of just doing that, I have no respect for such immature behavior.
I never said anything about homosexuality. I commented on the narrative on your photo which attempted to equate Jesus with the force and coercion of the state. By the way, Elizabeth Warren is just another know-nothing academic who has never run anything but her mouth. The last thing we need in Congress is another clueless professor, who doesn't know squat about the real world.
#19. To: jwpegler (#18)
I don't se that illustration as anything but a lampoon of some of the crazy verbiage and posturing of some folks on the right. We also will have to agree to disagree on Ms. Warren. I know she will make an excellent senator.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestLiberals say they are pro-Jew. So, why do they hate the nation of Israel? Why are so many Jews members and supporters of the Democrat Party? This is one of most mind-boggling of liberal contradictions.
#2. To: mininggold (#1)
thinly disguising their lust for the creation of their own theocratic state.
#4. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, Lucysmom, Mininggold, Murron, all (#2)
#3. To: Ferret Mike (#2)
“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.” ReadyWriter
#5. To: Ferret Mike (#4)
(Edited)
#6. To: A K A Stone (#5)
#7. To: Ferret Mike (#6)
Still, now feel free go to your master and get a good hyena yummie treat for calling the obvious possible.
#8. To: A K A Stone, mogowenjim (#7)
"Is mogowenjim a plagiarist."
#9. To: Ferret Mike (#8)
She does this to to get past her shortcomings in grammar, sentence construction and spelling.
#14. To: A K A Stone (#9)
#16. To: Ferret Mike (#14)
(Edited)
Do you really want to hear Jesus say...
#17. To: jwpegler (#16)
#18. To: Ferret Mike (#17)
(Edited)
Anti-homosexual activity has no proof of wrong or immorality to it.
Replies to Comment # 18.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]