Video and Audio
See other Video and Audio Articles
Title: Ron Paul's Takedown of Newt Gingrich: Serial Hypocrisy
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 30, 2011
Author: ronpaul
Post Date: 2011-11-30 18:37:40 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 12377
Comments: 28
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
LOL!!! Nice!
What a great piece..... Nothing I've ever seen.....so perfectly positions - gingrich the candidate, the republican party, and everything that both offer the American people in 2012.
If it is Newt vs Obama. Who would you vote for? I'd pick Newt even though there are many concerns.
I'll write in Ron Paul. Anyone that is aware of Newt's voting record knows he's anything but a Constitutional conservative, he KILLED the "republican revolution" in 1994 and worked with Clinton and the global elites to shove through NAFTA and GATT. You can thank Gingrich for our industry being forced off-shore, the loss of jobs and the resulting collapse of our economy. Newt is more dangerous than Obama...we KNOW Obama is a Communist...Gingrich hates the Constitution just as much, but he'll be able to push garbage through because he'll have a compliant house and senate...with Obama we'll have 4 more years of grid-lock. I've met Gingrich...I lived in his district in Georgia...he is a VERY dangerous man...VERY dangerous.
Those things about Newt suck. They suck bad. I used to like Newt before they took the majority and for a while after that. I despise Obama. I don't know what I will actually do. I don't want Obama in there anymore though. That is for sure. I'm just thinking out loud.
The RNC is owned and run by the same folks that own and run the DNC...that's why the march is ALWAYS toward globalism. I'll vote for the ONLY man that WILL bring change, Ron Paul...even if that means we get 4 more years of Barry...Newt would be just as bad, and for the reasons I outlined, I think worse...if that's possible. I think we are running headlong toward another civil war in this country and a financial collapse that we can't even imagine. The globalists in BOTH parties have brought us to the brink.
I agree with you about both parties marching towards globalism. I understand your thinking. I don't agree that Newt is worse then Obama. Newt has done some good things. He helped cut spending. Cut welfare. Has better voting record on social issues, etc. If Obama wins. At least we could have Rand paul in 2016. If Newt did win. I'm afraid we would be on the globalist road until at least 2020.
I don't believe we have anywhere near that kind of time left. They are building this control grid with the intent of using it. Secrete assassinations, illegal arrests, constant monitoring, military use on civilians...don't fool yourself. The mask is coming off and the iron fist is about ready to come down HARD...and if you don't go along with the program YOU will be considered the enemy. I've been following this for YEARS and the pace at which things are happening now is simply breathtaking.
They will probably declare me a terrorist and take me away someday. Just because I believe in freedom and living free and harming no one.
Tortured, starved, beatened, waterbordered and death are what will happen if they take you away...there's a fight coming and it's going to be nasty., but don't think for one moment you'll be given the option of living...any more than the jews were.
In a 2 way race - Obama It appears that the gop will retain the House and has a real chance at taking control of the senate - single party rule has been shown to be very bad for Americans....... However - the "Americans Elect" people could have a candidate on the ballot in all 50 states..... if that candidate were Dr. Paul - I believe we would have a real 3 way horse race.
What if Obama is not the Democrats' candidate?
Not Hillary either or any other democrat I am aware of. If it is JFK I will vote for him.
Newt is on the right side of some issues. While it is not 100 percent about every person. It does have some truth in it that Obama would never admit. At a campaign stop in Des Moines, Iowa Thursday, GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich said children in poor neighborhoods have "no habits of working," no one around them works and they get cash illegally.
That statement ought to shake you to your very core. So what is this TRASONIOUS POS going to do...outlaw cash... he's VERY capable of trying. As I said, this man is crazy dangerous. He HATES us for our freedoms and liberties. He's a power hunger megalomaniac. Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler and Mao were on the right side of "some" issues.
There will always be another choice than the 2 hand picked big government globalists. You could always vote 3rd party. I could never vote for Newt Gingrich or Obama.
Which issues are those?
Newt is on the right side of every issue... and the wrong side, as well... It just depends on the day.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation-- One was welfare reform. Tax cuts. Abortion. There are others. It isn't my fault we don't have many good choices.
we have a FABULOUS choice. Ron Paul, with a PROVEN track record of standing for freedom and liberty 100% of the time.
Agreed. My vote will go to Ron Paul. I don't care if I have to write him in again. The RNC obviously wants to lose; there's no other explanation for the collection "mainstream" RNC morons, half-wits and statists that have been put up as "electable" candidates. The candidate who gets my vote must deserve my vote. Which makes the choice very easy. The "lesser of two evils" crowd is a bunch of God-damned cowards, who deserve everything they're going to get.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation-- Yes I like Ron Paul and will vote for him in the primaries. Notice I said we don't have "many" I didn't say we didn't have "any".
I wasn't assigning blame, I was just curious.
Two things: 1) No way the RNC/globalist/big government pig wins WITHOUT the support of the folks that are FINALLY awake to this 2 party scam...ie, those that support RP and the Constitution. 2) There are just as many Democrats that have been disenfrachised by the DNC as there are republicans by the RNC. I know some dems that HATE Obama. Paul appeals to EVERYONE that loves liberty and freedom...he reaches across BOTH parties. The globalists that own and run both parties KNOW this and it has them crapping themselves. Only the deluded fools still believe there is a difference between a globalist(R) and a globalist(D).
That deserves repeating. Many simply want to be on the winning side and will vote for whomever they believe will win. Their core beliefs and values play no part in their decision.
Don't we all have potential for evil. Haven't we all done things that are wrong or evil? So it is always the lesser evil. None of us are pure good.
Generally speaking, your point is correct. But it doesn't apply in the context that I'm talking about.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation-- But it doesn't apply in the context that I'm talking about. I understand your point. But we all do have something wrong with us at times. I don't care for Newt that much. I honestly think we would have more freedom and prosperity under Newt then the ugly African usurper.
#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Serial Hypocrisy
#3. To: Jameson, We the People (#2)
#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)
#5. To: freedomsnotfree (#4)
I'll write in Ron Paul. Anyone that is aware of Newt's voting record knows he's anything but a Constitutional conservative, he KILLED the "republican revolution" in 1994 and worked with Clinton and the global elites to shove through NAFTA and GATT. You can thank Gingrich for our industry being forced off-shore, the loss of jobs and the resulting collapse of our economy.
#6. To: A K A Stone (#5)
#7. To: freedomsnotfree (#6)
#8. To: A K A Stone (#7)
I'm afraid we would be on the globalist road until at least 2020.
#9. To: freedomsnotfree (#8)
#10. To: A K A Stone (#9)
#11. To: A K A Stone (#3)
Newt vs Obama. Who would you vote for?
#12. To: A K A Stone (#3)
If it is Newt vs Obama.
#13. To: Jameson (#12)
What if Obama is not the Democrats' candidate?
#14. To: freedomsnotfree (#8)
#15. To: A K A Stone (#14)
they get cash illegally
#16. To: A K A Stone (#3)
If it is Newt vs Obama. Who would you vote for?
#17. To: A K A Stone (#14)
Newt is on the right side of some issues.
#18. To: A K A Stone (#14)
Newt is on the right side of some issues.
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff? 
#19. To: We The People (#17)
#20. To: A K A Stone (#19)
It isn't my fault we don't have many good choices.
#21. To: freedomsnotfree (#20)
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
#22. To: freedomsnotfree (#20)
#23. To: A K A Stone (#19)
It isn't my fault we don't have many good choices.
#24. To: Capitalist Eric (#21)
(Edited)
#25. To: Capitalist Eric (#21)
The "lesser of two evils" crowd is a bunch of God-damned cowards
#26. To: Capitalist Eric (#21)
The "lesser of two evils" crowd is a bunch of God-damned cowards, who deserve everything they're going to get.
#27. To: A K A Stone (#26)
Don't we all have potential for evil. Haven't we all done things that are wrong or evil? So it is always the lesser evil. None of us are pure good.
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
#28. To: Capitalist Eric (#27)
Generally speaking, your point is correct.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]