[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with What the fagots LGBTQ really means I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience. Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson) "Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’" "Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon" Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time! Ok this is Funny Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232 Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need "How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America" How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos. Reagan JOKE On The Homeless The Deleted Wisdom (1776 Report) Sicko Transfaggots video The Englund Gambit Checkmate 20 Minutes Of Black DC Residents Supporting Trump's Federal Takeover! "Virginia Public Schools Deserve This Reckoning" "'Pack the Bags, We're Going on a Guilt Trip'—the Secret to the Democrats' Success" "Washington, D.C., Is a Disgrace" "Trump Orders New 'Highly Accurate' Census Excluding Illegals" what a freakin' insane asylum Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax "No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability" RIP Ozzy "Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return" "Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign" "We Hate Communism!!" "Mamdani and the Democratic Schism" "The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death" "President Badass" "Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster" "How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran" There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined. "This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like" America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996] Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment? Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit "The Addled Activist Mind" "Don’t Stop with Harvard" "Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?" "Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF" "'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal" Freepers Still Love war Status: Not Logged In; Sign In The Water Cooler See other The Water Cooler Articles Title: Question of the Day. If Congress..... Source: [None] URL Source: [None] Published: Nov 24, 2011 Author: A K A Stone Post Date: 2011-11-24 21:31:24 by A K A Stone Keywords: None Views: 8964 Comments: 36 If congress is forbidden to make a law. Can they go ahead and make that law anyways? Very simple question. My 11 year old could get the answer right. Can liberals? Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 35. #5. To: A K A Stone (#0) The question isn't what "no law" means. The question is what constitutes speech. war  posted on  2011-11-25   9:31:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #6. To: war (#5) Let me help you out. speech (spch) n. 1. a. The faculty or act of speaking. b. The faculty or act of expressing or describing thoughts, feelings, or perceptions by the articulation of words. 2. Something spoken; an utterance. 3. Vocal communication; conversation. You're welcome. But next time to to the local elementary school and ask one of the fourth graders. A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-25   10:27:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #8. To: A K A Stone (#6) When did Exxon ever converse with Shell? war  posted on  2011-11-25   10:45:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #9. To: war A K A Stone (#8) When did Exxon ever converse with Shell? Stone would have been a Tory during the Revolution, since it was the only position that supported the Monarchy/East India Co, corporatism is free speech, alliance that existed then. The founders got rid of that concept and now the dummy TeaBaggers want it back. mininggold  posted on  2011-11-25   10:53:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #11. To: mininggold, war (#9) The founders got rid of that concept and now the dummy Liar Liar your pants are on fire! I've already proved that wrong with the first amendment. If you think they ignored their own first amendment you are going to have to show me some law passed that did as you say. If you do that I will say sorry for calling you a liar. But lying does have a definition. You know it was wars position that corporations didn't exist back then so there was no prohibition. War can correct me if I am not exactly right on what he said. A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-25   11:10:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #28. To: A K A Stone (#11) So you agree with NAMBLA's position that it should be able to publish child pornography... war  posted on  2011-11-28   11:24:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #29. To: war (#28) So you agree with NAMBLA's position that it should be able to publish child pornography... No. It isn't speech either. A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-28   11:27:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #30. To: A K A Stone (#29) It's Press. Do you even KNOW what's in the first amendment? war  posted on  2011-11-28   11:40:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #31. To: war (#30) It's Press. Do you even KNOW what's in the first amendment? We will just have to disagree on this one. You can support NAMBLA and say they have first amendment rights to publish child porn. I disagree. The constitution specifically mentioned speech. I would agree that freedom to publish pictures that go along with stories would be covered. Just not in this case. It isn't speech. A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-28   11:55:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #34. To: A K A Stone (#31) The constitution specifically [mentions] speech. It also specifically mentions "Press". "Congress shall pass no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press..." How about if I form a religion that worships the killing of the God(s) of other religions? war  posted on  2011-11-28   12:41:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #35. To: war (#34) An argument could be made as to what you suggest. Is this in fact an admission by you that sometimes you or others substitute their own sense of right and wrong and call that constitutional? A K A Stone  posted on  2011-11-28   13:08:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 35. #36. To: A K A Stone (#35) (Edited) An argument could be made as to what you suggest. A) You've already made the argument..."what does "no law" mean? B) I'm not "suggesting" anything. Your logic MANDATES that any material is free to be published and the Congress is powerless to stop it. It means that I can start a religion that worships those who laugh at the "false Gods" like the ones in the Hebrew/Christian bible. NO LAW MEANS NO LAW. war  posted on  2011-11-28 13:18:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   End Trace Mode for Comment # 35. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com