Other
See other Other Articles
Title: I want to know your thoughts
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 17, 2011
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2011-11-17 09:54:55 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 73642
Comments: 102
I want to know your thoughts.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
The end is near - now !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons are for girlie boys !
Banjo boy, you finally got one thing correct.
yes we rubbish can Affirmative action - gangrene Anarchy (( marxism - evolution )) + democracy = neocoms ! Retrogrades - luddites - zombies ! website ... occutards ! http://www.embassyofheaven.com/current/johnjoe.htm Very pathetic when conservatives take up leftists habits - causes !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons are for girlie boys !
No you don't!!!
"CHANGE" you can step in..... Damn. You fucked this place up "but good"... Shut it down and spare yourself further embarrassment. BTW, who are the 8 before you that registered on this site? You are logged as user #9, I'm #19. Are there elders, perhaps, that might intervene to save this venue? LOL!
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
You ever fall off a roof? Not fun.
Shut it down and spare yourself further embarrassment. Well stated.
You looking for sympathy? I suggest you look some where in the dictionary between syphilis and shit. Good nite.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
LOL! Women aren't as tolerant as men when it comes to you showing your ass, are they Brian S? "Today, you finally convinced me that you have no interest in being civil; you have indicated your complete disrespect for me and for LP, and LP members. Your antagonism has finally made it imperitive that I ban you. It is not something I enjoy doing, nor do I want to. Your actions have made it mandatory. So, it is you and you alone that have made this action necessary. It's too bad your hatred of Jews and me has made you so sour and nasty to so many. Your membership here has not been a positive one." snip/ Goodbye Brian. Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-02-21
"OWS! Liberals! Their goal is to find a way to live within the means of the working class rich, but without the work."
Well stated. Stone has done nothing to fk this place up, in fact, he just might do more to clean it up, who knows? What I do know is, he has given all of you a place to air your opinions, thoughts, idea..ect, but you have chosen instead to insult him by dumping on the site. If anyone is embarrassing themselves, it's the two of you, and a few others who don't know a good thing they have, until it is gone. Fred, if anyone had enough years under his belt to know better, I would have thought it would be you. You are no man, you are a pathetic loser, a friend to no one, not to be trusted here, nor in the life you lead. You will always be a follower of the lower class, the trash, you have never been, nor will you ever be, a leader. jmho!
"OWS! Liberals! Their goal is to find a way to live within the means of the working class rich, but without the work."
Working 12+ hours a day with my new customer in Taiwan. 8 am meeting in Seattle. 10 hour day. Have dinner. 8 pm phone call with Taiwan... Tuck my kids in... Work weekends to catch up with the backlog... My thoughts = Exciting, tired, very little time to for much else... Trying to build a substantial business... Sorry for my neglect on the site...
Your family and business is much more important then some forum on the internet. You have your proprieties in the right order. The OWS crowd should work so hard and they might accomplish something. Instead of camping out for a few months.
Why? You don't care about any ideas or opinions other than masturbating to yourself or opinions similar to yourself in a mirror. You ban posters, kick posters, delete poster's original ideas. You are the anti-thesis of what Jesus Christ suggested, "I am the way, the truth and the life." You are the DEVIL that speaks with a fork tongue; you are Beelzebub in ALL reality. You subjugate any ideas while you play as though YOU have a sense of power over others. Have you noticed you chased almost everyone away with your own shenanigans?
CZ82: No you don't!!! Perfect comment.
Everyone has noticed, except our gracious host.
Hey Fred, When people personally attack me they can go away. If you don't like it here then you are free to leave. Some people think they can come here and shit all over the place and I will welcome them here. FUCK THAT!!!!!
He must be a GOD, eating peeled grapes with naked beauties, having them personally skinning the grape skins to POP in his mouth as these same beauties fan him. I wonder from time to time, if he strums a harp while laying on a cloud in heaven; Stone claims to be close to GOD, so he MUST be fairely close to GOD AND we are (as the rest of us are sniveling little maggot posters) awaiting his his capability to proclaim our innocence before GOD. Kinda cool to be here, if you think about it. We are special.
When people act like assholes they get timeouts. If they want to whine about it and quit. So be it. I have less banned people and deleted comments then any other pinguinite software. Not even close.
You have no critical thinking capability. Everyone knows it. Even Moderator X stays away from you.
It could be. But, let us examine FACTS. How do you know?
I'd like to see you give yourself a two week timeout. This site might get rolling again. I won't hold my breath.
Stone used to have a job. We can only assume he has quit and is retired and SO FUCKING RICH that he has nothing else to do in life. Irrespective of his his GREAT FORTUNE in life, it is amazing how he attempts to slam good posters based on faerie tales.
This site did much better when he was working. Then he fell off a roof and the place goes to SHIT. It might be the Humpty Dumpty syndrome.
Fred take the night off. Bye.
Stone doesn't reveal much data about himself other than the JEWS are the GREATEST PEOPLE on the Planet and he wants to become a RICH_MAN because he believes that heaven shall open up for him. How come Stone has never introduced his wife or resume to HIS own channel? IS he hiding stuff?
That is the reason, on your own thread, that your own channel (LF) is a loser channel.
Goodnight buckeroo.
Constructive criticism is one thing. Coming here to behave like an ass is a different thing. Have a good night.
Have a good night. You didn't ask for constructive criticism, you asked for poster's thoughts. Looks like you were either lying again or looking for lame excuses to ban the few that are left.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
Maybe 'STUPID' can't be fixed, but it sure is fun watching it self-destruct! ROTFLMAO!!! "OWS! Liberals! Their goal is to find a way to live within the means of the working class rich, but without the work."
Like I said earlier, they don't know a good thing when they have it, till it's gone. I know of three forums, all run by females, who will not tolerate such attacks that you've all waged against Stone, at least not for long, and these cyber clowns know it too, they have either been banned from these forums for running their mouths, or they treat the hostess with respect knowing their antics will get their asses kicked off the site, no if's, and's, or but's about it, you're gone. I've watched over the years as some members, stone included, try to post holiday/birthday/, just plain happy threads, but all any of you are fit for is to go onto those threads and take a dump, you ruin anything that was meant to be good, and still Stone is tolerant enough to allow you to continue posting. You abuse this mans hospitality, disgrace yourselves, and for what? What is it you want from him that you don't already have? You're even welcomed here if your a liberal, even if you have nothing in common with this man, yet not one of you are grateful for the opportunity he's given you to speak out on his forum. If any of you had an ounce of integrity, just a smidgeon of shame for the way you have treated your host you'd apologize to this man, because if it was me who owned this site, Bitchslapping you off this forum would be a polite word for what I'd do to all of you! ~JMHO! Rant Off!
"OWS! Liberals! Their goal is to find a way to live within the means of the working class rich, but without the work."
My goodness, that could be read several different ways.
Wall Street owns the country…Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us…Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
In other words, you can be as nasty as you want, just remember which behind to kiss.
Wall Street owns the country…Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us…Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
She's certifiable. And a thief to boot. I doubt she has an ethical bone in her body.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
dingbat, you are the ultimate in hypocrisy, on this forum. Repeatedly, I've proven you to be a liar. PROVEN, with FACTS. And you have made a variety of accusations against me, to which my response has been consistent: PROVE IT, with LINKS. Each and every time, you fail to respond, or simply attempt to bluster your way out of the lie that you were CAUGHT in. You talk a LOT of shit... because you're full of it... And we all know it.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation-- Repeatedly, I've proven you to be a liar. PROVEN, with FACTS. And you have made a variety of accusations against me, to which my response has been consistent: PROVE IT, with LINKS. Each and every time, you fail to respond, or simply attempt to bluster your way out of the lie that you were CAUGHT in. You talk a LOT of shit... because you're full of it... And we all know it. You proved nothing, you refused to show the evidence or else you would have been able to post from LP. If you truly got bounced it's because YOU deserved it.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
There you go again. Perhaps someday you'll lean the difference between debate and a temper tantrum.
Wall Street owns the country…Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us…Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
You're a lying cunt, as I proved. I'd post the links- again- but it's really beside the point... You're a lying bitch. I proved it, you KNOW it, and that's the end of the story.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation-- You're a lying bitch. I proved it, you KNOW it, and that's the end of the story. All you have to do is post from LP.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
It's beside the point. You claimed I was banned. You lied. I opused out. I not only told you, I LINKED to it. No amount of twisting will change the fact that YOU LIED, AND I PROVED IT.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation-- Looks like you were either lying again or looking for lame excuses to ban the few that are left. I'm not looking to ban anyone. I'm trying to make it clear that constantly attacking the host is no longer acceptable. That when a member comes in and makes a comment. That going straight to calling people names is no longer acceptable. If you want to say to someone that they are a dumbass because they think that the Citizens United case was decided incorrectly. That is still ok. I don't agree with your politics. But if people behaved like you do they would never get 1 day suspensions. You like Lucy can be tough but you don't go to far with the insults. Hope you understand where I am coming from. I also think that you would like the forum better if there was more debate and less personal attacks. I know I am guilty of the same thing. I admit that. But I am looking for a more serious place to discuss issues now. Have a good day.
You're a lying bitch. I proved it, you KNOW it, and that's the end of the story. Eric you can get your point across without calling her the C word. I think I might enact the filter for a while.
How come Stone has never introduced his wife or resume to HIS own channel? IS he hiding stuff? The Jews were the chosen people. That doesn't mean that today they are the greatest. I think that they have a right to Israel though. Yes I am hiding stuff. My identity. Someone might want to harm me for some of the things I have said.
They claim that perspective, don't they? But, is it because of being a culture based on religious creeds and precedents or because they wrote the parts of the Bible called the Torah? So, what does it mean? They are not humbled for crucifying Jesus Christ? Because he is denounced as the coming messiah? Why? Because they say so? Because the make-believe UN gave them a sense of sovereignty? Isn't that like a thief or rapist that wants to steal into your house and commit massive sexual practices on your wife?
Hi Buck. I believe that the Bible is from God. Jews used their fingers to write it, but it was inspired by God. That is what I believe. Is it ok for me to believe that?
It means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.
They are probably not humbled. Remember this though. Didn't Jesus say that he gave his life freely? Wasn't that his purpose here? If that hadn't happened would there be any grace? Since you apparently aren't a believer, you will probably not understand where I am coming from.
Just because the UN (satan) recognized them. Doesn't mean that they created Israel. Say the UN declared Israel a nation. Without the Jews on the ground fighting for the land (and buying it too) that resolution would be meaningless. And no it is not like a thief or rapist. We aren't going to solve anything to do with Israel. What is going to happen is going to happen. We're just going to have to sit back and see what happens.
What Bible? THE CATHOLIC VULGATE HELD IN SECRET FOR A THOUSAND YEARS as the priests had their way with women exerting their POWER (350-1350) OR THE GUTENBERG BIBLE BY ERASAMUS (1455)? Which one do you prefer? Or do you enjoy someone else's interpretation?
How do you really KNOW that?
Why should I believe in a myth? How did Jesus' mother Mary give birth to Jesus if she didn't have sex with a man? You believe in faerie tales.
I have always used the King James Bible. Not that I am an expert (You folks claim I claim to be an expert, but i've made no such claim) but I haven't found any contradictions or errors in it. There is an article here by cz82 that talks about the Geneva Bible. I am going to take a look at it and see what differences there are. I don't trust the NIV version because I have found many contradictions. If it is truly the word of God there should be no contradictions. Now a question for you buckeroo. Do you think there is a God? If so do you think that the Bible could actually be his word?
They aren't buying anything. They just TAKE IT!
How do you really KNOW that? Throughtout history many people have tried to destroy the Bible. It didn't happen though. If you read from Genesis it promises a Messiah to come. If you continue reading the scriptures you will see that Jesus was born and fulfilled many things that were prophesied to happen. That is the short version. Remember that it takes faith too.
How could you if that is all you read? Who cares.
What "Bible" are you talking about? Are you out of your freakin' mind?
You said you believed in evolution. That is a myth. There has never been a person born without the seed of a man and a woman. So how do you explain that from an evolutionary perspective?
It was a miracle. You will have to take it on faith. If you take the other teachings found in the Bible. Use that as your foundation. It isn't hard to believe that if there really is a God and he created us that he could have impregnated Mary supernaturally.
Who cares. I care buckeroo. I am interested in what you believe and why you believe it. We argue a lot. But I see that you are a patriot and care about important issues.
The original Greek and Hebrew texts. Which our English version was translated from. Just as God said he would do in the Bible. Look Buck it is what I believe. If you don't then that is your business. I'm not an expert on this subject and I'm sure there are others who could answer these questions far better than I could.
I never said I "believed" in evolution. Evolutionary Theory is a FACT if you care to consider the elements of not just mankind's existence but all species. But you are too concerned with your eternal battle of Christians vs. Muslims to get your head out of your ass to look around. What is a myth to you? Adam and Eve eating a apple off the tree of knowledge? Or is that FACT?
Because the text does not contradict itself. Like the NIV does.
What is a myth to you? Adam and Eve eating a apple off the tree of knowledge? Or is that FACT? Buckeroo evolution isn't a fact just because you proclaim it to be. It is a laughable discredited theory. It isn't the purpose of Christians to battle Muslims. On Adam and Eve eating an apple. That is not a fact. It doesn't mention the fruit specifically.
You just contradicted yourself. A theory is not the definition of a fact.
What makes YOU think that even those versions are close to correct? Since you are so well read on Biblical scriptures, where was anyone during Jesus' stay on the planet writing anything about him? There was no documentation until after the crucifixion and that means, the stuff is from someone's foggy memory. And the same goes for the Torah ( The old testament) which is just a chronology of" begating" this and that person within Jewish folklore. Just like the laffable story of Abraham and Sarah fucking at 100 years old and having a child.
By who? YOU?
Many scholars have read them and confirmed it. Do you think that those versions were faked?
By who? YOU? By the majority of Americans.
So why do you make that issue a strong central theme of your posts and articles?
The bible documented it. I'm not sure about your claim that there was no other documentation beforehand.
My GOD, man, those assholes can't even vote with careful exercise of principled judgment when given a choice to wave their chad wands on a card.
What Bible are you blabbering about?
Actually I don't. When asked about it I tell you what I think. I think Israel is for the Jews given to them by God with certain conditions. So I do support Israels right to exist. So I believe there is a God and Israel is in his end times plan. That doesn't mean they need the United States tax money for that plan to be fulfilled. So I don't support any foreign aid save some humanitarian assistance from time to time to help people in natural disasters.
I really can't argue with that Buck. But that doesn't mean the majority is wrong about everything.
I use the King James version. But all the versions document it.
Let us look at Exodus in the Old Testament or the Jewish Torah. What makes you think all that stuff about Moses is true? The Egyptians have no documentation collaborating the myth, yet Ramses was proficient at documentation with his Egyptian priests.
Becuase it's in the Bible and also this Biblical Archaeology - Red Sea Video: Remains of Pharoahs Chariots Found I know you can't see video sometimes. But google it and read about it. Watch the video when you get a chance. That is if you want to.
I wouldn't characterize it as a myth. Especially since archeologists have documented the chariots in the Red Sea. I wouldn't expect the Egyptians to admit that they got their asses kicked by Some Hebrew God.
I need a link.
Here is one link. It seems like a good one. http://www.messianic-literary.com/chariots.htm
You believe in myths and faerie tales, Stone. And when you are asked to provide collaborating documentation, you hide (as always) to produce anything other than some country-bumkin' opinion as though YOU have studied the data. You are a laff-a-minute, about your belief system, your sense of religions and political opinion and also about educational characteristics.
Oh sure. Of course, it is impossible to determine if that old relic is directly tied to the Jewish Exodus; but you already knew that, didn't you?
Actually I provided you pictures and links and video. It is you who is foolish enough to believe in myths. You have never offered any proof that evolution is true. You have also not answered any of the questions I've addressed to you considering evolution. Your second sentence needs to be re written for me to understand what you are trying to say.
I need a link. "CHANGE" you can step in..... There are scores of them. From my little knowledge about the sea. I thought people usually used boats to cross and not horses and carts. You must have some advanced knowledge that the rest of us lacks.
Also I support the idea of devolution as well. And you exemplify that FACT.
Hey, it is good t know that you use the ka-noodle from time to time. But, I sense, they didn't find the skeletal remains of a horse or a man or anything other than a some old wheel possible used to remove weight from a boat.
In 1952, Immanuel Velikovsky published Ages in Chaos, the first of a series of books in which he proposed a radical redating of Egyptian history in order to bring the histories of Egypt and Israel into synchronization. Velikovsky's work sparked a wave of new research into ancient history. And while the bulk of Velikovsky's conclusions have not been borne out by this research, his main the-sis has. This is that the apparent conflict between ancient records and the Bible is due to a misdating of those ancient records, and that when these records are dated correctly, all such "conflicts" disappear. Both Thutmose III and Ramses II date to a period called the Late Bronze Age, which ended with the onset of the Iron Age. Since the Iron Age has been thought to be the time when Israel first arrived in Canaan, the Late Bronze Age has been called "The Canaanite Period," and historians have limited their search for the Exodus to this time. When we break free of this artificial restraint, the picture changes drastically. According to the midrash [3], the Pharaoh of the Exodus was named Adikam. He had a short reign of four years before drowning in the Red Sea. The Pharaoh who preceded him, whose death prompted Moses's return to Egypt (Exodus 2:23, 4:19), was named Malul. Malul, we are told, reigned from the age of six to the age of one hundred. Such a long reign - ninety four years! - sounds fantastic, and many people would hesitate to take this midrash literally. As it happens, though, Egyptian records mention a Pharaoh who reigned for ninety four years. And not only ninety four years, but from the age of six to the age of one hundred! This Pharaoh was known in inscriptions as Pepi (or Phiops) II [4]. The information regarding his reign is known both from the Egyptian historian-priest Manetho, writing in the 3rd century BCE, and from an ancient Egyptian papyrus called the Turin Royal Canon, which was only discovered in the last century. Egyptologists, unaware of the midrash, have wrestled with the historicity of Pepi II's long reign. One historian wrote: [5] Pepi II...appears to have had the longest reign in Egyptian history and perhaps in all history. The Turin Royal Canon credits him with upwards of ninety years. One version of the Epitome of Manetho indicates that he "began to rule at the age of six and continued to a hundred." Although modern scholars have questioned this, it remains to be disproved. While the existence of a two kings who reigned a) ninety four years, b) in Egypt, and c) from the age of six, is hard enough to swallow as a coincidence, that is not all. Like Malul, Pepi II was the second to last king of his dynasty. Like Malul, his successor had a short reign of three or four years, after which Egypt fell apart. Pepi II's dynasty was called the 6th Dynasty, and was the last dynasty of the Old Kingdom in Egypt. Following his successor's death, Egypt collapsed, both economically and under foreign invasion. Egypt, which had been so powerful and wealthy only decades before, suddenly could not defend itself against tribes of invading bedouin. No one knows what happened. Some historians have suggested that the long reign of Pepi II resulted in stagnation, and that when he died, it was like pulling the support out from under a rickety building. But there is no evidence to support such a theory. A papyrus dating from the end of the Old Kingdom was found in the early 19th century in Egypt [6]. It seems to be an eyewitness account of the events preceding the dissolution of the Old Kingdom. Its author, an Egyptian named Ipuwer, writes: Plague is throughout the land. Blood is everywhere. The river is blood. That is our water! That is our happiness! What shall we do in respect thereof? All is ruin! Trees are destroyed. No fruit or herbs are found... Forsooth, gates, columns and walls are consumed by fire. Forsooth, grain has perished on every side. The land is not light [dark]. Velikovsky recognized this as an eyewitness account of the ten plagues. Since modern men are not supposed to believe in such things, it has been interpreted figuratively by most historians. The destruction of crops and livestock means an economic depression. The river being blood indicates a breakdown of law an order and a proliferation of violent crime. The lack of light stands for the lack of enlightened leadership. Of course, that's not what it says, but it is more palatable than the alternative, which is that the phenomena described by Ipuwer were literally true. When the Bible tells us that Egypt would never be the same after the Exodus, it was no exaggeration. With invasions from all directions, virtually all subsequent kings of Egypt were of Ethiopian, Libyan or Asiatic descent. When Chazal tell us that King Solomon was able to marry Pharaoh's daughter despite the ban on marrying Egyptian converts until they have been Jewish for three generations because she was not of the original Egyptian nation, there is no reason to be surprised. more at source http://starways.net/lisa/essays/exodus.html
You're wrong on that one too Buck. Chariot parts, and the remains of horses and humans found on the seabed Chariot parts, and the remains of horses and humans found on the seabed On diving down to the sea bed, in 1978, Ron Wyatt and his two sons found and photographed numerous coral encrusted chariot parts. Several dives since then have revealed more and more evidence. When these coral formations were scanned with a metal detector, the readings read positive for iron. In a number of places they found broken pieces of coral that contained rust, such as this rusted axle. One of his finds included an eight spoke chariot wheel, which Ron took to the director of Egyptian Antiquities, Dr. Nassif Mohammed Hassan. After examining it Dr Hassan immediately announced it to be of the eighteenth dynasty, dating it to the Exodus of 1,445 B.C. When asked how he knew this Dr. Hassan explained that the eight spoke wheel was only used during this period, the lifetimes of Ramases II and Tutmoses (Moses). Chariot boxes, horse and human skeletal remains, four, six and eight spoke chariot wheels all lie as a silent testimony to the miracle of the parting of the Red Sea Read more: http://www.freechristianteaching.org/modules/smartsection/item.php?com_mode=flat&com_order=1&itemid=387#ixzz1eBYevYgW Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives
Who is this ridiculous idiot wearing old clothing, wearing a beard and long hair? What is his background?
When asked how he knew this Dr. Hassan explained that the eight spoke wheel was only used during this period, the lifetimes of Ramases II and Tutmoses (Moses).
You are bringing out total idiots that have been refuted for decades. Even I wrote that stupid son-of-bitch back in 1973 about his lunacy for, "Chariots of the Gods." He is fully discredited about any scientific merit. I do want to point out though, he is good for a laff.
I hate that word just as much as any female, but this is exactly what that liberal hag was going for, to provoke an angry response from your conservative members that would get them timed out, or banned even. I don't know if you ever will stone, understand how the female mind works, but I saw exactly where she was going, how she manipulates you, and this liberal peace of trash will do it again, and you won't even know you're being used. jmho!
"OWS! Liberals! Their goal is to find a way to live within the means of the working class rich, but without the work."
I don't know if you ever will stone, understand how the female mind works, but I saw exactly where she was going, how she manipulates you, and this liberal peace of trash will do it again, and you won't even know you're being used. jmho! I think you just told us about the workings of your mind.
Wall Street owns the country…Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us…Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
OH! And btw ladies (and I use the word ladies loosely), If either one of you knew a damn thing about me you'd know my posting history, I kiss NO ONE's ass, not even forum owners if the present situation calls for it and I dissagree with them on certain hot button issues. The two of you just don't know, or understand the the difference between treating a person with common decency, and kissing their ass, it's all the same in your tiny little minds.
"OWS! Liberals! Their goal is to find a way to live within the means of the working class rich, but without the work."
You're more like a twelve-year-old girl hanging out with her click of bullies.
Wall Street owns the country…Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags. The [political] parties lie to us and the political speakers mislead us…Money rules. Mary Elizabeth Lease, 1890
Perhaps she was... It's not beyond the realm of possibility. She has a specific agenda, that is not in agreement with the stated aims of this forum. That is much is clear. I say what I honestly think. MY agenda is to put out as much information as possible about what's coming, what's really happening in the financial sector, and why it matters to us. It's like that last line in the first Terminator movie, "there's a storm coming..." The title of this thread was "tell me your thoughts," right? Ok, here goes... While I was making a decent living before I started going back to school, I wanted to understand how executives think about money, how businesses gauge which projects are to be funded or scrapped, etc. It's been 15 years of work, studying economics, getting my MBA... and even then, a lot of details were left out of the classroom, and I studied a lot more, well past the 7 years of school already under my belt... I wanted to see, and understand beyond the talking-heads on TV. And I gotta' tell you, I understand a LOT more than I ever thought I would... What I see, scares the shit out of me. The financial systems are inextricably intertwined. The actions of the Federal Reserve, since 2008, have strenghtened those ties between the EU and the USA; we're completely joined at the hip. When the euro goes down the tubes, due to the overt default of Greece or Italy or Spain, people will flock to American T-bills, giving a short bump in value of the dollar, and causing a short-term dip in the values of gold and silver (combined with an attack on both by the big banks). People will see the dollar- to use an expression I've heard by one analyst- as the best-looking horse. But it's the best-looking horse in the glue factory. Eventually- maybe within a couple of weeks of the euro's eventual collapse- people will start flocking to precious metals. They'll see the dollar as being only marginally-better than the euro, because while the dollar is backed by the "full faith and credit" of the U.S. government, there's no faith in the government, and they've used up all our credit... The rest of the world will then start to dump dollars in earnest, and pick up either precious metals or go to the Chinese yuan, in an attempt to find a safe haven. When the dollar gets dropped as the reserve currency, prices for everything will go up (IMHO) by ~3-4 times, overnight. People will start pulling cash, putting into tangibles like food and fuel, causing bank-runs. The Fed will attempt to backstop banks as people pull their money out, by printing mountains of currency, to fulfill FDIC requirements, but it won't matter... The cycle of hyperinflation will begin, and the economic system of the USA and W.Europe will collapse in short order... Think Zimbabwe, 1950's Hungary or Weimar Germany. The main point is, there are only two ways for this nightmare to end; default or (hyper)inflation. Default would strip the politicians of their power, but the country at large will be ok, after a period of pain. Inflation will subject the country at large to a much longer and more intense period of pain, but the politicians will retain power. They'll choose inflation, of course, because it's in their best interest to sacrifice American well-being, rather than sacrifice their own power. The ramifications of massive inflation will be catastrophic; imagine people who live on fixed incomes (social security, welfare, unemployment, etc.)... Imagine that one day the prices suddenly go to the stratosphere; those people on fixed incomes will realize that their checks will not only not put gas in the car, it won't even put a can of beans on the table... Their savings- if they have any- will be worthless. They'll no longer be able to feed their kids, buy diapers, pay the electric bill... Suddenly, there will be no possibility to earn any kind of living, by any means... Americans are in a unique position compared to other countries- we have guns. Lots and LOTS of guns... And when the SHTF, those guns will be used, first against each other, and later against our socialist-leaning government. By the time people start after the government, they'll be highly angry, and focused on who the real enemy is. CWII is coming. There's no stopping it at this point. This fact is exactly why the government is getting podunk police-forces militarized and brain- washed. It's why they're tightening the noose on anyone who might represent a threat to the power of the government bureaucrats, and openly criticize them. It's why the TSA does the full-fondle "pat-downs" at the airports, or make you go through the naked-body scanners... They're trying to get people acclimated to police-state tactics, a lack of privacy, and the primacy of the police-state. THEY know what's coming, and so do I... My main goal is to warn others, as much as I can. Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean politics won't take an interest in you. --Pericles Regards,
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation-- It's like that last line in the first Terminator movie, "there's a storm coming..." Your a good poster and put out good information. Thanks for taking the time to post here and share your thoughts with us. With that I will continue to read the rest of your comment.
She has a specific agenda, that is not in agreement with the stated aims of this forum. That is much is clear Are you saying that you are easily to provoked and as such, not responsible for your own actions? That sounds like the excuses made by every inmate at the local forensics facility. YOU are the one who needs to learn how to get your angry impulses under control. Hopefully someday you will realize YOU are then only person you can truly influence.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
I said EXACTLY what I meant.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation-- So easily provoked with impulse control issues, it is then. As it is a personality weakness not conducive to the wheeling dealing of the capital markets and business world in general, you will need to work on keeping a lid on it.
"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.
Thanks, I appreciate a good laugh. :)
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... "Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
#2. To: BorisY (#1)
#3. To: Fred Mertz (#2)
(Edited)
#4. To: A K A Stone (#0)
I want to know your thoughts
My dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the self appointed Messiah!!! Number of shallow, inadequate, hypocritical Leftards who have me on BOZO---3.......... That means I'm doing my job correctly !!!!!!!!!
#5. To: A K A Stone, all (#0)
#6. To: Brian S (#5)
#7. To: Brian S (#5)
Damn. You fucked this place up "but good"...
#8. To: A K A Stone (#6)
You ever fall off a roof? Not fun.
#9. To: Brian S, A K A Stone (#8)
"You looking for sympathy? I suggest you look some where in the dictionary between syphilis and shit. Good nite."
#10. To: Fred Mertz, Brian S, A K A Stone (#7)
Damn. You fucked this place up "but good"... Shut it down and spare yourself further embarrassment.
#11. To: A K A Stone (#0)
In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. - Voltaire (1764)
#12. To: jwpegler (#11)
Trying to build a substantial business... Sorry for my neglect on the site...
#13. To: A K A Stone (#0)
(Edited)
I want to know your thoughts.
#14. To: CZ82, A K A Stone (#4)
A K A Stone: I want to know your thoughts
#15. To: buckeroo (#13)
Have you noticed you chased almost everyone away with your own shenanigans?
#16. To: Fred Mertz (#15)
#17. To: Fred Mertz, A K A Stone (#15)
Everyone has noticed, except our gracious host.
#18. To: buckeroo (#13)
You don't care about any ideas or opinions other than masturbating to yourself or opinions similar to yourself in a mirror. You ban posters, kick posters,
#19. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, Moderator X (#16)
If you don't like it here then you are free to leave.
#20. To: A K A Stone, pinguinite (#18)
I have less banned people and deleted comments then any other pinguinite software. Not even close.
#21. To: A K A Stone (#18)
When people act like assholes they get timeouts.
#22. To: Fred Mertz (#21)
#23. To: buckeroo (#22)
#24. To: Fred Mertz (#23)
#25. To: Fred Mertz (#23)
#26. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz (#24)
Fred take the night off. Bye.
#27. To: buckeroo (#26)
#28. To: buckeroo (#26)
#29. To: A K A Stone (#28)
Constructive criticism is one thing. Coming here to behave like an ass is a different thing.
#30. To: mininggold (#29)
"You didn't ask for constructive criticism, you asked for poster's thoughts. Looks like you were either lying again or looking for lame excuses to ban the few that are left."
#31. To: A K A Stone, buckeroo, Fred Mertz, mininggold, ALL (#28)
"Constructive criticism is one thing. Coming here to behave like an ass is a different thing."
#32. To: Murron (#30)
Maybe 'STUPID' can't be fixed, but it sure is fun watching it self-destruct! ROTFLMAO!!!
#33. To: Murron (#31)
If any of you had an ounce of integrity, just a smidgeon of shame for the way you have treated your host you'd apologize to this man, because if it was me who owned this site, Bitchslapping you off this forum would be a polite word for what I'd do to all of you! ~JMHO!
#34. To: lucysmom, murron (#33)
(Edited)
In other words, you can be as nasty as you want, just remember which behind to kiss.
#35. To: mininggold, lucysmom, murron (#34)
(Edited)
She's certifiable. And a thief to boot. I doubt she has an ethical bone in her body.
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff? 
#36. To: Capitalist Eric (#35)
dingbat, you are the ultimate in hypocrisy, on this forum.
#37. To: Capitalist Eric (#35)
dingbat, you are the ultimate in hypocrisy, on this forum.
#38. To: mininggold (#36)
You proved nothing, you refused to show the evidence or else you would have been able to post from LP. If you truly got bounced it's because YOU deserved it.
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
#39. To: Capitalist Eric (#38)
You're a lying cunt, as I proved. I'd post the links- again- but it's really beside the point...
#40. To: mininggold (#39)
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
#41. To: mininggold (#29)
You didn't ask for constructive criticism, you asked for poster's thoughts.
#42. To: Capitalist Eric (#38)
You're a lying cunt, as I proved. I'd post the links- again- but it's really beside the point...
#43. To: buckeroo (#25)
Stone doesn't reveal much data about himself other than the JEWS are the GREATEST PEOPLE on the Planet and he wants to become a RICH_MAN because he believes that heaven shall open up for him.
#44. To: A K A Stone (#43)
The Jews were the chosen people.
That doesn't mean that today they are the greatest.
I think that they have a right to Israel though.
#45. To: buckeroo (#44)
But, is it because of being a culture based on religious creeds and precedents or because they wrote the parts of the Bible called the Torah?
#46. To: buckeroo (#44)
So, what does it mean?
#47. To: buckeroo (#44)
They are not humbled for crucifying Jesus Christ? Because he is denounced as the coming messiah?
#48. To: buckeroo (#44)
Why? Because they say so? Because the make-believe UN gave them a sense of sovereignty? Isn't that like a thief or rapist that wants to steal into your house and commit massive sexual practices on your wife?
#49. To: A K A Stone (#45)
I believe that the Bible is from God. Jews used their fingers to write it, but it was inspired by God. That is what I believe.
#50. To: A K A Stone (#46)
It means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.
#51. To: A K A Stone (#47)
Since you apparently aren't a believer, you will probably not understand where I am coming from.
#52. To: buckeroo (#49)
Which one do you prefer? Or do you enjoy someone else's interpretation?
#53. To: A K A Stone (#48)
Without the Jews on the ground fighting for the land (and buying it too) that resolution would be meaningless.
#54. To: buckeroo (#50)
t means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.
#55. To: A K A Stone (#52)
but I haven't found any contradictions or errors in it.
Do you think there is a God?
#56. To: A K A Stone (#54)
Throughtout history many people have tried to destroy the Bible. It didn't happen though.
#57. To: buckeroo (#51)
Why should I believe in a myth?
#58. To: buckeroo (#51)
How did Jesus' mother Mary give birth to Jesus if she didn't have sex with a man?
#59. To: buckeroo (#55)
Do you think there is a God?
#60. To: buckeroo (#56)
What "Bible" are you talking about? Are you out of your freakin' mind?
#61. To: A K A Stone (#57)
You said you believed in evolution. That is a myth
#62. To: buckeroo (#55)
How could you if that is all you read?
#63. To: buckeroo (#61)
never said I "believed" in evolution. Evolutionary Theory is a FACT if you care to consider the elements of not just mankind's existence but all species. But you are too concerned with your eternal battle of Christians vs. Muslims to get your head out of your ass to look around.
#64. To: buckeroo (#61)
Evolutionary Theory is a FACT
#65. To: A K A Stone (#60)
The original Greek and Hebrew texts. Which our English version was translated from. Just as God said he would do in the Bible.
#66. To: A K A Stone (#63)
It is a laughable discredited theory.
#67. To: buckeroo (#65)
What makes YOU think that even those versions are close to correct?
#68. To: buckeroo (#66)
It is a laughable discredited theory.
#69. To: A K A Stone (#63)
It isn't the purpose of Christians to battle Muslims.
#70. To: buckeroo (#65)
There was no documentation until after the crucifixion and that means, the stuff is from someone's foggy memory.
#71. To: A K A Stone (#68)
By the majority of Americans.
#72. To: A K A Stone (#70)
The bible documented it.
#73. To: buckeroo (#69)
So why do you make that issue a strong central theme of your posts and articles?
#74. To: buckeroo (#71)
My GOD, man, those assholes can't even vote with careful exercise of principled judgment when given a choice to wave their chad wands on a card.
#75. To: buckeroo (#72)
What Bible are you blabbering about?
#76. To: A K A Stone (#70)
I'm not sure about your claim that there was no other documentation beforehand.
#77. To: buckeroo (#76)
et us look at Exodus in the Old Testament or the Jewish Torah. What makes you think all that stuff about Moses is true?
#78. To: buckeroo (#76)
he Egyptians have no documentation collaborating the myth
#79. To: A K A Stone (#77)
Remains of Pharoahs Chariots Found
#80. To: buckeroo (#79)
#81. To: A K A Stone (#78)
I wouldn't expect the Egyptians to admit that they got their asses kicked by Some Hebrew God.
#82. To: A K A Stone (#80)
#83. To: buckeroo (#81)
You believe in myths and faerie tales, Stone. And when you are asked to provide collaborating documentation, you hide (as always) to produce anything other than some country-bumkin' opinion as though YOU have studied the data.
#84. To: buckeroo (#79)
Remains of Pharoahs Chariots Found
My dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the self appointed Messiah!!! Number of shallow, inadequate, hypocritical Leftards who have me on BOZO---3.......... That means I'm doing my job correctly !!!!!!!!!
#85. To: buckeroo (#82)
Oh sure. Of course, it is impossible to determine if that old relic is directly tied to the Jewish Exodus; but you already knew that, didn't you?
#86. To: A K A Stone (#83)
It is you who is foolish enough to believe in myths. You have never offered any proof that evolution is true.
#87. To: A K A Stone (#85)
I thought people usually used boats to cross and not horses and carts.
#88. To: buckeroo (#87)
#89. To: buckeroo (#87)
But, I sense, they didn't find the skeletal remains of a horse or a man or anything other than a some old wheel possible used to remove weight from a boat.
#90. To: CZ82 (#84)
#91. To: All, buckeroo, skip intro, cz82, murron, brian s, war (#89)
(Edited)
#92. To: A K A Stone (#88)
Immanuel Velikovsky
#93. To: A K A Stone, Capitalist Eric, mininggold (#42)
"Eric you can get your point across without calling her the C word. I think I might enact the filter for a while."
#94. To: Murron (#93)
I hate that word just as much as any female, but this is exactly what that liberal hag was going for, to provoke an angry response from your conservative members that would get them timed out, or banned even.
#95. To: A K A Stone, lucysmom, mininggold (#93)
"In other words, you can be as nasty as you want, just remember which behind to kiss."
#96. To: Murron (#95)
The two of you just don't know, or understand the the difference between treating a person with common decency, and kissing their ass, it's all the same in your tiny little minds.
#97. To: Murron, A K A Stone (#93)
(Edited)
this is exactly what that liberal hag was going for, to provoke an angry response from your conservative members that would get them timed out, or banned even.
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
#98. To: Capitalist Eric (#97)
I say what I honestly think. MY agenda is to put out as much information as possible about what's coming, what's really happening in the financial sector, and why it matters to us.
#99. To: Capitalist Eric (#97)
this is exactly what that liberal hag was going for, to provoke an angry response from your conservative members that would get them timed out, or banned even. Perhaps she was... It's not beyond the realm of possibility.
#100. To: mininggold (#99)
Are you saying...
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
#101. To: Capitalist Eric (#100)
I said EXACTLY what I meant.
#102. To: mininggold (#101)
Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]