Other
See other Other Articles
Title: I want to know your thoughts
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 17, 2011
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2011-11-17 09:54:55 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 73644
Comments: 102
I want to know your thoughts.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 92.
#13. To: A K A Stone (#0)
(Edited)
Why? You don't care about any ideas or opinions other than masturbating to yourself or opinions similar to yourself in a mirror. You ban posters, kick posters, delete poster's original ideas. You are the anti-thesis of what Jesus Christ suggested, "I am the way, the truth and the life." You are the DEVIL that speaks with a fork tongue; you are Beelzebub in ALL reality. You subjugate any ideas while you play as though YOU have a sense of power over others. Have you noticed you chased almost everyone away with your own shenanigans?
When people act like assholes they get timeouts. If they want to whine about it and quit. So be it. I have less banned people and deleted comments then any other pinguinite software. Not even close.
I'd like to see you give yourself a two week timeout. This site might get rolling again. I won't hold my breath.
Stone used to have a job. We can only assume he has quit and is retired and SO FUCKING RICH that he has nothing else to do in life. Irrespective of his his GREAT FORTUNE in life, it is amazing how he attempts to slam good posters based on faerie tales.
This site did much better when he was working. Then he fell off a roof and the place goes to SHIT. It might be the Humpty Dumpty syndrome.
Stone doesn't reveal much data about himself other than the JEWS are the GREATEST PEOPLE on the Planet and he wants to become a RICH_MAN because he believes that heaven shall open up for him. How come Stone has never introduced his wife or resume to HIS own channel? IS he hiding stuff?
How come Stone has never introduced his wife or resume to HIS own channel? IS he hiding stuff? The Jews were the chosen people. That doesn't mean that today they are the greatest. I think that they have a right to Israel though. Yes I am hiding stuff. My identity. Someone might want to harm me for some of the things I have said.
They claim that perspective, don't they? But, is it because of being a culture based on religious creeds and precedents or because they wrote the parts of the Bible called the Torah? So, what does it mean? They are not humbled for crucifying Jesus Christ? Because he is denounced as the coming messiah? Why? Because they say so? Because the make-believe UN gave them a sense of sovereignty? Isn't that like a thief or rapist that wants to steal into your house and commit massive sexual practices on your wife?
It means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.
How do you really KNOW that?
How do you really KNOW that? Throughtout history many people have tried to destroy the Bible. It didn't happen though. If you read from Genesis it promises a Messiah to come. If you continue reading the scriptures you will see that Jesus was born and fulfilled many things that were prophesied to happen. That is the short version. Remember that it takes faith too.
What "Bible" are you talking about? Are you out of your freakin' mind?
The original Greek and Hebrew texts. Which our English version was translated from. Just as God said he would do in the Bible. Look Buck it is what I believe. If you don't then that is your business. I'm not an expert on this subject and I'm sure there are others who could answer these questions far better than I could.
What makes YOU think that even those versions are close to correct? Since you are so well read on Biblical scriptures, where was anyone during Jesus' stay on the planet writing anything about him? There was no documentation until after the crucifixion and that means, the stuff is from someone's foggy memory. And the same goes for the Torah ( The old testament) which is just a chronology of" begating" this and that person within Jewish folklore. Just like the laffable story of Abraham and Sarah fucking at 100 years old and having a child.
The bible documented it. I'm not sure about your claim that there was no other documentation beforehand.
Let us look at Exodus in the Old Testament or the Jewish Torah. What makes you think all that stuff about Moses is true? The Egyptians have no documentation collaborating the myth, yet Ramses was proficient at documentation with his Egyptian priests.
Becuase it's in the Bible and also this Biblical Archaeology - Red Sea Video: Remains of Pharoahs Chariots Found I know you can't see video sometimes. But google it and read about it. Watch the video when you get a chance. That is if you want to.
I need a link.
Here is one link. It seems like a good one. http://www.messianic-literary.com/chariots.htm
Oh sure. Of course, it is impossible to determine if that old relic is directly tied to the Jewish Exodus; but you already knew that, didn't you?
There are scores of them. From my little knowledge about the sea. I thought people usually used boats to cross and not horses and carts. You must have some advanced knowledge that the rest of us lacks.
Hey, it is good t know that you use the ka-noodle from time to time. But, I sense, they didn't find the skeletal remains of a horse or a man or anything other than a some old wheel possible used to remove weight from a boat.
In 1952, Immanuel Velikovsky published Ages in Chaos, the first of a series of books in which he proposed a radical redating of Egyptian history in order to bring the histories of Egypt and Israel into synchronization. Velikovsky's work sparked a wave of new research into ancient history. And while the bulk of Velikovsky's conclusions have not been borne out by this research, his main the-sis has. This is that the apparent conflict between ancient records and the Bible is due to a misdating of those ancient records, and that when these records are dated correctly, all such "conflicts" disappear. Both Thutmose III and Ramses II date to a period called the Late Bronze Age, which ended with the onset of the Iron Age. Since the Iron Age has been thought to be the time when Israel first arrived in Canaan, the Late Bronze Age has been called "The Canaanite Period," and historians have limited their search for the Exodus to this time. When we break free of this artificial restraint, the picture changes drastically. According to the midrash [3], the Pharaoh of the Exodus was named Adikam. He had a short reign of four years before drowning in the Red Sea. The Pharaoh who preceded him, whose death prompted Moses's return to Egypt (Exodus 2:23, 4:19), was named Malul. Malul, we are told, reigned from the age of six to the age of one hundred. Such a long reign - ninety four years! - sounds fantastic, and many people would hesitate to take this midrash literally. As it happens, though, Egyptian records mention a Pharaoh who reigned for ninety four years. And not only ninety four years, but from the age of six to the age of one hundred! This Pharaoh was known in inscriptions as Pepi (or Phiops) II [4]. The information regarding his reign is known both from the Egyptian historian-priest Manetho, writing in the 3rd century BCE, and from an ancient Egyptian papyrus called the Turin Royal Canon, which was only discovered in the last century. Egyptologists, unaware of the midrash, have wrestled with the historicity of Pepi II's long reign. One historian wrote: [5] Pepi II...appears to have had the longest reign in Egyptian history and perhaps in all history. The Turin Royal Canon credits him with upwards of ninety years. One version of the Epitome of Manetho indicates that he "began to rule at the age of six and continued to a hundred." Although modern scholars have questioned this, it remains to be disproved. While the existence of a two kings who reigned a) ninety four years, b) in Egypt, and c) from the age of six, is hard enough to swallow as a coincidence, that is not all. Like Malul, Pepi II was the second to last king of his dynasty. Like Malul, his successor had a short reign of three or four years, after which Egypt fell apart. Pepi II's dynasty was called the 6th Dynasty, and was the last dynasty of the Old Kingdom in Egypt. Following his successor's death, Egypt collapsed, both economically and under foreign invasion. Egypt, which had been so powerful and wealthy only decades before, suddenly could not defend itself against tribes of invading bedouin. No one knows what happened. Some historians have suggested that the long reign of Pepi II resulted in stagnation, and that when he died, it was like pulling the support out from under a rickety building. But there is no evidence to support such a theory. A papyrus dating from the end of the Old Kingdom was found in the early 19th century in Egypt [6]. It seems to be an eyewitness account of the events preceding the dissolution of the Old Kingdom. Its author, an Egyptian named Ipuwer, writes: Plague is throughout the land. Blood is everywhere. The river is blood. That is our water! That is our happiness! What shall we do in respect thereof? All is ruin! Trees are destroyed. No fruit or herbs are found... Forsooth, gates, columns and walls are consumed by fire. Forsooth, grain has perished on every side. The land is not light [dark]. Velikovsky recognized this as an eyewitness account of the ten plagues. Since modern men are not supposed to believe in such things, it has been interpreted figuratively by most historians. The destruction of crops and livestock means an economic depression. The river being blood indicates a breakdown of law an order and a proliferation of violent crime. The lack of light stands for the lack of enlightened leadership. Of course, that's not what it says, but it is more palatable than the alternative, which is that the phenomena described by Ipuwer were literally true. When the Bible tells us that Egypt would never be the same after the Exodus, it was no exaggeration. With invasions from all directions, virtually all subsequent kings of Egypt were of Ethiopian, Libyan or Asiatic descent. When Chazal tell us that King Solomon was able to marry Pharaoh's daughter despite the ban on marrying Egyptian converts until they have been Jewish for three generations because she was not of the original Egyptian nation, there is no reason to be surprised. more at source http://starways.net/lisa/essays/exodus.html
You are bringing out total idiots that have been refuted for decades. Even I wrote that stupid son-of-bitch back in 1973 about his lunacy for, "Chariots of the Gods." He is fully discredited about any scientific merit. I do want to point out though, he is good for a laff.
There are no replies to Comment # 92. End Trace Mode for Comment # 92.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestI want to know your thoughts.
#18. To: buckeroo (#13)
You don't care about any ideas or opinions other than masturbating to yourself or opinions similar to yourself in a mirror. You ban posters, kick posters,
#21. To: A K A Stone (#18)
When people act like assholes they get timeouts.
#22. To: Fred Mertz (#21)
#23. To: buckeroo (#22)
#25. To: Fred Mertz (#23)
#43. To: buckeroo (#25)
Stone doesn't reveal much data about himself other than the JEWS are the GREATEST PEOPLE on the Planet and he wants to become a RICH_MAN because he believes that heaven shall open up for him.
#44. To: A K A Stone (#43)
The Jews were the chosen people.
That doesn't mean that today they are the greatest.
I think that they have a right to Israel though.
#46. To: buckeroo (#44)
So, what does it mean?
#50. To: A K A Stone (#46)
It means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.
#54. To: buckeroo (#50)
t means that they were chosen for God to deliver his message to the world through.
#56. To: A K A Stone (#54)
Throughtout history many people have tried to destroy the Bible. It didn't happen though.
#60. To: buckeroo (#56)
What "Bible" are you talking about? Are you out of your freakin' mind?
#65. To: A K A Stone (#60)
The original Greek and Hebrew texts. Which our English version was translated from. Just as God said he would do in the Bible.
#70. To: buckeroo (#65)
There was no documentation until after the crucifixion and that means, the stuff is from someone's foggy memory.
#76. To: A K A Stone (#70)
I'm not sure about your claim that there was no other documentation beforehand.
#77. To: buckeroo (#76)
et us look at Exodus in the Old Testament or the Jewish Torah. What makes you think all that stuff about Moses is true?
#79. To: A K A Stone (#77)
Remains of Pharoahs Chariots Found
#80. To: buckeroo (#79)
#82. To: A K A Stone (#80)
#85. To: buckeroo (#82)
Oh sure. Of course, it is impossible to determine if that old relic is directly tied to the Jewish Exodus; but you already knew that, didn't you?
#87. To: A K A Stone (#85)
I thought people usually used boats to cross and not horses and carts.
#88. To: buckeroo (#87)
#92. To: A K A Stone (#88)
Immanuel Velikovsky
Replies to Comment # 92.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]