whineyold / loonymom, war, and gooberson are all on my bozo list -- for good reason.
Only Mom of that list survived my cut. And yes, avoiding Leftist propaganda and insanity is good reason.
I guess the real question here is whether there are any House Commies who are willing to debate honestly without feeling compelled to coddle 0bama and make up excuses for a Leftist agenda and policies.
I guess the real question here is whether there are any House Commies who are willing to debate honestly without feeling compelled to coddle 0bama and make up excuses for a Leftist agenda and policies.
Ferret tries at times to scale that wall...until an internal alarm goes off and he remembers that 0bama is all about "healing the world's oceans," while the Koch Bros. and Tea Party are peeing in it. Other than him, it's slim pickings indeed.
Ferret tries at times to scale that wall...until an internal alarm goes off and he remembers that 0bama is all about "healing the world's oceans," while the Koch Bros. and Tea Party are peeing in it. Other than him, it's slim pickings indeed.
Ever read Mike's posts? I mean REALLY read/PERUSE his posts? His political slant is on the liberal side of the political system but he condemns 0bama for many things. He has always presented a fresh and mature picture of the world around him. He doesn't cloak himself in some elected leader, either.
And there is nothing wrong with having ecology in mind, either. It shows compassion about the world around him and for everyone. He is as conservative about natural resources and financial matters as anyone not born with a silver spoon in their mouths. He is almost (in my opinion) a vivacious representative of a Jeffersonian Democrat.
#17. To: buckeroo, jwpegler, Ferret Mike (#16)(Edited)
Ever read Mike's posts? I mean REALLY read/PERUSE his posts? His political slant is on the liberal side of the political system but he condemns 0bama for many things. He has always presented a fresh and mature picture of the world around him. He doesn't cloak himself in some elected leader, either.
Yes, I've REALLY REALLY read Mike's posts. His "condemnation" of 0bama is more like a "Aw, gee, come on bro!" rather than a, "Are you %@!#& kidding me, dammit??!"
In his defense - as I've stated - he's more willing to be pried away from partisan Dem positions than the House Commies. And he will occasionally present interesting perspectives. But I would not come close to saying that he does not defend 0bama far more than is deserved.
And there is nothing wrong with having ecology in mind, either. It shows compassion about the world around him and for everyone.
Nobody criticized him for that; However, as a Greenie, Mike certainly gave 0bama a lot of slack for his part in the Gulf Spill debacle.
He is as conservative about natural resources and financial matters as anyone not born with a silver spoon in their mouths. He is almost (in my opinion) a vivacious representative of a Jeffersonian Democrat.
