Title: Who gives shit if Godwinson post here again? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 26, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-10-26 11:24:19 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:483525 Comments:595
because even if you often disagree with someone, or even grown to not particularly like them, everyone deserves to be recognized when they are right. And he does speak the truth here.
But he doesn't practice what he preaches.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
"The site owner/moderator is immune from criticism? I don't buy that."
I don't either. I would never agree to that one. The owner is human, and if they are mature will take the criticism with good grace and show the characture to correct themselves. Thanks Fred.
When Fascism goes to sleep, it has Mummy look under the bed for Ron Paul and turn on a night light to help keep him away.
No argument there, but it is never constructive to not give credit where credit is due.
I agree. It's just that he rarely indulges in practices that he says would make this forum great. So he needs to blame himself first, since he is the only one able to change his own behavior that is sooooo 'vital' to creating that difference he says he supports.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
Bullshit Freddie. Neil was a self appointed 'site manager' who was upset I didn't 1) Agree with him on the election...2) Didn't kiss his ass because I knew he was a flat out fraud. Much later, when he laid down and whimpered in court after all his bravado on the internet, he confirmed my view of him.
Which is why he's still my personal internet bitch to this very day (laughing).
I never lied to him, like you, he wasn't worth a lie. Nice spin though.
"The problem with Commies and Leftists at a forum is their lack of logic, un-willingness to exchange cogent, honest thought and debate, and un-willingness to deviate from their hardened dogma."
This is your hardened dogma which as little touch with reality you are unwilling to debate.
Mike, it is indeed 98% true.
I'll give you that 2% because folks like you will at least listen even if you already know you disagree with whatever premise.
It suits your purposes to treat people whom you label as unwilling and incapable of change. You speak of people who are left of you politically as if they were automatons cut from the same cookie cutter.
Unfortunately, 90% of the political Left *are* automatronic. They are partisan Dems. They are hardened socialists. What's to debate? You say it's not true, I say it is. It's not even hyperbole on my part.
My "purpose" is gleaning and determining the truth of the matter and then considering solutions that promote construction instead of de-construction and destruction of this nation. Michael, you and your ilk want the US turned upside down on its head, aka "fundamentally changed" into a socialist state - which is unconstitutional.
In fact, people are people.
What does that even mean? If it means "we're all the same," then I vociferously disagree with that characterization. This forum, this debate, our respective political view proves it to be a fallacy; Sharia Law proves it to be a fallacy; The political class of elites proves that a fallacy; Any Country Club proves that to be a fallacy.
Everyone agrees with everyone else on some things and disagrees on others.
Is this supposed to be some kind of revelation??
Yyou repete your mantra I speak of over and over, and this is meant to shut down debate, to label and damn whomever you don't like politically.
And that "mantra" is what exactly? That the system of Communism are repressive, oppressive, and fascist?
And lol, who the hell are you kidding about "labeling"? You and you ilk engage in it like clockwork to shut down to marginalize and demonize debate (EX: "racist," "homophobe," "bigot," "talibornagain," "Holy Roller," "intolerant," "Teabagger," etc.)
Are conservatives and liberatarian all supposed to overlook the Left's and your rhetoric that's ALL based on Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals'?
SERIOUS QUESTION:
Are you conscious that you are engaging in Alinsky-type debate?
Bullshit Freddie. Neil was a self appointed 'site manager' who was upset I didn't 1) Agree with him on the election...2) Didn't kiss his ass because I knew he was a flat out fraud. Much later, when he laid down and whimpered in court after all his bravado on the internet, he confirmed my view of him.
Which is why he's still my personal internet bitch to this very day (laughing).
I never lied to him, like you, he wasn't worth a lie. Nice spin though.
Now, why are YOU here, hypocritical freddie?
When are you going to demonstrate to us how you plan to bring this site back to it's former glory, when Murron was the only poster and the side bar didn't change for days?
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
Chyea...remember that one? He claimed that he *thought* that he needed one (1) name logon from home and yet another one (1) to logon from work - even though he used the one to cheer on the other...
But I always enjoyed how Neil could pop up out of nowhere and reduce Boofer to a sniveling, sputtering mass of Boofshit...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
In Robin Sage, phase three of the Special Forces Qualification Course (SFQC), the student NCO has the responsibility to show an ability to create rapport with the foreign nationals they are tasked in their mission to teach things like insurgency and counterinsurgency. One has to do it even should one find the people odious or hard to take culturally or in other respect.
Thus, those playing the roles of the foreign nationals getting the military assistance are school how to task SF students in this regard.
We had a Mormon officer who was offered the village' honor drink' by the 'village elder.' It was drinkable, but disgusting and nasty. The officer sniffed it and said, "I can't drink this because this has alcohol in it and as a Mormon I....." at that point, the mock villager with the M60 machine gun (with blanks) started firing the SF students up who had to go into action in conducting a retrograde operation (retreat) until the cadre reset the scenario.
This officer was wrong and did not keep his eye on the primary reason for being there. His mission was to establish rapport and to teach, not lecture or be inhospitable.
There are people I meet all the time whom I don't like and likely never will like. But if they do good, i compliment or praise them for this.
It is what I was taught in my life in times like phase three in the SFQC, and I take the lesson to heart.
That is my point. badeye is not an evil or bad man. I disagree with him quite often and he irritates the snot out of me. But you know what, I still like the scoundrel.
So sue me. ;-D
When Fascism goes to sleep, it has Mummy look under the bed for Ron Paul and turn on a night light to help keep him away.
The same question could be asked of the other House Commies, but I think we know the answer to that query:
To agitate, spam, shill, and otherwise promote Commie propaganda. To their (dis)credit, it's the same reasons Police-Statist fascists frequent and infect conservative forums - to promote their brand of Big Goob control.
Neocoms lack higher consciousness to solve simple problems !
They have an aversion - immunity to it - reality !
Though I *think* I know what you mean (and what you say is true *I think*), I wish you'd convert your written language to something we don't have to run through Babelfish first.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
Please direct me to a picture of myself, you fat drunken c**t See reply 73.....(grin).
If its that important to you, run a google search on me JJ. You know my name, and there is a pic of me getting an award...or at least there was last time I checked. Its from 1997, February. The award was from the Cincinnati Minority Suppliers Council for sales under $1 million.
I'll see what I can do about posting a more current pic, if you really want one.
Just don't do anything like you do when you look at yourself....thats a polite request.....
Badeye posted on 2003-03-15 9:26:22 ET Reply Trace
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
That is my point. badeye is not an evil or bad man. I disagree with him quite often and he irritates the snot out of me. But you know what, I still like the scoundrel.
You don't know him nor what he did and tried to do simply because he got his ass kicked by me on the internet.
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Are you conscious that you are engaging in Alinsky-type debate?
You're KIDDING, right?
He admitted that he is political operative, as a JOB.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
RE: Monocle Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:17:59 -0500 From: [Badeye] To: [Neil] Neil,
When I first registered at your site it was from work. I didn't realize that I could use the same screen name and password, so at home I registered as Monocle (or the other way around....LOL!). Other political boards won't let you run from to separate machines/locations/ISP's with the same screen and password.
Guilty!...Please delete the Monocle access. It wasn't "intentional"...although I did take advantage of it for one comment yesterday, as I'm sure you know.
Since I've got the opportunity, thanks for giving me access. I get the feeling I'm not exactly the LP "target audience", but its been very educational. I've noticed quite a few posters from Pipebomb, which I did sponsor, which I'm sure you know. The internet has changed politics, although the pundits on all sides have yet to realize the full impact. I want to ensure this trend of political communication via the web continues....all the good, all the bad, all the ugly.
I have a great deal of faith in people that are informed.
If you feel the need to delete my access completely I understand. Its your house.
Anyway,
Thanks!
Badeye frm Monocle
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
That is my point. badeye is not an evil or bad man. I disagree with him quite often and he irritates the snot out of me. But you know what, I still like the scoundrel.
So you support a guy who threatens this:
"Sure would suck to see your real name and address pop up, wouldn't it 'freddie'?
have a nice day"
And you like Stone, who posts the private phone numbers of people he wants to have harassed?