Title: Who gives shit if Godwinson post here again? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 26, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-10-26 11:24:19 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:483719 Comments:595
Just imagine if the founding fathers had a list like CZs ...
CZ for sure wouldn't have approved of their actions. Surely the founding fathers could have found many ways to cash in on their fellow colonists rather than put a target on their own backs.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
#413. To: sneakypete, Parrot with speed dial (#397)(Edited)
I think the Globalists use* whichever medium/mediums can best effect their plans.
That is one of the oldest organized crime organizations in the world. Why would anybody expect them to give up so easily after so many years in the game? They lust after a return to the lost power and wealth they once had.
Don't make the mistake of thinking the Catholics are the only players in this game,though. The Hebrews and the Muslims are also players.
This competition for control is what has driven the wars of the last couple of centuries.
The globalists now have a green light to do whatever they want. They own DC. The own the media. They own the bank.
It appears the usual and traditional cast of world power elites are going for the throat, colluding to completely stomp out any rogue elements of pro-sovereignty players and nations. Iraq, Libya and Egypt are now under control despite the illusion of the so-called "Arab Spring."
Once the Unholy Alliance sorts put that pesky sovereignty problem they've had with a stubborn US, all that's left is for the One World Governance is to divvy up the middle class's loot and land and serfs. Ye olde Vatican Empire, British Empire, Bluebloods, Rothchild Banksters, and Secular Hebrews will all again be Kings of this World.
China appears to be unwilling participants of the Western Globalists chess game. For now.
I don't think the Muslims have any place reserved at the globalists' table - it appears they are mere bogeymen and tools-by-design. They appear well-suited to the role (as are the illegal Mexicans) of disrupting Western cultures and economies, challenging host sovereignties, and keeping us in a perpetual state of "crisis." On behalf of the global elites of course.
Expect ever more intrusive draconian security measures in order to "keep us safe."
The globalists now have a green light to do whatever they want. They own DC. The own the media. They own the bank.
Absolutely,and this means they have won and own it all. The only open question is "Who sits at the head of the board table at "Global Inc"?"
Iraq, Libya and Egypt are now under control despite the illusion of the so-called "Arab Spring."
Can you say "Saudi Arabia"?
Ye olde Vatican Empire, British Empire, Bluebloods, Rothchild Banksters, and Secular Hebrews will all again be Kings of this World.
Yup,it's taken them a long time to make their comeback,but it does seem they have accomplished it.
China appears to be unwilling participants of the Western Globalists chess game.
IMHO,China is a VERY willing participant in this game. They have no choice because when the dust settles,they will be the only roadblock to the western elites owning and controlling the world. Their job is to control Asia and protect it and them from western domination.
I don't think the Muslims have any place reserved at the globalists' table - it appears they are mere bogeymen and tools-by-design.
Fundamental Islam will all but disappear the day after Saudi Arabia unites the Middle East under their Kingdom. Don't forget,the Sauds know who the real movers and shakers are in radical Islam,and know who their relatives are and where they all live. That had to know all this in order to move money to them. Once the Saud King is King of a United Arabia,they will be a threat to his order,and it is a historical fact that Kings don't play well with people who threaten their rule.
BTW,Israel will be safe because she will be the banking center for the Middle East,as well as a free market place for the Arabs to shop for forbidden things and get medical care and other services not available in Muslim countries.
Expect ever more intrusive draconian security measures in order to "keep us safe."
The surest thing you ever said.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
Most of them [House Commies] are stupid sheeple that have never had an original thought in their lives and don't understand what they are doing.
I agree of course, but it's not as though they are mentally incapable of finding their way to the nearest Community healthcare clinic or liquor store dumpster.
#418. To: sneakypete, whinyOLD mininggold, remora boy Fred Mertz (#414)
whinyOLD; Poor baby, a big bad Army Ranger like you IS being 'stalked'. Maybe Fred will come to your rescue if you can stop bad mouthing him for a few minutes.
SP; LOL! Are you ever right about ANYTHING?
I was never a Ranger,and Fred and I get along pretty good. Always have.
Pete come on you know what's going on here.
You are old enough to know what this is.
WhinyOLD wants to have your baby.
"She" WANTS you.
"She" LUSTS after your actual MALE persona.
(Btw, IMO, that's the same reason that remora boy has a crush on you also), (remember that these libTURDS live in meterosexual /faggot paradise land).
You are just TOO much of an actual man for them to deal with.
They piss themselves when you talk to them.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WERD!
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
#419. To: sneakypete, Parrot with speed dial (#416)
Absolutely,and this means they have won and own it all. The only open question is "Who sits at the head of the board table at "Global Inc"?"
Buckwheat, Alfalfa, and Spanky? Goldfinger? George Soros? Ziggy Bzgbiwgrgszbgwnski??
Can you say "Saudi Arabia"?
Fundamental Islam will all but disappear the day after Saudi Arabia unites the Middle East under their Kingdom. Don't forget,the Sauds know who the real movers and shakers are in radical Islam,and know who their relatives are and where they all live. That had to know all this in order to move money to them. Once the Saud King is King of a United Arabia,they will be a threat to his order,and it is a historical fact that Kings don't play well with people who threaten their rule.
Yeah - forgot about the House of Saud. But they're only Muslim-in-Name. You make a good case for a United Arab-Muslim Reich, and end to fundamentalist Islam, but I don't see either ever happening. This is a 1400 year old cult of genetic mental mutation that simply will not die.
The safest bet for the Sauds is in reaching an understanding within the NWO umbrella of ye olde British Empire in exchange for what they've received for decades: PROTECTION and PRESERVATION of the House of Saud as leaders of Islamia.
In a projected Muslim war of attrition against a United Western Europe, it's just not possible. A gazillion cro-magnon Islamists could not possibly win a war against a rabidly vicious, focused, play-for-all-the-marbles Western Europe.
BTW,Israel will be safe because she will be the banking center for the Middle East,as well as a free market place for the Arabs to shop for forbidden things and get medical care and other services not available in Muslim countries.
Good call, I agree. Israel's role as a Middle Eastern Switzerland seems to be a natural.
Rat-boy claims I'm into baiting. Were that the truth, I would have made comments such as 371, 377, 383 and 385, on this one thread.
Typical leftist hypocrisy, from one of the resident traitors.
Feh.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
You claim bait ain't the game, yet you hang favorite baiting quotes in your poster directed signature.
Yeah, right, what was I ever thinking of by commenting on your propensity to bait? It is reflexive to claim the intent is not to bait when one baits, as their is no intent to communicate constructively when one is a master baiter such as you.
If you have any more trouble trying to figure this all out, just ask. I'll even try to help you sans the rhetorical questions. Maybe.
"Among politicians and businessmen, *Pragmatism* is the current term for "To hell with our children." -- Ed Abbey
Yeah - forgot about the House of Saud. But they're only Muslim-in-Name. You make a good case for a United Arab-Muslim Reich, and end to fundamentalist Islam, but I don't see either ever happening. This is a 1400 year old cult of genetic mental mutation that simply will not die.
Saudi Arabia is "the keeper of the faith" because they own Mecca. Nobody is saying they will destroy Islam. They would be utter fools to do so because Islam is what makes them important. What they will do is execute the most radical fundie leaders that refuse to go along with the New Sheriff in Town,and then end up controlling the others and controlling the religion itself. I repeat,fundie Islam will for all purposes be extinct once the Sauds take over because THEY will control it and they ain't about to let it get in the way of them making more money or having more influence and power. They might approve of "true believers" attacking other Muslim leaders who aren't willing to fall in line behind the Sauds,but that will be focused housecleaning,not international terrorism attacks.
The safest bet for the Sauds is in reaching an understanding within the NWO umbrella of ye olde British Empire in exchange for what they've received for decades: PROTECTION and PRESERVATION of the House of Saud as leaders of Islamia.
That's a given. They do love and admire their British masters.
In a projected Muslim war of attrition against a United Western Europe, it's just not possible.
Irrelevant because it's not going to happen if the Sauds are successful at taking over a united Arabia. It would be bad for business and a actual threat to their power and position. Which is one of the big reasons they will end up taking over and becoming the ruling family of Arabia.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
You claim bait ain't the game, yet you hang favorite baiting quotes in your poster directed signature.
The first is a direct quote. The second is an observation- NOT made by me- regarding the method of "spin" that the dummy uses consistently. Oh, BTW, the observation is brutally accurate.
How either of these can be taken as "baiting," is a mystery to be resolved in your head.
Oh, and BTW, the vid you posted right after the above comment, once-again demonstrates you're baiting game.
Thank you, for yet one more example of your disgusting leftist hypocrisy.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
The efective range of a lame excuse is zero point zero meters.
Correct.
Which is also the effective range of your overt hypocrisy.
You're a typical "do as I say, NOT as I do" leftist.
And THAT'S just a fact, not baiting.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
I consider you a megalomaniac and a sociopath. Your Mom must have made you stand in the front yard with an "I wet my bed" sign so your peers could taunt you, a lad who couldn't control his bladder as a ten year old. You never recovered from the humiliation, and so here you are.
Granted that is mere supposition, but if you are like you are for any less of a reason, yor problem is organic in nature. Something only the veterinarian who does primary care for you would truly know about.
"Among politicians and businessmen, *Pragmatism* is the current term for "To hell with our children." -- Ed Abbey
Your Mom must have made you stand in the front yard with an "I wet my bed" sign so your peers could taunt you, a lad who couldn't control his bladder as a ten year old. You never recovered from the humiliation, and so here you are.
More baiting, eh? LOL.
Granted that is mere supposition, but if you are like you are for any less of a reason, yor problem is organic in nature.
Ah, I know this one!
Rule of Disinformation #11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the high road and confess with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made - but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, just isnt so. Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for coming clean and owning up to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
LOL.
Something only the veterinarian who does primary care for you would truly know about.
Back to the baiting, once again. LMAO....
Rule of Disinformation # 4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponents argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
Rule of Disinformation # 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as kooks, right-wing, liberal, left- wing, terrorists, conspiracy buffs, radicals, militia, racists, religious fanatics, sexual deviates, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
Nothing being utterly predictable, eh, Rat-boy? You keep forgetting, I've read the script you operate from...
And BTW, while you keep attacking, I've not lost sight of the main point- which is that you're a HYPOCRITE. Which means you've failed.
No big surprise, eh?
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
"Nothing being utterly predictable, eh, Rat-boy? You keep forgetting, I've read the script you operate from... "
I've never read what's his names shit. It is a good vehicle libby likes to cite, but it means nothing to me.
And indeed that was baiting I reciprocated with. And if you don't like getting what you dish out, then tough shit. It's better then what you'd get if you talked that way to me in real time.
Count your blessing, dumb shit.
"Among politicians and businessmen, *Pragmatism* is the current term for "To hell with our children." -- Ed Abbey
Mad Dog is only using me as a surrogate to show you how much he 'loves' you. He's shy.
Just because he ran away from you doesn't mean he is shy. The only way you can get any action is to sneak up on somebody with a club and a can of spray starch.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
I've never read what's his names shit. It is a good vehicle libby likes to cite, but it means nothing to me.
Of course not. You make it a point to be willfully ignorant. That you refuse to educate yourself, or face anything which contradicts your preconceived (and 99% wrong) viewpoints surprises me not at all. You merely confirm the point.
Thanks for clarifying.
And indeed that was baiting I reciprocated with. And if you don't like getting what you dish out, then tough shit.
I really don't give a FUCK about you. So what makes you think I care enough about you, to bait you? PLEASE.
You're a worthless sack of shit. You're too fucking STOOOPID to even hold down a job as a fucking *helicopter* mechanic. You've failed in everything that you set out to do, so now you're a permanent parasite on society- feeding on it, as a paid pol. It's not baiting, it's exactly what you've already stated. You don't like it? TOO FUCKING BAD, you PUTZ.
It's better then what you'd get if you talked that way to me in real time. Count your blessing, dumb shit.
LOL. Resorting to the internet threats, eh? I could post a pic of the teenaged "internet tough guy" with braces, but I'm too lazy, too tired to bother. You're really not worth the effort.
As to meeting me in real time, what makes you think you can even enter my world? SHIIIIIIIIIIIT. LMAO!!!!!
And that's what pisses you off the most, hence your stupid threats.
Now go behind your mobile-home, and kick your dog. Maybe you'll feel better, maybe you won't. Either way, I really don't give a flying fuck, in a stiff wind, at a rolling doughnut, what you think.
G'night, PUTZ.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
Just because he ran away from you doesn't mean he is shy. The only way you can get any action is to sneak up on somebody with a club and a can of spray starch.
But Mad Dog is making veiled overtures by trying to impress YOU.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
"What makes you think anyone cares whether or not you care?"
It is really important to him to try to control the situation when he posts. The control is the motive for posting, not exchanging views on politics and engage in discussion on current events.
I like your question as it is very intuitive. Thanks.
"Among politicians and businessmen, *Pragmatism* is the current term for "To hell with our children." -- Ed Abbey
I believe Steve the mad Doggie Dawg is betrothed to Yukon. You should post to him warning him that his alpha has a wandering eye.
I'm sure he still lurks over here. But if I were Sneaky I would be a little leery of any attempts by MD to 'cozy up'. Or maybe the happy couple needs to recruit a 'best man' for their wedding.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
That was a very amusing response. I learned what I wanted by responding out of character. It completely threw you for a loop.
Translation: you're baiting again, like the little hypocrite bitch I said you were.
Thanks for proving my point.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
Of all the people who must suffer your stupidity, the person I feel most sorry for is Lucy.
Having a numb cunt like you for a mother, must be a real drag.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--