Title: Who gives shit if Godwinson post here again? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 26, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-10-26 11:24:19 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:483668 Comments:595
YOU wanted me to prove that you're a liar, and I DID.
8^)
Then where's you email correspondence with Goldi? Plus the evidence for your claims against Mike? There were two parts to the equation and you failed to fulfill either.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
You challenged me to prove that you're a liar, and I DID.
8^)
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
POS: I did appreciate the hearty laugh that you gave me last night when you claimed that decreasing revenues while increasing spending did not cause debt. Capitalist Eric: Please provide the EXACT quote where I said that. POS: It [debt] isn't due to the tax cuts AT ALL. The data I posted makes that VERY clear.
The ACTUAL conversation included the following:
As of January, 2010, our existing national debt- NET of projected tax receipts over the next 50 years- is $200 TRILLION. This includes: Social Security ($17,500,000,000,000.00, $17.5 trillion) Medicare Part A ($36,700,000,000,000.00, $36.7 trillion) Medicare Part B ($37,000,000,000,000.00, $37 trillion) Medicare Part D ($15,600,000,000,000 underfunded, $15.6 trillion) Government and military pensions ($2,000,000,000,000, $2 trillion), etc.
You get the idea. We're bankrupt, because government made SPENDING promises it could not hope to actually fulfill. Instead, they promised goodies in return for votes. ...... According to the Federal Reserves most recent report on wealth, Americas private net worth was $53.4 trillion as of September, 2009. But at the same time, Americas debt and unfunded liabilities totaled at least $120,000,000,000,000.00 ($120 trillion), or 225% of the citizens net worth. Even if the government expropriated every dollar of private wealth in the nation, it would still have a deficit of $66,600,000,000,000.00 ($66.6 trillion), equal to $214,286.00 for every man, woman and child in America and roughly 500% of GDP. If the government does not directly seize the nations private wealth, then it will require $389,610 from each and every citizen to balance the countrys books. State, county and municipal debts and deficits are additional, already elephantine in many states (e.g., California, Illinois, New Jersey and New York) and growing at an alarming rate nationwide. In addition to the federal government, dozens of states are already bankrupt and sinking deeper into the morass every day. ...... ...If the government decides to expropriate (steal) or commandeer (e.g., force into Treasuries) Americas private wealth in order to buy survival time, such a measure will be designed to destroy the common citizens, not the elite. Insiders will be given advance warning about any such plan, and will be able to transfer their money offshore or into financial vehicles immune from harm. Assuming that the elite moves its money to safety, there would then be $120,000,000,000,000.00 ($120 trillion) in American debt and liabilities supported by only $32,000,000,000,000.00 ($32 trillion) in private net worth, for a deficit of $88,000,000,000,000.00 ($88 trillion). In that case, each American would owe $285,714.29 to balance the countrys books. (Remember to multiply this amount by every person in your household, including any infant children.)
...If the common people suspect that something diabolical was in the works, a portion of the $32 trillion in non-elite wealth could be evacuated as well prior to a government expropriation and/or currency devaluation, resulting in less money for the government to steal. What these statistics mean is that it is absolutely impossible for the government to fund its debt and deficits, even if it steals all of the nations private wealth. Therefore, the governments only solutions are either formal bankruptcy (outright debt repudiation and the dismantling of bankrupt government programs) or unprecedented American monetary inflation and debt monetization. If the government chooses to inflate its way out of this fiscal catastrophe, the United States dollar will essentially become worthless.
I provided the data that SHOWS it's a spending problem, not a tax problem, and you twist it into a complete lie.
Translation: You can't provide the exact quote, so YOU'RE LYING YOUR ASS OFF AGAIN.
Oh, there's something ELSE I wrote, that you have now confirmed:
You want to keep believing the bullshit about "soak the rich," then fine, you go ahead and swallow those lies.
But at the end of the day, they're just lies, and you KNOW it.
So don't give me your sh!t about how you give a crap about the little people, and what "fair" is all about... Because you're not about that...
You're all about YOU.
Being a broker, and promoting the status quo, I was spot-on, when I said that... It really is ALL ABOUT YOU. It's all about lining your POCKETS...
You are truly despicable.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
I challenged you FIRST to prove YOUR premise about Mike.
And I ignored it. You've no standing to challenge me over any conversation with someone else.
You wanna' talk smack about me, and then challenge me to PROVE you're a liar...? Oh, yeah, of COURSE I'm slap you down. You were stupid enough, arrogant enough to think I couldn't prove the point.
Your mistake.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
Oddly enough, by the time Ike became President, the role of President seemed more like a figure head and puppet of the Elite puppetmeisters.
Since all he really did was play golf and smile a lot,it worked out really well.
As you've pointed out, Ike gave his warning about the "military-industrial complex" - he was signaling it wasn't he as President who was pulling the strings.
I would say it was more of a case of a president who was tired of having HIS strings pulled by these very same creatures,and a man familiar enough with military procurement and operations that he truly understood the danger to our Republic it represented.
After all,you don't have to be the first in your class to realize you need to get off the tracks when there is a train bearing down on you.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
Patton even said that Ike was the best clerk he ever had.
Wasn't it MacArthur who said that?
May have been. I know Ike worked under Big Mac,and I THINK he may have worked under Patton at one point or another. Patton was his superior until Ike rocketed right up 5 paygrades without going to jail or collecting 200 dollars.
Then again,it could have been both of them. It ain't like either one was very lacking when it came to self-image or pettiness.
Both were brilliant men in their own right,and in Patton's case truly fearless to top it off,but they both surely had their own VERY big flaws.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
Were there any witnesses or any documentation of the supposed German surrender terms from 1943?
There were several attempts by the German High Command to make a separate peace with the west,and they were all turned down. The most common reason/explanation given is that the Germans wanted a negotiated surrender leaving the Germans in charge of Germany,and the Allies wanted a unconditional surrender. Mostly the Brits and the Soviets.
AFAIK there is zero controversy over this. It is a established historical fact that the German Military kept trying to surrender,and kept getting ignored. Even Rommel was a part of the conspiracy. He managed to avoid being hanged on a meat hook,but a lot of the other senior officers weren't so lucky.
The one German Waffen war hero (Stauffenberg) that tried to blow up Hitler's bunker and kill Hitler. Tom Cruise recently starred in a movie about this and played the role of Stauffenberg. Even though the Allies refused to accept their surrender terms,the senior officers thought killing Hitler would be a good move that might cause public opinion to demand the Allies negotiate a surrender if Hitler were killed.
Here is a interesting link with attempts to kill Hitler listed.
This is the first time I ever heard that Ike was the one that made the decision to do this,though. Probably because the mere suggestion that a theater General or anybody else in the military had the authority to turn down a surrender during a war would result in howls of laughter.
That type of thing is a political decision,not a military one. Soldiers,sailors,and Marines may accept the surrender of enemy soldiers,but it takes a nation to accept the surrender of a nation.
So for all Patton's mouthy warnings and loathing of the Soviets, HE was right, and FDR was wrong. He smelled the stench of rot from DC and had had it.
Yup. Not much doubt about that. Nor is there much doubt that Patton would have beaten Truman like a rented mule if he had came back to the US,put in his retirement papers,and announced he was running for President as a Republican. Patton was the Rock Star General of WW-2. "The American Rommel". He was wildly popular with the citizens for all his victories during the war.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
I'm gonna' give you a little tip, you weren't aware of...
Rat-boy didn't call me a liar and dare me to *prove* my point, because I would have easily done so.
The *only* thing you said today that wasn't a lie, is when you said "the database doesn't lie."
Rat-boy knows that... So give credit where it's due: he wasn't so stupid as to lie, and then challenge me to prove he lied.
YOU were *were*.
And I must confess, today was made FAR more enjoyable, by rubbing your nose in your own shit.
If you choose to pretend it's roses...? Whatever.
We *both* know better.
You're a stupid, LYING bitch, and I *proved* it.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
#335. To: Capitalist Eric, Ferret Mike (#334)(Edited)
Rat-boy knows that... So give credit where it's due: he wasn't so stupid as to lie, and then challenge me to prove he lied.
YOU were *were*.
And I must confess, today was made FAR more enjoyable, by rubbing your nose in your own shit.
If you choose to pretend it's roses...? Whatever.
We *both* know better.
You're a stupid, LYING bitch, and I *proved* it.
I challenged you to put your money where your mouth is twice and you failed both times. I really don't care if Mike wanted to challenge you or not, I did and you as usual came up short again, Vinnie.
Even Libby and Calcon were busting your propaganda pushing ass over there, no wonder you crawled over here like a snake. And I even agree with you about Palin, I just don't agree with your tactics.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
The way it was explained to be about impersonating a serving officer being a federal felony is because serving officers have the right (not to mention duty) of carrying loaded firearms anywhere they go,and they can't be arrested for it because if Martial Law were declared they would be the ones who became the local LEO's and Sheriffs until order was restored. If they did not have this legal right they could be arrested by local LEO's for violating local ordinances.
It also extends to civilians dressing up as a military member and trying to access military establishments, files and information.......
"CHANGE" you can step in..... My dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the self appointed Messiah!!! Slap the shit out of a Leftard today, it won't help but at least you will feel better!!!!
But it seems like I only see the same ones over and over and over..... what's up with that???? Are they the only "skinny" ones doing porn nowadays or have all the others just "blimped" out????
"CHANGE" you can step in..... My dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the self appointed Messiah!!! Slap the shit out of a Leftard today, it won't help but at least you will feel better!!!!
Since all he really did was play golf and smile a lot,it worked out really well.
Lol. And so that's when the Presidential golfing and scripted decisions all began?
I would say it was more of a case of a president who was tired of having HIS strings pulled by these very same creatures,and a man familiar enough with military procurement and operations that he truly understood the danger to our Republic it represented.
Fair enough assessment. After having his chain yanked (and yanking others) I guess his recognition of the charade was better late than never. Not that it was in time to help reverse the future damage.
You don't have to be the first in your class to realize you need to get off the tracks when there is a train bearing down on you.
Which is why I believe so few Americans of honor and integrity are willing to run for office. Selling their soul and succumbing to the institutional globalist cabal is too high a personal price.
#339. To: sneakypete, Parrot with speed dial (#331)
There were several attempts by the German High Command to make a separate peace with the west,and they were all turned down. The most common reason/explanation given is that the Germans wanted a negotiated surrender leaving the Germans in charge of Germany,and the Allies wanted a unconditional surrender. Mostly the Brits and the Soviets....
A nice try, but...
It is a established historical fact that the German Military kept trying to surrender,and kept getting ignored. Even Rommel was a part of the conspiracy...Tom Cruise recently starred in a movie about [the conspiracy to kill Hitler] and played the role of Stauffenberg.
Cruise 's casting as von Stauffenberg prevented me from watching what would have been a very interesting movie for me. Hess's solo flight to Ireland was the first indication that some Germans had second thoughts about the "Today Germany, Tomorrow ze Vorld" thingy. After watching in horror as Hitler sacrificed the German Army outside Stalingrad had to clinch this notion for a number of military high command.
That type of thing is a political decision,not a military one. Soldiers,sailors,and Marines may accept the surrender of enemy soldiers,but it takes a nation to accept the surrender of a nation.
Hear ya. Of the German offer to surrender was the question of authority as was the acceptance of such surrender to finalize the terms.
Nor is there much doubt that Patton would have beaten Truman like a rented mule if he had came back to the US,put in his retirement papers,and announced he was running for President as a Republican. Patton was the Rock Star General of WW-2. "The American Rommel". He was wildly popular with the citizens for all his victories during the war.
Fascinating to think about were Patton to have spilled all the beans AND ran for office. Make a good movie, don't you think? Like JFK, there were any number of people who had reason to have Patton silenced - including Ike, the State Dept, the Ruskies, the Dems, the *American* Commies, and of course the globalist-elites who called all the shots.
It seems like I only see the same ones over and over and over..... what's up with that???? Are they the only "skinny" ones doing porn nowadays or have all the others just "blimped" out????
I would start by canceling your subscription to 'The Anorexic Porn Channel' immediately. Rib cage and sunken-eye fetishes are way overrated...
OTOH, I hear 'The Big Beautiful Whale-Azz' porn channel is becoming increasingly more popular. Try it as a refreshing change of pace.
That is just some examples of bad governance by him [0bama]. I support the new health care legislation, withdrawing the troops from Iraq, the stimulus packages for the most part, and we do concur on things, but he is not my ideal POTUS. He never was in th first place.
The first thing he did was allow a major timber sale in the Tsongas national Park in Alaska. He is oppressing cannabis instead of moving toward legalized and regulated like alcohol and tobacco, he has not prosecuted Smirk and Snarl for blowing up the twin towers and for putting a missile into the Pentagon.
You've just enumerated reasons that 0bama is a fraud (from a socialist/Green standpoint.) And also exposed is his pro-Muslim position regarding the LACK of prosecutions as well as his coincidental position on even medicinal pot.
Of your reasons to support this Communist and Annihilator of American institutions, traditions, and heritage, they are pretty flimsy. Even you have to admit it.
I understand why you support the *concept* of affordable health care for all, but that's NOT what 0bamaCare is all about. Moreover, his program is patently over-officious, intrusive, unfair, inequitable, elitist in its policy, promises, AND not economically feasible in the least.
Sure - most Americans now concur with you that the troops - not just the ones in Iraq, but Afghanistan as well. What's taken 0bama so long? And why has he left the troops in A-Stan? Do you endorse his interference and warmongering in Libya? Yemen? Do you support his endorsement of the 'Arab Spring? Why didn't he support the 'Arab Spring' in Iran?
Mike, that so-called "Stimulus" of 0bama's wasn't helpful to the economy or job situation in the least - come on! And haven't you been following the corruption of Solyndra and funding funneled to ACORN and other special interest/partisan groups?
What of his involvement in 'Fast and Furious'? His laziness and indifference in helping stop the Gulf oil spill? His ubiquitous personal racist divisiveness (and that of his DoJ?)
I would argue that his political ideology compels him to undermine America, capitalism, and our very sovereignty at both a national and state level.
Why give this guy a pass at all? He's as much ruining this country for me and my kids and much as he's undermining it for yours.
You can't dwell on the fact that because he's a black man he must necessarily be given the benefit of doubt. If 0bama were a white man with his record, he's have already been the subject of Impeachment Hearings - he's THAT bad.
You're too smart to be conned any further by guy at this point.
I challenged you to put your money where your mouth is twice and you failed both times.
ANOTHER lie.
You made two challenges. One of which, you DID have the right to make, the other you did NOT.
So I answered your challenge. You're desperately trying to spin this away. After all, you consider yourself intellectually and morally superior. Going by that viewpoint, how someone as low as I am (according to your perspective) so easily make you look like such a fool?
Such a result is inconceivable, yet that's exactly what happened.
The answer is really quite simple... in fact, it's so simple, that you really can't bring yourself to believe it...
You were stupid, and you lied. THEN you challenged me to prove you lied.
So I did. I proved you're a lying cunt.
Your responses since then, demonstrate that (contrary to your view of yourself), not only are you not morally superior (being the lying cunt you are), but you're not too fucking bright, either.
You get your ass handed to you on a daily basis, and yet you keep coming back for more... Why? Because you're the retard that everyone plays the joke on... you laugh, thinking it's funny... But YOU are the joke, and everyone laughs AT you.
It's time for you to move on. You've LOST, and that's the end of the story.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
Fair enough assessment. After having his chain yanked (and yanking others) I guess his recognition of the charade was better late than never. Not that it was in time to help reverse the future damage.
No matter what anybody says about Ike,nobody can ever say he was a egotist that put himself ahead of others or his country. IMHO,it was this lack of ego that got him promoted from LTC to 4 Star General.
BTW,I am NOT saying he was lacking in ego to the point he was self-effacing,but compared to all the other Generals he was practically a Eagle Scout. "Modesty" in not a term you EVER hear attached to Generals. Ever. They ain't type A personalities,they are Type AAA personalities. McArthur was just more obvious than most.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
Cruise 's casting as von Stauffenberg prevented me from watching what would have been a very interesting movie for me.
Me,too. Von Stauffenberg was a serious man and a serious soldier that was prepared to give up his own life and bring harm to his family in order to save his country,not a pretty boy.
Hess's solo flight to Ireland was the first indication that some Germans had second thoughts about the "Today Germany, Tomorrow ze Vorld" thingy.
Yeah,and we all saw what THAT got him,prison for his entire life,despite him being the one Nazi completely innocent of war crimes.
Fascinating to think about were Patton to have spilled all the beans AND ran for office. Make a good movie, don't you think?
LOL!Nobody ever called Patton a shrinking violet,so there can be no doubt that he would have made everything he knew about war mismanagement and official corruption public and even gone so far as to name names. The biggest problem with a movie about him would be nobody that grew up today would believe it was anything but fiction. IMHO,this is as responsible for the murder conspiracies as anything else. NOBODY was under the illusion that Patton could really be controlled.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
No matter what anybody says about Ike,nobody can ever say he was a egotist that put himself ahead of others or his country. IMHO,it was this lack of ego that got him promoted from LTC to 4 Star General.
Good call from what I've seen, heard and read.
I guess that's like saying he's the ultimate politician. For a two-term President, Ike never seemed to be hated by anyone or provoked strong emotions either way. Obviously, no one forgot his standing as the winning WWII General of the European Theater of Operation.
BTW,I am NOT saying he was lacking in ego to the point he was self-effacing,but compared to all the other Generals he was practically a Eagle Scout. "Modesty" in not a term you EVER hear attached to Generals. Ever. They ain't type A personalities,they are Type AAA personalities. McArthur was just more obvious than most.
I agree - a guy who was both a thousand-star general and President, he was extremely modest. A unicorn by any standard.
Nice (but failed) try by the German generals to convince the allies that a conditional surrender was palatable. My bad at explaining my thought.
Von Stauffenberg was a serious man and a serious soldier that was prepared to give up his own life and bring harm to his family in order to save his country,not a pretty boy.
I'd read that von Staffenberg was a serious military man of great integrity, respected by many; he was badly injured in as well in action. To see Tom Cruise trying to pull that personality and look off (including eye-patch) seemed almost comical to me. Although the word was that von Staffenberg was a handsome man, he wasn't a pretty-boy. Cruise brought to much cutsy/pretty-boy baggage with him from his movies. Too bad for us - it should have been a good movie.
Yeah,and we all saw what THAT got him [Hess], prison for his entire life,despite him being the one Nazi completely innocent of war crimes.
Hadn't thought about that perspective. But even Speer served 20 years for being a Nazi architect. Maybe it was assumed Hitler's inner-circle of Nazi pals weren't as innocent as claimed.
LOL!Nobody ever called Patton a shrinking violet,so there can be no doubt that he would have made everything he knew about war mismanagement and official corruption public and even gone so far as to name names. The biggest problem with a movie about him would be nobody that grew up today would believe it was anything but fiction.
The chaos he would have created by simply stating the truth would have been really hard to believe. Problem for Ike and the elites was Patton was believed AND believable - despite his rep as a little nuts. Heck, it's scarcely believed today that 0bama is gay, a Marxist, a Muslim, and attended a "Hate-Whitey!" church for 20 years, and it's been proven.
IMHO,this is as responsible for the murder conspiracies as anything else. NOBODY was under the illusion that Patton could really be controlled.
Yep. Almost anyone could have had a motive to off Patton.
#356. To: A K A Stone, Godwinson, Fred Mertz, Liberator (#0)
Who would like to see him post here again?
I am in on the vote for a thumb's UP! Yet, this is a stinkin' little out of the way NAZI chit chat forum/website that is completely mismanaged by some asshole; I won't mention any names; nope; MUMS THE WORD!. Of course, I am NOT referring to Moderator X; he is a good guy. So there must be only one in "authority" that I am talking about.
Knowing A K A Stone with respect to his antics, he has no clue. Watch this post get raped ... very typical, too.
Nice (but failed) try by the German generals to convince the allies that a conditional surrender was palatable. My bad at explaining my thought.
No problemo : ).....look where our conversation went ,...and how it was enlarged
sneakypete noted correctly in the article I posted that Ike did not make the calls which historians claim created an extended war and loss of American lives. I got to thinking about WW-2 and the Globalist agenda of that time, question....Who would have an intelligence service which was extant to Russia,Europe,and America....capable of soft influence and critical intervention to change the outcome of events? The many resources on the net[Historical works/evidences]... which place the Jesuits and Vatican in this slot sits well with me. I think the Globalists use* whichever medium/mediums can best effect their plans. Since the creation of the IMF/World Bank,...the 300 Group,CFR,Bilderbergs etc,....the torch appears to have been passed off to these worker houses. and yet...The Pope..just recently stated that the World needs a global banking system In the movie Patton,..at the end,...he walks down a hall to be dismissed,..on his way down the hall....you see the Bust of a Caesar. next..he is walking in an open field by a windmill. Don Quixote.....tilting at Windmills,...a Jesuit symbol excerpt: But who is this character Don Quixote? The Jesuit Carroll Quigley once said, Look at the real situations which lie beneath the conceptual and verbal symbols. So lets take his advice. Quixote was satirically characterized as the epically famous madman of Azpeitia. If we start with Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, the author of Don Quixote, we discover that not only was he a strict Roman Catholic it is believed that he also attended a Jesuit school in 1566: Cervantes is likely [to have] enrolled in a Jesuit high school (colegio).[12] Next we find that Cervantes book Don Quixote expressly refers to the pope as His Holiness the Pope and his holiness Pope Pius V of happy memory. (pp. 138, 331).
....
... So who was this character represented by the original Don Quixote of whom Cervantes wrote so affectionately? It was Ignatius Loyola [13]....
.... Catholic professor Miguel de Unamuno in his book [16] draws parallels between Don Quixote and the life of the founder of the Jesuit Order, Ignatius of Loyola, their Lord. And the Jesuit-trained Voltaire wrote, the only difference between Loyola and the Quixote, is that Don Quixote had a horse and an esquire, but Ignatius was not provided with either.[17][end]
Parrot....so ya....These symbols at the end of the Movie Patton indicate to me that the Jesuits had Patton ended.
It's time for you to move on. You've LOST, and that's the end of the story.
Why? Because you're banned form LP and can't go crawling back? The Bozo feature works as good here as it does over there, where you said you had half the posters there on it.
And as far as liars go, I'm still waiting for the proof of your own statement about Mike.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard