Title: Who gives shit if Godwinson post here again? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 26, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-10-26 11:24:19 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:483499 Comments:595
An infraction pertaining to the Medal of Honor provided for imprisonment for not more than one year. A federal felony is subject to imprisonment in excess of one year. The statute would only establish a misdemeanor.
I stand corrected. Thanks.
At least technically. The few cases I know of where someone has gone to jail for falsely claiming a MoH always involved profiting from that claim. Which would make it a fraud and a felony. Telling your neighbor you earned a MoH is one thing. Telling audiences on speaking tours or using those credentials in order to establish your "legend" in order to promote your business and get contracts is something altogether different.
Finding no appropriate way to avoid the First Amendment question Alvarez poses, we hold that the speech proscribed by the Act is not sufficiently confined to fit among the narrow categories of false speech previously held to be beyond the First Amendments protective sweep.
Alvarez was wrong to compare claims of earning a MoH to simple everyday lying,and you would have to be blind to not see it.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
Have YOU ever read one with a coach nearby to explain them to you?
You know,somebody capable of having a actual thought that MIGHT be willing to put up with you?
There are reasons why people are Dims,ranging from shallow gene pools to fetal alcohol syndrome,being dropped on the head a lot,being given acid instead of children's aspirin while a child,etc,etc,etc.
I keep wondering what your story is.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
Have YOU ever read one with a coach nearby to explain them to you?
You know,somebody capable of having a actual thought that MIGHT be willing to put up with you?
There are reasons why people are Dims,ranging from shallow gene pools to fetal alcohol syndrome,being dropped on the head a lot,being given acid instead of children's aspirin while a child,etc,etc,etc.
#308. To: sneakypete, Parrot with speed dial (#297)
As much as it pains me to say this,this was a brilliant move by King Franklin. Eisenhower was the perfect man for that slot. While he was never much of anything as a soldier,he was a superb politician,and a politician is what that job needed,not a strategic and tactical military mind. What King Franklin (and the world) needed in that position was a man that could sooth the egos of some pretty massive prima donnas like Patton,Montgomery,and DeGaulle,and get them to work together. I suspect herding cats would have been a task easier to accomplish.
Can you imagine the nightmare that Patton or Dougout Doug would have created if they had been appointed to that position?
And that WAS Eisenhower's job in the ETO. King Franklin had the JCS to plan strategy. What he needed in England was a "Yes Man" that would follow orders and play nice with others. He got that in Ike.
I agree - FDR needed a babysitter. Ike's role was performed perfectly.
Oddly enough, by the time Ike became President, the role of President seemed more like a figure head and puppet of the Elite puppetmeisters.
As you've pointed out, Ike gave his warning about the "military-industrial complex" - he was signaling it wasn't he as President who was pulling the strings.
#310. To: Parrot with speed dial, sneakypete (#292)
Upon his arrival in England in 1943, a controversial claim has been made that Eisenhower received a communique from senior members of the SS offering clear and specific terms of unconditional surrender of all German forces, including the assassination of Hitler, if the Americans would help halt the Soviet advance into Central Europe.
Whether true or false, there is no question that Eisenhower quickly shelved the Churchill plan of a 1943 invasion while the Nazi forces were in a state of disarray and allowed the Germans a full six months to re-arm and re- equip their French forces ahead of any invasion.
In 1944, Eisenhower was confirmed as a Five Star General and Chief of the Army. In spite of the massive logistical superiority of the Allied forces, the Eisenhower D-Day plan very nearly failed. Again, during the Battle of the Bulge Eisenhower inexplicably ordered the halt of the encirclement of German forces enabling up to 150,000 to escape and prolonging the war a further twelve months. No rational, military or political explanation for this order has ever been given. The effect of Eisenhower's deliberate decisions to prolong the war cost an additional 100,000 allied personnel and effectively handed Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union.
One man that did know the truth was Gen. George Smith Patton. On December 9th 1945, the day before he was due to fly back to Washington to meet with President Truman with proof that Eisenhower was a traitor who had costs the lives of thousands of American soldiers and millions of civilians, he was seriously injured in a road accident near Mannheim, Germany on 9 Dec 1945 (dying in hospital 21 December 1945).
Fascinating stuff.
Were there any witnesses or any documentation of the supposed German surrender terms from 1943?
There's no question that Ike, FDR, his Commie overlords or whomever sandbagged the advance of the US military and sabotaged our own efforts by the end of WWII.
Cutting a deal with Stalin and the American Commies did NOT work out well; It should have been ridiculed by everyone at the time. So for all Patton's mouthy warnings and loathing of the Soviets, HE was right, and FDR was wrong. He smelled the stench of rot from DC and had had it. Some things never change...
Btw, a program has been running on the History Channel (I believe) where three historical researchers explore the mystery of Patton's odd death in depth, speaking to those who'd known Patton - as well as his grand-daughter. They even traveled to the US Army Medical Hospital in Heidelberg, Germany.
Of course after speaking to Army personnel, they conclude it to be purely "accidental," just like the "official" report. I was shocked. /s
Fascinating; as this common epithet for a fuckwit like you discribes you well.
Oh, goody.
An upscale version of "I know you are, but what am I?"
This is what passes for leftist intellect, eh?
Feh.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
Sorry, Junior, but Boofer has already beaten you to the Irony of The Day award...
His prize winning entry was laughing at someone - me - being accused of posting on political websites 24/7. The accusation was leveled by the owner here, who should have won in his own right, or to be ironic *chuckles* myself, write but management and employees are ineligible for prizes.
Please feel free to submit a new entry in our daily Irony of the Day contest tomorrow...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
Fascinating; as this common epithet for a fuckwit like you discribes you well.
Oh, goody.
An upscale version of "I know you are, but what am I?"
This is what passes for leftist intellect, eh?
Feh.
So no proof of your assertion about Mike... Day 2.
You need to go back to reading your fairy tales about Good Knights versus Bad Knights, but first get those nasty commies that are hiding under your bed... out, before the guards do the cell checks for contraband.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
So no proof of your assertion about Mike... Day 2.
YOU wanted me to prove that you're a liar, and I DID.
8^)
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
Sorry, Junior, but Boofer has already beaten you to the Irony of The Day award...
Actually, YOU are the winner...
Claiming to be "a broker," while not knowing SHIT about economics!!!
I have to admit, THAT made me laugh.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
See my previous statement about being too late to claim The Irony of the Day award...I did appreciate the hearty laugh that you gave me last night when you claimed that decreasing revenues while increasing spending did not cause debt.
Thanks...
I'll believe that a corporation is a person 1 second after Texas executes one...
See my previous statement about being too late to claim The Irony of the Day award...I did appreciate the hearty laugh that you gave me last night when you claimed that decreasing revenues while increasing spending did not cause debt.
I bet you're not taking an advanced degree from Glenn Beck University like Erica is, are you?
Capitalist Eric: Claiming to be "a broker," dummy Dwarf: I'm not claiming anything, Junior. I am.
Yeah, and responsible for $12K of revenue in what, 6 hours? LMAO. You pat yourself on the back for doing such a piddley-ass job...
What' the net, boy? Gross revenues don't mean sh!t.
I did appreciate the hearty laugh that you gave me last night when you claimed that decreasing revenues while increasing spending did not cause debt.
Please provide the EXACT quote where I said that.
Oh, BTW, your failure to do so will be taken as admission (by you), that you're a lying POS.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
YOU wanted me to prove that you're a liar, and I DID.
8^)
Then where's you email correspondence with Goldi? Plus the evidence for your claims against Mike? There were two parts to the equation and you failed to fulfill either.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
You challenged me to prove that you're a liar, and I DID.
8^)
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
POS: I did appreciate the hearty laugh that you gave me last night when you claimed that decreasing revenues while increasing spending did not cause debt. Capitalist Eric: Please provide the EXACT quote where I said that. POS: It [debt] isn't due to the tax cuts AT ALL. The data I posted makes that VERY clear.
The ACTUAL conversation included the following:
As of January, 2010, our existing national debt- NET of projected tax receipts over the next 50 years- is $200 TRILLION. This includes: Social Security ($17,500,000,000,000.00, $17.5 trillion) Medicare Part A ($36,700,000,000,000.00, $36.7 trillion) Medicare Part B ($37,000,000,000,000.00, $37 trillion) Medicare Part D ($15,600,000,000,000 underfunded, $15.6 trillion) Government and military pensions ($2,000,000,000,000, $2 trillion), etc.
You get the idea. We're bankrupt, because government made SPENDING promises it could not hope to actually fulfill. Instead, they promised goodies in return for votes. ...... According to the Federal Reserves most recent report on wealth, Americas private net worth was $53.4 trillion as of September, 2009. But at the same time, Americas debt and unfunded liabilities totaled at least $120,000,000,000,000.00 ($120 trillion), or 225% of the citizens net worth. Even if the government expropriated every dollar of private wealth in the nation, it would still have a deficit of $66,600,000,000,000.00 ($66.6 trillion), equal to $214,286.00 for every man, woman and child in America and roughly 500% of GDP. If the government does not directly seize the nations private wealth, then it will require $389,610 from each and every citizen to balance the countrys books. State, county and municipal debts and deficits are additional, already elephantine in many states (e.g., California, Illinois, New Jersey and New York) and growing at an alarming rate nationwide. In addition to the federal government, dozens of states are already bankrupt and sinking deeper into the morass every day. ...... ...If the government decides to expropriate (steal) or commandeer (e.g., force into Treasuries) Americas private wealth in order to buy survival time, such a measure will be designed to destroy the common citizens, not the elite. Insiders will be given advance warning about any such plan, and will be able to transfer their money offshore or into financial vehicles immune from harm. Assuming that the elite moves its money to safety, there would then be $120,000,000,000,000.00 ($120 trillion) in American debt and liabilities supported by only $32,000,000,000,000.00 ($32 trillion) in private net worth, for a deficit of $88,000,000,000,000.00 ($88 trillion). In that case, each American would owe $285,714.29 to balance the countrys books. (Remember to multiply this amount by every person in your household, including any infant children.)
...If the common people suspect that something diabolical was in the works, a portion of the $32 trillion in non-elite wealth could be evacuated as well prior to a government expropriation and/or currency devaluation, resulting in less money for the government to steal. What these statistics mean is that it is absolutely impossible for the government to fund its debt and deficits, even if it steals all of the nations private wealth. Therefore, the governments only solutions are either formal bankruptcy (outright debt repudiation and the dismantling of bankrupt government programs) or unprecedented American monetary inflation and debt monetization. If the government chooses to inflate its way out of this fiscal catastrophe, the United States dollar will essentially become worthless.
I provided the data that SHOWS it's a spending problem, not a tax problem, and you twist it into a complete lie.
Translation: You can't provide the exact quote, so YOU'RE LYING YOUR ASS OFF AGAIN.
Oh, there's something ELSE I wrote, that you have now confirmed:
You want to keep believing the bullshit about "soak the rich," then fine, you go ahead and swallow those lies.
But at the end of the day, they're just lies, and you KNOW it.
So don't give me your sh!t about how you give a crap about the little people, and what "fair" is all about... Because you're not about that...
You're all about YOU.
Being a broker, and promoting the status quo, I was spot-on, when I said that... It really is ALL ABOUT YOU. It's all about lining your POCKETS...
You are truly despicable.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
I challenged you FIRST to prove YOUR premise about Mike.
And I ignored it. You've no standing to challenge me over any conversation with someone else.
You wanna' talk smack about me, and then challenge me to PROVE you're a liar...? Oh, yeah, of COURSE I'm slap you down. You were stupid enough, arrogant enough to think I couldn't prove the point.
Your mistake.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
Oddly enough, by the time Ike became President, the role of President seemed more like a figure head and puppet of the Elite puppetmeisters.
Since all he really did was play golf and smile a lot,it worked out really well.
As you've pointed out, Ike gave his warning about the "military-industrial complex" - he was signaling it wasn't he as President who was pulling the strings.
I would say it was more of a case of a president who was tired of having HIS strings pulled by these very same creatures,and a man familiar enough with military procurement and operations that he truly understood the danger to our Republic it represented.
After all,you don't have to be the first in your class to realize you need to get off the tracks when there is a train bearing down on you.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
Patton even said that Ike was the best clerk he ever had.
Wasn't it MacArthur who said that?
May have been. I know Ike worked under Big Mac,and I THINK he may have worked under Patton at one point or another. Patton was his superior until Ike rocketed right up 5 paygrades without going to jail or collecting 200 dollars.
Then again,it could have been both of them. It ain't like either one was very lacking when it came to self-image or pettiness.
Both were brilliant men in their own right,and in Patton's case truly fearless to top it off,but they both surely had their own VERY big flaws.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
Were there any witnesses or any documentation of the supposed German surrender terms from 1943?
There were several attempts by the German High Command to make a separate peace with the west,and they were all turned down. The most common reason/explanation given is that the Germans wanted a negotiated surrender leaving the Germans in charge of Germany,and the Allies wanted a unconditional surrender. Mostly the Brits and the Soviets.
AFAIK there is zero controversy over this. It is a established historical fact that the German Military kept trying to surrender,and kept getting ignored. Even Rommel was a part of the conspiracy. He managed to avoid being hanged on a meat hook,but a lot of the other senior officers weren't so lucky.
The one German Waffen war hero (Stauffenberg) that tried to blow up Hitler's bunker and kill Hitler. Tom Cruise recently starred in a movie about this and played the role of Stauffenberg. Even though the Allies refused to accept their surrender terms,the senior officers thought killing Hitler would be a good move that might cause public opinion to demand the Allies negotiate a surrender if Hitler were killed.
Here is a interesting link with attempts to kill Hitler listed.
This is the first time I ever heard that Ike was the one that made the decision to do this,though. Probably because the mere suggestion that a theater General or anybody else in the military had the authority to turn down a surrender during a war would result in howls of laughter.
That type of thing is a political decision,not a military one. Soldiers,sailors,and Marines may accept the surrender of enemy soldiers,but it takes a nation to accept the surrender of a nation.
So for all Patton's mouthy warnings and loathing of the Soviets, HE was right, and FDR was wrong. He smelled the stench of rot from DC and had had it.
Yup. Not much doubt about that. Nor is there much doubt that Patton would have beaten Truman like a rented mule if he had came back to the US,put in his retirement papers,and announced he was running for President as a Republican. Patton was the Rock Star General of WW-2. "The American Rommel". He was wildly popular with the citizens for all his victories during the war.
"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.
I'm gonna' give you a little tip, you weren't aware of...
Rat-boy didn't call me a liar and dare me to *prove* my point, because I would have easily done so.
The *only* thing you said today that wasn't a lie, is when you said "the database doesn't lie."
Rat-boy knows that... So give credit where it's due: he wasn't so stupid as to lie, and then challenge me to prove he lied.
YOU were *were*.
And I must confess, today was made FAR more enjoyable, by rubbing your nose in your own shit.
If you choose to pretend it's roses...? Whatever.
We *both* know better.
You're a stupid, LYING bitch, and I *proved* it.
DUMMY DwarF: ...I'm eating a meatball... Capitalist Eric: Foreplay before the president's staff?
"Whenver the dwarf sees something negative about a Democrat, he tries to change the topic of the thread to something else. Usually a personal attack, followed by mutterings about correct 'grammar' 'spelling' whatever. Anything he can think of to avoid a discussion about a Democrat screwing up or looking bad. It's a decade long pattern." --Badeye observation--
#335. To: Capitalist Eric, Ferret Mike (#334)(Edited)
Rat-boy knows that... So give credit where it's due: he wasn't so stupid as to lie, and then challenge me to prove he lied.
YOU were *were*.
And I must confess, today was made FAR more enjoyable, by rubbing your nose in your own shit.
If you choose to pretend it's roses...? Whatever.
We *both* know better.
You're a stupid, LYING bitch, and I *proved* it.
I challenged you to put your money where your mouth is twice and you failed both times. I really don't care if Mike wanted to challenge you or not, I did and you as usual came up short again, Vinnie.
Even Libby and Calcon were busting your propaganda pushing ass over there, no wonder you crawled over here like a snake. And I even agree with you about Palin, I just don't agree with your tactics.
When the people are afraid, that's when the greatest long term money is made.~~~~Clark Howard
The way it was explained to be about impersonating a serving officer being a federal felony is because serving officers have the right (not to mention duty) of carrying loaded firearms anywhere they go,and they can't be arrested for it because if Martial Law were declared they would be the ones who became the local LEO's and Sheriffs until order was restored. If they did not have this legal right they could be arrested by local LEO's for violating local ordinances.
It also extends to civilians dressing up as a military member and trying to access military establishments, files and information.......
"CHANGE" you can step in..... My dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the self appointed Messiah!!! Slap the shit out of a Leftard today, it won't help but at least you will feel better!!!!
But it seems like I only see the same ones over and over and over..... what's up with that???? Are they the only "skinny" ones doing porn nowadays or have all the others just "blimped" out????
"CHANGE" you can step in..... My dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the self appointed Messiah!!! Slap the shit out of a Leftard today, it won't help but at least you will feel better!!!!
Since all he really did was play golf and smile a lot,it worked out really well.
Lol. And so that's when the Presidential golfing and scripted decisions all began?
I would say it was more of a case of a president who was tired of having HIS strings pulled by these very same creatures,and a man familiar enough with military procurement and operations that he truly understood the danger to our Republic it represented.
Fair enough assessment. After having his chain yanked (and yanking others) I guess his recognition of the charade was better late than never. Not that it was in time to help reverse the future damage.
You don't have to be the first in your class to realize you need to get off the tracks when there is a train bearing down on you.
Which is why I believe so few Americans of honor and integrity are willing to run for office. Selling their soul and succumbing to the institutional globalist cabal is too high a personal price.