Title: Who gives shit if Godwinson post here again? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 26, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-10-26 11:24:19 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:483528 Comments:595
You are the only forum owner I'm aware of that tolerates being told to 'fuck off' 'suck my dick' 'you are an asshole' 'the site runs better when you aren't here' etc etc etc.
Every thread here degenerates to that eventually, at least the ones you happen to post on. As such, yep, the site is sliding downhill faster with each passing week. Combined with your allowing some to use it for personal attack threads, or racial bullshit...it comes down to a simple question: Why bother with LF? You don't give a shit how it looks. You don't give a shit how these kooks talk trash to YOU for God's sake. Which is why even that idiot Goldi gets more respect than you do in her kooky forum. Or JR at Free Republic, or mystery over at GBR.
You aren't promoting 'freedom of speech' by allowing this crap, Stone. You simply promote your site isn't to be taken seriously, because nobody here takes YOU seriously. I drop by every day, but honestly, there hasn't been anything here worth commenting on for the past couple of weeks.
Its your site, Stone. but the reason it hasn't grown is because you haven't 'grown' as a site owner/operator. This isn't about politics, or anything else, as much as it is kooks talking shit behind absurd screen names in ways they'd NEVER do in the real world. Basically, its a fantasyland for losers that have been banned from legitimate sites for the obvious reasons.
As for 'godwincing' posters come, posters go. The rep of the site is what you should be worrying about. Thats the only 'constant' you have any influence over. So far, this site is just as amaturishly run as it was when I signed up.
And thats the problem...unless you enjoy being humiliated, taunted, and insulted by people on the internet. Maybe you do. I honestly don't get it, but its your site. Like the song says, you can't always have what you want, but you get what you need, eh?
Bullshit Freddie. Neil was a self appointed 'site manager' who was upset I didn't 1) Agree with him on the election...2) Didn't kiss his ass because I knew he was a flat out fraud. Much later, when he laid down and whimpered in court after all his bravado on the internet, he confirmed my view of him.
Which is why he's still my personal internet bitch to this very day (laughing).
I never lied to him, like you, he wasn't worth a lie. Nice spin though.
The same question could be asked of the other House Commies, but I think we know the answer to that query:
To agitate, spam, shill, and otherwise promote Commie propaganda. To their (dis)credit, it's the same reasons Police-Statist fascists frequent and infect conservative forums - to promote their brand of Big Goob control.
Now, why are YOU here, hypocritical freddie? Good question.
Actually, I just ask it because I know the answer already.
He's been banned from everywhere else. Just like the dwarf.
If either of them had any balls, they'd create their own forum. But nope, too lazy, even though both have spent a decade doing the same thing, over and over and over again.
Actually, I just ask it because I know the answer already.
Yeah, I realized that.
He's been banned from everywhere else. Just like the dwarf.
That's because both are posting to antagonize conservatives and play "gotcha!" - both only on their terms.
Funny how many liberals, Leftists, and Commies all seek approval and interaction with conservatives instead of hanging with their own ilk. It's a Love-Hate thing. I call it the "Impress Daddy Syndrome."
Your stereotyping is like any fart you might issue forth; it smells sweet to you, and is rancid to the nose of anyone else. ;-)
Ok, I chuckled...
But please amend any untrue characterization I suggested of the Left and replace them with YOUR version (i.e., those principles and traits of those typically marching on YOUR side.)
We used to have an RCYB (Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade) cell in Eugene all of us really hated. We called them 'Really Confused Young Bourgeoisie.' They were so out there and annoying we used to extrapolate they were actually government disinformation plants. One of them lived near me and used to pawn copies of the Revolutionary Worker on me. I used it for the dog to shit on.
When you speak as you do I remember how much I detested them. I also recall how flawed and unrealistic the Communist Manifesto was when we used it in Western Civilization class as an example of an original historical document compared to a secondary historical document such as a history book.
I know beyond any shadow of doubt I am no proponent of Communism or Socialism. I was pleased when the USSR fell, and I -to say the least - shed no tears when Mao or Vietnam's Uncle Ho died.
So if it's all the same to you, I will continue to strongly be against taking away the property of people and collectivizing it. In fact, I would prefer to see family farms replace agribusinesses' corporate collectivizing of land.
I also want the U.S. Constitution upheld and followed, and this country to remain a Republic. There are indeed people out there who are really way way out there and believe we need to have some sort of communist revolution that would inevitably wind up as a repressive dictatorship of a few leaders oppressing everyone else a la George Orwell's satire concerning this called 'Animal Farm.' But to say the least, I am hardly one of them.
So, you are endowed with the free speech right to brand and label others anyway you wish, but it will never make that true. ;-)
We used to have an RCYB (Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade) cell in Eugene all of us really hated. We called them 'Really Confused Young Bourgeoisie.' They were so out there and annoying we used to extrapolate they were actually government disinformation plants. One of them lived near me and used to pawn copies of the Revolutionary Worker on me. I used it for the dog to shit on.
When you speak as you do I remember how much I detested them. I also recall how flawed and unrealistic the Communist Manifesto was when we used it in Western Civilization class as an example of an original historical document compared to a secondary historical document such as a history book.
I know beyond any shadow of doubt I am no proponent of Communism or Socialism. I was pleased when the USSR fell, and I -to say the least - shed no tears when Mao or Vietnam's Uncle Ho died.
Thanks for a well thought out post...
It kinda saddens me that for all your early and present recognition of the evil of socialism/Communism that you would far more closely align with this ilk.
Mike, we are all falling into line on one of two sides of the fence. Ya gotta decide which side will more closely reflect the America you remember and want for your kids; The America that makes you proud.
So if it's all the same to you, I will continue to strongly be against taking away the property of people and collectivizing it. In fact, I would prefer to see family farms replace agribusinesses' corporate collectivizing of land.
I also want the U.S. Constitution upheld and followed, and this country to remain a Republic. There are indeed people out there who are really way way out there and believe we need to have some sort of communist revolution that would inevitably wind up as a repressive dictatorship of a few leaders oppressing everyone else a la George Orwell's satire concerning this called 'Animal Farm.' But to say the least, I am hardly one of them.
You are truly an enigma.
You disapprove of nearly every major Communistic ideal, yet you more closely relate with and align with.....Communists. AND 0bama. AND his acolytes.
I know this about you - you are a loyal, principled, and possess a good measure of courage. But you're wasting it because you're misguided and dwell on the worst so-called "representatives" of conservatism. Perhaps the overriding factor for you is your conflict with Christians? The rejection of gay militancy by conservatives? The abortion issue? Maybe you perceive conservatives as "racist" (when it's the other way 'round?)
So, you are endowed with the free speech right to brand and label others anyway you wish, but it will never make that true. ;-)
We ALL brand and label others - with good reason. Yeah, sometimes we're wrong. I'm right about who and what most of the posters here are. I would label you a confused closet conservative (based on you're own self-description, but subject to change.)
Only you know why you more closely relate with the political Left - and you do.
"It kinda saddens me that for all your early and present recognition of the evil of socialism/Communism that you would far more closely align with this ilk."
I support whomever I feel is the best man or woman for the country and Constitution; not whomever is closest to me ideologically. Which is why Ron Paul has my support over Obama.
There is nothing enigmatic about me at all. You just think you know me, but you aren't close at all.
