Title: Who gives shit if Godwinson post here again? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 26, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-10-26 11:24:19 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:483465 Comments:595
#48. To: calcon, sneakypete, Happy Quanzaa, Get Outta Dodge!, CZ82, jwpegler, Rudgear, Capitalist Eric, A K A Stone, Thunderbird, Mad Dog, Murron, e_type_jag, Badeye, Parrot with speed dial, nolu chan, Sebastian, We The People, hondo68 (#45)
YES, godwinson is a left wing as you can get, but what's a forum without opposing views
I think there are plenty of conservatives and libertarians who disagree with each other and opposed respective views....
Should the debate be about promoting the right direction of the country, OR, humoring the Commie blitzkrieg and agenda of Leftist propaganda? Of course it can also be considered an intellectual blood sport.
The problem with Commies and Leftists at a forum is their lack of logic, un-willingness to exchange cogent, honest thought and debate, and un-willingness to deviate from their hardened dogma.
It's not so much a "debate" for these folks as it is about spamming a forum with Commie/Leftist propaganda.
QUESTION: When was the last meaningful "debate" between LF's House Commies vs. Conservatives/Libertarians? Leftist do NOT want to debate because the truth is never on their side. That's why all they do is obfuscate, create red herrings, and lie.
"The problem with Commies and Leftists at a forum is their lack of logic, un-willingness to exchange cogent, honest thought and debate, and un-willingness to deviate from their hardened dogma."
This is your hardened dogma which as little touch with reality you are unwilling to debate.
It suits your purposes to treat people whom you label as unwilling and incapable of change. You speak of people who are left of you politically as if they were automatons cut from the same cookie cutter.
When in fact, people are people. Everyone agrees with everyone else on some things and disagrees on others. Yyou repete your mantra I speak of over and over, and this is meant to shut down debate, to label and damn whomever you don't like politically. And thus in this regard you are often an eye roller of a bore.
"The problem with Commies and Leftists at a forum is their lack of logic, un-willingness to exchange cogent, honest thought and debate, and un-willingness to deviate from their hardened dogma."
This is your hardened dogma which as little touch with reality you are unwilling to debate.
Mike, it is indeed 98% true.
I'll give you that 2% because folks like you will at least listen even if you already know you disagree with whatever premise.
It suits your purposes to treat people whom you label as unwilling and incapable of change. You speak of people who are left of you politically as if they were automatons cut from the same cookie cutter.
Unfortunately, 90% of the political Left *are* automatronic. They are partisan Dems. They are hardened socialists. What's to debate? You say it's not true, I say it is. It's not even hyperbole on my part.
My "purpose" is gleaning and determining the truth of the matter and then considering solutions that promote construction instead of de-construction and destruction of this nation. Michael, you and your ilk want the US turned upside down on its head, aka "fundamentally changed" into a socialist state - which is unconstitutional.
In fact, people are people.
What does that even mean? If it means "we're all the same," then I vociferously disagree with that characterization. This forum, this debate, our respective political view proves it to be a fallacy; Sharia Law proves it to be a fallacy; The political class of elites proves that a fallacy; Any Country Club proves that to be a fallacy.
Everyone agrees with everyone else on some things and disagrees on others.
Is this supposed to be some kind of revelation??
Yyou repete your mantra I speak of over and over, and this is meant to shut down debate, to label and damn whomever you don't like politically.
And that "mantra" is what exactly? That the system of Communism are repressive, oppressive, and fascist?
And lol, who the hell are you kidding about "labeling"? You and you ilk engage in it like clockwork to shut down to marginalize and demonize debate (EX: "racist," "homophobe," "bigot," "talibornagain," "Holy Roller," "intolerant," "Teabagger," etc.)
Are conservatives and liberatarian all supposed to overlook the Left's and your rhetoric that's ALL based on Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals'?
SERIOUS QUESTION:
Are you conscious that you are engaging in Alinsky-type debate?
Are you conscious that you are engaging in Alinsky-type debate?
You're KIDDING, right?
He admitted that he is political operative, as a JOB.
Mike supposedly prides himself in possessing a large measure of honesty and integrity. I was challenging the degree.
I didn't know if he posted off the top of his head OR gave his response much thought after parroting the usual one-sided self-serving Leftist tripe about "labels" and "shutting down debate."
Sure, he's always been a political activist - that's no secret, nothing wrong with it...But I didn't know that he was a *paid* political operative.
#209. To: mininggold, A K A Stone, Murron, Mad Dog, jwpegler, hondo68, sneakypete, Happy Quanzaa, Get Outta Dodge!, CZ82, jwpegler, Rudgear (#193)(Edited)
bimbitch: Erica came crawling here after s/he was banned from LP. Capitalist Eric: LOL. Want me to provide links (with time-stamps) to prove that you're lying again? bimbitch: Go for it, but first you need to prove your charge against Mike.
If Mike challenges me to prove the point, I'll be HAPPY to embarrass him.
You lie your ass off, then you try to set the rules. You think you're pretty safe, eh?
Fine. Let's START with YOU.
The post on LP where I told goldi she's a coward, she sucks, and she's a propagandist, is HERE. Oh, BTW, once I was done, my exact quote to goldi was "Now that I've said my peace, I hereby give you permission to delete my account. And f**k you very much."
The time where I started posting (as I opus'ed out of LF) is HERE.
I've proven the point, and demonstrated that you are, indeed, a lying b! tch.
I challenged you. So why don't you just prove your point by posting under your ID on LP?
The exact conversation was the following:
bimbitch: Erica came crawling here after s/he was banned from LP. Capitalist Eric: LOL. Want me to provide links (with time-stamps) to prove that you're lying again? bimbitch: Go for it, but first you need to prove your charge against Mike.
You made a claim that I ran away from LP after I was banned.
You challenged me to prove that you're a liar, and I did.
"And where is your evidence supporting what you posted about Mike? "
The prick needs no evidence, as that one is all agenda. I do believe their is a great love to abuse and to try to bully too.
He's someone I would assume an aggressive defensive posture were he to approach and identify himself in real time. He doesn't know how to agree to disagree nor does he like people who do.
