[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Economy Title: Bank of America, CARD Act, Dodd-Frank, and soaking the poor. Bank of America, CARD Act, Dodd-Frank, and soaking the poor. Posted by Moe Lane Friday, September 30th at 11:00AM EDT Congratulations, Congressional Democrats: youve managed to soak the working poor again. Bank of America will start charging debit-card users $5 a month to pay for purchases. The move comes as the cards increasingly replace cash and as banks look for ways to offset the loss of revenue from a new rule that will limit how much they can collect from merchants. Via Instapundit. You see, what happened here is that Senator Dick Durbin took a break from throwing minority kids out of private schools to extend his legislative magic to the field of merchant debit card fees. The plan? Force the banks to give up their greedy, greedy profits by limiting merchant-to-bank transaction fees, thus saving the merchants money, which they would then pass along to the customer in the form of lower prices. Which sounded
actually, it sounded stupid in theory, even then. It sounds really stupid now because Durbin and the rest of Team Jackass didnt consider the possibility that their Congressional mishandling of the economy from 2007 to 2001 might have resulted in a poor economy in 2011. So what happened? Well, the banks still need the revenue because of the economy so theyre going to raise debit card fees to make up for it. And the retailers arent doing much better because of the economy so theyre not racing to lower their retail prices. Assuming that they do it at all. End result? Your monthly expenses are probably about to go up. Hope you have a job!
Oh. Right. Oops? Anyway, the Atlantic takes up the tale from there: The worst result of this new rule may be that it will specifically harm lower- and middle-income Americans. Think about who banks will force to pay for checking now. A bank has two customers: one with a high income that carries a few thousand dollars in her checking account and another with lower income who carries a few hundred in his checking account. It would value more deposits, so it will charge the lower income individual a larger checking account service fee. Indeed, we see this already. Some banks offer free checking accounts if a minimum balance is maintained. So the wealthier person who can afford to keep a larger balance will continue to enjoy free checking, while a less affluent person who basically lives from paycheck to paycheck will have to pay. Before, neither faced a direct fee for their checking. Double oops. And before anybody says that this is unexpected
no. No, it was not. I was telling people back in JANUARY that this was going to happen, and I even explained why: Whats going on? Well, its a handy primer in why government interference in markets is something not to be entered into lightly. For the last few years Congress was run by the political party whose members are just ever-so-slightly more willing to believe in conspiracy theories about the evil, evil big banking industry and its quiet plan to turn us all into techno-serfs*. When times are good, this isnt that much of a problem; when times are bad, though
well, thats when the Democrats economic paranoia can bubble up, and the results aint always pretty. And so it was in this case. Regulating an industry and banking is an industry needs to be done dispassionately if its to be done at all; if you want to go in and punish groups, you end up being sloppy. The CARD Act and Dodd/Frank were both punitive bills dressed up as reform: so its not surprising that the laws immediate targets are not going to reform. Predictable, in fact.
Unless youre a Democratic legislator, at least. It must be nice to not have a long-term memory: every mornings sunrise is a new wonder, and the shame felt with every failure at basic math is swiftly drowned out by the ever-flowing river of Now. A shame that we have to live in the country that these amnesiacs are currently trusted with running, alas
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|